SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH TO SYSTEM REALISATION P. Srikumar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Module: Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture.
Advertisements

The Role of Environmental Monitoring in the Green Economy Strategy K Nathan Hill March 2010.
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Aerospace Systems Engineering
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Pertemuan 5-6 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Software life cycle processes Purpose n A new international standard (ISO/IEC 12207:1995(E) that –establishes a common framework for software life cycle.
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
Development and Use of Architectures in System Engineering Rosalind Lewis USC-CSSE Workshop October 2007 © 2007 The Aerospace Corporation Motivated by.
1 6/21/2015 Space Cowboys Team Project Final Report Mobility Subsystem Brett Padgett.
1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
TECH 101 Product Design and Manufacturing. TECH 1012 System Life-Cycle Engineering 2 Major phases in almost all products and in many cases services –Acquisition.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
BAE SYSTEMS Overview of Systems Engineering at BAE SYSTEMS & ALENIA MARCONI SYSTEMS 8/10/2015/MS By Leigh Watton Friday 27th July 2001.
Systems Engineering for Space Vehicles Bryan Palaszewski with the Digital Learning Network NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH.
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
Process: A Generic View n A software process  is a roadmap to building high quality software products.  provides a framework for managing activities.
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
Web Development Process Description
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, 2012
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
1 Systems Engineering Process Review Mark E. Sampson EMIS 8340 Systems Engineering Tool—applying tools to engineering systems.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
2/27/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 2/27/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance Gaps.
Space Systems Engineering: Functional Analysis Module Functional Analysis Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0.
Final report and briefing
Autonomous Air & Ground Surveillance Unit Objectives, Preliminary Specifications, and Option Analysis.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.
QUALITY. QUALIDOC Web site: Telephone: 44+ (0) JEAN WHITE.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
Process: A Generic View
Network UAV C3 Stage 1 Final Briefing Timothy X Brown University of Colorado at Boulder Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program Electrical and Computer.
1 Accounting systems design & evaluation Karen Lau 25 Feb 2002.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
FRAT – A BASIC FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMS ENGINEERING By Brian W. Mar and Bernard G. Morais.
Using Mica Motes for Platform Management A Telecommunications Application.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Auto-Park for Social Robots By Team Daedalus. Requirements for FVE Functional Receive commands from user via smartphone app Share data with other cars.
AAE Team 1 - 2/20/07 System Requirements Review 2/20/07 Team 1 John Horst John Horst Jared Odle Jared Odle Keith Fay Keith Fay Boyce Dauby Boyce.
MSA Orientation – v203a 1 What’s RIGHT with the CMMI?!? Pat O’Toole
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Advancing National Wireless Capability Date: March 22, 2016 Wireless Test Bed & Wireless National User Facility Paul Titus Department Manager, Communications.
Supportability Design Considerations
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Project Management PTM721S
CINEMA System Engineering
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Phantom Eye Boeing UAV Brandon Witte.
Software Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V)
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Level - 3 Process Areas (CMMI-DEV)
Capability reporting Francesco Schillirò INAF- OACT
Raytheon Parts Management
Lockheed Martin Challenge
Rapid Automation Design
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Test Process “V” Diagram
Airborne Internet.
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Presentation transcript:

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING APPROACH TO SYSTEM REALISATION P. Srikumar

LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECT LECTURES ON THE SUBJECT IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS EXAMPLES OUR PRACTICAL PROBLEMS IDENTIFY YOUR SYSTEM / SUBSYSTEM SE - THE STARTING POINT

CONCEPT OF OPERATION Eg: Long Range / Endurance UAV REQUIREMENT FOR THE MISSION PLAN THE MISSION PREPARE SYSTEM TEST SYSTEM LAUNCH / TAKE OFF CRUISE – NAVIGATE, ALTERNATE MISSION LOITER IN AREA INTEREST FOR RECCY / SURVEILLANCE TRANSMIT INFORMATION RETURN CRUISE LAND BACK & REFURBISH

ALLOCATION OF FUNCTIONS TO SYSTEMS 1.GROUND CONTROL STATION a)MISSION PLANNING & CHECKOUT SYSTEM b)MISSION MONITORING & CONTROL SYSTEM 2.LAUNCHER / RUNWAY 3.AIR VEHICLE 4.PAYLOAD 5.COMMAND & DATA LINK FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS

PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS 1.OPERATIONAL SPEED 2.MIN & MAX SPEED 3.ALTITUDE OF OPERATION 4.RANGE / RADIUS OF ACTION 5.ENDURANCE / MISSION TIME 6.PAYLOAD OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING & APPRECIATION OF 1.OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS VERIFIABLE a)STORAGE, HANDLING b)PREPARATION, TESTING, DEPLOYMENT c)OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY, RELIABILITY 2.PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS MEASURABLE a)ACCURACY, RANGE, ENDURANCE b)SPEED, ALTITUDE c)FUEL, PAYLOAD

CAPABILITY ANALYSIS TO ESTABLISH MATURITY OF 1.EXPERTISE 2.TECHNOLOGIES 3.ENGINEERING 4.INFRASTRUCTURE 5.FUNDS 6.VIABILITY CAPABILITY TO DEVELOP A VIABLE & USEFUL SYSTEM IN TIME & WITHIN REASONABLE COST “TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL”

STAKEHOLDERS 1.USER 2.PRODUCTION AGENCY 3.THE ORGANISATION 4.PROGRAM GROUP 5.DESIGNER 6.DEVELOPERS 7.OTHERS

TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATIONS LOWER LEVEL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS SINGLE-STEP PROCESS - NO ANALYSIS - NOT ACCEPTABLE

TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS LOWER LEVEL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS QUERIES & CLARIFICATIONS LOWER LEVEL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS CAPTURE & AUDIT THE RESOLUTION OF ISSUES RAISED

TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS QUERIES & CLARIFICATIONS FINAL SPECIFICATIONS LOWER LEVEL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FINAL SPECIFICATIONS SUBSYSTEM REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS DRAFT SPECIFICATIONS QUERIES & CLARIFICATIONS FINAL SPECIFICATIONS LOWER LEVEL REQUIREMENTS LOWEST LEVEL REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS

THE REQUIREMENTS FLOW R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 REQUIREMENTSREQUIREMENTS SYSTEM LEVEL SUBSYSTEM LEVEL COMPONENT LEVEL

THE REQUIREMENTS FLOW UAV SYSTEM CNG SYSTEM MISSION COMPUTER AIR VEHICLE PROCESSOR BOARD

SUBSYSTEM 2 REQUIREMENTS ‘NODE’ SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 3 SUBSYSTEM 1

SUBSYSTEM 2 REQUIREMENTS TO SPECIFICATIONS SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 3SUBSYSTEM 1 DESIGN & ANALYSIS TOOLS EMPIRICAL METHODS BLOCK DIAGRAMS FLOW CHARTS MODELING & SIMULATION o SURROGATE MODELS o DETAILED MODELS

THE SPECIFICATIONS FLOW S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 SPECIFICATIONSSPECIFICATIONS SYSTEM LEVEL SUBSYSTEM LEVEL COMPONENT LEVEL

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION SS SSS2 SP SSP2 PERFORMANCE VALIDATION SSP1 SSP3 SSS1 SSS3 SYSTEM INTEGRATION PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION SS : SYSTEM SPECS SSS : SUBSYSTEM SPECS SP : SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SSP : SUBSYSTEM PERFORMANCE V & V - HOW ?

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 SPECIFICATIONSSPECIFICATIONS INTEGRATED PERFORMANCEINTEGRATED PERFORMANCE SYSTEM INTEGRATION - THE ‘V’ DIAGRAM

UAV SYSTEM CNG SYSTEM MISSION COMPUTER AIR VEHICLE PROCESSOR BOARD MISSION REQUIREMENTSUSER EVALUATION

SUBSYSTEM 2 SYSTEM REALISATION ISSUES SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM 3SUBSYSTEM 1 AVAILABLE LEVELS OF EXPERTISE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS

‘SYSTEM HOUSE’ ROADMAP FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMS SYSTEMSYSTEM SYSTEMSYSTEM SYSTEMSYSTEM CAPABILITIES CAPABILITYCAPABILITY TIME

THANK YOU