Advanced TDDFT II Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York II. Frequency-Dependent Kernels: Double Excitations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Well Defined and Accurate Semiclassical Surface Hopping Propagators and Wave Functions Michael F. Herman Department of Chemistry Tulane University New.
Advertisements

From weak to strong correlation: A new renormalization group approach to strongly correlated Fermi liquids Alex Hewson, Khan Edwards, Daniel Crow, Imperial.
Tutorial: Time-dependent density-functional theory Carsten A. Ullrich University of Missouri XXXVI National Meeting on Condensed Matter Physics Aguas de.
Sohrab Ismail-Beigi Applied Physics, Physics, Materials Science Yale University Describing exited electrons: what, why, how, and what it has to do with.
Advanced TDDFT II Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Memory-Dependence in Linear Response a. Double.
Chemistry 2 Lecture 1 Quantum Mechanics in Chemistry.
Advanced TDDFT I: Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Memory and Initial-State Dependence Mr. Adiabatic.
The Sum Over States model, although exact, requires a detailed knowledge of many parameters which are not generally available. Experience has shown that.
L2:Non-equilibrium theory: Keldish formalism
Time-dependent density-functional theory University of Missouri
Advanced TDDFT Kieron Burke and friends UC Irvine Chemistry and Physics BIRS TD tutorial1 Jan 25, 2011.
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Lecture 3. Improvements of DFT Contents: 1. LDA+U. 2. LDA+DMFT. 3. Supplements: Self-interaction corrections,
Improved Description of Electron-Plasmon coupling in Green’s function calculations Jianqiang (Sky) ZHOU, Lucia REINING 1ETSF YRM 2014 Rome.
Conical Intersections Spiridoula Matsika. The study of chemical systems is based on the separation of nuclear and electronic motion The potential energy.
Small Josephson Junctions in Resonant Cavities David G. Stroud, Ohio State Univ. Collaborators: W. A. Al-Saidi, Ivan Tornes, E. Almaas Work supported by.
Green’s function of a dressed particle (today: Holstein polaron) Mona Berciu, UBC Collaborators: Glen Goodvin, George Sawaztky, Alexandru Macridin More.
Femtochemistry: A theoretical overview Mario Barbatti III – Adiabatic approximation and non-adiabatic corrections This lecture.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Chapter 10. VSEPR - Lewis structures do not help us predict the shape or geometry of molecules; only what atoms and bonds are involved. To predict shape.
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation Superposition Given a few solutions of Schrödinger’s equation, we can make more of them Let  1 and  2 be two solutions.
Crystal Lattice Vibrations: Phonons
Optical potential in electron- molecule scattering Roman Čurík Some history or “Who on Earth can follow this?” Construction of the optical potential or.
Lecture 9: Advanced DFT concepts: The Exchange-correlation functional and time-dependent DFT Marie Curie Tutorial Series: Modeling Biomolecules December.
Density Functional Theory And Time Dependent Density Functional Theory
Lecture 8: Introduction to Density Functional Theory Marie Curie Tutorial Series: Modeling Biomolecules December 6-11, 2004 Mark Tuckerman Dept. of Chemistry.
Anharmonic Oscillator Derivation of Second Order Susceptibilities
Lecture 4 Intramolecular energy transfer
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Pseudopotentials Contents: 1. Plane Wave Representation 2. Solution for Weak Periodic Potential 3. Solution.
Lecture 17: Excitations: TDDFT Successes and Failures of approximate functionals Build up to many-body methods Electronic Structure of Condensed Matter,
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : DFT Plane Wave Pseudopotential versus Other Approaches CASTEP Developers’
Nanostructures Research Group CENTER FOR SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory David K. Ferry and Dragica Vasileska Arizona.
R. Martin - Pseudopotentials1 African School on Electronic Structure Methods and Applications Lecture by Richard M. Martin Department of Physics and Materials.
Advanced TDDFT III Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Molecular Dissociation and Long- Range Charge-Transfer.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Time-Dependent Electron Localization Function Co-workers: Tobias Burnus Miguel Marques Alberto Castro Esa Räsänen Volker Engel (Würzburg)
Manifestation of Nonadiabatic Effects in the IR Spectrum of para-Benzoquinone Radical Cation Krzysztof Piech, Thomas Bally Department of Chemistry, University.
ISSP I1 ISSPI: Time-dependent DFT Kieron Burke and friends UC Irvine Physics and Chemistry Departments.
Background 1927: Introduction of the Thomas-Fermi model (statistics of electrons). 1964: Hohenberg-Kohn paper proving existence of exact Density Function.
The Quantum Theory of Atoms and Molecules The Schrödinger equation and how to use wavefunctions Dr Grant Ritchie.
Semiclassical Correlation in Density-Matrix Dynamics Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
NCN nanoHUB.org Wagner The basics of quantum Monte Carlo Lucas K. Wagner Computational Nanosciences Group University of California, Berkeley In collaboration.
Double Excitations and Conical Intersections in Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Chaehyuk Ko, Benjamin G. Levine, Richard M. Martin, and Todd J.
Drude weight and optical conductivity of doped graphene Giovanni Vignale, University of Missouri-Columbia, DMR The frequency of long wavelength.
Fundamentals of DFT R. Wentzcovitch U of Minnesota VLab Tutorial Hohemberg-Kohn and Kohn-Sham theorems Self-consistency cycle Extensions of DFT.
Ch11: Normal Modes 1. Review diagonalization and eigenvalue problem 2. Normal modes of Coupled oscillators (3 springs, 2 masses) 3. Case of Weakly coupled.
Dynamics of irradiated clusters and molecules Solvated molecules Deposited clusters Free clusters Electron Emission Laser Projectile Irradiation of solvated.
LINEAR RESPONSE THEORY t = t 0 :Interacting system in ground state of potential v 0 (r) with density  0 (r) t > t 0 :Switch on perturbation v 1 (r t)
Physics “Advanced Electronic Structure” Lecture 2. Density Functional Theory Contents: 1. Thomas-Fermi Theory. 2. Density Functional Theory. 3.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 6. The theory of molecular orbitals for the description of nanosystems (part II) Perturbational methods for dealing.
How do you build a good Hamiltonian for CEID? Andrew Horsfield, Lorenzo Stella, Andrew Fisher.
Advanced TDDFT I: Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York Memory and Initial-State Dependence Where were.
Numerical Aspects of Many-Body Theory Choice of basis for crystalline solids Local orbital versus Plane wave Plane waves e i(q+G).r Complete (in practice.
Advanced methods of molecular dynamics 1.Monte Carlo methods 2.Free energy calculations 3.Ab initio molecular dynamics 4.Quantum molecular dynamics 5.Trajectory.
Chapter 4 Two-Level Systems, Spin. Two-level systems Let us start with the simplest non-trivial state space, with only two dimensions Despite its simplicity,
Quantum Two 1. 2 Time-Dependent Perturbations 3.
Electron density: Probability of finding one electron of arbitrary spin within a volume element dr 1 (other electrons may be anywhere). Properties of electron.
Comp. Mat. Science School Electrons in Materials Density Functional Theory Richard M. Martin Electron density in La 2 CuO 4 - difference from sum.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
fxc Beyond Standard Approximations in Linear Response
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Statistical Mechanics and Multi-Scale Simulation Methods ChBE
Stationary Perturbation Theory And Its Applications
2. Solving Schrödinger’s Equation
Coherent Nonlinear Optics
Fourier transforms and
Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory
Concept test 14.1 Is the function graph d below a possible wavefunction for an electron in a 1-D infinite square well between
TDDFT Prof. Dr. E.K.U. Gross Prof. Dr. Mark Casida.
Presentation transcript:

Advanced TDDFT II Neepa T. Maitra Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York II. Frequency-Dependent Kernels: Double Excitations f xc

Plan -- Double-Excitations in TDDFT -- Autoionizing Resonances -- Opening the optical gap – also needs a frequency-dependent kernel

Poles at KS excitations Poles at true excitations Need (1) ground-state v S,0 [n 0 ](r), and its bare excitations (2) XC kernel Yields exact spectra in principle; in practice, approxs needed in (1) and (2). adiabatic approx: no  -dep ~  (t-t’) First, quick recall of how we get excitations in TDDFT: Linear response Petersilka, Gossmann & Gross, PRL 76, 1212 (1996) Casida, in Recent Advances in Comput. Chem. 1,155, ed. Chong (1995) n0n0

Well-separated single excitations: SMA When shift from bare KS small: SPA Useful tool for analysis Zoom in on a single KS excitation, q = i  a TDDFT linear response in quantum chemistry codes: q =(i  a) labels a single excitation of the KS system, with transition frequency  q =  a -  i, and Eigenvalues  true frequencies of interacting system Eigenvectors  oscillator strengths

Interacting systems: generally involve mixtures of (KS) SSD’s that may have 1,2,3…electrons in excited orbitals. single-, double-, triple- excitations Non-interacting systems eg. 4-electron atom Eg. single excitations near-degenerate Eg. double excitations Types of Excitations

Double (Or Multiple) Excitations  – poles at true states that are mixtures of singles, doubles, and higher excitations  S -- poles at single KS excitations only, since one-body operator can’t connect Slater determinants differing by more than one orbital.    has more poles than  s ? How does f xc generate more poles to get states of multiple excitation character? Consider: How do these different types of excitations appear in the TDDFT response functions?

Exactly solve one KS single (q) mixing with a nearby double (D) Simplest Model:

This kernel matrix element, by construction, yields the exact true  ’s when used in the Dressed SPA, strong non- adiabaticity! Invert and insert into Dyson-like eqn for kernel  dressed SPA (i.e.  - dependent): adiabatic

 -1 =  s -1 - f Hxc

An Exercise! Deduce something about the frequency-dependence required for capturing states of triple excitation character – say, one triple excitation coupled to a single excitation.

General case: Diagonalize many-body H in KS subspace near the double-ex of interest, and require reduction to adiabatic TDDFT in the limit of weak coupling of the single to the double: N.T. Maitra, F. Zhang, R. Cave, & K. Burke JCP 120, 5932 (2004) usual adiabatic matrix element dynamical (non-adiabatic) correction Practical Approximation for the Dressed Kernel So: (i) scan KS orbital energies to see if a double lies near a single, (ii)apply this kernel just to that pair (iii)apply usual ATDDFT to all other excitations

Alternate Derivations  M.E. Casida, JCP 122, (2005) M. Huix-Rotllant & M.E. Casida, arXiv: v1 -- from second-order polarization propagator (SOPPA) correction to ATDDFT  P. Romaniello, D. Sangalli, J. A. Berger, F. Sottile, L. G. Molinari, L. Reining, and G. Onida, JCP 130, (2009) -- from Bethe-Salpeter equation with dynamically screened interaction W(  )  O. Gritsenko & E.J. Baerends, PCCP 11, 4640, (2009). -- use CEDA (Common Energy Denominator Approximation) to account for the effect of the other states on the inverse kernels, and obtain spatial dependence of f xc -kernel as well.

Simple Model System: 2 el. in 1d Vext = x 2 /2 Vee =  (x-x’) = 0.2 Dressed TDDFT in SPA, f xc (  ) Exact: 1/3: 2/3 2/3: 1/3 Exact: ½ : ½ ½: ½

(i) Some molecules eg short-chain polyenes Lowest-lying excitations notoriously difficult to calculate due to significant double- excitation character. When are states of double-excitation character important? R. Cave, F. Zhang, N.T. Maitra, K. Burke, CPL 389, 39 (2004); G. Mazur, R. Wlodarczyk, J. Comp. Chem. 30, 811, (2008); Mazur, G., M. Makowski, R. Wlodarcyk, Y. Aoki, IJQC 111, 819 (2010); M. Huix-Rotllant, A. Ipatov, A. Rubio, M. E. Casida, Chem. Phys. (2011) – extensive testing on 28 organic molecules, discussion of what’s best for adiabatic part… Other implementations and tests:

(ii) Coupled electron-ion dynamics - propensity for curve-crossing means need accurate double-excitation description for global potential energy surfaces Levine, Ko, Quenneville, Martinez, Mol. Phys. 104, 1039 (2006) (iv) Near conical intersections - near-degeneracy with ground-state (static correlation) gives double-excitation character to all excitations (iii) Certain long-range charge transfer states! Stay tuned for next lecture! When are states of double-excitation character important? (v) Certain autoionizing resonances Coming up shortly!

How about Doubles in Adiabatic Quadratic Response? Since two photons are required to excite two electrons, can we get away with the adiabatic approx in quadratic response? Not really: The adiabatic quadratic response function does have poles at double excitations but they’re simply sums of linear-response-corrected single excitations, i.e. no mixing between singly-excited states lying near a double-excitation See analyses in P. Elliott, S. Goldson, C. Canahui, N. T. Maitra, Chem. Phys. 135, (2011), and S. Tretiak and V. Chernyak, JCP 119, 8809 (2003).

Autoionizing Resonances When energy of a bound excitation lies in the continuum: bound, localized excitationcontinuum excitation   Electron-interaction mixes these states  Fano resonance KS (or another orbital) picture ATDDFT gets these – mixtures of single-ex’s True system: M. Hellgren & U. van Barth, JCP 131, (2009)  Fano parameters directly implied by Adiabatic TDDFT (Also note Wasserman & Moiseyev, PRL 98, (2007), Whitenack & Wasserman, PRL 107, (2011) -- complex-scaled DFT for lowest-energy resonance )

Auto-ionizing Resonances in TDDFT Eg. Acetylene: G. Fronzoni, M. Stener, P. Decleva, Chem. Phys. 298, 141 (2004) But here’s a resonance that ATDDFT misses: Why? It is due to a double excitation.

bound, localized double excitation with energy in the continuum single excitation to continuum Electron-interaction mixes these states  Fano resonance  ATDDFT does not get these – double-excitation  a  i  a i e.g. the lowest double-excitation in the He atom (1s 2  2s 2 )

Photo-absorption cross section: Where, ^^ Getting the cross-section in TDDFT How does the exact kernel add the resonant bump to  s ? Need a degenerate perturbation theory analysis in the continuum, diagonalizing the bound double-excitation with the continuum states. Aha! Luckily this is closely along the lines of what Fano did in 1961…

U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961) Fano’s Universal Resonance Formula q = asymmetry parameter…next slide  E is the resonance-modified continuum state at energy E =  +E i  E is the unmodified continuum state at energy E   +E i |i> is the initial (ground) state is a transition operator Transition probability to continuum modified by the resonance due to  b resonance position resonance width “pre-diagonalized” coupling Hamiltonian

Figure from U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124,1866 (1961)  -This is the case when dressing the KS system with a resonance from a bound double-excitation! Fano Lineshapes : Asymmetry parameter: Note q = ± 1 means total integrated oscillator strength unchanged by resonance.

Fano into TDDFT Consider | i >,  E and  b (double-ex) to be Kohn-Sham states, and T = n(r), For near resonance into Fano analysis: Approximations: -- considered coupling between doubly-excited bound-state and continuum only -- took  as the smallest energy scale in the system. ^ ^

To find we need Use Kramers-Kronig relation … eventually get… A. Krueger & N. T. Maitra, PCCP 11, 4655 (2009); P. Elliott, S. Goldson, C. Canahui, N. T. Maitra, Chem. Phys. 135, (2011). weak- interaction limit

Frequency-Dependent Kernels, more generally Note some other recent  -dep kernels have been developed for calculations of spectra (but not for capturing doubles): -- Exact-exchange kernel, A. Görling, PRA 57, 3433 (1998); Y. Shigeta, K. Hirao, and S. Hirata, PRA 73, (R) (2006); M. Hellgren & U. von Barth JCP (2009) -- VK kernel of TDCDFT, G. Vignale & W. Kohn (PRL 77, ); C. A. Ullrich & K. Burke JCP 121, 28 (2004), and M. van Faassen & P. L. de Boeij JCP 120, 8353 (2004) -- “Nanoquanta kernel”, M. Gatti, V. Olevano, L. Reining, I. V. Tokatly, PRL 99, (2007), S.Botti, A. Schindlmayr, R. Del Sole, L. Reining, Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 357 (2007), and citations therein – derive f xc from Bethe-Salpeter equation. Main motivation behind these is capturing spatial ultranonlocality (this implies time-nonlocality) Another place where the adiabatic approximation fails is the optical gap in semi-conductors – next slide!

The optical gap: Another place where adiabatic approx fundamentally fails Meaning, onset of continuous absorption in spectrum ( Im  Typically KS gap << true gap -- even with the exact ground-state v xc Opening the gap requires f xc to have an imaginary part. Why? Consider what happens if take a real approximate f xc in imaginary part of : For   inside the KS gap, While, analogously for  inside the true gap, Since [….]’s above cannot vanish identically in the whole true and KS gap regions  wherever

 Having an imaginary part means f xc cannot be frequency-independent. Why? must be real, since  its Fourier transform to  -domain must then satisfy  adiabatic approx means  -independent (= ) and therefore f xc real  adiabatic f xc cannot open the gap i.e. the KS system and the true system have the same gap when a purely-real approximation for f xc is used  Note that also a long-ranged f xc ~ 1/q 2 is also required. See more in eg. “Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid” by G.F. Guiliani and G. Vignale (Cambridge, 2005); also some discussion in Ch. 4 of your “Fundamentals of TDDFT” book.

ATDDFT fundamentally fails to describe double-excitations: strong frequency-dependence is essential. Diagonalizing in the (small) subspace where double excitations mix with singles, we can derive a practical frequency-dependent kernel that does the job. Shown to work well for simple model systems, as well as real molecules. Likewise, in autoionization, resonances due to double-excitations are missed in ATDDFT. Summary