Tier 2 Continuum of Behavior Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justin Boyd & Jessica Turtura University of Oregon School Psychology Program March 8, 2010.
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS Chris Borgmeier PhD Portland State University
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Intensive-PBS: Implementing a System of Individual Student Support Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Behavior assessment & intervention
Supporting District Yellow/ Red Zone planning for Behavior Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Coaching School Implementation of Tier 2 & Tier 3 Systems of Support Role of Behavior Specialist Chris Borgmeier PhD Portland State University
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Beyond Check-In/Check-Out: Considerations for Tier 2 Interventions Chris Borgmeier Portland State University
Group-Based Interventions for Tier 2 An Overview of Research Supported Practices Deb Childs, Ph.D. MO SWPBS Tier 2/3 Consultant.
“Tiering” It Up Tier 2 & 3 Supports Lauren Feigel & LaThomas Willis The Lincoln Center Wyandotte, MI 1/17/2013.
Quick Sort Matrix 1 Check-In Check-Out Check & ConnectSocial Skills Group Organizational Skills Newcomers Club Adult Attention XXXXX Peer Attention XX.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Modifying Check-in/Check-out to Fit a Range of Student Needs Jessica Turtura, PhD Center on Teaching and Learning University of Oregon
Critical Elements PBIS TEAM FACULTY COMMITMENT EFFECTIVE PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH DISCIPLINE DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS PLAN ESTABLISHED GUIDELINES.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
Check-In/Check-Out Staff Introduction. CICO (Check-In/Check-Out) Designed for Students with moderate problem behaviors Most appropriate when problem behaviors.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Dr. Dana Morris Jessica Barrett Alcott Middle School.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Advanced Tiers in High Schools Ali Hearn, IL PBIS Network Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
PBIS Process and Classroom Management Bringing it all together LMSA 2011.
SW-PBIS Training Cambrian SD Sept Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Principles of Behavior Basic Overview for Tier 1 Monthly Coaches’ Meeting Module P DC Name and Date Here.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
FBA Interviews Beyond Staff Other Assessments. Additional Interviews GOAL: Time is of the essence; always aim for maximal efficiency – the most critical.
Data Teaming - Tier 2+ Individual Student Behaviour Support Chris Borgmeier PhD Portland State University
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Session B4: Expanding Your Tier 2 Behavior Intervention.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
Planning, Implementing and Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports Janeah Gullett Area Coordinator, Kycid Amanda Warder, Guidance.
Data Teaming - Tier 2+ Individual Student Behavior Support
Check In/Check Out A Tier 2 targeted system for providing behavioral support to groups of students at risk MCPS “Bone” Evidence Based Practices Training,
What’s ahead? PBIS Year 2 Chris Borgmeier, PhD
What to Do When Check-in, Check-out Doesn’t Work: Next Steps
Tier 2 Interventions Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Day 2 pbis. sccoe
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3
Southwest Junior High School CICO Handbook
Tier 2 Interventions Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Day 2 pbis. sccoe
Basic FBA to BIP e-Learning Modules: Building Capacity for Tier 3 Support Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Data Teaming for Tier 2 Systems of SW-PBIS
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Presentation transcript:

Tier 2 Continuum of Behavior Support Tier 2 Continuum of Behavior Support Data, Teaming & Intervention Systems Chris Borgmeier PhD Portland State University cborgmei@pdx.edu www.tier2pbis.pbworks.com

Tier 2 & 3 Logic Assessment & Intervention Intensive Targeted Many Minutes Increasing Minutes Spent on Assessment and Intervention Intervention Assessment Few Minutes Few Minutes Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Teaming Structures & Processes Screening Decision Rules Progress Monitoring

Individual PBIS Efficient Teaming Process Intervention Focused Clear roles, procedures & responsibilities Intervention Focused Linked to Continuum of Interventions (Tier 1  2  3) Try the easy things first (Tier 2 Interventions) …then Tier 3 (FBA/BSP) Data focused & Early Identification Progress Monitoring Student Identification through Systematic Screening

