Administration & Workflow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focus on Your Content, Not on Ingesting Your Content Terry Brady Applications Programmer Analyst Georgetown University Library
Advertisements

Presentation by Priyanka Sawarkar
MOSS 2007 Document Management Adam McCarthy 1 st April 2009.
Open Stirling: Open Access Publishing and Research Data Management at Stirling Monday 25 th March 2013 Michael White, Information Services STORRE Co-Manager/RMS.
Finding a Software System to Support ETDs Susan Gibbons Digital Initiatives Librarian University of Rochester.
Wits By Charl Roberts & Felix N. Ubogu University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
UJOPEN ACCESS – IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY UJ OPEN ACCESS – IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.
Institutional Repository for CDU What’s in your bottom drawer? Ruth Quinn, Director Library and Information Access Charles Darwin University.
The Knowledge Bank Project at the Ohio State University Presented at the American Accounting Association Meeting – Chicago 8/6/07 Charles J. Popovich Head.
Copyright management in open access projects Iryna Kuchma Open Access Programme Manager Attribution 3.0 Unported.
Your Name AutoArchive?:The ADS and the SWORDARM project Catherine Hardman - Archaeology Data Service University of York White Rose/RoaDMap 24 th May 2012.
Technical Framework Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC)
Electronic Theses/Dissertation (ETD)
Dr Gordon Russell, Napier University Unit Data Dictionary 1 Data Dictionary Unit 5.3.
Institutional Repositories
DAEDALUS: Facing the Challenges of eTheses at Glasgow William J Nixon Project Manager: Service Development (DAEDALUS) ETD Berlin, May 2003.
MIT’s DSpace A good fit for ETDs Margret Branschofsky Keith Glavash MIT LIBRARIES.
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
Dspace – Digital Repository Dawn Petherick, University Web Services Team Manager Information Services, University of Birmingham MIDESS Dissemination.
Introducing Symposia : “ The digital repository that thinks like a librarian”
BY THE “DIGITAL UNDERGROUND ” DSpace Workflow & Tutorials for the Backyard Botanicals Collection.
Update on the VERSIONS Project for SHERPA-LEAP SHERPA Liaison Meeting UCL, 29 March 2006.
The DSpace Course Module – An introduction to DSpace.
Libra: Thesis and Dissertation Submission. What is Libra? UVA’s institutional repository, providing online archiving and access for the scholarly output.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Practical Advice Morag Greig Advocacy William J Nixon Service Development DAEDALUS Workshop – 27 June 2005.
Staffing and Budgets – The Wits example Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand
Julie Hannaford, Meryl Greene, Kristian Galberg,
Electronic Theses at Rhodes University presented by Irene Vermaak Rhodes University Library National ETD Project CHELSA Stakeholder Workshop 5 November.
Depth customization of DSpace: Best practices and techniques of institutional repository at IIT Kanpur, India By S. K. Vijaianand V. D. Shrivastava Gaurav.
Keele Pathfinder Project CLA Reporting of Scanned Material in a Repository Pathfinder - Tim Denning - Project Leader Catering VLE Powerlink - Boyd Duffee.
Library Exposing Your PhD Thesis Online Via ARAN – Access to Research at NUI Galway Rosarie Coughlan & Gwen Ryan 3 rd August 2010.
The DSpace Course Module – Item submission workflows.
May 2, 2013 An introduction to DSpace. Module 9 – Item submission workflows By the end of this module, you will … Understand the purpose of workflows.
Presentation to Legal and Policy Issues Cluster JISC DRP Programme Meeting 28 March 2006.
Training by the Office of Library and Information Services Contact for more information: karen.gardner- or
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
© Imperial College London Imperial College’s Digital Repository Spiral Philippa Hatch Project officer 2008.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
CSUN eCommons Submitting Learning Objects to CSUN eCommons: A Preliminary Guide February 7, 2008.
Legal and copyright issues: experiences and advice Morag Greig.
After the RAE: Continuing to manage research outputs Morag Watson Digital Library Development Manager University of Edinburgh.
CIRcle 101: Referrals Tara Stephens cIRcle Librarian.
DEEP BLUE University of Michigan Institutional Repository.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
ARIADNE is funded by the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme Archiving and Repositories Holly Wright.
Copyright © 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Using Document Management and Collaboration Appendix B.
A Project of the University Libraries Ball State University Libraries A destination for research, learning, and friends.
Greater Visibility, Greater Access QSpace QSpace Queen’s University Research & Learning Repository.
Electronic Theses and Dissertations: The bepress Approach Ben Hermalin Interim Dean, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley & Co-Founder, bepress.
ETD / Wits Charl Roberts UWL IR Workshop Jul 2007.
Filling institutional repositories: considering copyright issues Susan Veldsman eIFL Content Manager
The Glasgow Experience: From DAEDALUS to Enlighten William J Nixon and Morag Greig Glasgow University Library IUA Librarians Group, 20 th February 2007.
Collecting Copyright Transfers and Disclosures via Editorial Manager™ -- Editorial Office Guide 2015.
Moving to a 1-Step Process for Student Submission to the Graduate College, Library, Institutional Repository and ProQuest Abstract In September 2013, Texas.
ProQuest Dissertation Publishing ETD Administrator June 2012.
Policy Frameworks: building a firm foundation for your IR Jackie Knowles ‏
Outline of Talk What is eResearch and why does it matter? The South African SARIS project Challenging the current scholarly communication system eResearch,
Wanted: The Right Content and The Content Rights Putting Knowledge to Work: Building an Institutional Repository for Your Campus California Polytechnic.
An Enlighten-ed view of Repository and Current Research Information System Integration William J Nixon and Marie Cairney University of Glasgow RSP Administrators.
William J Nixon Digital Library Development Manager Workflows.
Session 3 Metadata & Workflow
Moshe Shechter | Alma Product Manager
Tiewei (Lucy) Liu Metadata Librarian June 26, 2016
Moving on : Repository Services after the RAE
Best Practices for Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Open Access to your Research Papers and Data
Policy Frameworks: building a firm foundation for your IR
Managing the Institutional Repository for OA Khawulile Radebe: Librarian: Repository Administrator & Metadata.
Presentation transcript:

