Seven Steps in Designing the eWriting Learning Objects (LOs) eWriting: ESL Writing Success September 2002 – August 2005 ESL/Foreign Languages Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

E-Learning for Enterprise Managing online learners and learning e-Learning for Enterprise Clive Young & Wendy David.
Spotlight on Reading and Writing Kit
Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligence and Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments Punyanuch Borwarnginn 5 August 2013.
Designing Learning Programs. Ambition in Action Topics /Definition /Components of a learning program /Defining the purpose and focus.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Understanding by Design Planning Instruction Stage Three Prepared for Mercer University EDUC621 by Sherah B. Carr, Ph.D Information adapted from training.
What is the ADDIE Model? By San Juanita Alanis. The ADDIE model is a systematic instructional design model consisting of five phases: –Analysis –Design.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
An Introduction to Instructional Design Online Learning Institute Mary Ellen Bornak Instructional Designer Bucks County Community College.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Multi-Section Assessment of One Course: English 407A Ed Nagelhout Julie Staggers Department of English.
Dr. Pratibha Gupta Associate professor Deptt. of Community Medicine ELMC & H, Lucknow.
Assessment Human Society and Its Environment 7-10 © 2007 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
INTEL CONFIDENTIAL, FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY 1 Intel Teach Essentials Program Curriculum Roundtable – Oxford – July 2013.
© Scottsdale Community College Creating Engaging Online Exercises and Activities Leveraging the Power of E-Learning Series:
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Purposes of the evaluation:  1) Document the extent to which intended strategies have been implemented;  2) Describe any difficulties experienced in.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Courseware Development Plan 7 stages 2 levels per stage multiple tools per stage 7 stages 2 levels per stage multiple tools per stage.
Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School of Education Additional Unit 2 Lecture Notes New Instructional Design Focus School.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
1 Linked Learning Summer Institute 2015 Planning Integrated Units.
Standards For Teacher Preparation. What do you see in the previous slide? Students who are ready to answer the question? Students who are listening and.
The Library Imperial College London Debbi Boden & Sue Holloway Information Literacy: Its not sexy but it’s clever!
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Basic Education 4 May 2010 Development of Workbooks.
Information literacy features strongly on the CIT Strategic Plan, the Learning Services Division Business Plan and the Library & Learning Centre Operational.
National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers Including Artifacts.
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
June 081 Competent Learner Model Overview. June 082 Today you will learn… What is the CLM What is the goal of the CLM What are the foundations of the.
DONALD THORNTON JR EDLD871 MODULE 4 WIKI POST Professional Development Module.
First Year FIPSE Project Overview eWriting: ESL Writing Success September 2002 – August 2005 Miami-Dade College Kendall Campus ESL/Foreign Languages Department.
The Call to Write, Third edition Chapter 23, Writing Portfolios.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Blended Learning Design: Revised Recommendation
Training Program Proposal December  Review ~ of The Educational Technology Plan from Donegal’s Strategic Plan  Analysis ~ of Donegal’s School.
Developing High Quality Student Learning Objectives
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Kesarkar Madhura, Ph.D. Head, Department of Education, SNDTWU, Mumbai.
Using Common Core State Standards of Seventh Grade Mathematics in the Application of NXT LEGO® Robotics for CReSIS Middle School Students.
April 8, 2004Washington University Teaching Center Self-Evaluation as an Instructor; Course Redesign Regina Frey, Director Washington University Teaching.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Second Language Classroom Research (Nunan, D. 1990) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sehnaz Sahinkarakas.
Local Evaluation Overview and Preliminary Findings Diane Schilder, EdD.
EPoster: Co-teaching in a collaborative environment The Orchestrators Kelly Taylor & Russ Simpson Summer 2005.
Copyright © Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright Toshiyuki Urata 2003 This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Working With the Instructional Development Team Presented by Heidi King 20 November 2002.
Quality Management in Web-based Learning - A Finnish perspective Kristiina Karjalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology WebCT Executive Seminar EDEN.
Standards-Based Education
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Instructional Design Course Evaluation Phase. Agenda The Evaluation Process Expert Review Small Group Review The Pilot Feedback and Revision Evaluation.
Three Instructional Design Models Shaun Rosell EDCI 888 Proseminar II Kansas State University.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Understanding Standards Biology (Advanced Higher)
Univ. Prof Dr Viktor Jakupec
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
RDG/416 METHODS OF TEACHING IN EARLY CHILDHOOD: MATHEMATICS The Latest Version // uopcourse.com
RDG 416 RDG 416 rdg 416 rdg416 Entire Course // uopstudy.com
Presentation transcript:

