Generation Constraints and Considerations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spinning Reserve from Load Consideration of a Trial at Xcel Energys Cabin Creek Station Presentation to CMOPS January 7, 2005 John Kueck ORNL Brendan Kirby.
Advertisements

1 ACE Diversity Interchange. 2 ADI Pilot Project Founded on Negotiation Theory: A transaction should occur if the parties involved are either held harmless.
Dynamic Transfers Bob WECC MIC Meeting “The Last Hurrah!”
Energy. oil and natural gas  supply 62% all energy consumed worldwide  how to transition to new sources?  use until mc of further use exceeds mc of.
Elasticity: Concept & Applications For Demand & Supply.
January 9, 2013 BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC.
Impact of Variability on Control Performance Metrics James D. McCalley Harpole Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Iowa State University 1.
1 Utility Wind Integration Group Workshop ACE Diversity Interchange (ADI) Project Sharing Area Control Errors July 2007 Sponsoring Utilities: British Columbia.
Western Regulation Usage and Pilot Program Results 1.
1 Low Load Process Jarreau Cycle Objectives l Review applicable NERC Standards that apply l Review CDP 2.6 Low Load Condition Procedure l Describe.
Low Load Process David L. Plant March Objectives Describe the three stages of the Low Load Process and their time requirements Describe the three.
Control Performance Frequency Analysis Control Standards Surveys Inadvertent Interchange Time Error Frequency Bias Settings Control Area Assistance Automatic.
FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING BLACK START OPERATIONS
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6, also Chapter 2.4 (Network Equations). HW 5 is 2.38, 6.9, 6.18, 6.30, 6.34, 6.38; do by October 6 but does not need.
Active Power and Frequency Control
System Operator Conference NERC Standards Review for: Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS.
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
MNG221- Management Science –
System Operator Conference Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS Facilitator Team.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Supervisory Systems.
Chapter 13 We have seen how labor market equilibrium determines the quantity of labor employed, given a fixed amount of capital, other factors of production.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Determining Sample Size
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
PHY 202 (Blum)1 Analog-to-Digital Converter and Multi-vibrators.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
PHY 202 (Blum)1 Analog-to-Digital Converter and Multi-vibrators.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
FREQUENCY CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
Management and Organisation of Electricity Use Electrical System Optimisation Belgrade November 2003.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
ERCOT Planning WMS 10/20/2010 Target Reserve Margin and Effective Load Carrying Capability of Installed Wind Capacity for the ERCOT System – Methodology.
Montana Energy Summit April 22, 2008 Ancillary Service – Regulating Reserves.
Date 05/01/2012 MIT Manual TEC Analysis Sandip Sharma ERCOT.
ERCOT Wind Survey Leo Villanueva. Abilene Mc Camey Big Spring.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 15: Power Flow Sensitivities, Economic Dispatch Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
Outstanding Issues & Action Items 1.Obligations to Honor Ancillary Services Commitments 2.Variable ERCOT Bias 3.Sign reversals of the Regulation Signal.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
May 11, 2012 RPG meeting YTP Scope and Process – RPG Comments.
1 Presentation MIT November 14, 2011 Metering Issues Taskforce (MIT) Elimination of Time Error Correction Potential Impact on Wholesale Settlements.
-- Bhanu Bhushan -- < > (August, 2011)
1. Non-Dispatchable Resources and EIS Market Carrie Simpson May 30,
Inventory Management The goal of effective inventory management is to “meet or exceed your customers’ expectations of product availability with the amount.
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy.
ERCOT Wind Survey Leo Villanueva. Abilene McCamey Big Spring.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Generation: Control & Economic Dispatch 2016 System Operator Seminar.
Restoration Concepts PEAK RC Training Classification: Confidential Version No.: 1.5 Date of Document: Document Owner/Author: B Pederson Classification:
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
NERC BAL-005, BAL-006, FAC-001 Gary Nolan WECC ISAS April 20, 2016.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
7. FREQUENCY CONTROL AND REGULATING RESERVES
Abilene Mc Camey Big Spring. Far West Abilene Area All the values are based on returned ERCOT survey results Total number of Wind Powered Generation.
SEMINAR ON ISLANDING BY PAWAN. What is islanding? Normally all Power generators are interconnected to form a network called ‘GRID’. Some times it so happens.
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
Energy and Ancillary Services Design Stream Working Group Meeting 6
Economic Operation of Power Systems
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Automatic Generation Control (AGC)
Sizing Methodologies • Sizing Calculations
Presentation transcript:

Generation Constraints and Considerations Phillip Jarreau Cycle 5 2010

Objectives—Generation Constraints Explain generation control and the impact performance has on the power system Identify the difference between normal, permissive, and emergency regulating states Describe typical problems that affect generators and actions that the system operator can take in response to these problems Describe factors other than economic that determine the way generating units are dispatched

References General Physics NERC CBT NERC website NERC.COM http://www.nerc.com/ SPP System Operator Training Program Modules Current Day Procedures

Generation Constraints & Considerations Goals of AGC: Maintain frequency at its nominal value. Maintain compensated net interchange at the scheduled value. Allocate generation economically among available units. Not, allocating generators equally The AGC mode required by NERC Tie line bias control

Generation Constraints & Considerations Area Control Error (ACE) represents the mismatch between generation and load within a control area. ACE should be maintained as close to zero as possible at all times. Control performance is the expression used to describe how well the ACE is controlled. The NERC Control Performance Standard has criteria for continuous monitoring and for disturbance conditions. There are two Control Performance Standards for continuous monitoring: CPS1 and CPS2. Entergy has been operating under a NERC field trial program that uses BAAL in lieu of CPS2

Generation Control and Performance Standards CPS1—12 month rolling avg. Control Compliance Rating = Pass if CPS1 ≥ 100%. Each Balancing Authority shall operate such that, on a rolling 12-month basis, the average of the clock-minute averages of the Balancing Authority’s Area Control Error (ACE) divided by 10B (B is the clock-minute average of the Balancing Authority Area’s Frequency Bias) times the corresponding clock-minute averages of the Interconnection’s Frequency Error is less than a specific limit. The CPS1 equation can be simplified as follows: CPS1 (in percent) = 100* (2 – (a Constant 1)* (frequency error)*(ACE)) Frequency error is a deviation from scheduled frequency. Normally this is a deviation from 60Hz. Scheduled frequency is different during a time correction, but for the purposes of this discussion, assume scheduled frequency is always 60 Hz. Refer to the equation above. Any minute where the average frequency is exactly on schedule or Control Area ACE is zero, the quantity ((frequency error)*(ACE)) is zero. Therefore CPS1 = 100* (2-0). CPS1 is exactly 200% whenever frequency is on schedule or ACE is zero. For any one-minute average where ACE and frequency error are “out of phase”, CPS1 is greater than 200%. For example, if frequency is low, but ACE is positive (tending to correct frequency error), the Control Area gets extra CPS1 points.

GMS CPS1 screen shot of our current levels

Generation Control and Performance Standards Should the BAAL field trial be suspended or ended Entergy would have to comply with CPS2 CPS 2 is considered pass at 90 % CPS2 relates to a bound on the ten-minute average of ACE. CPS2 is measured for a monthly average CPS2 is a measure of ACE over all 10-minute periods in a month. Under CPS2, ACE is limited to a “regulating road” whose width is proportional to a Control Area’s size. The term used to describe the width of the road is L10 and for Entergy that number is currently 111.98.

Generation Control and Performance Standards So this means that L10 is a boundary around you ACE. CPS2 (percent) = 100 * (periods without violations)/(all periods in the month) Periods are 10minutes in length CPS2 must be 90% or greater for month or Control Area is in violation.

