Gravitational Faraday Effect Produced by a Ring Laser James G. O’Brien IARD Bi-Annual Conference University Of Connecticut June 13 th, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture Outline Chapter 30 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
Advertisements

Knight - Chapter 28 (Grasshopper Book) Quantum Physics.
PH0101 UNIT 2 LECTURE 2 Biot Savart law Ampere’s circuital law
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
Physics 430: Lecture 21 Rotating Non-Inertial Frames
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 4.  Recall for the four Maxwell’s equation:
PH0101 UNIT 2 LECTURE 31 PH0101 Unit 2 Lecture 3  Maxwell’s equations in free space  Plane electromagnetic wave equation  Characteristic impedance 
Maxwell’s Equations from Special Relativity James G. O’Brien Physics Club Presentation University Of Connecticut Thursday October 30th, 2008.
EEE 498/598 Overview of Electrical Engineering
Fundamentals of Electromagnetics: A Two-Week, 8-Day, Intensive Course for Training Faculty in Electrical-, Electronics-, Communication-, and Computer-
Electromagnetic (E-M) theory of waves at a dielectric interface
Electromagnetic Waves
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Quantum One: Lecture 4. Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for a Free Quantum Particle.
Now that we have determined the solutions to the differential equation describing the oscillations of the electric and magnetic fields with respect to.
Quantum One: Lecture 3. Implications of Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for Conservative Systems.
Ch 5.8: Bessel’s Equation Bessel Equation of order :
1/22/2001Physics 222 Special Relativity Lecture 3.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2007 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29 Lecture Notes 8.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2005 Dr Geraint F. Lewis Rm 557, A29
c = km/sec I F = I 0 x (cosθ) 2.
LESSON 4 METO 621. The extinction law Consider a small element of an absorbing medium, ds, within the total medium s.
EE3321 ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY
Chapter 32 Inductance.
Building a Photodetector to Observe the Polarization of Light Kevin J. McElwee Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater MA Mentor: Edward F. Deveney.
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University,Noida Department of Physics and materials.
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
ME 2304: 3D Geometry & Vector Calculus Dr. Faraz Junejo Double Integrals.
Physics 430: Lecture 14 Calculus of Variations Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Kinematics in Two Dimensions Chapter 3. Expectations After Chapter 3, students will:  generalize the concepts of displacement, velocity, and acceleration.
1 ECE 480 Wireless Systems Lecture 3 Propagation and Modulation of RF Waves.
ME 1202: Linear Algebra & Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs)
1 EEE 498/598 Overview of Electrical Engineering Lecture 11: Electromagnetic Power Flow; Reflection And Transmission Of Normally and Obliquely Incident.
Nanostructures Research Group CENTER FOR SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory David K. Ferry and Dragica Vasileska Arizona.
Cross section for potential scattering
Part 6: Graphics Output Primitives (4) 1.  Another useful construct,besides points, straight line segments, and curves for describing components of a.
Dr. Hatim Dirar Department of Physics, College of Science Imam Mohamad Ibn Saud Islamic University.
Advanced EM - Master in Physics The (GENERAL) solution of Maxwell’s equations Then for very small r, outside the charge region but near it,
The Wrench: Let’s suppose that we have already reduced a complicated force system to single (resultant ) force,, and a single couple with the moment,,

