BL5 EPU coupling Strong skew gradient varies with gap (not much variation with row phase). 570 30 mm gap Implemented permanent magnet correctors on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transparent Re-alignment of the Diamond Storage Ring M. Apollonio – Diamond Light Source Ltd ESLS – XXII Workshop, ESRF Grenoble, November 25 th /11/2014M.
Advertisements

XXII ESLS, Grenoble Basic approach to managing transverse coupling in Elettra: strategy and simulations S. Di Mitri S.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam dynamics in insertion devices m Closed orbit perturbation m Linear.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
SPEAR3 Chicane, Accelerator Physics Update, February 10, 2005 Electron optics design review August 11, 2004 –“… no show stoppers. However, …” Additional.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Optimization of dynamic aperture for the ESRF upgrade Andrea Franchi on behalf of the ASD Beam Dynamics Group Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Extending FETS with a Ring Electron models are not sufficient for simulating the beam.
E. Karantzoulis - BESSY, June Elettra2.0-The next generation Emanuel Karantzoulis Circumference m 12 fold symmetry Energy 2 (& 2.4 GeV.
:00: Prepared new fill B1: Q X =0.293, Q Y =0.269; lifetime = 25h ✔ B2: Q X =0.297, Q Y =0.267; lifetime = 5h ✗ Strong 50Hz and 100hz lines.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Adiabatic eRHIC Extraction June 3, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC meeting1 With emittance growth analysis.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
1 Dynamic aperture of non-scaling FFAG with sextupole Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 21 July, ffag/machida_ ppt.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
SCU1 Vertical Test Results Matt Kasa 9/16/2014. Vertical Cryostat Assembly Coil Training Record the current decay and the terminal voltage across the.
A users viewpoint: absorption spectroscopy at a synchrotron Frithjof Nolting.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Insertion Devices: Wigglers and Undulators Session 6 Insertion Devices Group 11/1/12.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Study and Optimization of Dynamic Aperture for the SuperKEKB LER E.Levichev and P.Piminov, BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
Frequency map analysis workshop - Orsay 1 - 2/04/04Mahdia Belgroune 1 Role of the frequency map analysis in the choice of the working point of SOLEIL M.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
LCWS, UTA, Reaching ultra-low emittance at SLS through (systematic and) random optimization LCWS 2012 Joint CLIC/ILC Working Group – Damping.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Machine Operation and Studies at SSRF Wenzhi ZHANG Dec. 16, 2013 Spain.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
Status of RHIC Polarization Studies. Summary of Polarization Studies during Run09 Tune scans: – Nearby 0.7 – Near integer tune Polarization ramp measurement.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Polarized Proton Acceleration in the AGS with Two Helical Partial Snakes October 2, 2006 SPIN 2006 H. Huang, L.A. Ahrens, M. Bai, A. Bravar, K. Brown,
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Diamond Light Source Status and Future Challanges
Jim Crittenden CHESS Simulation Working Group 30 March 2015
Sextupole calibrations via measurements of off-energy orbit response matrix and high order dispersion Nicola Carmignani.
Status of the ASTRID2 facility
Andrea Franchi (ESRF, Grenoble)
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
DAFNE experience with compensating wires
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design The DESY Experience
Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
Nonlinear Field Quality Checks
The new 7BA design of BAPS
Startup program, 1 Machine setup (i.e. R:\Controls\matlab\acceleratorcontrol\docs\SRSetupUsingMatlab_ALS.doc) Bergoz BPM/orbit checks: monbpms, correct.
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Undulator Line Design Liz Moog, Advanced Photon Source April 24, 2002
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Linear beam dynamics simulations for XFEL beam distribution system
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Presentation transcript:

BL5 EPU coupling Strong skew gradient varies with gap (not much variation with row phase) mm gap Implemented permanent magnet correctors on each end of device (R. Carr). –Good correction at 30 mm gap –Overcorrection at larger gaps Despite poor coupling correction, lifetime decreases by 15% at gaps ~45 mm. –Beam-based measurements indicate only weak nonlinear fields –Cause of lifetime reduction remains a mystery Design of electromagnet skew quad corrector in progress (R. Carr).

BL5 EPU ops., June Strong coupling; varies with gap and a bit with row phase. Lifetime varies with gap changes Lifetime varies with row phase change EPU mode

EPU coupling correction schemes

Permanent magnet skew corrector EPU error corrector EPU integrated skew gradient vs. gap Four bar magnets at each end of EPU Over-corrects at intermediate gaps.

PM skew quad end correctors At 30 mm gap, skew corrector generates required correction plus -5.8 G/cm 2 skew octupole (compare to 40 G/cm 2 specification for BL12 undulator). At 50 mm gap, skew gradient = 375 Gauss, skew octupole = G/cm 2 {At 40 mm gap, skew gradient = 235 Gauss, skew octupole = -5.3 G/cm 2 } a3a3 a3a3

EPU skew quad end correctors

4.2 A*hr 3.6 A*hr Lifetime vs. EPU gap after PM skew corrector installed, lifetime reduction at intermediate gaps, despite larger coupling at these gaps!?

Lifetime reduction independent of row phase

LOCO analysis of coupling vs. gap with skew corrector installed: confirms coupling larger at 45 mm, despite lower lifetime:

Lifetime reduction at 45 mm gap with 100 mA in 31 consecutive bunches 30 mm 45 mm 210 mm

Dynamic aperture and beam-based nonlinear dynamics measurements indicate lifetime reduction for EPU at 45 mm not associated with nonlinear fields. (Analysis not yet fully completed.)

Electromagnet skew corrector Kapton tape, total thickness 150  m, *2 layers (above and below the beampipe) increase gap 0.3 mm. 576 Gauss integrated correction Design in progress.

Fit skew gradients from LOCO measurements

EPU coupling Jeff Corbett, 7/14/04: With the EPU out, closest tune approach is ~400Hz. If we set skew quads to zero closed tune approach is ~2kHz. With the EPU at 30 mm closest tune approach is ~10kHz. Analyzing response matrices from 6/29/04: –Integrated skew gradient from EPU at 30 mm is 570 Gauss. 20% stronger than strongest skew corrector 11 times stronger than BL4&7 skew gradient spec. Row phases for this measurement were for vertical polarization (horizontal field)

A.P., June 28, 2004

A.P., June 29, 2004

A.P., July 13, 2004

A.P., July 14, 2004

EPU mode during 2004 run: 23:00 16 June, 4 hours, A.P. 06:00 24 June, 40 hours, ops. 29 June, A.P. 14 July, A.P.