Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics Presenter: Chun-Yi Lee Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Nunokawa, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H A N K Y O U !. Charlie Robinson Charlie
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Department of Mathematics and Science
Jason Powell The University of North Texas.  Traditional instruction separates knowing from doing.  Knowledge is abstract and decontextualized.  Activity.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
Mathematics Reform The Implications of Problem Solving in Middle School Mathematics.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Thinking: A Key Process for effective learning “The best thing we can do, from the point of view of the brain and learning, is to teach our learners how.
Paper Gliders. Science and Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions (science) and defining problems (engineering). 2. Developing and using models. 3.
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
HISTORICAL ROOTS OF REFLECTIVE TEACHING – Chapter 2 John Dewey Wholeheartedness Openmindedness Responsibility Donald Schon Reflection-in-action Reflection-on-action.
Why Science Fair?. Promoting Positive Attitudes Towards Science Heightening student interest in science and allow for the exploration of personal interest.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Dr. Laura McLaughlin Taddei
The 5 E Instructional Model
Manipulatives – Making Math Fun Dr. Laura Taddei.
Chapter 3: Instructional Approaches for the Young Learner
Critical Characteristics of Situated Learning: Implications for the Instructional Design of Multimedia Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1995). Critical Characteristics.
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Learning and Teaching Technology Integration Dr. Brush Research Group
Applying creativity in CS high school education - criteria, teaching example and evaluation Romeike, R. (2007). Applying creativity in CS high school education.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Brandon Graham Putting The Practices Into Action March 20th.
P28.  Educator provides the learners with content.  It is a educator approach  Examples : lectures and demonstrations  Educators must keep the following.
Alpha II Learning Systems Failure Is Not An Option.
This presentation reviews the procedures for implementing Japanese style lesson study. The underlying aim is to help you to become a reflective practitioner.
K–12 Session 4.2 Standards for Mathematical Practices Part 2: Student Dispositions & Teacher Actions Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards.
1 Speaking, Reading, and Writing Science and Mathematics Potential Research Issues Steve Lerman, David Pimm, Jim Shymansky, Larry Yore.
Content Area Reading, 11e Vacca, Vacca, Mraz © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 0 Content Area Reading Literacy and Learning Across the.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
An exploration of students’ problem solving behaviors Presenter: Chun-Yi Lee Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Muir, T., Beswick, K., & Williamson, J. (2008). I am.
The ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS  S) and Performance Indicators for Students.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
Ch. 3 StudyCast SarahBeth Walker. NETS-T Standard 1  Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
Cognitive Science Overview Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory.
Next Generation Science Standards Advancing Inquiry-based Teaching & Learning through Action Research.
Welcome Science 5 and Science 6 Implementation Workshop.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
Critical Thinking By: Nakendra Jones Tyrone Salmon-Jarrett Nikia Johnson Peta-ann Rowe Tiffany Brown.
Measuring Beliefs about Mathematical Problem Solving Presenter: Chun-Yi Lee Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Kloosterman, P. & Stage, F. K. (1992). Measuring beliefs.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Chiraz Ouerfelli Higher Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities Tunis Situating Strategy Use: The Interplay of Language Learning Strategies and Individual.
Charlie Robinson Charlie
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
INQUIRY BASED TEACHING. What do you understand by the term ‘Inquiry’?
Are you looking in the mirror or out the window? Pausing Pausing Paraphrasing Paraphrasing Probing for specificity Probing for specificity Putting ideas.
Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities Adviser: Ming-Puu Chen Presenter:
Engaging junior college students in computer-mediated lessons using scaffolding strategies 指導教授: Chen, Ming-Puu 報 告 者: Juan, Hui-Lan 報告時間: Lim,
1 A Retrospective Account of the Past 25 Years of Research on Teaching Mathematical Problem Solving Kilpatrick, J. (1985). A retrospective account of the.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Plenary 1. What’s important about the Math we Teach? A Focus on Big Ideas Marian Small
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
Assessment in Numeracy Staff Meeting # “Independent learners have the ability to seek out and gain new skills, new knowledge and new understandings.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
Improving Literacy and Numeracy Outcomes Geoff N Masters.
Helping Students Learn
Lesson 3: The Roles of Technology
Software Name (Function Type)
Understanding by Design
Creating an Active Learning environment
Scaffolding.
UDL Guidelines.
Presentation transcript:

Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics Presenter: Chun-Yi Lee Advisor: Ming-Puu Chen Nunokawa, K. (2005). Mathematical problem solving and learning mathematics: what we expect students to obtain. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24,

