Comprehensive Plan for Tysons Corner 1. 2 Land Use Categories 1.Transit Station Mixed Use: the overall percentage of office uses throughout all of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Tysons Transportation: Planning, Analysis, and Design Projects Presented to: Transportation Committee,
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Recommendations on Parking Requirements in Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Areas Outside Tysons To Amend Zoning Ordinance.
What’s Happening? What’s happening in Tysons? A lot!
Tacoma Link Expansion Infrastructure, Planning and Sustainability Committee Tacoma City Council--Nov. 13, 2013.
TYSONS THE AUDACITY OF CHANGE
Countywide Rule Amendment Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Category Planners Advisory Committee September 2010.
Twinbrook Sector Plan A New Community in the Technology Corridor
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) ARTICLE City of Columbus
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST Settlement & Development Agreement.
Noel H. Kaplan, Senior Environmental Planner
Public Meeting Agenda – September 13, 2007 Provide an Update on the Committee’s Work Discuss Emerging Vision for Redevelopment of Town-owned Property.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Boulder Junction Park+. Boulder Junction Park+ model Existing condition Proposed development Conceptual build-out Built to be flexible as area develops.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
A Handbook That Outlines When traffic impact studies should be required What analyses should be included How the study should be reviewed and used Who.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
ZMAP & SPEX Planning Commission June 23, 2010 Public Hearing MORLEY CORNER TEMPLE BAPTIST CHURCH.
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK REZONING REQUEST APPLICATION #2648.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.
Tools for a Transit Oriented Community Mt. Lebanon From Plan to Practice.
How Would a Transportation – Land Use Grant Program Work in the Washington Region? Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Technical Committee.
Public Meeting: Tuesday, February 25,  Relationship to Comprehensive Plan  Existing Conditions  Transportation Overview  Market Overview  Concept.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
The Dulles Corridor 1. Wiehle Avenue 2 Joint development - Fairfax County and Comstock 3.5 acre Comstock parcel and 9.0 acre County parcel Mixed-use,
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
TOD Technical Assistance Panel June 21, rd STREET, San Pablo CA.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
City of Maitland Community Redevelopment Agency Proposed Town Center Development Consistency with Downtown Maitland Revitalization Plan (DMRP)
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Public Hearings D10, E11, F12 March 26, Today’s Public Hearings D C-TRAN-2 Comprehensive Plan amendment adoption E C-TRAN-1 Comprehensive.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
planning and zoning committee presentation September 19, 2016
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Gateway Specific Plan Concepts
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Valley & Third Streets Redevelopment
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Recommendations on Parking Requirements in Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Areas Outside Tysons TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION July 16, 2013 This.
MPO School Transportation Working Group
City Commission Workshop
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

Comprehensive Plan for Tysons Corner 1

2

Land Use Categories 1.Transit Station Mixed Use: the overall percentage of office uses throughout all of the Transit Station Mixed Use areas should be approximately 65%. Individual developments may have flexibility to build more than 65% office if other developments in the category are built or rezoned with a use mix that contains proportionately less office. The residential component should be on the order of 20% or more of the total development 2.Retail Mixed Use: the residential component should be on the order of 20% or more 3.Office: planned almost exclusively for office uses 4.Residential Mixed Use: the residential component should be on the order of 75% or more of the total development 5.Residential: planned almost exclusively for residential uses 6. Civic Use or Public Facility: planned for public uses, such as a library, school, arts center, or community center 7.Parks/Open Space: planned for passive and active park land and urban open spaces such as plazas and pocket parks 3

4

FARs No maximum FAR for properties within ¼ mile of rail; however, office (and uses that generate more trips than hotels) above a 2.5 FAR will be approved through an SE Properties beyond ¼ mile of Metro Stations may redevelop up to a 2.0 FAR, plus bonuses for affordable and workforce housings and superlative contributions toward implementing public facilities Properties within 1/3 mile of Metro Stations that do not include any office space or other high trip generating uses may redevelop up to 2.5 FAR, plus bonuses (this increase was meant to encourage residential uses between the ¼ and ½ mile) Redevelopment proposals for TOD District areas that are located more than 1/4 mile from the stations may be allowed additional intensity if: They are planned for the residential mixed use category They can demonstrate a convenient, safe, and pleasant walk to a Metro station They can demonstrate that they are unable to achieve the proposed intensity through bonuses for affordable housing or public facilities and They are in close proximity to or redeveloping in coordination with an area that is located within 1/4 mile of a Metro station Specific guidance for properties in the Non-TOD area is outlined in the District Regulations 5

The County has set an initial “maximum” office development level of 45 million square feet Today, Tysons has: 27 million square feet of office development on the ground 6 million square feet approved and in the pipeline and 2 million square feet reserved for the superlative provision of public facilities leaving: 10 million square feet of office development remaining and At least 5 rezoning applications have been or are about to be filed. Initial Development Level 6