Seven Steps in Designing the eWriting Learning Objects (LOs) eWriting: ESL Writing Success September 2002 – August 2005 ESL/Foreign Languages Department Presented by: Michaela Tomova, FIPSE Grant Manager FIPSE Grant Manager

Project Overview  Goals Goals  Content and scope Content and scope Content and scope  Collaborators Collaborators  Dissemination and publications Dissemination and publications Dissemination and publications

Step 1 : Defining an LO What is an LO? Definition of the eWriting LO: The LO is a one hour, self-contained, reusable unit of online instruction. It neither links out, nor does it depend on other LOs for pre or post instruction. It pre-tests students’ knowledge of the target concept, and measures learning through a post-test. It incorporates a variety of technology tools for online instruction and addresses all learning styles. The LO is a one hour, self-contained, reusable unit of online instruction. It neither links out, nor does it depend on other LOs for pre or post instruction. It pre-tests students’ knowledge of the target concept, and measures learning through a post-test. It incorporates a variety of technology tools for online instruction and addresses all learning styles.

Defining an LO: First Steps The “Learning Clock”, FIPSE Focus Group, April 17, 2003, Group Work

Defining an LO: First Steps FIPSE Focus Group

Step 1: Defining an LO Components of the eWriting LO: the eWriting LOthe eWriting LO Learning objectiveLearning objective Time on taskTime on task Pre-testPre-test Warm-up/IntroductionWarm-up/Introduction Lectures (teacher talk with examples)Lectures (teacher talk with examples) ActivitiesActivities Post-testPost-test Survey (paper and on-line version)Survey (paper and on-line version)on-line versionon-line version Answer keyAnswer key Feedback to wrong answersFeedback to wrong answers Links to additional online references to reinforce learningLinks to additional online references to reinforce learning

Defining an LO: WebCT Online Seminar: WebCT Online Seminar: WebCT Online Seminar:LEARNING Pedagogical expectations: Learning objectives Learning objectives Range in scope and size Purpose and goals Teaching strategies Teaching strategies Activities, content, assessment Learner focused Learner focused Interactive, adaptable. NEW! Various learning styles addressed, LO themes introduced OBJECT Practical expectations: Easy to use Accessible Searchable Identifiable Customizable Integrate-able Improvable Sellable, etc, etc.

Step 2 : Team Selection and Writing the Curriculum (we’re almost there!)  Team selection  Training  Course design: 1.The college writing and grammar competencies 2.Developing a Table of Contents for the six levels Table of Contents Table of Contents 3.Outlining the writers’ instructions and format 4.Determining the pre and post test requirements pre and post test requirementspre and post test requirements 5.Providing a checklist of LO components 6.Setting the eWriting schedule

Step 3 : Classroom Test Piloting (work in progress)  The “First steps” in piloting tested: The content in terms of appropriateness of level, length of the LO, students’ understanding, clarity of instructions, usefulness of activities, interest and positive response. The content in terms of appropriateness of level, length of the LO, students’ understanding, clarity of instructions, usefulness of activities, interest and positive response. Initially, classroom piloting facilitated: The evaluation process The evaluation process Revision and editing of LOs Revision and editing of LOs  Evolution of piloting strategies and results: Revised piloting instructions Revised piloting instructions Extended time for LO classroom delivery Extended time for LO classroom delivery Error analysis and feedback for all activities in the LO Error analysis and feedback for all activities in the LO Better feedback and evaluation data Better feedback and evaluation data

Step 4 : Evaluation: Purposes and Tools (Dr. Barry Greenberg)  Classroom interviews  Measuring learning

Step 5: Programming (work in progress)  Hire and train programmers  Develop online tutorials online tutorialsonline tutorials  Design online templates  Select tools to develop online LOs Hot Potatoes Hot Potatoes Hot Potatoes Hot Potatoes Lectora Lectora Lectora

Step 6: Online Piloting (third year project)  Facilities: the ESL lab  Students’ surveys Students’ surveys Students’ surveys  Collection of final evaluation data

Step 7 : Evaluation and Final Product Samples of online LO activities: Samples of online LO activities: Level 2 Level 6

Seven Steps in Designing the eWriting Learning Objects (LOs) THANK YOU!