4th July, 2002NuFact 2002 Workshop at Imperial College, London Possibility on a point positive muon source for a neutrino factory by laser excitation of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
Optical sources Lecture 5.
ATF2 Interaction Point Beam Size Monitor (Shintake Monitor) Status T. Yamanaka, M. Oroku, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Komamiya ( Univ. of Tokyo ), T. Suehara, Y.
Positronium Rydberg excitation in AEGIS Physics with many positrons International Fermi School July 2009 – Varenna, Italy The experimental work on.
Recent development of a point positive muon source by laser excitation of muonium atoms Introduction Experiment at the RIKEN-RAL Muon facility Future prospect.
Generation of short pulses
2. High-order harmonic generation in gases Attosecond pulse generation 1. Introduction to nonlinear optics.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Frictional Cooling Studies at Columbia University/Nevis Labs Raphael Galea, Allen Caldwell + Stefan Schlenstedt (DESY/Zeuthen) Halina Abramowitz (Tel Aviv.
Frictional Cooling MC Collaboration Meeting June 11-12/2003 Raphael Galea.
Frictional Cooling 2004 Workshop on Muon Collider Simulation Columbia University & the Max-Planck-Institute R. Galea, A. Caldwell, S.Schlenstedt, H. Abramowicz.
Photoelectron Spectroscopy Lecture 7 – instrumental details –Photon sources –Experimental resolution and sensitivity –Electron kinetic energy and resolution.
ECE/ChE 4752: Microelectronics Processing Laboratory
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
Carbon Injector for FFAG
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Study of MgB 2 Thin Films on Nb by Pulse Laser Deposition S.Mitsunobu, S.Inagaki, H.Nakanishi, M.Wake and M.Fukutomi* KEK,NIMR*
NuFact04 July26-August 1, 2004 Osaka University, Osaka, Japan Columbia University & the Max-Planck-Institute Review & Status of Frictional Cooling A. Caldwell,
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
WG4 Summary -Intense Muon Physics- Conveners Y. Semertzdis (BNL), M. Grassi (Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN) summary-1 for muon applications by K. Ishida.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
PRISM and Neutrino Factory in Japan Y. Kuno KEK, IPNS January 19th, 2000 at CERN.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Radioactive ion beam facilities How does they work ? 2012 Student Practice in JINR Fields of Research 9.oct.2012 I. Sivacekflerovlab.jinr.ru.
Laser Stripping and H 0 monitor systems 10/18/2011B.Cheymol, E. Bravin, U. Raich, F. Roncarolo BE/BI1.
Generation of low energy muon with laser resonant ionization of muonium atoms Yasuyuki Matsuda (for slow muon collaboration) Frascati 22nd.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
The Apparatus…. Ionic target studies…. Neutral target studies…. Queens University Belfast University College London.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Observation of ultrafast response by optical Kerr effect in high-quality CuCl thin films Asida Lab. Takayuki Umakoshi.
Muon Catalyzed Fusion (µCF) K. Ishida (RIKEN) Principle of µCF Topics D2/T2 α-sticking, dtµ formation T2tt-fusion, He accumulation µCF with high intensity.
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology Toward a World-Leading University Y.K KIM.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Desorption mechanism of hydrogen isotope from metal oxides Contents 1.Background 2.Experimental system and Mechanism 3.Results and discussion 4.Conclusions.
Observation of ultrafast nonlinear response due to coherent coupling between light and confined excitons in a ZnO crystalline film Ashida Lab. Subaru Saeki.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
FFAG-Workshop Dec Kumatori Japan Diagnostics for FFAG- accelerator Takahisa ITAHASHI Department of Physics, Osaka Univ. Toyonaka, Osaka, ,Japan.
Nonlinear Optics in Plasmas. What is relativistic self-guiding? Ponderomotive self-channeling resulting from expulsion of electrons on axis Relativistic.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
Mitigation of fast particles from laser- produced Sn plasma for an extreme ultraviolet lithography source Y.Tao and M.S.Tillack University.
Enhancing the Macroscopic Yield of Narrow-Band High-Order Harmonic Generation by Fano Resonances Muhammed Sayrac Phys-689 Texas A&M University 4/30/2015.
Molecular Triplet States: Excitation, Detection, and Dynamics Wilton L. Virgo Kyle L. Bittinger Robert W. Field Collisional Excitation Transfer in the.
Status Report of the LISOL Laser Ion Source Yu.Kudryavtsev, T.Cocolios, M.Facina, J.Gentens, M.Huyse, O.Ivanov, D.Pauwels, M.Sawicka, P.Van den Bergh,
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
Recent progress of RF cavity study at Mucool Test Area Katsuya Yonehara APC, Fermilab 1.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS)
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Antihydrogen Workshop, June , CERN S.N.Gninenko Production of cold positronium S.N. Gninenko INR, Moscow.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
An H- stripping laser using commercial, diode-pumped Nd:YAG amplifiers Russell Wilcox Laser Stripping Workshop, April 11, 2011.
Basic of muon ionization cooling K. Yonehara 8/29/11HPRF cavity physics seminar - I, K. Yonehara1.
DECam Spectrophotometric Calibration DECam calibration workshop, TAMU April 20 th, 2009 Jean-Philippe Rheault, Texas A&M University.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
Acknowledgements Slides and animations were made by Dr. Jon Karty Mass Spectrometry Facility Indiana University, Bloomington.
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #17 Wednesday ,April 4, 2012 Dr. Brandt
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Presentation transcript:

4th July, 2002NuFact 2002 Workshop at Imperial College, London Possibility on a point positive muon source for a neutrino factory by laser excitation of muonium atoms Introduction : slow muons Experiment at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility Possibility of application as a point muon source Yasuyuki Matsuda (RIKEN) (for slow muon collaboration)

Collaborators Y. Miyake (KEK) K. Shimomura (KEK) S. Makimura (KEK) K. Nagamine (KEK) J.P. Marangos (Imperial College, UK) Y. Matsuda (RIKEN) P. Bakule (RIKEN) P. Strasser (RIKEN) K. Ishida (RIKEN) T. Matsuzaki (RIKEN) M. Iwasaki (RIKEN)

slow muons Slow muons : muons which are (re)accelerated from the muons which are almost in a rest. Momentum is tunable, and its distribution are very small. The range in the material is tunable down to sub  m. Small emittance enable us to make small aperture beam.  New application of  SR for thin film, surface/interfaces and nano- materials, which are scientifically interesting as well as commercially important.  Possible application towards future muon/neutrino source.

Two methods to generate slow muon beam Cryogenic moderator method Successful PSI application. Use a layer of solid rare gas as a moderator. Initial energy is eV, and its spread is around 10eV. Time structure is determined by initial beam. Laser resonant ionization method Developed at KEK. Obtain slow muons by ionizing thermal muoniums emitted from a hot tungsten film. Initial energy is around 0.2eV, and its spread is less than 1eV. Time structure is determined by laser timing.  Gives better time resolution for pulsed beam.  Suitable for high intensity beam.

Purpose of the experiment Pros Very low emittance. Target can cope with high intensity. Cons Low efficiency. muon  muonium conversion: a few %. muonium ionization : a few %? (We need high power VUV light). Loss due to decay of slow muon. Needs stable laser operation for reliable beam. Purpose of the experiment: Demonstrate slow muon generation by laser resonant ionization. Obtain stable and high power VUV light. Study feasibility for application of slow muon beam.

The RIKEN-RAL Muon Facility

The world most intense pulsed surface and decay muon source. Surface muon: muons are generated at the surface of the intermediate target following decay of pions (       ). The beam has fixed momentum (30MeV/c) Decay muon: muons are generated from in-flight decay of pions in a superconducting solenoid. Maximum momentum is 120MeV/c. Repetition rate is 50Hz, each extraction has two pulses with 340ns separation. Momentum acceptance about 2% (standard deviation). Surface muon flux 1x10 6 muon/sec, beam size about 3cm in diameter.

How to ionize muonium? Similar scheme with LIS (example: COMPLIS at ISOLDE) but needs much higher ionization energy. Use two-photon ionization of muonium with 122nm and 355nm light. 1S-2P transition is most intense one. Use sum-difference frequency mixing method to generate 122nm light.

Diagram of the laser system Good overlapping of 212nm laser and 820nm laser for frequency mixing in Kr gas is necessary. Good overlapping of VUV light and 355nm laser for ionizing muonium is required. (The lifetime of 2P state is only 1.6nsec.)  All lasers must be synchronized within 1nsec accuracy.  All-solid laser system using OPOs and Nd:YAG lasers.

Schematic view of the slow muon beam line

Slow muon beam line

Lasers in the cabin Mirage800 laser system which generate single-mode 850nm light from frequency-doubled YAG laser (532nm) Amplifier stage and BBO crystals which quadruple frequency of laser

The first observation of slow muons at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility A clear peak on TOF spectrum corresponding to calculated TOF for slow muon at accelerating voltage of 7.5kV. (Lasers are irradiated at t=120ns.) Measured magnetic field of the bending magnet corresponds to the correct muon mass. Count rate was 0.03  /sec.