Electromagnetism Lenz’s law and Maxwell’s equations By: Mahdi Dardashtian.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Chapter 32 Inductance. Joseph Henry 1797 – 1878 American physicist First director of the Smithsonian Improved design of electromagnet Constructed one.
SECTION 13.8 STOKES ’ THEOREM. P2P213.8 STOKES ’ VS. GREEN ’ S THEOREM  Stokes ’ Theorem can be regarded as a higher- dimensional version of Green ’
Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC Plane-Wave Propagation.
1 STRESS STATE 2- D. 2 It is convenient to resolve the stresses at a point into normal and shear components. The stresses used to describe the state of.
Chapter 35 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves Galilean Relativity Why do E and B depend on the observer? Maxwell’s displacement current (it isn’t a real.
Shielded Wires Let us say that the voltages measured at the terminal of the receptor circuit are beyond the desired level. What can we do? Two common solutions.
Advanced EM - Master in Physics We have now calculated all the intermediate derivatives which we need for calculating the fields E and B. We.
So far, we have considered plane waves in an infinite homogeneous medium. A natural question would arise: what happens if a plane wave hits some object?
VI. Electromagnetic Waves All the important physics in electromagnetism can be expressed in four Maxwell’s Equations, the Lorentz force and.
Module 6Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light1 Module 6 Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light The term aberration used here means deviation. If a light.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
Electric Field.
Chapter 3 Polarization of Light Waves
Assam Don Bosco University Electromagnetic Waves Parag Bhattacharya Department of Basic Sciences School of Engineering and Technology.
Boyce/DiPrima 9 th ed, Ch 11.3: Non- Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 9 th edition, by.
Physics 842, February 2006 Bogdan Popescu Presentation based on “Introduction to Elementary Particles” by David Griffiths WEAK INTERACTION (1)
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 16 Vector Calculus.
Conductor, insulator and ground. Force between two point charges:
Multiplication of vectors Two different interactions (what’s the difference?)  Scalar or dot product : the calculation giving the work done by a force.
Seismology Part II: Body Waves and Ray Theory. Some definitions: Body Waves: Waves that propagrate through the "body" of a medium (in 3 dimensions) WRONG!
Superconductivity and Superfluidity Landau Theory of Phase Transitions Lecture 5 As a reminder of Landau theory, take the example of a ferromagnetic to.
Chapter 22 Electric Fields The Electric Field: The Electric Field is a vector field. The electric field, E, consists of a distribution of vectors,
7. Electromagnetic Waves 7A. Plane Waves Consider Maxwell’s Equations with no sources We are going to search for waves of the form To make things as general.
UPB / ETTI O.DROSU Electrical Engineering 2
Larmor Orbits The general solution of the harmonic oscillator equation
Lienard Wierchert Potential
Handout 4 : Electron-Positron Annihilation
Presentation transcript:

Gravitational Faraday Effect Produced by a Ring Laser James G. O’Brien IARD Bi-Annual Conference University Of Connecticut June 13 th, 2006

History Gravitational Frame Dragging was first introduced as a consequence of the General Theory of Relativity. It states that masses not only curve space and time, but rotating masses cause the very fabric of space and time to twist as well. Gravitational Frame Dragging was first introduced as a consequence of the General Theory of Relativity. It states that masses not only curve space and time, but rotating masses cause the very fabric of space and time to twist as well. Current tests of the Frame Dragging Effect include Gravity Probe B (2004), launched by NASA, in conjunction with Stanford University under the guidance of Francis Everett. This mechanical method of testing the Frame Dragging Effect uses ultra sophisticated gyroscope methods, and telescope technology.

The Balazs Effect The idea of using a non-mechanical method of measuring the gravitational frame dragging was well documented in 1957 by N.L. Balazs. His idea was to use a gravitational field to change the plane of polarization of an incident light beam, due to a slowly rotating massive body. See below: Although in reality, as seen above, this presents many technical difficulties. Change in Angle:

Mallett’s Ring Laser In 2000, Dr. Mallett documented the gravitational effects of a circulating laser. Working in the linear approximation for the weak gravitational field produced by the ring laser, Mallett showed that if a massive, spinning neutron were placed at the center, the precession would be: a a a a

Linear Combinations But there is another way to observe the gravitational frame dragging effect, Light on Light. After meeting with Francis Everett, Mallett suggested an attempt to combine Balazs into his own work. Of course, along the way, we see that the rabbit hole is deeper than we expect:

Classical Faraday Effect Recall the Classical Faraday Effect: For an incident beam of light, when influenced by a magnetic field, the plane of polarization precesses (Classical Faraday Effect). Now, the startling consequence is that if the light is reflected, the polarization does not precess back to its original state, but is instead amplified in the new direction.

Classical Faraday Effect

Foundations Original Goal: To determine if and how the plane of polarization of an incident beam is affected by a ring laser. Thus, we turn to the foundations given by Mallett, and work in the linear approximation for the gravitational field produced by the metric of the ring laser:

Required Calculations Where: Now having stated the givens, we are ready to proceed by first calculating how Maxwell’s equations are modified by the Gravity Field.