Administration & Workflow Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand charl.roberts@wits.ac.za Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk Workflow A repository workflow is a breakdown of the administrative tasks involved. They allow the various activities involved in the running of the repository to be assigned to the individuals or groups who are best able to deal with them. The process of defining workflows is closely aligned with a stakeholder analysis of those involved with the repository: once the benefits and issues relevant to each stakeholder group have been identified, the next step is to ask exactly how users are going to interact with the repository software, as well as the specific tasks they are going to complete. There are several types of workflow in a typical repository. These include workflows to manage user registration and administration; workflows to manage authorisation and permissions within the repository; and various administrative workflows to allow for maintenance and software updates. However, the most significant workflow focuses on the submissions process. This workflow is crucial as it will be used regularly by a wide variety of depositors. It is through understanding the workflows of potential contributors to the repository that you can understand the best points at which deposit of content might happen, and how to make that deposit as easy as possible. For example, the process of an individual academic producing a doctoral thesis in history involves different activities to the process by which a team of researchers collaborate on a paper in experimental physics. The copyright, ownership of data, timescales and publisher involvement will vary, and consequently the potential workflows and interaction with the repository will vary. Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Benefits of a good workflow There are several benefits to creating good submission workflows within the repository, namely they: Streamline the deposit process - Comprehensive submission workflows minimise effort and simultaneously ensure capture of all required information without duplication of effort or heroic measures Encourage user deposits - User-friendly submission workflows can encourage academics to deposit more items Integrate quality assurance - Building checking stages into workflows allows items or metadata to be double-checked for accuracy and consistency early in the life of the item Add value - Workflows can add value to a collection or process for example, by adding subject classification to an object, or by triggering other actions such as submission to publishers or other repositories Facilitate administration - Once content starts flowing into the repository sound workflows enable the repository administrator to manage new deposits, track objects through each stage, and address any problems that may arise Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Typical tasks in a submission workflow Acknowledging newly-submitted items (if this is not done automatically by your software) Checking the eligibility of depositors and/or the types of item being deposited Verifying, and if necessary querying copyright permissions. For instance, there may be a need to check which version of the item is being deposited i.e. preprint; author's peer-reviewed version; published version Validating metadata Approving the submissions i.e. making them publicly visible Releasing embargoed full-texts when the relevant period has expired - if your software does not do this automatically Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Simple DSPACE workflow Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Planning a submission workflow A simple submission workflow has three basic elements: metadata; permissions; and file management. The following questions must be addressed to define an effective and comprehensive workflow: Metadata input What metadata is going to be gathered from the authors? What metadata (if any) will be generated automatically? What metadata (if any) are administrators or other repository staff going to add to each record? What are the options for minimising free text fields? Permissions/copyright and licence handling Who is responsible for checking the copyright of each submission? At what stage in the process is this check completed and how are the decisions recorded in the metadata? When will the depositor sign a deposit agreement or license? How will embargoes be dealt with? File management What files will be requested from authors? What formats will be requested? How will associated files be identified and stored in the repository? How will different versions of deposits be managed? Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Wits ETD Workflow Faculty sends copies to the University Archives Archives keeps unbound copy, send the digital and bound copy to the Cullen Library (WCL) WCL sorts copies, sends it on to WWL (Wartenweiler Library) WWL – Catalogued and loaded onto ETD system Rejected Copies forwarded to Faculty who contacts the student Student submits to Faculty final copy Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk Wits Example Staffing There is no Repository Manager (all Senior Librarians are involved in getting content) Metadata – all cataloguing staff involved in creation and enrichment Development (1 developer) We have two working groups, the IR Team – tasked with populating the IR and the Digitization Team, tasked with the creation of digital collections for the IR Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

DSPACE Workflow examples Communities and sub communities Collections and sub collections Handle service Workflow example: Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk

Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk Questions Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC) http://www.rsp.ac.uk