Optimum laser delay relative to the muon beam Thermal muonium energy ~ 0.17eV  velocity 1.7cm/  sec. Distance between the tungsten film and the extraction lens is ~1cm. Laser light pass between the film and the lens.  Reasonable traveling time of muonium atoms from the surface of film to ionization region.

Tunable laser wavelength dependence The yield of slow muon peaked when we tune VUV frequency to the 1S-2P transition of muonium atom.

Problems The observed yield, 0.03  /sec, is lower than our estimation. Possible reasons are…? Smaller intensity of lasers…? NO gas ionization chamber to monitor VUV light’s power gives about one fifth of the signal we obtained in Japan in commissioning period. Measured profile of VUV light is much wider than our design. We may have some misalignment of lenses in our VUV beam path. Surface muon beam intensity…? Collimators with small aperture were in the beam line… loss of beam. Later (re)calculation showed our target was probably too thick so that many surface muons stopped in the middle and didn’t come to the surface of the target.

Towards high intensity VUV light Requirement for VUV intensity. VUV light with energy of 20  J/pulse will be able to excite a quarter of electron in 1S state to 2P state. Then slow muon generation efficiency will be 2.5x How to achieve it? Increase laser power. “phase-matching” in Kr gas with Ar gas. Farris et al. obtained 7  J/pulse at frequencies near 1S-2P transition using sum-difference mixing method with phase-matched Kr gas. (J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, Vol. 17 No. 11, p.1856(2000)) Marangos et al. reported generation of 11  J/pulse of Lyman-  light. (J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. Vol. 7, No.7 p.1254(1990))

VUV power vs. laser power VUV power ~ E R 0.75, not E R 2 as expected. VUV power is saturated with E T, while it supposed to show linear dependence. R = nm T = nm

VUV generation (Kr/Ar mixing) We can enhance VUV generation efficiency in Kr gas by adding Ar gas. This is called ‘phase matching’. The mixing ratio has a sharp peak. The optimum ratio depends on the wavelength of generated light. Kr base pressure 80hPa Optimum Kr:Ar ratio 1:4.2

VUV generation (Kr/Ar mixing) Farris et al. and Marangos et al. reported an enhancement of VUV generation of a factor of Under our conditions, the enhancement is about a factor of 5, though. We suspect impurity in Kr (and/or Ar) gas and two photon re-absorption process in Kr as the reasons of strong saturation.

Yield estimation of slow muons (with 20  J VUV light) Intensity of muons at Port 3 : 5x10 5  /sec (at 50Hz) Muon to muonium conversion: 2% laser repetition rate: 25Hz Number of muoniums emitted from the target : 5x10 3  /sec. Ionization + transportation efficiency 20% Number of slow muons: 1000 slow  /sec. (With very small emittance so that we can focus beam to at least 1mm diameter after acceleration to 10keV. Further focusing depends on how small we can make ionization region.)  New field of applications of  SR for thin film, surface/interfaces and nano-materials will be open (with advantage of pulsed muon source).

Possible application for a muon collider?!? High intensity of beam will deposit large heat on the target.  the target can cope with it. Very large momentum dispersion of initial muon beam.  multi-layers of tungsten films and multi-beam of lasers. Long time stability of laser operation and high power VUV light are needed.   Need to wait developments of new non-linear optical devices. Initial muon beam time structure.   Need development of high-repetition laser system? (depends on accelerator design). Muon loss due to conversion efficiency of muonium and decay of (slow) muons before enough acceleration.  Unavoidable…But better quality will compensate loss, especially for muon collider??

Summery We have successfully generated slow muon beam with laser resonance ionization method at the RIKEN-RAL muon facility. The yield was smaller than expected.  Several improvements for more efficient VUV generation are under way to increase ionization efficiency of muonium.  Measurement of beam profile and emittance is planned, but detectors are not implemented yet. With available laser technology, we can generate powerful slow muon beam for study of material sciences. There is a possibility for application to neutrino/muon factory, but its feasibility largely depends on improvements of laser system.

What is phase matching? P=  0 (  (1) E+  (2) E 2 +  (3) E 3 +…) P: polarization (dipole moment per unit volume)  (1) : linear susceptibility  (2) : second order nonlinear susceptibility  (3) : third order nonlinear susceptibility Phase-matching condition: phase velocity of generated light equals to that of induced nonlinear polarization.  efficient nonlinear process