Neighborhood Stabilization Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Illinois Neighborhood Stabilization Program Illinois Department of Human Services March 2009.
Advertisements

1 The Development Process An Overview Forming the development concept Forming the development concept Evaluating your capacity and the needs of your community.
Highland Park, Illinois Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
NSP Plan Introduction Activity/ Strategy Estimated Amount Estimated Units A.Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed.
Pre-Submittal Conference May 17, 2011 Pre-Submittal Conference May 17, 2011 Palm Beach County Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 Residential Redevelopment.
Targeting NSP Funds Todd Richardson HUD Office of Policy Development and Research.
CDBG Supplemental Assistance For The Redevelopment of Abandoned And Foreclosed Homes Title III, Section 2301 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) October 17, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
NeighborWorks ® America Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program State of Montana Community Development Division Community Development Block Grant Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
Federal Reserve Survey of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Paul Wenske Senior Community Affairs Advisor January 27, 2010.
A Brief Description of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit.
City of Muncie Community Development Department
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program, a CDBG Component US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Neighborhood.
OV # - 1 Michigan Neighborhood Stabilization Program December 3, 2008.
Town of Davie Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Applicant Workshop January 30, 2010.
Vermont Neighborhood Stabilization Program (VT NSP) Approved Plan Agency of Commerce and Community Development Department of Housing and Community Affairs.
Vacant Property Working Group (VPWG) Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group 1901Centre Avenue, Suite 200 Pittsburgh, PA (412) Staff Contact:
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Property Management Companies November 4, 2009.
Georgia Department of Community Affairs Mike Beatty, Commissioner
City of Milwaukee Department of City Development Neighborhood Stabilization Program Federal Reserve Conference November 5, 2009.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 2 - Consortia Michelle Winters LISC.
1 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM Title III, Section 2301 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HR3221)
California Department of Housing and Community Development Deputy Director Chris Westlake - Division of Financial Assistance Neighborhood Stabilization.
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM A Component of HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program October 23, 2008.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Tim Waddell, Division Administrator Elyse Shindelar—Program Manager
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program, a CDBG Component US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Neighborhood.
March 25, Presentation Outline Background Program Accomplishments Community Partnerships Summary.
CDBG Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) January 28, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 24 CFR Part 92.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Quarterly Report August 25, 2009.
Affordable Housing Preservation Summit An Overview of Financing and Servicing Options. Wells Fargo Bank Reine Yazbeck.
Addressing the Foreclosure Crisis: Action Oriented Research in the Greater Atlanta Area Michael J. Rich Emory University.
1 Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: A Guide for Public Entity and Non- Profit Buyers.
Homeownership Programs. Neighborhood Stabilization Programs (NSP) Property Requirements Property must be a vacant bank owned foreclosed property. Property.
Key Features of NSP 2 Beyond the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Training Session Reclaiming Vacant Properties Conference Louisville, KY June 1, 2009.
Module 8 – Eligible Use B Scenarios: Homebuyer and Rental Housing Purchase and Rehabilitation.
1 Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: Overview for Homebuyer Assistance Program Administrators.
The HERA Neighborhood Stabilization Program: Converting Liabilities into Assets Professor Frank S. Alexander Emory Law School  Frank S. Alexander 2008.
Responding to the Foreclosure Crisis Presented by Jeremy Rosen, Executive Director, National Policy and Advocacy Council on Homelessness. (202)
Neighborhood Stabilization Loans
February 7, Presentation Outline Background Program Implementation Program Accomplishments Additional NSP Activity-Rental Summary.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Update February 16, 2010.
Page Housing and Redevelopment Workshop Community HOME Investment Program Created by the National Affordable Housing Act Provide decent, affordable.
State of Georgia Neighborhood Stabilization Program Goals.
Consolidated Plan Amendment #16 Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program March 4, 2009.
New York State HALT Task Force (“Halt Abusive Lending Transactions”) 1.Since 2007, the Governor’s HALT Task Force has led the coordination of foreclosure.
Georgia’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program Grants Process, Procedures and Timelines.
Presentation Outline Background NSP Plan Requirements Orange County NSP Plan NSP Implementation Strategies Timeline Action Requested.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed Homes.
February 17, 2009 Orange County Neighborhood Stabilization Program Update.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department October 5, 2015.
Community Planning and Development Programs. CPD Terms Office of Community Planning and Development – We provide funding to local governments and States.
Module 5: Financing Issues. Module 5: Financial Issues 2 Module 5 Content Affordability Financing Mechanisms (Eligible Use A) Types of Assistance Financing.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program “The Power of Community”
HOME Investment Partnership Grant (HOME) HOME Regulations 24 CFR Part 92 1.
Module 1: Eligible Uses, Activities and Properties, and Income Rules.
1 Desert Hot Springs Neighborhood Stabilization Program & Neighborhood Renewal Plan January 2009.
GRESHAM & MULTNOMAH COUNTY CDBG / HOME WORKSHOP Program Year
1.882 million total persons Most of Northeast States combined would fit in Nebraska geographically 0ver 600,000 persons live in 2 nd District (Omaha area)
Federal Housing Policies:
Housing Committee June 5, 2017 Cynthia Rogers-Ellickson,
Affordable/Workforce Housing Issues and Programs
HOME Underwriting and Subsidy Layering Training
Community HOME Investment Program (CHIP) Successful Partnerships
Presentation transcript:

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Douglas County Neighborhood Stabilization Program

Federal Allocation to Georgia $153,037,451 Total Allocation $77,085,125 for State NSP $75,952,326 to NSP Entitlements (9) Atlanta - DeKalb County Augusta/Richmond Co. - Fulton County Clayton County - Gwinnett County Cobb County - Savannah Columbus/Muscogee Co.

