© American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer Survivor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commission on Cancer Mission
Advertisements

Leading and innovating for excellence. Working towards the Best Cancer System in the World.
Behavioral Health Integration; Experiences of RIPCPC and RIBHN A bit on history and background Development of current model Demonstration of.
CONNECTICUT SUICIDE PREVENTION STRATEGY 2013 PLANNING NINA ROVINELLI HELLER PH.D. UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT.
 Meeting the needs of cancer survivors across the lifespan Norton Cancer Institute Survivorship Program Christy Roberts, RN, BSN, OCN.
CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL RESEARCH NETWORK COLORADO SITE ACTIVITIES FALL 2010 ADVISORS: GINGER BORGES TIM BYERS LORI CRANE JEAN KUTNER AL MARCUS JACK.
Disease State Management The Pharmacist’s Role
Implementation of the Navigator Role in Community – Based Oncology Program Our Journey Joan M. Daugherty, RN, MS Executive Director, Richard A. Henson.
Living with and beyond treatment for cancer – the challenge for secondary care Nigel Acheson Medical Director Peninsula Cancer Network.
Survivorship Care Plans Daniel P. McKellar, MD, FACS Chair Elect, Commission on Cancer.
What matters to me Cancer survivorship: A consumer and carers lens on cancer survivorship and its impact on service delivery Toni Ashmore and Dr David.
Clinical Pharmacy II Lobna Al Juffali,MSc Fall-2009.
 Lowell Smith Sr. Director, Business & Communication Research Administration Moffitt Cancer Center  Jeanine Stiles Chief Administrative Officer Associate.
Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care
Are You Ready to Assess For Distress? Lee Tremback, MA, LCSW, OSW-C Oncology Social Worker Eastern Connecticut Cancer Institute John A. DeQuattro Cancer.
NCCN and NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™
EFPC Position Paper workshop PC & Chronic Cancer Nicosia, May 8, 2009 Danica Rotar – Pavlic, MD, PhD Pim de Graaf, MD, MPH European Forum for Primary Care.
Spiritual Care and Cultural Competencies Session 1 Joint Commission and Cultural Competencies: A Roadmap Spiritual Care Champions Catholic Health.
Cancer Survivorship Care
Guide to Cancer Survivorship and Resources for Cancer Patients.
Mary S. McCabe Survivorship Care Planning. National Directions Focus on recurrence Increasing expectations by patients and families Identification of.
TRANSFORMING HEALTH CARE THROUGH RESEARCH AND EDUCATION 2012 Illinois Performance Excellence Bronze Award Integrating Behavioral Health Across the Continuum.
ASCO Presentation Summary: Chemotherapy Treatment Plan and Summary Templates as a Component of Comprehensive Cancer Care Kansas Cancer Partnership University.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Deborah K. Mayer, PhD, RN, AOCN, FAAN Professor, University of North Carolina School of Nursing Director of Cancer Survivorship, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive.
Presented by: Kathleen Reynolds, LMSW, ACSW
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Health Provider Teams: How you can support cancer survivors after treatment Washington CARES about Cancer Partnership: Survivorship Taskforce June 2012.
Janice Berry Edwards, PhD, LICSW, LCSW-C, BCD, ACSW
Perspectives on the Age Wave: Key Issues, Solutions, and Opportunities Robyn Golden, LCSW Director of Older Adult Programs Rush University Medical Center.
1 Communication & Care Plan for Breast Cancer Treatment Creating a Tool for Patient-Centered Care Kathy Hajopoulos, MPH UCSF Carol Franc Buck Breast Care.
Basma Y. Kentab MSc.. 1. Define ambulatory care 2. Describe the value of ambulatory care practices 3. Explore pharmacy services in some ambulatory care.
Session Fertility and Pregnancy FL-BBM Specific questions Risk of premature ovarian failure Ability to become pregnant Safety of pregnancy.