CPS2 Trend Example

GMS 10 Min Average

CPS2 Daily Impact 6 ten min periods per hour times 24 hours per day 6x24=144 144 x .9=129.6 144 -129.6= 14.4 More than 14 hits per day would negatively impact your monthly average

GMS CPS2 Daily Data

CPS2 Daily Data Date Selection

CPS 2 Analyzer

CPS 2 Analyzer (Cont)

Generation Constraints & Considerations The central concept of the NERC control performance standards is that when frequency is considered, a control area’s ACE can be either good or bad: Good ACE drives frequency up when frequency is low Bad ACE drives frequency down when frequency is low Good ACE drives frequency down when frequency is high Bad ACE drives frequency up when frequency is high Mathematically stated good ACE is ACE that has the opposite sign to ΔF and bad ACE is ACE that has the same sign as ΔF. ΔF is negative when frequency falls below 60 Hz and positive when frequency rises above 60 Hz.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Unit Control Modes: Automatic Automatic mode follow load fluctuations with the incrementally lowest cost generation. Regulating mode follow load fluctuations with available regulating generation, regardless of incremental cost. Economic Units in an economic control mode do not participate in regulation. Manual Units in manual control mode must be dispatched by the System Operator.

Goals of an AGC System Review from Generation Control Cycle Training A control area’s AGC system is used to maintain a constant 60 Hz frequency and scheduled interchange An additional duty of an AGC system is to assist in the economic utilization of the control area’s generating resources The AGC system, then, has two major functional areas associated with maintaining frequency and scheduled interchange: Regulation Function Economic Dispatch

Economic Dispatch Function Review from Generation Control Cycle Training The economic component is the movement needed to place the unit economically in the fleet. For instance, if the regulation error is +20 and the economic error is +10 then the unit would be asked to pick up +30 MWs. On the other hand, if the regulation error is + 20 and the economic error is -5 then the sum is +15 and will be pulsed to the unit. The economic dispatch function adjusts the generators’ outputs using the most economic mix of generation on line. Unlike the regulation function, the economic function of the AGC compares the relative costs of the unit and determines which units are the most economic to meet the current change in system load (Base Points). Economic dispatch is a “coarse” adjustment because of the economic runs CED (5 Mins)/AED (10 Mins), while load regulation is “fine tuning.” THE ECONOMIC DISPATCH FUNCTION The load regulation function is intended to be used only for minor changes in control area generation, while the economic dispatch function is responsible for large changes in system’s load, such as those required to meet the load increases from the morning to the peak load hour. When major changes in generation are required, the regulation function could, in theory, be used to adjust generation in the same manner as done for minor load changes. The problem is that the load regulation function does not make the large adjustments in the most economic manner possible. The economic dispatch function, on the other hand, adjusts the generators’ outputs using the most economic mix of generation on line. Unlike the regulation function, the economic function of the AGC compares the relative costs of the unit and determines which units are the most economic to meet the current change in system load. Once the economic dispatch function of an AGC system makes large adjustments in the MW output of the generators to satisfy load requirements, load regulation then makes small adjustments around the operating points chosen by economic dispatch. Economic dispatch is a “coarse” adjustment, while load regulation is “fine tuning.” The AGC system’s role in generation control is important, but it is not without limitations. AGC is used during normal daily operations. When large frequency excursions occur, those greater than 0.2 to 0.3 Hz, many utilities will disable the AGC system and turn power system control over to their system operators.

Regulation Function Review from Generation Control Cycle Training Involves adjustments to the MW output of control area generators to compensate for the constantly changing load magnitude, which could include steel mills, QF and/or EWG, as reflected in ACE An AGC system makes these generation adjustments every few seconds to compensate for normal, minor load changes Within a control area only a portion of the generators on line are assigned a role in load regulation. Large base-loaded generators, such as nuclear units, are not typically used for load regulation The regulation function adjusts the output of each generator on regulation control (AGC) by determining its participation within the regulating unit group (those on control), which is a ratio of each unit’s ramp rate to the total ramp of the fleet (Participation Factor)

