SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
Advertisements

Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
I NTEGRATING B ULLY P REVENTION WITHIN SWPBIS George Sugai, University of Connecticut Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Addressing Bullying Behavior W/in a PBIS Framework George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
School Discipline Institute “Meeting the Challenge” 2012 Safe & Healthy Students Conference Washington DC George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: School-based Prevention George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
A Framework for Making a Difference Rob Horner, University of Oregon Deputy Director of the Research to Practice Division for the U.S. Department of Education’s.
Review of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Maryland PBIS Summer Institute July 13,2004 Teri Lewis-Palmer.
Embedding Bully-Proofing in School-wide PBS Scott Ross Rob Horner Bruce Stiller University of Oregon
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Sustained Implementation of Tiered System of Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Implementation Example: Bullying Prevention. Bullying Program Component Review Purpose.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-based Decision Making: Basics OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports February 2006
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support George Sugai US Dept. of Educ.Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Developing & Implementing a State Plan George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 9,
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
SRBI/PBIS Implementation: Considerations George Sugai & Jen Freeman Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year 2 Team Training Day 1 Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Multi-tiered Systems of Support & Bullying Behavior Phi Delta Kappan - UConn George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
SWPBS: Implementation Fidelity & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Apr 7,
SWPBS: Sustainability
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Presentation transcript:

SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut February 28,

PURPOSE To improve our understanding of & responding to bullying behavior from perspective of school-wide positive behavior support. SWPBS Basics Bullying behavior in SWPBS Strategies

Good “things” about Bullying efforts Increased problem awareness More emphasis on prevention More curriculum development & research Greater focus on all students

“Bullying” Issues Labeling kids Limited assessment of context Generic intervention responses Limited examination of mechanism Over-emphasis on student responsibility for change Non-data based intervention decisions Too much attention on student, not enough on recipients

SWPBS: Basics

SWPBS is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidence- based interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students

IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY PREVENTION & EARLY INTERVENTION CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING UNIVERSAL SCREENING DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING RtI Reducing Bullying

Universal Targeted Intensive All Some Few Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

~80% of Students ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION ~15%

Universal Targeted Intensive Continuum of Support for “Manuella” Dec 7, 2007 Harassment Computer Lab Social Studies Physical Intimidation Adult Relations. Attendance Literacy Label behavior…not people

OUR BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVE “Do” Learning history “Context” or environment Context manipulation Data-based decision making

Teach effective, efficient, relevant social skills 1 R e m o v e t r i g g e r s o f p r o b l e m b e h a v i o r 2 Add triggers for social skills 3 Remove consequences that maintain problem behavior 4 Add consequences that maintain social skills 5 Prevention

SYSTEMS “BULLY BEHAVIOR” PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

SWPBS look at bullying behavior

Reconceptualizing Bullying from Behavior Analytic Perspective for SWPBS Emphasize overt observable behavior Consider sets of behavior w/ similar function Examine behavior in context Specific relationship between behavior & context Describe behavioral learning histories Change context to change probability of behavior

What is “bullying?” Remember “Label behavior, not people…’ So, say, “bully behavior” Behavior Verbal/physical aggression, intimidation, harassment, teasing, manipulation

Why do bully behavior? Get/obtain E.g., stuff, things, attention, status, money, activity, attention, etc. Escape/avoid E.g., same…but less likely Victim attention Bystander attention Self-delivered praise Tangible access

Why is “why” important? Teach effective, efficient, relevant alt. SS Remove triggers of BB Add triggers for alt. SS Remove conseq. that maintain BB Add conseq. that maintain SS PREVENTION De-emphasis on adding consequence for problem behavior

Context or Setting Context or Setting Initiator Target Bystander Staff Continuum of Behavior Fluency

Implement SWPBS continuum w/ fidelity Review SW data at least monthly Step 1 Modify implementation plan based on data Implement modifications w/ fidelity Step 2 Monitor implementation fidelity Monitor student progress & responsiveness Modify as indicated by data Step 3 Is Behavior an Issue?

Three basic strategies….if you do nuthin’ else….

Label student Exclude student Blame family Punish student Assign restitution Ask for apology Teach targeted social skills Reward social skills Teach all Individualize for non-responsive behavior Invest in positive school-wide culture Doesn’t WorkWorks

“Stop-Walk-Talk” “Talk-Walk-Squawk” “Whatever & Walk” 1. Teach common strategy to all

MUST….. Be easy & do-able by all Be contextually relevant Result in early disengagement Increase predictability Be pre-emptive Be teachable Be brief

2. Precorrect Analyze problem setting Describe problem behavior Identify triggers & function Identify acceptable alternative behavior Modify setting to prevent Check-in w/ student to remind of desired behavior Before Monitor Remind Reinforce Redirect During Correct Reinforce approximations Reteach Remind After

Move Scan Interact positively Model expectations Reward appropriate behavior Remind & precorrect 3. Actively Supervise

PBIS Prevention Goals & Bullying Behavior Goal 1 Establish positive, predictable, consistent, rewarding school culture for all across all settings Goal 2 Teach social skills that work at least as well as or better than problem behavior Goal 3 Respond to nonresponsive behavior positively & differently, rather than reactively & more of same Goal 4 Actively supervise & precorrect for problem behaviors & settings, especially nonclassroom Goal 5 Individualize support based on responsiveness & effect