Implementing universal Lynch Syndrome screening in a large healthcare system.
Connecting South Carolina: The Gibbs/Hollings Cancer Center An NCCCP/NCI Designated Center Connection Anita L. Harrison, MPH Associate Director, Administration.
Coordinating Care Sierra Dulaney Lisa Fassett Morgan Little McKenzie McManus Summer Powell Jackie Richardson.
American Cancer Society Prostate Cancer Activities 2007 African American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 28, 2007 Washington, D.C.
June 11, IOM, Reducing Suicide, 2002 Statement of Task w Assess the science base w Evaluate the status of prevention w Consider strategies for studying.
File #1 Table of Contents Introduction Presenter’s Notes Oncology Rehabilitation: Web-based Learning for Physical Therapists Who Provide Rehabilitation.
Applying Science to Transform Lives TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE TRI science addiction Mady Chalk, Ph.D Treatment Research Institute CADPAAC Conference.
Treating Chronic Pain in Adolescents Amanda Bye, PsyD, Behavioral Medicine Specialist Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 15 th Annual Conference.
Our Plans for 2015/16 We want to make sure that people in our area are able to live long and healthy lives, both now and in the future, and our plans set.
Colorectal Cancer Survivorship in Greene County, Pennsylvania: Assessment and Provider Education Mary Ann Ealy, Marlene Shaw and Carolyn Wissenbach Background.
The KU Wichita Center for Breast Cancer Survivorship Judy Johnston, MS, RD/LD Research Instructor Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health,
CANCER IN THE WORKPLACE: HOW EMPLOYERS CAN HELP Lynn Zonakis Principal, The Zonakis Group LLC October 23, 2015.
Primary Care Stephen F. Rothemich, M.D.,M.S. Associate Professor of Family Medicine Presentation 11/14/05 for Primary Care & Public.
Component 1: Introduction to Health Care and Public Health in the U.S. 1.9: Unit 9: The evolution and reform of healthcare in the US 1.9d: The Patient.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
Supporting people with active and advanced disease Need better data collection Discussion at MDT – new diagnosis support Identify best practice Early palliative.
Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Control Program 3/10/2015 Program Monitoring and Evaluation Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Intermediate.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative 2010 Update.
 Define Survivorship  Demonstrate understanding of the history of cancer survivorship  State the requirements of the Commission on Cancer of the American.
Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care Recommendation 1: Public Awareness and Patient Education (Updated 2008)
Florida Cancer Plan Phil Roland, MD FACS FACOG Florida State Chair A Commission on Cancer.
The Interface between Primary Care and Specialty Care in Primary Treatment of Cancer Jonathan Sussman Supportive Cancer Care Research Unit Laura-Mae Baldwin.
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Survivorship Essentials for Practice Administrators Christina Bach, MBE, MSW, LCSW, OSW-C Carolyn Vachani, MSN, RN, AOCN.
Expanding the Role of the Pharmacist Enhancing Performance in Primary Care through Implementation of Comprehensive Medication Management.
IT Solutions – Improving Timely Access to Health Care
Primary Care CMG Buttery MB, BS
Survivorship Care Plans (SCP)
Cancer Survivors: A Growing Population with Unique Health Care Needs
Jessica Lobban, PGY-3 CCLP Family Medicine Residency Program
Clinical Pharmacy II.
An Oncology Patient’s Journey from Treatment to Survivorship By Way of a Customized EMR 1/29/16.
Developing a Health Maintenance Schedule
Survivorship Pathway Template
Tit Albreht | Brussels | 7 November 2017
Presentation transcript:

© American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer Survivor Transitions: Continuum of Care Standards Nina Miller, MSSW, OSW-C Commission on Cancer Chicago, IL

2 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. The Commission on Cancer (CoC) is a consortium of professional organizations dedicated to improving survival and quality of life for cancer patients through standard- setting, prevention, research, advocacy, education, and the monitoring of comprehensive quality care.

3 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Commission on Cancer Objectives I.Establish standards to ensure quality, multidisciplinary, patient- centered and comprehensive cancer care delivery II.Conduct surveys in healthcare settings to assess compliance with those standards III.Collect standardized, high quality data from CoC-accredited facilities to measure cancer care quality IV.Use data to monitor treatment patterns and outcomes and enhance cancer control and clinical surveillance activities V.Develop educational interventions to improve cancer prevention, early detection, care delivery, and outcomes

4 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. respecting the values, preferences and expressed needs of patients coordinating & integrating care across system boundaries providing the information, communication, and education that people want and need promise of physical comfort, emotional support, and involvement of family and friends Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21 st Century Institute of Medicine March 2001 Patient-Centered Care

5 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer Care Continuum – Survivor Transitions PREVENTIONSCREENINGDIAGNOSISTREATMENT END-OF-LIFE CARE RECOVERY / SURVIVORSHIP PRIMARY CARE PSYCHOSOCIAL & PALLIATIVE CARE TARGETED NAVIGATION BASED ON NEED

6 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Standard 3.1: Patient Navigation Process identify the needs of the population determine potential to reduce cancer disparities guide patients through care transitions to improve outcomes identify barriers to care and the resources to address them provide resource information to all and work on resource gaps

7 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer Care Continuum – Survivor Transitions PREVENTIONSCREENINGDIAGNOSISTREATMENT END-OF-LIFE CARE RECOVERY / SURVIVORSHIP PRIMARY CARE PSYCHOSOCIAL & PALLIATIVE CARE TARGETED NAVIGATION BASED ON NEED DISTRESS SCREENING

8 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Psychosocial Distress Screening is a brief method for prospectively identifying and triaging cancer patients at risk for illness-related psychosocial complications that undermine their ability to fully benefit from medical care, the efficiency of the clinical encounter, satisfaction and safety Identify patients in need of further assessment – referral - intervention from psychiatry, mental health professionals, social workers, counselors, pastors Standard 3.2 Psychosocial Distress Screening

9 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Cancer Care Continuum – Survivor Transitions PREVENTIONSCREENINGDIAGNOSISTREATMENT END-OF-LIFE CARE RECOVERY / SURVIVORSHIP PRIMARY CARE PSYCHOSOCIAL & PALLIATIVE CARE TARGETED NAVIGATION BASED ON NEED DISTRESS SCREENING HEALTH LITERATE, ACTIVATED PATIENT & FAMILY

10 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. As of January 2014, it is estimated that there are 14.5 million cancer survivors in the United States representing over 4% of the population. The number of cancer survivors is projected to increase by 31%, to almost 19 million, by 2024, representing an increase of more than 4 million survivors in 10 years. “Primary care providers will need to play an expanding role in the early detection of cancer, as well as the follow-up, health promotion, and cancer surveillance…necessary after initial cancer treatment.” P. Ganz, M.D., UCLA

11 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. IOM: “Patients completing primary treatment should be provided with a comprehensive care summary and follow- up plan written by the principal provider(s) who coordinated oncology treatment. The content of the plan should be reviewed with the patient during a formal discharge (end of treatment) consultation. “ IOM 2006: From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition

12 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. “Cancer care plans are roadmaps that make sure you know where you are going and how you will get there.” National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship

13 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. “Today, most oncology practitioners recognize the need to consider cancer’s long-term impact on their patients’ overall health and function. However, how best to do this remains a challenge. The evolving mandate to develop survivorship care plans, inclusive of plans to address psychosocial needs and provision of counsel about health promotion, presents a unique opportunity for advancing an integrative model of cancer care for those entering this new phase.” Survivorship Care Planning: Unique Opportunity to Champion Integrative Oncology? By Julia H. Rowland and Ann O’Mara, Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (JHR) and Division of Cancer Prevention (AO), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2014) 2014 (50): 285. doi: /jncimonographs/lgu037

14 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. “…cancer and its treatment have the capacity to affect not simply physical well-being, but also virtually every aspect of an individual’s life, including psychological, social, economic and existential health and function. While some of these effects dissipate rapidly once treatment ends, others can persist over time, in some cases, becoming chronic. Still another set of effects may appear months or years after treatment ends, the most worrisome of these being recurrent or second cancers.” Survivorship Care Planning: Unique Opportunity to Champion Integrative Oncology? By Julia H. Rowland and Ann O’Mara, Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (JHR) and Division of Cancer Prevention (AO), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (2014) 2014 (50): 285. doi: /jncimonographs/lgu037 Late Effects

15 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. “We will establish best practices for the transition of care so patients can feel confident in knowing the facts about the treatment they have received and recommendations for their continued care and that nothing will ‘fall through the cracks’ if and when it’s time for their primary care doctor to manage their care.” “A seamless transition from provider to provider is vital to maximizing outcomes and quality of life.” Delaware Cancer Consortium Plan

16 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. The cancer committee develops and implements a process to disseminate a comprehensive care summary and follow-up plan to patients with cancer who are completing cancer treatment. The process is monitored, evaluated, and presented at least annually to the cancer committee and documented in minutes. Standard 3.3 Survivorship Care Plan

17 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. 1.A survivorship care plan is prepared by the principal provider(s) who coordinated the oncology treatment for the patient with input from the patient’s other care providers. 2.The survivorship care plan is given to the patient on completion of treatment. 3.3 Process Requirements

18 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Clarification of ‘patients with cancer who are completing cancer treatment’ Standard 3.3 is focused on the subset of survivors who are treated with curative intent, and have completed active therapy (other than long-term hormonal therapy). This includes patients with cancer from all disease sites. Patients with metastatic disease, though survivors by definition, are not targeted for delivery of comprehensive care summaries and follow-up plans under Standard 3.3. Standard Clarification – 9/14

19 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. 3.The written or electronic survivorship care plan contains a record of care received, important disease characteristics, and a follow-up care plan incorporating available and recognized evidence- based standards of care, when available. 3.3 Process Requirement

20 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. September, 2011: LIVESTRONG convened the Essential Elements of Survivorship Care Meeting in Washington, DC. Goal: build consensus among key stakeholders on the essential elements of survivorship care UPDATE November 2012: The LIVESTRONG Foundation and the LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence Network refined the definitions of the 20 Essential Elements including specific recommendations and examples of basic and enriched levels of survivorship care Essential Elements

21 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. research/models-long-term-follow-care Key Components of Survivorship Care

22 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Contact information of the treating institutions and providers Specific diagnosis (e.g. breast cancer), including histologic subtype (e.g. non-small cell lung cancer) when relevant Stage of disease at diagnosis (e.g. I-III) Treatment Surgery (yes/no). If yes, a. Surgical procedure with location on the body b. Date(s) of surgery (year required, month optional, day not required) Chemotherapy (yes/no). If yes, a. Names of systemic therapy agents administered (listing individual names rather than regimens) b. End date(s) of chemotherapy treatment (year required, month optional) Radiation (yes/no). If yes, c. Anatomical area treated by radiation d. End date(s) of radiation treatment (year required, month optional, day not required) Ongoing toxicity or side-effects of all treatments received (including those from surgery, systemic therapy and/or radiation) at the completion of treatment. Any information concerning the likely course of recovery from these toxicities should also be covered. For selected cancers, genetic/hereditary risk factor(s) or predisposing conditions and genetic testing results if performed TREATMENT SUMMARY Core Elements

23 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Oncology team member contacts with location of the treatment facility Need for ongoing adjuvant therapy for cancer a. Adjuvant therapy name b. Planned duration c. Expected side effects Schedule of follow up related clinical visits Cancer surveillance tests for recurrence Cancer screening for early detection of new primaries Other periodic testing and examinations Possible symptoms of cancer recurrence A list of likely or rare but clinically significant late- and/or long-term effects that a survivor may experience based on his or her individual diagnosis and treatment A list of psychosocial items (e.g. emotional or mental health, parenting, work/employment, financial issues, and insurance) A list of local and national resources to assist the patient obtain proper services A general statement emphasizing the importance of healthy diet, exercise, smoking cessation and alcohol use reduction FOLLOW-UP CARE PLAN Core Elements

24 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. How much information the template includes How easily staff or clinicians can walk patients through the document The visual layout of the document How easy it is to add patient information (e.g., whether the template includes any drop-down menus, if IT staff can save the template into the EMR) Whether to use a general cancer or a tumor site specific template If staff can embed educational information and related links into the care plan template, or if the template already contains such information Whether it’s more convenient for plan creators to use a web-based or a locally stored template Marisa Deline, 2014 Oncology Roundtable Philadelphia session - September, 2014 Considerations when choosing a care plan

25 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Survivor Care GuidelinesCare Plan Templates

26 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Delivers basic information about diagnosis and treatment in one easily accessible space Enhances communication with healthcare providers including primary care providers, specialty care providers, others unfamiliar with the patient’s history Empowers patients to make informed decisions about prevention and screening for second cancers or recurrence Provides information about potential symptoms of late effects or recurrence to facilitate early intervention Helps determine the need for psychological distress assessment and care Education, emotional support and tips on healthy lifestyles can improve physical and mental health From a Patient’s Perspective

27 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Outcomes and Satisfaction After Delivery of a Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Plan: Results of a Multicenter Trial Participants most commonly used SCP materials to make decisions about exercise (64%), which tests to receive and when (62%), and dietary changes (62%). Only 21% shared the SCP with their primary care provider during that time. Satisfaction with the SCP was high, with 90% of participants reporting being at least satisfied with the SCP. Perceived knowledge about survivorship improved after SCP delivery, as did perceived care coordination and the provider’s knowledge of the effects of cancer on survivors (all P.001). Individuals closer to the time of diagnosis reported greater satisfaction with and use of SCPs. Steven C. Palmer, PhD, et. al. JOP vol. 11, issue 2

28 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Building a Survivor Care Program – Best Model Needs Assessment

29 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Moving Beyond Patient Satisfaction: Tips to Measure Program Impact Guide cancer.org/survivorshipprogramevaluation 29 Guide for Delivering Survivorship Care cancersurvivorshipcentereducation.org/Survivorship_Guide.html Program Development & Evaluation Resources NCI’s Research Tested Intervention Programs:

30 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. It is recognized that models of health care and survivor care delivery vary. In the context of multidisciplinary care clinics the cancer committee should identify a physician team member or advanced practice partner who would be responsible for discussing the care plan with a patient. Standard Clarification

31 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. When is standard 3.3 to be implemented? During the implementation period, cancer programs should initially concentrate on their most common disease sites, such as breast, colorectal, prostate, early-stage bronchogenic, and lymphoma. Cancer Programs that have fully implemented the Standard by the time of their on-site visit during the 2015, 2016, 2017 survey cycle, will receive special recognition in their Performance Reports at the time of their next survey. Standard Clarification

32 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. When is Standard 3.3 to be implemented? January 1, 2015 Implement a pilot survivorship care plan process involving ≥ 10% of eligible patients. January 1, 2016 Provide survivorship care plans to ≥ 25% of eligible patients. January 1, 2017 Provide survivorship care plans to ≥ 50% of eligible patients. January 1, 2018 Provide survivorship care plans to ≥ 75% of eligible patients. January 1, 2019 Provide survivorship care plans to all eligible patients.

33 American College of Surgeons 2013 © American College of Surgeons 2015—Content cannot be reproduced or repurposed without written permission of the American College of Surgeons. Need for additional research on survivor care models Need for additional work on the technology piece - extracting data for pre- populating treatment summaries Need for additional outcomes research on the cost-benefit of the care plan Patient reported outcomes research Continued clarity of reimbursement for plan creation and delivery Care passports or some type of standard of care for patients with metastatic disease Ongoing work on follow-up care recommendations e.g. to help differentiate between late effect vs. recurrence Continued research for health care management in cancer survivors Conclusions, Thoughts & Considerations