AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, 2010 Report on Patent Prosecution Highway Manny Schecter Chief Patent Counsel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Advertisements

U.S. Entry from PCT Application
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
Eugen Stohr Director International Legal Affairs, PCT
AIA Final Rules Submission of Certified Foreign Priority Documents and Translations Under the AIA March 20, 2013.
Michael D. Stein Principal Stein IP LLC 1400 Eye Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC (202) Patent Prosecution.
Incorporation by Reference
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
1 © 2014 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved. Advantages and Disadvantages of PPH Mark Abumeri 9 November 2014 Asian Patent Attorneys.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
Comments of American Intellectual Property Law Association Public meeting January 13, 2009 Patent Cooperation Treaty Presenter: Carl Oppedahl Oppedahl.
Q. TODD DICKINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) USPTO PUBLIC MEETING JULY 20, 2010 AIPLA Comments: Enhanced.
International Worksharing and its Perspective Inhong YEO International Cooperation Division.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
JPAA International Activities Center Nobuo Sekine
PCT Direct Current program and extension for non-European applicants
0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Second Session Tokyo, February 4 to 6, 2015.
1 USER REACTION TO RECENT CHANGES IN THE PCT Melvin C. Garner Darby & Darby P.C. New York, NY AIPLA – FICPI COLLOQUIUM NICE,
Worksharing Robert A. Clarke Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration United States Patent and Trademark Office.
USPTO PCT Task Force Public Hearing January 13, 2010 Lawrence T. Welch Assistant General Patent Counsel Eli Lilly & Co.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates regarding: Global/IP5 PPH pilot program at the USPTO and Patent Law Treaty (PLT)
1 Worksharing: A Cooperative Approach to Patent Workload Management Charles Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of External Affairs USPTO.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
PCT-SAFE and e-Services developments Webinar September 7/
The Patent Prosecution Highway: Strategic Considerations in Accelerating U.S. and Foreign Patent Prosecution ACC Quick Hits June 13, 2012 Dr. John K. McDonald.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
1 USPTO Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Paolo Trevisan Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs United States Patent.
USPTO Public Meeting July 20, 2010 Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative Hans Sauer, Biotechnology Industry Organization.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.
PPH from the JPO Point of View Yutaka Niidome Deputy Director Japan Patent Office AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May 19, 2010.
Espacenet and Patent Searching Dr Karen Ryan Patent Examiner 22 September 2011.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
1 Overview of USPTO Work-Sharing December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting Bruce Kisliuk - Assistant Deputy Commissioner.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 Colloquium on PCT –Nice, 9 April.
Espacenet and Patent Searching Dr Dolores Cassidy Patent Examiner 09 October 2015.
2007 Revisions to Japanese Patent Law. 2 #1 Period for Filing Divisional Applications (A) BeforeBefore AfterAfter Notice of Allowance Divisional Application.
1 IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO Ken-Ichi MOROOKA The Japan Patent Office Fordham IP Conference April 29, 2011.
Toyotaka Abe Foreign Legal Consultant Patent Group, IP& Licensing Microsoft Corporation.
Recent changes to the PCT - Impact on Third Parties Introduction -Many, if not all, of recent amendments to PCT are user friendly -are they third party.
1 Further Developments on Group B+ Agreement concerning SPLT Kay KONISHI APAA Patents Committee, APAA Council Meeting in Adelaide, Nov. 18, 2007.
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Impact of PPH from a Global Perspective Moderator: Neil Henderson, BLG LLP Panel: Leonora Hoicka, IBM Corporation Aki Ryuka, RYUKA IP Law Firm, Japan IPIC.
1 The Patent Prosecution Highway A Brief History and Current Status Mark R. Powell Director, TC 2600 USPTO.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 Palette Border Color: 39 C7 C Cтратегии.
Yuichi Watanabe Osha Liang LLP January 26, 2016 Practice Tips: Prosecution of Japan-origin US applications 1 © AIPLA 2015.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
Patent Cooperation Treaty Improvements Past, Present & Future
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Best practices in the national phase Session 3
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
Patent Prosecution Highway(PPH)
EGYPO Organisational structure
Presentation transcript:

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, 2010 Report on Patent Prosecution Highway Manny Schecter Chief Patent Counsel

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Agenda Our experiences with PPH  Usage summary  Number of office actions & prosecution period  Rate of patent grants Benefits Suggested Improvements

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Usage Summary Over 300 petitions filed to enter PPH Primary routes:  JP-US PPH  US-JP PPH  PCT PPH Significant cost savings depending upon path:  Patent office fees to enter PPH  Number of office actions eliminated  Local labor/legal costs

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Number of Office Actions & Prosecution Period *1 Period from petition for JP US PPH with USPTO to 1 st US office action or 1 st action allowance *2 Period from US filing date to 1 st US office action or 1 st action allowance *3 Period from petition for US JP PPH with JPO to 1 st JP office action or 1 st action allowance *4 Period from request for examination with JPO to 1 st JP office action or 1 st action allowance Route Number of Office Actions in an OSF* Period to receive a 1st OA in OSF/ days JP US PPH (*1 JP US Non PPH (*2 US JP PPH1.349 (*3 US JP Non PPH (*4

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Rate of Patent Grants RouteGrant Rate % JP US PPH82.6 JP US non PPH72.0 US JP PPH86.7 US JP Non PPH69.5

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Summary of Benefits (1) Regarding prosecution in OSF -Cost reduction due to decrease of the number of OAs -Increased grant rate -Significant reduction of prosecution period -Simple formality requirement to trigger PPH in OSF (2) Regarding practitioners’ workload in PPH - Early office action in OSF – improves applicant recall of invention, thereby increasing efficiency and quality of prosecution

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Suggested Improvements (1) Symmetrical processes Issue: Currently, offices’ requirements for PPH vary. For example, a petition fee is necessary in USPTO while JPO does not require any such fee. Recommendation: Adopt symmetrical processes.

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Suggested Improvements (2) Clarification of requirement for “sufficiently corresponding claims” Issue: OSF requires sufficient correspondence of allowed claims in OFF and claims to be examined in OSF, but the standard is not clear. Copying of claims is generally effective to avoid denial of a petition. Recommendation: Clearly define “sufficiently corresponding”.

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Suggested Improvements (3) Translations of office actions Issue: Some OSFs require translations of office actions together with petitions for entering PPH. Translation cost is predominant additional cost, but substantially common parts are not standardized and mere cosmetics unduly increase translation expense. Recommendation: Adopt a common office action format.

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, Suggested Improvements (4) PCT information in WIPO Database Issue: In PCT PPH, a favorable opinion by ISA or IPEA is a condition for initiating examination in OSF. Currently, WIPO provides a database which includes (1) PCT documents in PDF format which are not searchable, and (2) searchable bibliographic data which does not indicate whether opinion is favorable or unfavorable. Recommendation: Facilitate applicants’ search for candidates of PCT PPH by including indications of favorability in the searchable bibliographic data.

AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May,