7

8

Proffer Summary 1. Major transportation commitments, including the grid of streets and Tysons-wide transportation improvements 2. Structured parking and parking design 3. Workforce and Affordable Housing 4. Urban parks and active recreation facilities 5. Stormwater management and environmental requirements 6. Green-building 7. Public facilities (schools, fire and police stations, libraries, etc.) 8. Urban design (shadow and wind studies, noise studies, landscaping, streetscape design amenities, etc.) 8. Bicycle parking, racks and lockers 9. Bus shelters 10. Circulator system 11. Lighting 12. Information and Communications Technology 13. Signage 9

1.Grid of Streets Creation of an official map with conceptual engineering sufficient to determine the centerline and width of right-of-way (with input and cooperation from local landowners and the Fairfax County and Virginia Departments of Transportation) a Provision of the grid of streets, on and off-site, including sidewalks, on-street parallel parking and dedicated bicycle lanes where applicable 2.Tysons-Wide Transportation Improvements (approximately $210 million, to be funded through a Tysons-wide Community Development Authority (“CDA”) and apportioned based on $.07 per $100 of assessed value, a smaller CDA that provides a significant component of the $210 million or other binding commitments to phase development to the funding or construction of one or more of the Tysons-wide improvements) 3.Tysons Transportation Fund: currently, $3.87 per square foot of non-residential development; $859 per unit for residential development (however, in a recent presentation by the Fairfax County Office of Community Revitalization and Reinvestment to the Planning Commission, it was suggested that this figure could go up as high as $8.63 per square foot of non-residential development and $1,000 per unit) 4.Traffic Impact Analyses (evaluating 3 time periods: 1 st phase, interim phase and Plan build-out) 5.Transportation Demand Management (“TDM”), including: TDM implementation plans TDM coordinators TDM monitoring and TDM commitments, including parking management, phasing plans, remedy funds to improve TDM program delivery and penalties to deter non-compliance Major Transportation Commitments 10

11

Proffers: Stumbling Blocks Workforce and affordable housing 20% of units in a residential development should be affordable to households with incomes ranging from % of Area Median Income (“AMI”) Non-residential development should contribute $3.00 per square foot (adjusted annually) to a housing trust fund Urban parks and active recreation facilities Urban parks (between ½ acre and 5 acres): 1.5 acres per 1,000 residents and 1 acre per 10,000 employees Recreational facilities: 20 fields to serve Tysons, approximately 2 acres per field (addressed through on-site development of needed facilities and/or through equivalent money or in-kind contributions to the Park Authority) 12

Parking Spaces Per Unit or Spaces Per 1,000 sq. ft. Previous 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 Non-TOD Min. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Min. Max. Townhouse Multifamily 0-1 bedroom bedroom bedroom Hotel/Motel 1.08 none 1.0 none 1.0 none Office 2.6 none 1.6 none 2.0 none Parking Ratios for Tysons Corner 13

In all cases, consolidations or coordinated development plans should meet the following objectives: 1.Commitment to a functioning grid of streets both on-site and off-site 2.Provision of parks and open space as set forth in the Environmental Stewardship section of the Areawide Recommendations, either on-site or within the subdistrict through a partnership 3.Provision of land and/or building space for public facilities as set forth in the Public Facilities section of the Areawide Recommendations 4.Conformance with the guidance in the Urban Design section and any urban design guidelines for the district or subdistrict 5.Demonstration of how adjacent parcels could be redeveloped in a manner that is compatible with the proposal and in conformance with the Plan. Consolidation 14

Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Major Elements Rezoning to the “Planned Tysons Corner Urban District” (“PTC”) required of all properties in Tysons Corner whose owners wish to take advantage of the redevelopment option in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Use of the PTC District limited to the 1,700 acres of Tysons Corner Cellar space counts toward FAR (it is not counted in the other districts) 10-acre minimum lot size required (but the minimum can be waived by the Board of Supervisors) Maximum FAR: Within ¼, mile, no maximum FAR (but a Special Exception above a 2.5 FAR is required for uses that generate more vehicle trips than hotel use ) Beyond ¼ mile and in the non-TOD districts, 2.5 FAR, exclusive of bonus FAR However, properties in the TOD district but beyond ¼ mile and proposed for residential mixed-use may utilize the FARs listed in the 1 st bullet subject to certain conditions (i.e. acceptable pedestrian access to the Metrorail station, adjacent to or redeveloping in coordination with property that is within ¼ mile) No maximum building heights or minimum yard requirements (Plan would dictate) No percentage requirement for open space (Plan would dictate) Small, stand alone structures discouraged except where part of a long-term phased development; and then, only as interim uses New parking methodology employed - both minimums and maximums are specified and the requirements are premised on distance to rail 15