Individual PBIS Team Responsibilities Universal Screening & Identifying Students at risk Individual PBIS Team Responsibilities Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks 30-45 min. Monitor Systems (Tier 2 & Tier 3) Match Students to Intervention Monitor Student Progress

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION (RTI) From Tier 2 to Tier 3 Tier I Tier II Tier III Universal SWPBIS Team Progress Monitoring Team FBA Team Monitors effectiveness and fidelity of Tier 2 Interventions (overall and for each student) Plans SW & Class-wide supports Conducts FBA, develops BIP NOT a standing team Trust the System -- Tier 2 Process Maximizing # of minutes/ student Sept. 1, 2009 6 6

Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 2 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks 30-45 min. Student 3 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 4 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team

Student Screening & Identification Emphasize early identification

Individual PBIS Team Responsibilities Universal Screening & Identifying Students at risk Individual PBIS Team Responsibilities Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks 30-45 min. Monitor Systems (Tier 2 & Tier 3) Match Students to Intervention Monitor Student Progress

Universal Screening Before the 1st Day of School Review Data from last year Your school data And data on incoming students (if available) Identify students who had Behavior Support Plans in place per IEP (or otherwise) Prepare to implement BSP with necessary modifications from beginning of the school year Identify returning students with more than 5 referrals last year who might benefit from behavioral support to begin the year

Previous Years Discipline data Who needs to be on our radar from Day 1? Who had FBA/BSP’s last year? Which students moved on? Which are returning this year? Can we get data for our incoming class & new students? Decision Rule

Returning Students (8+ referrals) Three returning students had FBA/BSPs last year Students w/ 16, 11, & 10 referrals Make modifications to last years BSP & prepare to implement from beginning of school year These returning students did not have behavioral interventions in place last year Robbie - 9 referrals last year Jaden - 8 referrals last year Jorge – 10 referrals last year Logan – 11 referrals last year Galen - 11 referrals last year Get all 5 started on CICO during 1st week of school Plan a Check-In Event (orientation) for students before the school year begins Start Supports from the beginning of year – NO WAITING TO FAIL!

Continuing Screening through the Year I-PBS team reviews student referral data every 2 weeks at each meeting Many referrals might also go directly to the CICO manager Develop Decision Rules for continuing Student Identification through the year Example: Students receiving 3rd referral or 2nd in a month

Tier 2 & 3 -- RTI Assessment & Intervention Wraparound Supports Intensive Targeted Refer to Tier 3 team: Practical FBA Individualized Behavior Support Plan Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Matched to Function Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Screening Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Team Tasks – Universal Screening Develop a plan for Universal Screening to implement before Day 1 of the school year: Who will meet? when? & where? What data will you use to ID students for intervention? Develop DECISION RULES for identifying students: At the beginning of the year? On a continuing basis throughout the year Using your current data, which students do you want to target for intervention NOW & Next Fall? What interventions & activities will you implement to support these students from the beginning of the school year? CICO FBA/BSP Other?

Tier 2 & 3 Continuum of Interventions

Tier 2 & 3 Continuum of Interventions Wraparound Supports Intensive Targeted Individualized Behavior Support Plan Modified CICO Matched to Function Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Questions about Tier 2 Interventions Systems Considerations What constitutes a Tier 2 Intervention? EFFICIENCY & MAXIMIZING RESOURCES An intervention that: Serves multiple students at one time (15-25 student at once) More efficient use of resources that 1 student at a time Students can get started with almost immediately upon referral Requires almost no legwork from referring staff to begin implementation of the intervention with a student All school staff know about, understand their role with, and know the referral process for SYSTEMS NOTE: Resources Required: If program is not self-sufficient… and requires significant organization by referring staff… it’s not a Tier 2/ targeted intervention

CICO from Simple to Advanced Start with Basic CICO Should work for the majority of at-risk students Complete CICO Fidelity Assessment Once implementing CICO with fidelity & using data for decision making Data for student identification Data for student progress monitoring to ID responders/borderline/non-responders Start adding variations of CICO

Major Features of Targeted Interventions Intervention is continuously available Rapid access to intervention (72 hr) Very low effort by teachers Consistent with school-wide expectations Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school Flexible intervention based on assessment Functional Assessment Adequate resources (admin, team) weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week Student chooses to participate Continuous monitoring for decision-making

CICO: Implementation Checks SYSTEM Person assigned with FTE to coordinate & manage daily implementation of CICO Bi-weekly team meetings for student referral/ identification for CICO & progress monitoring Materials & incentives readily available Staff-wide buy-in, commitment & training in roles, responsibilities related to CICO Regular updates to staff on student data & implementation

CICO: Implementation Checks PRACTICES Reliable daily am check-in & pm check-out Students earn rewards for success (daily at first) Not punitive

CICO: Implementation Checks DATA Daily collection of point card data Regular review of graphic student data for decision making (at least every 2 weeks) Regular student referral for early identification of at-risk students

Data Collection Focus on Efficiency Generic point card Expectations linked to School-wide rules Limited individualization We do not want to spend time tailoring the point card at this level of intervention

Generic Point Card No time spent individualizing

Team Task: 1. Take a few minutes to complete the BEP-FIM as a Self Assessment. 2 = In Place 1 = Partially In Place 0 = Not in Place 2. Identify actions necessary to address areas to improve CICO implementation

CICO: Advanced Applications Small Modifications or “Tweaks”

Additional Tier 2 Interventions Remember focus on Efficiency in Progress Monitoring Meeting Minutes per Student Tweak or Small CICO Modification Alternate Tier 2 Intervention (Function-based) Escalate to Tier 3 Student Centered team Trust the Process Most difficult thing = not talking about a student before it’s time

Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention Intensive Targeted Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Small Changes “Tweaks” In Progress Monitoring meetings – always weighing Minutes/Kid Tweaks to the plan for Borderline Responders should only take a couple of “minutes” Look at initial CICO data Not an extensive discussion Should have a menu of quick changes/ “tweaks”: Change CICO mentor Change incentives Change/individualize goals More frequent check-ins -- “adding hair”

Borderline Responder Last 3 weeks -- 10 of 16 days over 80%, but last 8 days -- 3 of 8 days over 80% “just missing”… but downward trend Good Candidate for a Small Change/ “Tweak” In 2 minutes or less - Which change is most likely to work for this student? Change (a) CICO mentor, (b) incentives, (c) individualize goals OR (d) more frequent check-ins

Borderline Responder Look at Initial CICO data Quick Check: Anything we can do about Period 3?

Ready to Make Quick Changes Readiness – what needs to be ready to make these ‘quick’ changes? Change/individualize goals Need alternate point card readily available to individualize Change CICO mentor Add Mid-Day Check-in & incentive Change incentives Individualize incentives for the student More frequent check-ins With teacher? With CICO Specialist? Need an adjusted point card?

Individualized Point Card Fill in more specific behaviors

Individualized Point Card Robbie Oct. 14th 20--

More Frequent Check-Ins “CICO Hair Club for Kids” Teacher gives more frequent feedback by applying hair – then uses hair to inform overall score for period Another Alternative – Create alternate card which breaks day into smaller intervals

Team Work Time What ‘tweaks’ do you want to develop to be ready for borderline responders? Adapt existing materials and/or Develop new materials required to make ‘tweaks’ readily available and accessible? Remember in the meeting, decisions regarding small intervention changes or ‘tweaks’ should occur in less then 2 minutes of discussion…. “Ready to Go” intervention options/ “tweaks” will make this as easy as possible

Non-Responders Modified (Function-Based) CICO

Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention Intensive Targeted Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Matched to Function Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Non-Responder

