Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Advertisements

Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
“I guarantee that we will see mathematics scores fall sharply…This is an indication that we are expecting more of students, not that they are learning.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Nationellt Centrum för Matematikutbildning vid Göteborgs Universitet Teaching Math through Problem Solving 1 Teaching School Mathematics through Problem.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Choosing Tasks that Encourage Students to Use Mathematical Practices.
WHAT STUDENTS KNOW AND CAN DO OECD Test for Schools (based on PISA)--Mathematics FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS APRIL 2013.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Algebra I Model Course Background. Education Reform Act signed into law by Governor Rell May 26, 2010 Includes many recommendations of the ad hoc committee.
Writing Instructional Objectives
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Grade Band Team Members Vickie Inge, University of Virginia Patricia Robertson, Arlington Public Schools, retired.
Identifying Mathematics Levels of Cognitive Rigor (DOK) Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Professional Development - Mathematics February 19, 2015 Module.
At the end of my physics course, a biology student should be able to…. Michelle Smith University of Maine School of Biology and Ecology Maine Center for.
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
Math Assessments: Creating Technology Enhanced Items and Adding Rigor Henrico County Public Schools August 2012.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Incorporating the process standards into the daily rigor Incorporating the process standards into the daily rigor.
1 Unit 4: One-Step Equations The Georgia Performance Standards Website.
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
More Rigorous SOL = More Cognitively Demanding Teaching and Assessing Dr. Margie Mason The College of William and Mary Adapted from
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Upgrade! Math Staff Development October 8, A New Trend Line in Student Achievement “I guarantee that we will see mathematics scores fall sharply…This.
2014 Mathematics Institutes Grade Band: High School Algebra 1.
Mathematical Connections and Representations 2014 Mathematics Institutes Mathematical Connections and Representations General Session October 2014 Michael.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Number.
New Mathematics SOL and Assessments and their Impact on Instruction and Assessment March 26, 2012 Michael Bolling, Mathematics Coordinator.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum Directors Conference September 20, 2006.
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.
Math Design Collaborative Overview Amy Lewis and Tiffany Schroyer.
Unwrapping the Standards. The power standards are the fence posts. They provide the curricular focus and teachers need to dig deeper to assure student.
Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Reflecting on Practice: Using Inquiry to Build Thinking Classrooms
Increasing Rigor to Develop Critical Thinking Skills
Examining Student Work
Presentation transcript:

Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013

Task Sort Activity Directions:  Individually, read each task. Sort and record the provided tasks as high or low cognitive demand.  Record your answers in the google form.  Discuss your results as a table group and come to a consensus.  Describe the criteria you used to sort each task. How did you communicate your reasoning to your table group?  List the criteria in your task analysis guide. Math Assessments & Rigor

Discussing the Task Sort TaskABCDEFGHIJ Low High Criteria for a low level task Criteria for a high level task Math Assessments & Rigor

Discussing the Task Sort TaskABCDEFGHIJ Low High Criteria for a low level task Computation, mechanical explanations One step, rote Skill oriented, Clear directions/task Basic concepts Criteria for a high level task Multi-task, reasoning, connections, steps Interpret/process info/analyze Justify Create ‘new’ item Extraneous info included Math Assessments & Rigor

Task Analysis Guide Lower-level Demands  Involve recall or memory of facts, rules, formulae, or definitions  Involve exact reproduction of previously seen material  No connection of facts, rules, formulae, or definitions to concepts or underlying understandings.  Focused on producing correct answers rather than developing mathematical understandings  Require no explanations or explanations that focus only on describing the procedure used to solve Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press Math Assessments & Rigor

Task Analysis Guide Higher-level Demands  Focus on developing deeper understanding of concepts  Use multiple representations to develop understanding and connections  Require complex, non-algorithmic thinking and considerable cognitive effort  Require exploration of concepts, processes, or relationships  Require accessing and applying prior knowledge and relevant experiences to facilitate connections  Require critical analysis of the task and solutions Adapted from Stein, M.K., Smith, M.S., Henningsen, M.A., & Silver, E.A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press DOING Mathematics Math Assessments & Rigor

Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design STEPS 1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework - what students should be able to do 2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL 3. Develop an assessment 4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources/lesson plans Math Assessments & Rigor

1. Identify the nouns and verbs in the SOL 2. Review the Curriculum Framework 3. Examine the Essential Knowledge and Skills 4. List at least 5 different things that students should know and be able to do. Good news! The Assessment Templates are already set up for you. Step 1: Analyze the SOL What should students be able to do? Math Assessments & Rigor

Assessment Templates Math Assessments & Rigor

Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design STEPS 1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework - what students should be able to do 2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL 3. Develop an assessment 4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources/lesson plans Math Assessments & Rigor

Slope Comparative Questions  What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (2, 3) and (5, 7)?  Write a linear equation that is parallel to the given line 3x + 2y = 24.  Access ramps must be built to meet specifications with regard to slope. Federal regulations states that for every 12 inches along the base of a ramp, the height cannot rise more than 1 inch. Design an access ramp for a doctor’s office that extends no more than 108 inches. Include your solution and a scaled diagram to illustrate your design.

Modifying Assessment Items Use these guiding questions to “upgrade” the following SOL questions  How could an old test item be revised to reflect the new rigor?  How could a test item writer ask this in a TEI format?  What types of classroom activities or assessments could I use to prepare students? Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Modifying Assessment Items Math Assessments & Rigor

Where can I get ideas for quality assessment items?  NAEP released items (searchable database)  PISA released items  APEC Mathematics Assessment Database  Heinemann Mathematics (not free, but cheap)  JMU Center for STEM Education Outreach (by SOL in Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II) html html 19 Math Assessments & Rigor

Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design STEPS 1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework - what students should be able to do 2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL 3. Develop an assessment 4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources/lesson plans Math Assessments & Rigor

Practice SOL Items  It is essential that students have experiences with the Practice SOL Items prior to testing.  Use of the Practice Item Guides is STRONGLY recommended.  Practice Item Guides provide:  Guided practice with tools  Information specific to TEI functionality  Information on item format Math Assessments & Rigor

Assessment Templates Math Assessments & Rigor

TEI Creation Math Assessments & Rigor 1. Download the ActivInspire template from the Math Assessments blog posting on the HCPS math website. 2. Individually or as a group, convert the questions to TEI items. Sample Hot Spot Problem

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework - what students should be able to do 2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL 3. Develop assessment items 4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources Math Assessments & Rigor Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design

1. Analyze an SOL and Curriculum Framework - what students should be able to do 2. Brainstorm ways to assess the SOL 3. Develop assessment items 4. Brainstorm instructional strategies 5. Develop instructional resources Math Assessments & Rigor Instruction, Assessment, and Backwards Design