What do we expect students to obtain from problem solving experiences? Type A: emphasizing the application of mathematical knowledge students have Type B: emphasizing understanding of the problem situation Type C: emphasizing new mathematical methods or ideas for making sense of the situation Type D: emphasizing management of solving processes themselves

Emphasizing the application of mathematical knowledge students have What we expect our students to obtain is an experience and/or knowledge of how and when to apply mathematical knowledge they have. Teaching for problem solving

Emphasizing the application of mathematical knowledge students have Support 1: enhancing students’ schemata –the students learn these schemata by induction through solving many problems that are related to the targeted mathematical knowledge. In order to support such students’ induction, one thing we can do is to deliberately select the problem situations they encounter. Support 2: operating situations presented to students –operating problem situations so that they can elicit students’ mathematical knowledge more easily.

Emphasizing understanding of the problem situation What we expect our students to obtain is the deepened understanding of the situation and/or the notion that new information about the situation can be induced by their mathematical knowledge. Teaching in problem solving

Emphasizing understanding of the problem situation Support 1: selecting and presenting a situation so that students want to get information about it –contradiction, uncertainty, and surprise. Support 2: providing an empirical way of validating mathematical methods –there are students who are not sure whether the mathematical method used to generate new information is reliable or not. In such cases, we need to show that the used mathematical method is reliable and the information obtained through it really deepens their understanding of the situation. –prediction Other supports: providing tools and calling attention to an appropriate interpretation –it can be a possible support to provide students with tools which help them implement their mathematical methods and obtain more information about the situation, like graphic calculators (Osawa, 1996) or computers. –In using realistic situations, it is also an important support to direct students’ attention to an appropriate interpretation of a mathematical result (Silver & Shapiro, 1992).

Emphasizing new mathematical methods or ideas for making sense of the situation What we expect our students to obtain through problem solving is a mathematical content and how that new content is related to the mathematical knowledge they already have. Teaching via problem solving

Emphasizing new mathematical methods or ideas for making sense of the situation Support 1: selecting a situation that can bridge old and new knowledge –we should select appropriate situations that can bridge between the novel ideas or methods and the mathematical knowledge students have. Support 2: promoting a shift toward mathematical knowledge –encourage students to reflect on their own activities (De Corte et al., 1996), to shift their attentions (Streefland, 1993), and to elicit mathematical knowledge from students’ results and formulate it. –Introducing notations (Streefland, 1988) or a shared vocabulary (Brown et al., 1989) may be helpful for such a support. Support 3: bringing in appropriate values in the classroom –we need to select the situations where students can find out the necessity or the merit of new mathematical knowledge and the limit of the mathematical knowledge they already have for dealing with those situations. (Necessity, merit, limit)

Emphasizing management of solving processes themselves What we expect our students to obtain is the wisdom concerning how to treat problematic situations, manage their solving processes, and put forward their thinking. Teaching about problem solving.

Emphasizing management of solving processes themselves Support 1: providing each component of problem solving activities –One is the explicit instruction of each component of the mathematical disposition (heuristic strategies). –Another is involving students in authentic mathematical problem solving, where we direct their attention to desirable behaviors at an appropriate time and/or scaffold their solving activities. Support 2: scaffolding students’ activities in actual problem solving –metacognitive behaviors and appropriate beliefs have been instructed in the situated-learning manner. –heuristics and asking questions

Critical role of selection of situations In the Type A approach, we expect our students to enrich their schemata of the targeted mathematical knowledge. –problem situations should be selected so that they can experience enough various kinds of situations. –Everyday or realistic situations should be selected if a mathematically educated person usually applies the targeted knowledge to those kinds of situations.

Critical role of selection of situations In the Type B approach, we should select problem situations where students come to want new information about it and/or which can lead to new information that is interesting to them. –Problem situations should produce interesting or unexpected results that cannot be easily found without the use of their mathematical knowledge. –problem situations should include wondrous phenomena whose mechanism can be uncovered using students’ mathematical knowledge.

Critical role of selection of situations In the Type C approach, we should select problem situations that are apt to elicit informal or na¨ıve approaches from students—some of which can be formulated into the targeted mathematical knowledge. –Problems situations should show the necessity and merit of the targeted new knowledge. –The support to be provided may depend upon the cultures of our mathematics classrooms.

Critical role of selection of situations In the Type D approach, the authenticity lies in the experiences of thinking in mathematically valued ways. –We should select a problem situation that students can explore and operate upon in various ways that reflect important heuristics. –While scaffolding or coaching (Brown et al., 1989) their thinking, teachers need to design our support so that students can appreciate the power of the adopted ways of thinking or the metacognitive actions in achieving gradual understanding (e.g., students can find new and important information by themselves in investigating the situation in those ways)