April 29, 2014 Gail A. Epps, Ed. D. Program Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Developing the Teaching Portfolio Carol Tresolini, Ph. D
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
Consistency of Assessment
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Orientation to the Civic Studies 11 Integrated Resource Package (IRP) 2005.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Growing Success-Making Connections
Ryerson University Online to Success. Beginnings Online to Success is a transition program created by Queen’s University. For 5 consecutive years Ryerson.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
Welcome to I-CAT Training! Iowa Core Outcome 4 …increase the degree of alignment of each and every student’s enacted curriculum … to the Iowa Core I A.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Custom Faculty Development: Reach Faculty Where They Live Linda A. Leake, M. Ed. Instructional Designer/Blackboard Support Specialist University of Louisville.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Orientation to the Health and Career Education 8 and 9 IRP 2005.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | TECH TALKS: TOOLS WORTH KNOWING Professional.
Creating Web-based Learning Activities to Support the Needs of Diverse K-12 Learners.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Copyright © 2011, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. SAS ® Curriculum Pathways ® Ralph Moore
Welcome Richard Montgomery Parents! Richard Montgomery PTSA Information Session on the MYP.
ENGAGING STUDENTS FOSTERING ACHIEVEMENT CULTIVATING 21st CENTURY GLOBAL SKILLS Designing Engaging Units for 21 st Century Learners Consider the 21st Century.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Gifted & Talented Program Evaluation CCSD Board Meeting Monday, May 19th, :00 PM.
Designing An Instructional Program For ELL And R-ELL Students: An Examination of A Professional Development Plan To Enhance Student Instruction Newport.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
AMY FITCHETT Classroom Management, Classroom Community, Developing a Positive Culture, OH MY!
Successes to Date. Fastest improving state in the nation on 4 th and 8 th grade NAEP Consistent gains on TCAP every year since new assessments in 2010.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Sheltered Instruction: Making Content Comprehensible for ELLs London Middle School April 18, 2008.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Differentiation What it is? and What it is not?. Outcomes Participants will be able to: Define differentiation Explain the advantages of differentiated.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
ENGLISH IMMERSION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF ENGLISH.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Public Consulting Group - PCG Education Helping Florida Charter Schools Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards 1.
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Professional Teaching Portfolio Valerie Waloven
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Presentation transcript:

April 29, 2014 Gail A. Epps, Ed. D. Program Manager

  Collected data through students or secretaries helping us count/tally feedback forms and surveys by hand  Typed in all information onto Excel spreadsheets  Took hours to create graphs and charts  Updated to Test Pilot  Graduated to Scantron HISTORICALLY

  Collaborate with our Office of Shared Accountability (OSA) through an Evaluation Specialist  Implement theories from Evaluating Professional Development (Guskey, 2000) for all surveys and feedback information  Institute suggestions from OSA regarding various questions, design of survey tool, and delivery format  Circulate drafts of surveys to various stakeholders for review (e.g. NEO Think Tank, Teacher Professional Growth System)  Update all surveys to either Survey Monkey or Google Docs for NEO, courses, and workshops

QUESTIONS Responses 641/800=80.1%463/548=84.5% 456/489=93.2% 1. The New Educator Orientation expanded my understanding of MCPS curriculum, instruction, and assessment. NA 97.6% 2. The key messages of MCPS were effectively explained during the first three days of on-site orientation. 98.7%93.3% 98.7% 3. There were opportunities for collegial interaction that helped to create a professional community. 94.8%93.3% 97.4% 4. Adequate time was devoted to understanding the expectations of MCPS. 94.8%93.3% 96.7% 5. The New Educator Orientation provided a variety of learning activities throughout the sessions to meet my needs as a learner. NA 95.4% 6. The Professional Growth System presentation was informative and clearly presented. 93.1%95.6% 91.7% 7. I understand how MCEA can support me as a teacher. 97.8%97.6% 98.2% 8. Opportunities were provided for me to process and reflect upon curriculum information presented. 94.8%94.6% 94.9% 9. Adequate time was devoted to developing my understanding of MCPS curriculum, instruction and assessment. 89.2%90.9% 91.7% 10. The three days of on-site orientation were well organized. NA94.2% 96.1% 11. I would recommend that all teachers new to MCPS receive this orientation.94.7%92.0%95.2%

QUESTIONS Responses (Strongly Agreed/Agreed) 403/467=86.3%*215/308=69.8%*361/482=74.8%*493/590=83.5%* 479/617=77.6%* 1. The key messages of MCPS were effectively explained during the first three days of on-site orientation. 93.8% (-4.9%) 198/215=92.1% (-1.7%) 328/361=90.9% (-1.2%) 484/493=98.2 (+7.2%) 2. The New Educator Orientation expanded my understanding of MCPS curriculum, instruction, and assessment. 97.8% (+.2%) 206/215=95.8% (-2.0%) 342/361=94.7% (-1.1%) 482/493=97.8% (+3.0%) 3. Adequate time was provided for me to process curriculum information presented. N/A198/215=92.1%315/361=87.5% (-4.6%) 461/493=93.5 (+6.0%) 447/479=96.5% (+3.0%) 4. The New Educator Orientation provided a variety of instructional strategies throughout the sessions to meet my needs as an adult learner. 96.0% (+0.6%) 209/215=97.2% (+1.2%) 336/361=93.1% (-4.1%) 473/493=95.9 (+2.8%) 5. There were opportunities for collegial interaction that helped me as an educator to network with my colleagues. 96.3% (-1.1%) 211/215=98.1% (+1.8%) 341/361=94.5% (-3.6%) 483/493=98.0% (+3.5%) 445/479=96.1% (-1.9%) 6. The New Educator Orientation made me feel welcomed by MCPS. N/A 486/493=98.6% 464/464=100% (+1.4) 7. I am able to identify support (people/resources) when needed. N/A213/215=99.1%351/361=97.2% (-1.9%) 472/493=95.7% (-1.5%) 8. The two days of on-site orientation were well organized. 97.2% (+1.1%) 196/215=91.2% (-6.0%) 339/361=93.9% (+2.7%) 463/492=94.1% (+.2%) 477/479=99.6% (+5.5%) 9. As an educator new to MCPS and having attended NEO, I am now better prepared to provide quality instruction in my classroom. N/A206/215=95.8%334/361=92.5% (-3.3%) 471/493=95.5% (+3.0%) 10. I would recommend that all teachers new to MCPS receive this orientation. 96.0% (+0.8%) 204/215=94.8% (-1.2%) 338/361=93.6% (-1.2%) 471/493=95.5% (+1.9%) 454/462=98.2% (+2.7%)

 QUESTIONS Responses (Strongly Agreed/Agreed)479/617=77.6%* (-5.9%) 1.The time allocated for curriculum sessions was adequate.447/463=96.5% (+3.0%) 1.There were adequate opportunities for collegial interaction and networking with my colleagues.445/463=96.1% (-1.9%) 1.The New Educator Orientation made me feel welcomed by MCPS.464/464=100% (+1.4%) 1.During NEO, I was able to get answers to my questions.459/463=99.1% 1.The first two days of NEO were well organized.462/464=99.6% (+5.5%) 1.I now have a better understanding of MCPS culture and expectations.459/462=99.3% 1.I would recommend that all teachers new to MCPS attend this orientation.454/462=98.2% (+2.7%) 1.I am better prepared to communicate high expectations to all students.447/460=97.1% 1.I am better prepared to create a positive, safe, and inclusive climate that encourages all learners to thrive.448/459=97.6% 1.I have learned proactive classroom management strategies to address a variety of learners’ (e.g., special needs, ELL) needs. 393/459=85.6% 1.The session outcomes were clear (Creating a Positive Classroom Environment).449/456=98.4% 1.The session outcomes were met.455/457=99.5% 1.The trainer(s) was knowledgeable about the content.456/456=100% 1.The trainer(s) used effective adult learning strategies.448/456=98.3% 1.I can now locate resources to plan instruction.450/455=98.9% 1.I have a better understanding of the MCPS expectations for delivering instruction.438/445=98.5% 1.I have learned methods to integrate English language learners in classroom instruction.286/452=63.3% 1.The trainer(s) was knowledgeable on how to differentiate and modify the curriculum to provide grade level access for students who are below grade level. 406/456=89.1% NEO EVALUATIONS

 What insights or interests were highlighted for you?  I really enjoyed learning about surveying my students and I learned a lot from doing this activity. I also liked both guest speakers.  I appreciate being given the opportunity to request topics to be covered in class.  UDL, differentiation, equity, grouping/interaction  Activator & summarizer ideas – differentiation & UDL  Fantastic activator & summarizer ideas!!  Be a “warm demander” as a teacher  I really think that UDL is something I want to focus more on.  The various activities that fostered collaboration – the “warm demander” philosophy  Discussions about UDL, parent contact, and working with other teachers was helpful  UDL – Mrs. Textoris was amazing!!!  Wait time – summarizers/activators – visual learning/UDL NTT-01 FEEDBACK COMMENTS Fall 2013 Secondary Section