Generation Constraints & Considerations Factors affecting AGC control performance: Poor unit response. Steady or sudden changes in system load or QF put. Sudden changes in interchange schedule Unit testing. Unit not responding and a “NT” on GMS Margin screen NT means Not Tracking and indicated that AGC not responding due to saturation or unit is not responding by system not seeing a “H” or “L” indication.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Regulating States indicates how much control action is being implemented by the AGC: Three main states: Normal (EES=Economic) If ACE is < +-75, then = 1 X ACE (gain factor) Permissive (EES=Assist) If ACE is > +- 75 and < +- 150, then = 2 x ACE (gain factor) Emergency (EES=Emergency) If ACE is > 150, then = 4 X ACE (gain factor) +150 +75 +75 -150

Generation Constraints & Considerations Regulating states (cont’) In the normal state, units assigned to the economic control mode are moved automatically for economics In the permissive state, only units which are moving in a direction to correct ACE are allowed to change their output In the emergency state, all the regulating units are sent to either their maximum or minimum regulating limit to correct the ACE, after the demand out-strips the Participation Factor demand Remember Gain Factor is the multiple for ACE calculation

Generation Constraints & Considerations Three AGC components that affect the amount of regulation supplied by a unit on AGC: Penalty factors Regulation participation Ramp rates GFOT X Regulation State 1 (Economic) examples: ACE 50 X 1 = 50 ACE 50 X .10 = 5 2 (Assist) ACE 100 X 2 = 200 ACE 100 X .10 = 10 4 (Emergency) ACE 200 X 4 = 800 ACE 200 X .10 = 20

Generation Constraints & Considerations Penalty factors are a way of economically accounting for transmission losses when dispatching generation State estimator is constantly calculating against the actual system configurations, lines in or out and load flow levels. You would monitor the penalty factor runs on the Generation Summary display Penalty factors affect regulation only when economics are included in regulation. If AGC simply dispatches units to regulate without regard for economics, penalty factors do not affect response.

Operating Constraints & Considerations A regulation participation factor is the amount of regulation assigned to a unit by the System Operator as a part of the total amount of a control area’s regulation. If a unit is assigned a RPF of .3, the unit is given 30% of the control area’s required regulation response to cover the ACE. Regulation participation factors share regulation among units assigned to automatic control. Regulation factors should sum to 1 or 100%. Higher participation factors will receive more regulating pulses from AGC.

Operating Constraints & Considerations The AGC program uses the ramp rate value as a factor in combination with the RPF when assigning regulation pulses. When the AGC ramp rate value closely matches the actual value at the unit, the AGC regulation function is optimized.

Operating Constraints & Considerations The current value of ACE and the ACE trend are two major indicators of a system’s control performance. System Operator must check the CPS1 and CPS2 control performance indicators in GMS to evaluate the performance of the units that were assigned to regulate during the previous hour. Significant number of violations may be due to a poor response by one or more of the regulating units. Evaluate the causes for poor response and take action accordingly. It may be necessary to take a unit off of regulation and place a different unit on regulation.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Checking the amount of inadvertent each hour allows the System Operator to determine how closely the system met its scheduled interchange. ACE has both an interchange and frequency component. Even if the control area is meeting its net scheduled interchange, the regulating units may be moved to help with frequency control. This results in good inadvertent since it contributes to relieving poor frequency control on the Interconnection.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Fuel Problems (coal): As coal sits in the elements, it gets wet and loses some of its ability to burn well. After a large amount of rain at a generating plant, wet coal from the pile causes problems in the boiler. Plugged feeders and pulverizers and uneven burning in the boiler make the generating unit less stable. Unit derates are common, and the unit is not capable of changing load quickly. Option: Schedule extra generation on-line to cover anticipated derates.