Typical Reasons CICO may not be working for an individual student Low fidelity of implementation The student needs more instruction on how to use the program The rewards are not powerful or desirable for the student The program does not match the function of the problem behavior The student requires more intensive, individualized support Address Implementation Issue Individualize Tier 2 Escalate to Tier 3 Support

Behavioral Explanations for “Why” Don’t forget - From student’s perspective, problem behavior serves a purpose, such as… Gaining attention Gaining access to activities or tangible items Avoiding or escaping from something student finds unpleasant (e.g. difficult or undesired tasks)

Using Function of Behavior to Inform CICO Modifications Individual Student Planning Can use “Function of Behavior” to match students to appropriate version of CICO Function-Based Assessment might include: Data from ODRs “Possible Motivation” Or Preliminary/Brief FBA

Minor – “Uh-Oh”

Preliminary FBA Use existing data for preliminary FBA ODR data Identify function/motivation Identify antecedents – time/location/persons involved, etc. CICO data Identify antecedents – time/location

Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Does this tell us anything about when/ where/ who is involved (antecedents)?

Preliminary FBA Discipline Referral Summaries Suspensions, detentions, office referrals Look for patterns Triggers/Antecedents  Day of the week, Time of Day, Location, Students Involved Behavior Consequences/Function  Possible Motivation, Disciplinary Action, Administrative Decision

Student Referral Report - SWIS Date Staff Time Location Prolem Behavior Motivation Others Involved Admin Decision 1 02/08/11 43866 12:15PM Plygd Agg/Fight Unknown mot Peers Out-sch susp 2 01/28/11 47522 1:30PM Class Disrespt Avoid Task Teacher Detention 3 01/10/11 10:30AM 4 12/18/10 9:30AM 5 12/08/10 1:00AM Peer 6 10:15AM Parent 7 11/20/10 9:30PM Does this tell us anything about the function of student behavior? How about when/ where/ who (Antecedents)?

Advanced Applications of CICO Function-Based Modifications of CICO

Breaks Are Better Function = Escape Task (elem) Justin Boyd University of Oregon

Logic Guiding Breaks are Better Children may benefit from taking small, appropriate breaks If breaks are available, students may: Engage in less escape-maintained problem behavior Request breaks less often than escape-maintained problem behavior occurred Increased reinforcement for: Asking for assistance Taking a break appropriately

CICO Modification Elementary Escape Academic Task Explicitly teach an alternative/replacement behavior (i.e., break requests) Promote self-management by teaching students to “keep track” of their breaks Establish & Teach teachers (and students) how this will look in the classroom Make it feasible and sustainable for classroom teachers to implement

Breaks are Better Modifications Prior to intervention: Child & teacher identify appropriate “break” activities Student is taught: How to request a break How to take a break How to return to work Points earned for: Meeting academic-specific expectations Asking for break appropriately or not needing a break Weekly point total tied to reinforcers

Sample Break Options & Rewards Move to separate desk for quiet activity Quiet activity at desk Drawing Doodle on notebook Stretch in backroom Run errand for teacher Weekly Rewards Computer time Extra Recess Coupon for bonus points on assignments Coupons for buddy work Coupon to make assignment shorter or easier Library pass

Breaks are Better Card The goals are more specifically defined in academic terms The “break column” The “teacher feedback on break column”

Students will be trained by the BrB coordinator to use break request routine. This will be done by role playing positive and negative examples. I will show you an example teaching script in just a minute. Student’s are taught how to ask for a break the right way: (1) hold up hand with a “#1” signal; (2) wait for teacher to give a “thumbs up” signal or a “thumbs down”; They are also taught how to take a break: (3) when given the “thumbs up”, cross out one of the break circles on the BrB card; (4) start the 2-min break timer, (5) take the break appropriately (i.e., as practiced and for the appropriate length of time); and (6) when the timer goes off, get back to work. If the teacher responds to the break request with a “thumbs down”, the student is taught that it’s no big deal & they can request a break again later. Also, if they choose to (which we are recommending) teachers can remind them to request a break – thus helping to strengthen the student’s skills with knowing when to ask for a break, etc. 57

Taking a Break in the Classroom

ABC: Academic Behavior CICO Function = Escape Task (MS) Jessica Turtura University of Oregon

Logic Guiding ABC Students benefit from organizational structure More frequent and tangible reinforcement for: Recording assignments Completing in-class work & participating Asking for help Completing homework Parental structure for homework completion: Parents are aware of assignments Parents check for completion

Academic focused CICO (Escape Tasks) Middle School Morning Check-in Students check-in with counselor All homework completed? Prepared for the school day with all necessary materials? Opportunity to complete unfinished homework and to gather materials Daily point card and Homework tracker Receive feedback each period about behavior during class (participation, staying on- task, completing work) Record assignments on homework tracker Afternoon Check-out Check-out with counselor Review point card and homework tracker Does student know what is due tomorrow? Have all materials needed to complete assignments? Home Component Parents review daily feedback with student Sign card to indicate if student has completed all homework

ABC Modifications Prior to intervention – coordinator meets w/ parents Morning Check-In: Assess & give bonus pts for: Materials Ready & Homework Completed Afternoon check-out: Check Tracker Expectations focus on Academic Behaviors + Add’l Expectation of completing Tracker Parent signature with focus on Homework Completion

ABC Point Card -- Front

ABC Point Card -- Back

Non-Responders Escalate to Tier 3

Tier 2 Assessment & Intervention Intensive Targeted Refer to Tier 3 team: Practical FBA Individualized Behavior Support Plan Non-Responder Preliminary FBA Modified CICO Matched to Function Borderline Initial CICO Data Intervention Assessment “Tweak”/ Small change to CICO Student Referral Data (ODRs) Basic CICO Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems

Non-Responder Tweak ABC CICO After multiple interventions, including match to function-based CICO RTI  Time to move to Tier 3 Support

Individual PBIS Team Team Members: Student 1 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks 30-45 min. Meeting 1 Permissions Coordinate Assessment (FBA) Meeting 2 Review Assessment& Finalize Implementation Plan Meeting 3 Monitor Student Progress & Review/Modify Plan Meetings Ongoing as needed to Monitor Student Progress & Review/Modify Plan

Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 2 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Individual PBIS Team Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring (Systems & Students) Team Members: Administrator Behavior Specialists -e.g. SPSY, SPED CICO Coordinator -e.g. counselor, IA Meets every 2 wks 30-45 min. Student 3 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team Student 4 FBA/BSP team Administrator Behavior Specialist Student Centered team

A Proactive Approach to Behavior Support Planning Majority of problem behaviors that teams encounter do not require comprehensive FBA-BSP (Loman & Horner, in press) Using simplified FBA-BSP procedures that “match” the level and intensity of problem behavior Provide FBS at the first signs of persistent problem behavior Basic FBA: Behaviors and Maintaining Functions are Easily Defined and Identified Complex FBA: Behaviors and Maintaining Functions Vary, and are not Easily Defined and/or Identified Alternative that researchers have suggested , using Function based support proactively 70

District Behavior Support Specialist Train and coach PBIS at all three tiers Support Teams building behavior support plans from Assessment information Train 1-2 people per school to conduct “basic” FBA/BSP

Building Capacity for Function-Based Support Basic FBA2BSP Training Series of 7 - 90 minute trainings (each training spaced about 2 weeks apart) Session 1: Basics of Behavior Session 2: FBA Interview Session 3: FBA Observation Session 4: Function-Based Intervention Session 5: Behavior Support Planning Session 6: Implementation Planning Session 7: Evaluation Plan & Monitoring

Format of Basic FBA to BSP Training Sessions Objectives Review Activities Checks for Understanding Comments/ Questions Tasks Key Points