Public and Private Data by County Foreclosure Data Notices of Default (Number and % of Households) Notices of Foreclosure Sales* (*Number and % of Households) Real Estate Owned Property (Number and % of Households) Mortgage Loan Data % of conventional home mortgages by subprime lenders Conventional home purchase mortgage loans by subprime lenders Sources: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council) http://beta.dataplace.org www.RealtyTrac.Com * Noted as “Trust Sales” in RealtyTrac data source

Public and Private Data by County Vacancy Rates Units vacant 90 days or longer USPS High Housing Cost Burden HH’s <50% AMI paying >30% of income on housing

DCA Determined Need by Actual Data and Ranks

Need Determined by Actual Data and Ranks Formula used to measure need and determine possible direct allocations down to minimum grant size of $500,000 Regional or Joint applications encouraged Remaining funds will be placed in a “flexible pool” to be administered by the Georgia Housing Finance Agency (GHFA) Entitlement needs adjusted by offset from previous HUD allocation

State Action Plan Priorities Priority within Low-, Moderate- and Middle-Income Areas Each Sub-Recipient must use at least 25% of their funds to assist those at or below 50% of Area Median Income (AMI)…(rental) For Douglas County this amount is $936,065 Properties must be purchased at an overall discount of 15% as verified by an appraisal made within 60 days of purchase.

State Action Plan Priorities Continued Affordability – DCA proposes to adopt the HOME program standards to be in compliance with HUD’s affordability standard Program income to be managed with existing CDBG Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) policies and local reporting procedures

Eligible Activities Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed properties; 0% interest soft seconds Down Payment assistance Purchase and rehab residential properties that have been abandoned or foreclosed upon, in order to sell, rent, or redevelop such properties; Establish land banks for homes that have been foreclosed upon; Demolish blighted structures; and Redevelop demolished or vacant properties.

Total Budget: (Include public and private components)             Acquisition         (a) Total NSP Grant Funds                   $3,744,262         (b) Administration Funds                     $   224,655 (this is 6% of the NSP)               (for entire program)                                                     (c)  Break-out of Acquisition Funds                                                                                                  (1) 50% or under AMI $  936,065 (this is 25% of the NSP)                                 (2) 51%-80% of AMI      $  387,531 (this is 10.35% of the NSP)                                 (3) 81%-120% of AMI    $2,196,011 (this is 58.65% of the NSP) $3,519,607

Georgia Department of Community Affairs NSP Program Budget Analysis *Staff Proposed Recommendation (For Review Only) Applicant: ___Douglas County___________________________________________ Original: ___X__ Amendment dated: _____ 1 NSP Eligible Use 2 Activity Name/Number 3 Itemized Unit Costs 4 NSP Funds 5 Other Funds 6 Source of Other Funds 7 Total Cost *(A) Down payment Assistance/H- 013-00 Administration/H-21A-00 140± homebuyers assisted at an average of $25,000 a unit $224,655 $3,519,607 $0 N/A 8 Subtotal _________ ___$3,744,262______ __$0_______ ____$3,744,262______ 9 Grand Total (if final page) $_________ Check here if continued on additional pages: ________ Page ___1__ of __1___ DCA NSP Form H

Timelines Action Plan published 11/13/2008 NOFA was announced December 1, 2008 Applications for Direct Allocation must be received by January 15, 2009 DCA expects HUD approval of its Plan by December 31, 2008 DCA announces Direct Allocation awards on or about February 20, 2009 18 months (from HUD Plan approval) to “use” funds

Direct Allocation Application Rating Prioritization of assistance to area(s) of highest and greatest need Douglas County is 3rd in the State for areas of greatest need. Administrative capacity (understanding and history of successfully completing CDBG and HERA type activities) Implementation plan with specific eligible activities, and documentation of ability to implement activities quickly Application is prepared and ready for submittal including down payment assistance, purchase & sale of foreclosed homes and demolition of blighted structures.

Direct Allocation Application Rating Congruence between DCA’s initial proposed allocation, funds requested through the local proposal, and the activities chosen to address the needs described Adequacy of local proposal to ensure at least 25% of proposed allocation benefit persons below 50% of AMI Utilization of 0% soft seconds to accomplish Clear readiness to proceed with specific activities

Direct Allocation Application Rating The efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed activities Demonstrated understanding of applicable laws and regulations Description of implementation partnerships (if any) and documentation of partner roles and agreements Two possible partners for administration of funds; Cobb Housing Authority and/or Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partners. Needed agreements (e.g. options, contracts, leases, etc.) are in place and ready to implement.

Other Considerations 18 months to obligate and spend funds Local governments can be identifying potential REO residential units www.occ.treas.gov/cdd/ServicerContactInformation.pdf www.occ.treas.gov/cdd/MortgageElectronicRegistrationSystems.pdf www.mers-servicerid.org Quarterly reports and monitoring

Discussion