Generation Constraints & Considerations When a mill or pulverizer is plugged due to foreign matter getting inside, the system operator can expect what? The unit to trip offline The unit to be manually taken out of service A derate of 70 to 100 MW on the unit Constant MVA output with a decrease in the MW component but an increase in the MVAR component.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Fuel Problems (gas): Problems arise when a system contracts to use a certain amount of gas during a one- month period, and that amount is used before the month period is over. Options: Switch the gas-fired units to oil if they are capable of firing on both fuels. Seek reliable interchange power for the short term.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Fuel Oversupply: The condition of having too much fuel is usually the result of “take or pay” contracts which require that a certain amount of coal (or gas) be paid for whether the fuel is used or not. Options: The fuel cost for the excess is adjusted downward to reflect the savings the system gains by burning the fuel instead of simply paying for nothing. The lower fuel costs provide an incentive for other systems to purchase energy from the unit. The selling system loses less money by selling power at a lower fuel cost than paying and receiving no fuel. It is called “dumping” power on the system. Entergy does not practice this!

Generation Constraints & Considerations Change in availability: Boiler feed pump is taken out of service on a unit using dual pumps, the unit is only capable of half-load output. A mill or pulverizer is plugged due to foreign matter getting inside. A generator turbine is out of balance and unable to obtain high loads without damaging vibrations. When a unit is derated, the system operator should obtain the following information from the plant: Whether repairs will be made while the unit is on-line or off-line. The period of time the unit will be derated. If the unit is capable of automatic control during the derate period.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Loss of plant controller/computer A plant controller (PLC “Programmable Logic Controller”) is a computer at a generating plant that receives signals from the AGC function of the EMS and assigns regulation to the individual units at the plant. If a system operator receives an alarm that the PLC or unit RTU has been lost due to failure or communication problems, the units will need to be dispatched manually. The total load calculation in a control area uses generating unit output as a component. If a bad signal from the generating plant or unit is used in the calculation, the total load is also wrong.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Tie line telemetry failure Tie line telemetry or metering is essential for calculating the ACE. ACE is the difference between net scheduled and net actual flows. The net actual flows are the flows in and out of a system over tie lines. If one of the tie line numbers is faulty due to a communication or RTU failure, the entire calculation is wrong. If state estimated values are not available, the system operator will need to call the other system sharing the tie line for periodic updates on the instantaneous values. When the number is manually inserted into the EMS, the ACE calculation uses the approximate value to generate AGC pulses.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Transmission System Reliability Some problems on the transmission system: MW flow overloads voltage limit violations Can be relieved in part or in whole by re-dispatching generation. Power flows from generating units to loads via the transmission system. To avoid large flows on transmission lines, some generation must be raised or lowered adjust line loading. Running this generation is not the most economic choice, but is done for reliability.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Transmission System Reliability (cont) Some systems use generating units as the prime source of reactive power on the transmission system. To alleviate the MVAR support problems, turbines in the local areas must be ran with increased MVAR output to boost voltage support. The voltage on the system is determined by the settings of the automatic voltage regulators on the generators At times, the turbines are brought on-line only to supply MVARs; little MW power is actually generated.

Generation Constraints & Considerations Emissions Constraints The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designed measures to include emissions factors into dispatching power. When pollution levels reach a pre-determined limit the EPA can declare a pollution alert. When this is done, the system operator may have to take action to reduce pollution output. Reducing generating output on the affected units is an immediate measure, but load still exists on the system and must be covered. Some options for the system operator are to: Purchase power from an unaffected system Switch fuel in the unit to gas Re-dispatch generation to unaffected units Bring gas-fired combustion turbines on-line

Constraints & Considerations NERC Standards Current-Day Procedures

Generation Constraints & Considerations Which ONE of the following may cause the System Operator to dispatch generating units in a non-economic manner? Low load system conditions Overvoltage conditions Redispatch request Inclement weather (hurricanes) Transmission line overloads in an area of the power system Request for economic transaction from neighboring utility

Review—Generation Constraints Discussed generation control and the impact performance has on the power system Identified the difference between normal, permissive, and emergency regulating states Described typical problems that affect generators and actions that the system operator can take in response to these problems Described factors other than economic that determine the way generating units are dispatched

Questions?