SIGNAL PATHWAYS IN CELL MIGRATION AND ADHESION Sam Polak 28 April 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1978 Fibronectin shown to colocalize with fibrillar actin. Proposed a transmembrane relationship between microfilaments and FN First evidence of affinity.
Advertisements

Rho family GTPases Thuy Nguyen 3/6/2012
April 12, 2005 Maria Diverse-Pierluissi, Ph.D. Department of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry Mount Sinai School of Medicine Organization of Macromolecular.
Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way Xia Fan.
Last Class: 1. transportation at the plasma membrane A. carrier protein, B. channel protein 2. intracellular compartments A. nucleus, B. Endoplasmic Reticulum.
Differential palmitoylation regulates intracellular patterning of SNAP25 Jennifer Greaves and Luke H. Chamberlain *
Cell-cell adhesion occurs through morphological structures and CAMs.
Lecture 17 - Cell motility. The Range of Cell Movement Velocities of moving cells span more than 4 orders of magnitude Each cell has evolved.
Endo/exocytosis in the pollen tube apex is differentially regulated by Ca2+ and GTPases Presented by XIA,Fan.
Review Lecture II. 3 pathways to degradation in the lysosome.
Lecture 11 Vesicular Trafficking: Lysosomes;
Cell Motility Lecture 17. Cell Motility Includes: –Changes in Cell Location –Limited Movements of Parts of Cells Occurs at the Subcellular, Cellular,
Cdc42 plays a key role in yeast cell polarization Chao Wang June 17, 2005.
CDC42 a low molecular weight GTP-binding protein originally designated G(p) and also called G25K Chromosomal location: 1p36.1 The CDC42 protein binds to.
Pollen Tube -- the model system for the study of cell polarity control and tip growth Speaker: Chunhui Cai.
Chapter 15 Cytoskeleton: Regulation by Accessory Proteins
Actin By Enrique M. De La Cruz & E. Michael Ostap
The Effects of Ginseng Pectins on Tumor Cell Migration and Their Mechanisms Yuying Fan 26 th, Nov, 2012.
Extra credit for Midterm 2
Signal Transduction II Transduction Proteins & Second Messengers.
Last Class: A. intracellular vesicle traffic 1. ER to golgi 2. endocytosis, exocytosis B. Signaling Transduction 1. Ligand Receptor Interactions, 2. Intracellular.
Anusara Daenthanasanmak ZIB Jason Mercer and Ari Helenius Nature Cell Biology volume 11 May 2009.
Cell Signaling and Migration Erich Lidstone April 29, 2009.
Cell Migration Tom Paine March 16, Will cover papers on single cell migration, adhesion- dependent trafficking and collective cell migration. Single.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cell adhesion Adhesion molecule signaling Mechanotransduction
Chemotaxis of Eukaryotic Cells: 1.Dictyostelium discoideum - Part 2
LECTURE 3 - NONMUSCLE CELLS & CELL LOCOMOTION Non-Contractile Bundles Lamellipodia Filopodia Surface Projections Non-Muscle Cells Circumferential belt.
Src Kinase Biosensor. Outline 1.Src Kinase Introduction 2.Impacts of Src 3.Src reporter components  FPs (tECFP/EYFP)  SH2  Flexible linker  Substrate.
Src Kinase Activity upon substrate phosphorylation.
Chemotaxis of Eukaryotic Cells:
Speaker: Professor Yang Qian Nanjing Agricultural University
Introduction to Signaling Networks Biophysics 702, February 2012 Jonathan P Butchar.
Mechanisms of Integrin Trafficking
ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM
Last Class 1. GPCR signaling: 2. Enzyme-linked Receptor signaling:
Integrin-EGFR Cross-Activation Elizabeth Brooks Department of Chemical Engineering University of Massachusetts, Amherst Peyton Lab Group Meeting December.
Integrin signalling Vytášek 2010.
Monomeric G proteins
Rho-GTPases and downstream effector proteins involved in cell motility
Listeria Cycle of Propagation
درس دوم اسکلت سلولی و ضمائم تحرک سلول ها
Integrin signalling Vytášek 2009.
Figure 3 Integrative signalling networks enable interactions
Endocytosis Conducts the Cell Signaling Orchestra
Lamellipodial extension driven by actin assembly
Nicole Tegtmeyer, Steffen Backert  Cell Host & Microbe 
Endocytic Trafficking of Integrins in Cell Migration
Great Expectations for PIP: Phosphoinositides as Regulators of Signaling During Development and Disease  Lara C. Skwarek, Gabrielle L. Boulianne  Developmental.
Philip P. Ostrowski, Sergio Grinstein, Spencer A. Freeman 
Eric A. Vitriol, James Q. Zheng  Neuron 
Rab5 and Rac Team Up in Cell Motility
Thomas D Pollard, Gary G Borisy  Cell 
Eric A. Vitriol, James Q. Zheng  Neuron 
Exploring the Neighborhood
Ayman El-Sayed, Hideyoshi Harashima  Molecular Therapy 
Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (February 1996)
Chapter 13 Intracellular Vesicular Traffic.
Figure 1 Altered modes of cAMP signalling at PTHR1
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion
Two Poles and a Compass Cell
Cell migration is mediated by Rho-GTPase protein activity.
Neuronal Polarity and Trafficking
Ras and Rho GTPases Cell
Rho and Rac Take Center Stage
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-18 (January 2011)
Toward total synthesis of cell function: Reconstituting cell dynamics with synthetic biology by Allen K. Kim, Robert DeRose, Tasuku Ueno, Benjamin Lin,
Reported events related to the replication cycle of Orientia tsutsugamushi in nonphagocytic cells. Reported events related to the replication cycle of.
Presentation transcript:

SIGNAL PATHWAYS IN CELL MIGRATION AND ADHESION Sam Polak 28 April 2008

Ridley A, Schwartz M, Burridge K, Firtel R, Ginsberg M, Borisy G, Parsons J, Horwitz A Science (302) 5 December Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back

Overview  Migration Cycle  Components of migration  Polarization  Integrins (yes, again)  Summary

Migration Cycle Initial Response: Polarization Extend lamellipodia or filopodia Disassemble at back FrontBack

Components of Migration Lamellipodia Actin  Barbed and pointed ends  Dendritic vs Parallel  Proteins

Components of Migration

Filopodial Actin  Treadmilling  Ena/VASP  Fascin RFpoly01.gif

Components of Migration Rho Family Guanosine triphosphate binding proteins  RhoG activates Rac-GEF activates Rac  Rac actives WAVE  Cdc42 activates WASP End results in activation of Arp 2/3 Positive or negative feedback to Rho-GTPases

Polarization  Cdc 42  PI3Ks and PTEN  Rac activation  Defining the tail

Polarization Cdc42  Located in front of cell  Localizes microtubule- organizing center (MTOC) and Golgi apparatus  Positive feedback loop with target PAK1

Polarization PI3Ks and PTEN  Gradient amplifiers via PIP 3 and PI(3,4)P 2  Off-set each other  Feedback loops between PI3K, PTEN, and Cdc42

Polarization Rac Activation  Stimulate recruitment/activation of PI3Ks  Microtubules and Rac form activation/stability loop  Integrins and Rac form activation/recruitment loop

Polarization Defining the Tail – Rho and Rac  Rho stabilizes microtubules  Rho and Rac mutually antagonistic  Exceptions  Rac involved in tail detachments  Rho involved in Rac activation

Integrins  Integrin affinity  Formation of adhesions  Tractional forces  Adhesion disassembly in front  Adhesion disassembly in rear

Integrins Integrin Affinity  Preferentially localize to leading edge  Binding of ligands leads to conformational changes  Posttranslational modification

Integrins Formation of Adhesions  Migration rate influences integrin clusters  Focal complexes and focal adhesions  Rac and Cdc42  Component kinetics

Integrins Tractional Forces  Traction sites and mechanosensors  Adhesion strength determined by  Substrate ligand density  Adhesion ligand receptor density  Receptor affinity  Migrating cells vs more stationary cells  Transmitted force regulated by Myosin II

Integrins Tractional Forces MLC MLCK ROCK MLC Phosphatase Rho-GTP [Ca 2+ ] Phosphorlyation Myosin II Phosphorlyation

Integrins Adhesion disassembly at the front  Disassembly vs maturation  Targeting and microtubules  Kinases and phosphatases  FAK and Src/Cas and Crk/Rac-GEFs

Integrins Adhesion disassembly at the back  Tethering  Myosin II and retraction  FAK, Src, Calcium

Summary

Balasubramanian N, Scott D, Castle D, Casanova J, and Schwartz M Nature Cell Biology (9) 18 November Arf6 and microtubules in adhesion- dependent trafficking of lipid rafts

Overview  Lipid rafts and markers  Raft relationship with cytoskeletan  Raft localization after endocytosis  Arf6 and raft trafficking  Arf6 and Rac1  Arf6 and adhesion  Microtubules and raft trafficking  Discussion/Conclusions

Lipid Rafts and Markers  Modulate signalling pathways  Endocytosed via caveolae  GTPase Arf6 as a regulator  Raft marker CTxB

Raft Relationship with Cytoskeletan  Addition of Latrunculin or Nocodazole  Addition of CTxB before or after detachment  Gamma-tubulin staining CTxB labelled while attachedCTxB labelled after detachedCTxB labeled while attached, gamma-tubulin stained

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Golgi Investigation  GM130 colocalization  Befeldin A (BFA) – dispersion inducer  Protein kinase D mutant – protein movement blocker

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Golgi Investigation – GM130

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Golgi Investigation – Brefeldin A LocalizationSpreading

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Golgi Investigation – Protein Kinase D Overlap of VSV and CTxB in Golgi

Raft Localization after Endocytosis SER Investigation

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Recycling Endosome Investigation – Rab11

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Recycling Endosome Investigation – Tf

Raft Localization after Endocytosis Recycling Endosome Investigation – Rab11

Arf6 and Raft Trafficking  Arf6 regulates vesicle trafficking and Rac1 movement  Recycling endosomes and in lamellipodia Recycling EndosomesLamellipodia

Arf6 and Raft Trafficking  Arf6 and cell spreading  WT and caveolin -/-

Arf6 and Raft Trafficking  Arf6 only involved in raft exocytosis  Cav -/- control

Arf6 and Rac1  Compare WT and Cav1 -/-  Suspension and replating

Arf6 and Adhesion Adhesion regulation of Arf6

Arf6 and Adhesion Arf6 recycling power

Arf6 and Adhesion Arf6 recycling power

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking MTs and raft components colocalize

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking  WT and Cav1 -/-  Addition of nocodazole  Attached  90 minutes in suspension  Label with CTxB  0 minute of suspension  90 minute of suspension

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking WT Nocodazole spreading

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking WT Nocodazole CTxB

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking  Cav1 -/- Nocodazole

Microtubules and Raft Trafficking Cav1 -/- Nocodazole CTxB

Conclusions  Adhesion recycling of lipid rafts is Arp6 dependent; and Rab11, Rab22, and caveolin independent; microtubules and also involved  Arp6 gets raft to the membrane, but additional steps are needed to get the raft to the surface  Cell detachment sends rafts to recycling endosomes  Rac1 requires rafts, Arp6, and MTs for localization and activation

Critiques  Said that WT cell spreading was only moderately inhibited by late addition of nocodazole, but that’s not what the data show  Arp6 does not bring rafts to the surface of the plasma membrane in adherent cells, but data shows an increase in CTxB in suspended cells with overactive Arp6 – why would that be so?  Eliminated Golgi for localization of rafts, but the figure makes it seems as if there is significant overlap of Golgi marker and CTxB

References  Balasubramian, et al. Arf6 and microtubules in adhesion-dependent trafficking of lipid rafts. Nature Cell Biology (6) Issue 12, Dec 2007 (1381)  Ridley, et al. Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science (302) 5 Dec 2003 (1704)  Kuhn. Department of Biological Sciences  Davis. Inside the Cell, Chapter 2 Cells