Maxwell’s Equations in G-Field We see that the Modified Electromagnetic Fields are: Where we have reverted to the 3-space notation to see Maxwell equations more clearly. Note: The vector g is a three dimensional representation of the off diagonal elements of the metric viz. the (0i) components.

Maxwell Continued… Thus, we see the Maxwell Equations are: Now, the above equations are still in terms of both E and D as well as both H and B. Next, we make some approximations and write the Maxwell equations in terms of only D and B.

Approximations and Reductions As we are working in the linear approximation, we can assume that the gravitational field produced by the ring laser is weak. Also, there are no other electromagnetic sources (point charges, currents, etc), thus

Final form of Maxwell We see that after writing the Maxwell equations in terms of only B and D yields equations of the form: Which can be reduced after some labor since div(g)=0, leaving And it is now clear as to the terms in which we will need to solve these equations. Thus, we turn our attention now to the incoming beam of light.

Incident Beam Let the incident ray be plane polarized and traveling in the z-direction. Recall that the ring laser is oriented in the x-y plane. Hence: More grinding shows that for an arbitrary vector t, that: In lowest order terms (weak field). Note also in the above is the first appearance of the dimension a of the size of the ring laser.

Coupling of Field Equations Applying all of the previous to the Maxwell equations, we are left with the following set of coupled equations: We can then eliminate the time differentials and produce a set of full D.E’s, by making the following substitution:

Total Differential Equations Using the previous, we arrive at the following, still coupled equations : Now, assuming plane wave solutions for the fields, along with some modification function due to the gravity field, denoted by l(z), we see then:

Solving… With these new substitutions, we are led to the equations: Finally, after some more work, we arrive at the pleasing result: Note, we arrived at the above equation only after exploiting the fact that both l(z) and sigma are small. Now we have a differential equation for the modification to the plane waves, which can be integrated immediately.

Etc etc… Once the integral is known, we can back substitute into the expressions for B and D. We can thus resolve the components of the Electric Field using the standard forms of: And setting the amplitudes as equal (polarization angle changes, not amplitude)

Polarization Shift For once, a simple calculation shows the shift in polarization is: Thus, we see that the change in angle is simply the integral we calculated earlier. This result makes sense since if we let l(z)=0 then the change in polarization angle is zero as expected. Thus without further ado, we calculate the change in polarization angle for the incident beam caused by the ring laser.

Polarization Shift Continued Evaluation of the integral yields: While at the limit where z increases without bound (off to infinity), the shift is Change in polarization due to the ring laser. (Gravitational Analog of the Classical Faraday Effect)

But the Story Continues… Original Goal was successful Admittedly, the effect we shown is VERY small So can we remedy this? As it turns out, there is a gravitational analog of the consequence of this new “Faraday-Like” effect, as discussed earlier…

Gravitational Faraday Effect With a little more work, we can show that there does indeed exist a gravitational analog of the classical faraday effect. Let us now go back to the definitions of the incident beam, and let it incident from negative infinity. Then:

Evaluation Upon evaluation of the integral again, we see the result that: Which due to the sgn function, is positive definite. Thus, we obtain in the large z region, the previous result: Hence, no matter which way the beam is incident, the change in polarization orientation is the same (as seen in the classical case). Thus, reflection of the light back through the ring laser results in an amplification of the precession angle.

Current Work The existence of this gravitational analog allows us the possibility of terrestrial experiments of gravitational frame dragging. Dr. Chandra Roychoudhuri is currently designing experimental apparatus to perform the experiment.

Design Use of Confocal Lasers will be employed as the incident beam in the ring laser as pictured. This technique provides the highest amount of finesse which allows for the maximum amount of reflections without loss of intensity of the incident beam. Then, hopes are to stack the ring lasers in a helical pattern and allow for an increase in polarization precession. Then, the frame dragging effect can be measured by allowing the wave to propagate over time, as opposed to a huge space.

Conclusion Gravitational Frame Dragging may be able to be tested in an easily controlled, terrestrial lab. This is due to the existence of a gravitational analog of the Classical Faraday Effect. David Cox and I would like to thank you all for this wonderful opportunity and for your attention!