Soil Pile Group Interaction in FB-MultiPier

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pile foundations.
Advertisements

Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
Introduction to Structural Engineering
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model
1 UH-Contribution Ravi Mullapudi Parnak Charkhchi Ashraf Ayoub NEES - Jan 23, 2008.
The Effect of Working Fluid Inventory on the Performance of Revolving Helically-Grooved Heat Pipes Presenter: Dr. Scott K. Thomas, Wright State University.
Caltrans Guidelines on Foundation Loading Due to Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading Tom Shantz, Caltrans 2010 PEER Annual Meeting.
Hyung-Suk Shin Pedro University of Washington Steven L. Kramer
Large Diameter Open-End Pipe Piles for Transportation Structures Dan Brown, PhD., P.E., D.GE.
Designing Piles for Drag Force
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift Marios Panagiotou Assistant Professor, University of.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Performance of Improved Ground u Elizabeth A. Hausler and Nicholas Sitar.
Seismic design for the wind turbine tower (WP1.5 background document presentation) Institute of Steel Structures Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki.
Experimental & Analytical Studies of Drilled Shaft Bridge Columns Sandrine P. Lermitte, PhD Student Jonathan P. Stewart, Assistant Professor John W. Wallace,
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
A pile driving model applied to the hammering insertion of the MUPUS penetrator Preliminary results Norbert Kömle, Günter Kargl Space Research Institute,
Bradley Fleming, Sri Sritharan, & JinWei Huang Iowa State University
Mohr-Coulomb Model Short Course on Computational Geotechnics + Dynamics Boulder, Colorado January 5-8, 2004 Stein Sture Professor of Civil Engineering.
Reinforced Concrete Design II
Literature Review on Compatible Soil Structure Yielding by Weian Liu
Soil-Pile Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
Analysis of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts and Piles Using LPILE
Foundations for offshore wind towers
Joint Research of Seismic Retrofitting Technology for Existing Foundations Masahiro Ishida Public Works Research Institute JAPAN “Design and Execution.
C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
University of Missouri - Columbia
Static Pushover Analysis
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
FORUM FOR PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA Vijay K Puri Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, ILLINOIS,
GEO-MECHANICS (CE2204) Direct Shear Test Lecture Week No 2 Mdm Nur Syazwani Noor Rodi LINTON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING.
Driven Pile Design George Goble. Basic LRFD Requirement η k Σ γ ij Q ij ≤ φ g R ng η k – factor for effect of redundancy, ductility and importance γ ij.
MICROPILES RESEARCH AT WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Adrián Rodríguez-Marek, Dr. Balasingam Muhunthan, and Dr. Rafik Itani Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Geotechnical Engineering
Seismic Analysis of Some Geotechnical Problems – Pseudo-dynamic Approach Seismic Analysis of Some Geotechnical Problems – Pseudo-dynamic Approach Dr. Priyanka.
SESSION # 3 STIFFNESS MATRIX FOR BRIDGE FOUNDATION AND SIGN CONVETIONS.
1 IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY MODIFICATIONS MERLIN N. NELSON NRCS.
1 International Workshop on Micropiles May , 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles.
1 Quake Summit 2010 October 9, 2010 Centrifuge Testing and Parallel Numerical Simulations of Lateral Pressures Measured Against a Rigid Caisson PI: Scott.
ADVANCES ON SHEAR STRENGTH AND BEHAVIOR OF BRIDGE GIRDERS WITH STEEL CORRUGATED WEBS Dr. MOSTAFA FAHMI HASSANEIN Associate Professor Department of Structural.
1 Pile Groups Most pile foundations contain group of piles instead of single pileThe supporting capacity of a group of ‘n’similar piles in many cases (not.
Grouting Effectiveness Construction QA/QC of Post Grouted Shafts Gray Mullins, Ph.D., P.E.
The French National Research Project Soil Reinforcement by Micropile Systems François SCHLOSSER - Roger FRANK Ilan JURAN - Roger ESTEPHAN FOREVER.
DEEP FOUNDATIONS Course Work Topics
Midwest Geotechnical Conference Implementation of the AASHTO LRFD Geotechnical Strength Limit State for Bearing Resistance of a Single Driven Pile.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
2013 INTERNATIONAL VAN EARTHQUAKE SYMPOSIUM
A Paper from the Transportation Research Record
Center of Excellence in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics at IIT Roorkee A.Personnel 1.Relevant Faculty of Civil, Earthquake, Mechanical.
General Formulation for Surface and Embedded Foundations (Gazetas,1991) FIGURE XXX (MIWA, 20XX) A number of investigations have been done after earthquakes.
ASCE G-I Case History Night, April 28, 2016
Bridge Pile Foundation Evaluation for a Soil Remediation Project
International Workshop on Micropiles May , 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles.
BRIDGES MOST IMPORTANT GEOTECHNICAL EFFECT- LIQUEFACTION
CT Reinforced Earth Structures
Foundations.
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
The French National Research Project
COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICAL EQ ENGG.
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
Table 8. The different focus of teaching contents
Presentation transcript:

Soil Pile Group Interaction in FB-MultiPier Dr. J. Brian Anderson, P.E. Developed by: Florida Bridge Software Institute Dr. Mike McVay, Dr. Marc Hoit, Dr. Mark Williams

Session Goals Soil-Pile Group Interaction Discussion of Soil Strucuture Interaction Model Lateral p-y multipliers Axial efficiency factors Example #2 Pile Group Analysis – Load Test at Roosevelt Bridge

Coupled Soil-Structure Interaction Debris Impact Scour Plumb Piles/Shafts Earthquake Battered Piles Live and Dead Loading Ship Impact

Typical Deep Foundations:

Soil-Structure Interaction Vertical Nonlinear Spring Torsional Nonlinear Spring Lateral Nonlinear Spring Nonlinear Tip Spring

Single Pile Model P (F/L) Y  (F/L2) Z

Lateral Soil-Structure Interaction Y Passive State Active State Y P

Soil-Pile Group Interaction Lead Row Smallest Disturbance

Soil-Pile Group Interaction P x Pm2 P-y curves P P x Pm1 P-y curves Group Interaction: Modeled with Multipliers

Soil-Pile Group Interaction - Lateral P-Multipliers BROWN & REESE (1988) R R R I II III - Multipliers, Pm for P Values in P-y Curves - Function of Row Position in Group ROW Pm R 0.8 I R 0.4 II Static R 0.3 Ship Load III Pm would be 0.3 for R or greater IV

Summing Effects of a Friction Pile Group (FHWA) Soil-Pile Group Interaction - Axial Axial Efficiency Summing Effects of a Friction Pile Group (FHWA)

Block Failure Mode of Piles in Cohesive Soils (FHWA) Soil-Pile Group Interaction - Axial Axial Efficiency Block Failure Mode of Piles in Cohesive Soils (FHWA)

Experiments Scale Cenrtifuge Models (UF) Full Scale Plumb and battered pile groups Embedded caps Full Scale Roosevelt Bridge Lateral Load Test (UF) Axial Group Study (UH)

Centrifuge Modeling Field 1 ft Centrifuge 50 g 50 ft Same Soil Stresses

Full Scale Load Test at Roosevelt Bridge

Roosevelt 4x4 Field Study

Prediction of Field Response 1 2 3 4 5 6 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 LOAD-DEFLECTION CURVE ROOSEVELT BRIDGE - TEST PILE GROUP LOAD (KIPS) TEST PILE GROUP (MEASURED) FB-PIER PREDICTION DEFLECTION (IN)

Single vs. Group Axial Behavior 3D 10.75” pipe FHWA: Houston Study 25 ft clay 18 ft Sandy clay Total Group Individual Group Axial Single Axial

Experimental Results: Plumb Piles Efficiencies and multipliers are independent of soil density Group Efficiencies: At 5D Spacings - 95% At 3D Spacings - 70% to 75% Lateral Multipliers: At 3D Spacing- 0.8, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.2,…,0.3 At 5D Spacing- 1.0 , 0.85, 0.7,…..,0.7

Experimental - Battered Piles Efficiencies and multipliers are independent of soil density Lateral Multipliers: At 3D Spacing- 0.8, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.2,…,0.3 At 5D Spacing- 1.0 , 0.85, 0.7,…..,0.7 Data Available only for A frame design

Pinned Laterally Loaded Pile Group

Fixed Head Laterally Loaded Group

Design Summary Pile Group response is strongly influenced by geometry, loading, connectivity, & material characterization geometry: 3D vs. 5D, battered vs. plumb connectivity: fixed vs. pinned pile heads loading: lateral or combined lateral & axial material: linear vs. nonlinear pile models

References Zhang, L.M., McVay, M.C., Han, S.J., Lai, P. and Gardner, R., “Effects of Dead Loads on the Lateral Response of Battered Pile Groups,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 6, June 2002, pg. 188-203. McVay, M.C., Zhang, L., Molnit, T., Bollmann, H., and Lai, P., “Centrifuge Testing of Large Plumb Pile Groups (3x3 To 7x3) in Sands,” ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Oct. 1998, Vol. 124, No 10, pp. 1016-1026. Zhang, L., McVay, M.C., and Lai, P., “Numerical Analysis of Fixed Head 3x3 to 7x3 Plumb Pile Groups in Sands,” ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Nov, 1999, Vol. 125, No. 11, pp. 936-946. Brown, D, Morrison, C., and Reese, L. “Lateral Load Behavior of a Pile Group in Sand,” ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, Vol 114, No. 11, pp. 1261-1276 McVay, M.C., Zhang, L., Han, S., and Lai, P., “Experimental and Analytical Modeling of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups with Embedded Pile Caps in Sand,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1736, Dec. 2000, pp. 12-18. Pinto, P. and McVay, M.C., Hoit, M., and Lai, P, “Centrifuge Testing of Plumb and Battered Pile Groups in Sand,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1569, Jan. 1997, pp. 8-16. O'Neill, M. W., Brown, D. A., Anderson, D. G., El Naggar, M. H., Townsend, F. C., Mcvay, M. C. (1997). “Static and dynamic lateral loading of pile groups.” NCHRP 24-9, Highway Research Center, Harbert Engineering Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL