OPM and CAR Once special causes are removed from the execution of your chosen process in a project it is now possible to address common causes of variation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Project Management IPM (Without IPPD) Intermediate Concepts of CMMI Project meets the organization Author: Kiril Karaatanasov
Advertisements

Prescriptive Process models
Page 1 Capability Business Benefit Business Risk KEYBA Capabilities: Benefits V Risks Facilitation of Decision making Getting the right people together.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Buying Better Outcomes Workshop 4 Equalities and Contract Management If you do not take it seriously, why should the supplier?
Data Collection Six Sigma Foundations Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Foundations Continuous Improvement Training Six Sigma Simplicity.
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
Copyright 2005 CMMI and ITIL Alison Adams & Kieran Doyle.
© Copyright Richard W. Selby and Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved. 0 Process Synchronization and Stabilization February 2007 Rick.
Name of Student Name of Instructor Date Submitted:
QMS, ISO and Six Sigma It’s all related….. QMS Any Quality Management System must satisfy four requirements: Processes must be defined and their procedures.
6  Methodology: DMAIC Robert Setaputra. PDCA / PDSA PDCA / PDSA is a continuous quality improvement tool. PDCA is introduced by Shewhart. PDSA is Deming’s.
SIX SIGMA. What is six sigma? Sigma is a measure of “goodness: the capability of a process to produce perfect work. A “defect” is any mistake that results.
Product Lifecycle Management Cost of Quality Pasi Kaipainen, Mika Huhta.
Six Sigma By: Tim Bauman April 2, Overview What is Six Sigma? Key Concepts Methodologies Roles Examples of Six Sigma Benefits Criticisms.
Using Six Sigma to Achieve CMMI Levels 4 and 5
1 Lecture 6 Identifying Dimensions of SC Performance Evaluating Operating Initiatives pp & Discussion of your group project!
TTMG 5103 Module Techniques and Tools for problem diagnosis and improvement prior to commercialization Shiva Biradar TIM Program, Carleton University.
1 The Continuous Representation. 2 UNIT 2 Topics covered in this unit include Additional terminology Practices – The fundamental building blocks Process.
Copyright © 2009, Systems and Software Consortium, Inc. Introduction to an Integrated Lean Thinking, Six Sigma  and CMMI  Approach for Process Improvement.
8. CMMI Standards and Certifications
Integrated Capability Maturity Model (CMMI)
CMMI Technology Conference and User Group November 2003 Experiences with Leveraging Six Sigma to Implement CMMI Levels 4 and 5 Jeff Facemire & Hortensia.
Slide 1 D2.TCS.CL5.04. Subject Elements This unit comprises five Elements: 1.Define the need for tourism product research 2.Develop the research to be.
1 The Continuous Representation. 2 UNIT 2 Topics covered in this unit include Additional terminology Practices – The fundamental building blocks Process.
11 Explanation to Participants about this template and final presentation This template is meant as a Six Sigma / Re engineering Submission Template This.
7 th Continual Improvement & Innovation Symposium 2015 CASE STUDY COMPETITION: INNOVATION TEMPLATE [ Name of the Organization ] [ Innovation Title ]
Software Engineering Lecture # 17
NDIA Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 2003 Using Six Sigma to Improve Systems Engineering Rick Hefner, Ph.D.
ASQ Raleigh ASQ Raleigh Section 1113 Six Sigma SIG DMAIC Series.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Service Transition & Planning Service Validation & Testing
Evidence-based policies and indicator systems 2006 Conducting effective research and analysis to support policy delivery. The Green Book: Appraisal and.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
Copyright © Six Sigma Academy International LLC All Rights Reserved Introduction To Measure.
Performance Assurance 21 st May Value Chain. Value Chain Xoserve would like to propose an approach to further aid the development of the Performance Assurance.
Market Research & Product Management.
COPYRIGHT 2010 GENERAL DYNAMICS ADVANCED INFORMATION SYSTEMS Published and used by TwinSPIN with permission CMMI Level 5 Journey (A.K.A. Things I Wish.
SMU SE – LMMFC Collaboration Project Task 1 Approach and Process Systems Engineering Program Engineering Management, Information and Systems Department.
Purpose: The purpose of CMM Integration is to provide guidance for improving your organization’s processes and your ability to manage the development,
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
 CMMI  REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT  SPECIFIC AND GENERIC GOALS  SG1: Develop CUSTOMER Requirement  SG2: Develop Product Requirement  SG3: Analyze.
CMMI1 Capability Maturity Model Integration Eyal Ben-Ari 8/2006.
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
ITIL ♥ PM ITIL and Project Management: Friends Throughout the Lifecycle.
Copyright © 2004 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. All rights reserved.Developed by Cool Pictures and MultiMedia PresentationsCopyright.
Figures – Chapter 26. Figure 26.1 Factors affecting software product quality.
Valorisation: getting added value from projects Elli Georgiadou Middlesex University School of Science and Technology.
Rob Connatser NSS Instrument Work Packages and XLPM.
Human Resource Management 1 Performance Management Process.
1 Managing Risk in Software Process Improvement: Software Process Improvement: An Action Research Approach Jakob H. Ivesen, Lars Mathiassen, and Peter.
CMMI for Services, Version 1.3 Speaker: Business Excellence Date:
Product Lifecycle Management
IT Service Transition – purpose and processes
A Strategy for Achieving World Class Perfor-mance
Six Sigma.
Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category
Six-Sigma : DMAIC Cycle & Application
Project Portfolio Management
Level - 3 Process Areas (CMMI-DEV)
OPS/571 Operations Management
MARKET RESEARCH.
Explanation to Participants about this template and final presentation
SMART Objectives Are in addition to day-to-day accountabilities
DMAIC Roadmap DMAIC methodology is central to Six Sigma process improvement projects. Each phase provides a problem solving process where-by specific tools.
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
QMS, ISO and Six Sigma It’s all related…..
Presentation transcript:

OPM and CAR Once special causes are removed from the execution of your chosen process in a project it is now possible to address common causes of variation. If the performance of the process is not good enough to meet business objectives even though absence of special causes of variation mean it is stable then we should concentrate on addressing common causes of variation in order to optimise it….improve it to meet the business objectives. OPM sets the objectives and then sees if the company can use the process to meet the objectives.

ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS MANAGEMENT (ML5) The purpose of Organizational Performance Management (OPM) is to proactively manage the organization’s performance to meet its business objectives.

SG 1 The organization’s business performance is managed using statistical and other quantitative techniques to understand process performance shortfalls and identify areas for process improvement. SP 1.1 Maintain business objectives based on an understanding of business strategies and actual performance results. SP 1.2 Analyze process performance data to determine the organization’s ability to meet identified business objectives. SP 1.3 Identify potential areas for improvement that could contribute to meeting business objectives. If you are a baker you might have as one of your business objectives to offer the most luxurious and high quality products on the market. If after prioritising all your business objectives this is still high on the list then you must ensure that it is a realistic objective. Use performance baselines to balance desires with reality. You may need to introduce further measures so that you can best understand the ability of your baking process This is about understanding the VOP which is only visible after it is stable Identify shortfalls in performance…what are the risks in the shortfall? Understand the VOC….what the customer wants Identify where you think improvements could be made and identify initial costs for making improvements i.e aligning VOP with VOC. VOP VOC

SG 2 Improvements are proactively identified, evaluated using statistical and other quantitative techniques, and selected for deployment based on their contribution to meeting quality and process performance objectives. SP 2.1 Elicit and categorize suggested improvements. SP 2.2 Analyze suggested improvements for their possible impact on achieving the organization’s quality and process performance objectives. SP 2.3 Validate selected improvements. SP 2.4 Select and implement improvements for deployment throughout the organization based on an evaluation of costs, benefits and other factors. These SPs utilise the results of CAR…it uses the improvements that CAR has provided Elicit from all stakeholders ideas for improvement Select the improvements you want to make Analyse costs and benefits of the various improvements and any risks…then select a number of potential improvements for validation CAR is now used to provide the improvements OPM then proceeds to validate improvements maybe using pilot studies, modeling or simulation…create a trial implementation Prioritise improvements for deployment…select and determine how to deploy

SG 3 Measurable improvements to the organization’s processes and technologies are deployed and evaluated using statistical and other quantitative techniques. SP 3.1 Establish and maintain plans for deploying selected improvements. SP 3.2 Manage the deployment of selected improvements. SP 3.3 Evaluate the effects of deployed improvements on quality and process performance using statistical and other quantitative techniques. OPM now carries out the deployment of the selected improvements and evaluate the effects on performance

CAUSAL ANALYSIS AND RESOLUTION SUPPORT (ML5) The purpose of Causal Analysis and Resolution (CAR) is to identify causes of selected outcomes and take action to improve process performance. SG 1 Root causes of selected outcomes are systematically determined. SP 1.1 Select outcomes for analysis. SP 1.2 Perform causal analysis of selected outcomes and propose actions to address them. SG 2 Root causes of selected outcomes are systematically addressed. SP 2.1 Implement selected action proposals developed in causal analysis. SP 2.2 Evaluate the effect of implemented actions on process performance. SP 2.3 Record causal analysis and resolution data for use across projects and the organization Here CAR is simply discovering the underlying causes of the problems and coming up with solutions. Six sigma is an implementation of CAR.

Even though the baking process is stable… the VOC demands this quality of cake but unfortunately the baking process is delivering this quality of cake NB: The baking process is stable because QPM and OPP have removed special causes of variation

Even though this is stable it may still fall short of that expected by the VOC

We need to exercise both OPM and CAR so that we can move from this To a new band of performance Simply reducing the common causes of variation will improve the precision (VOP) but this might not meet the VOC. We need to improve our accuracy (VOP) so that on average we are producing cakes to the standard of the VOC. This may or may not be possible depending on our current circumstances.