Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 8. Gamma Camera (II)
Advertisements

CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Overview of ERL R&D Towards Coherent X-ray Source, March 6, 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL 1 Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS.
Microscopy Do you want a footer?.
NSLS-II Soft X-ray Undulator Beamlines
NSLS-II Stability Workshop – User Requirements Working Group – Day 1 Stability Requirements for soft x-ray coherent microscopy/imaging -- C. Jacobsen :
Do it with electrons ! II.
Microscopy Outline 1.Resolution and Simple Optical Microscope 2.Contrast enhancement: Dark field, Fluorescence (Chelsea & Peter), Phase Contrast, DIC 3.Newer.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Present status of the laser system for KAGRA Univ. of Tokyo Mio Lab. Photon Science Center SUZUKI, Ken-ichiro.
Limits and Interfaces in Sciences / Kumboldt-Kolleg São Paulo-SP,
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Ultrafast XUV Coherent Diffractive Imaging Xunyou GE, CEA Saclay Director : Hamed Merdji.
Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, USA Microscopy for biomedical, biofuels, and environmental.
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Images. Pinhole Lens Photons from a source can be focused by a small aperture. –Aperture radius a –Magnification m –Image is inverted Image is blurry.
ERL & Coherent X-ray Applications
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
1 A Grating Spectrograph for the LCLS Philip Heimann Advanced Light Source Observe the spontaneous radiation spectrum of the individual undulators Observe.
Fiber-Optic Communications James N. Downing. Chapter 2 Principles of Optics.
Workshop SLAC 7/27/04 M. Zolotorev Fluctuation Properties of Electromagnetic Field Max Zolotorev CBP AFRD LBNL.
R. M. Bionta SLAC November 14, 2005 UCRL-PRES-XXXXXX LCLS Beam-Based Undulator K Measurements Workshop Use of FEL Off-Axis Zone Plate.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
Microscopy.
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
Measurements with the KSTAR Beam Emission Spectroscopy diagnostic system Máté Lampert Wigner Research Centre for Physics Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Effective lens aperture Deff
Microscopy 1. UNITS OF MEASUREMENT 1 m = 1000 mm (millimeters) 1 m = 1000 mm (millimeters) 1000 mm = 1 µm (microns) 1000 mm = 1 µm (microns) Bacteria.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Other modes associated with SEM: EBIC
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
Advanced Biology Visualizing Cells. The Human Eye  Resolution – The minimum distance two points can be apart and still be distinguished as two separate.
1 2. Focusing Microscopy Object placed close to secondary source: => strong magnification The smaller the focus, the sharper the image! Spectroscopy, tomography.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
Digital two photon microscopy for multiple fast signals acquisition Laboratory of Advanced Biological Spectroscopy (L.A.B.S.) University of Milan - Bicocca.
Coherent X-ray Diffraction (CXD) X-ray imaging of non periodic objects Campi G., De Caro L., Giannini C., Guagliardi A., Margonelli A., Pifferi A.
Coherent X-ray Diffraction (CXD) X-ray imaging of non periodic objects Campi G., De Caro L., Giannini C., Guagliardi A., Margonelli A., Pifferi A.
Haifeng Huang and Kevin K. Lehmann
Scanning capacitance microscopy
Molecular Cell Biology Light Microscopy in Cell Biology Cooper Modified from a 2010 lecture by Richard McIntosh, University of Colorado.
A users viewpoint: absorption spectroscopy at a synchrotron Frithjof Nolting.
Intro. Light Propagation in Free Space Helmholtz Equation 1-D Propagation Plane waves.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
Proposed NSLS X13B Microdiffraction Instrument Source & Optics James M. Ablett National Synchrotron Light Source.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
Zone plates for gas-jet focusing
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
X-ray SNR in 3 steps. I ∆I. X-ray transmission SNR Review Let N = average number of transmitted x-rays N = N 0 exp [ - ∫  dz ] Emission and transmission.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Beam dynamics in IDsBeam-based Diagnostics, USPAS, June 23-27, 2003, J. Safranek Beam Size Measurement m Survey of beam size measurement techniques and.
IPBSM Operation 11th ATF2 Project Meeting Jan. 14, 2011 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park, California Y. Yamaguchi, M.Oroku, Jacqueline Yan.
Fluroscopy and II’s. Fluroscopy Taking real time x-ray images Requires very sensitive detector to limit the radiation needed Image Intensifier (II) is.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Vibrations effect on 1nm focussing K. Evans-Lutterodt NSLS-II VTG Januaury
Designing a Microscopy Experiment Kurt Thorn, PhD Director, Image from Susanne Rafelski, Marshall lab.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
METHODOLOGY Nanotechnology Prof. Dr. Abdul Majid Department of Physics
IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
SRI 2007: CLS Optical Metrology Facility- Overview
VERTICAL SCANNING INTERFEROMETRY VSI
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Emittance measurements for LI2FE electron beams
Microscopy.
Light Through a Single Slit
Diffraction vs. Interference
Basic of Light & Optics
Complex Nanophotonics
Optical Receivers 1. Photo Detectors
Presentation transcript:

Beam stability requirements: experience from the NSLS X1A STXMs Chris Jacobsen Department of Physics & Astronomy Stony Brook University, NY, USA

Coherence requirements for microscopy General property of lenses: preserve sizeangle product (Liouville’s Theorem), so Microprobe/STXM: want so that diffraction limit of optic rather than geometrical image of source dominates spot size Rayleigh resolution of thus gives phase space of Full-field: each pixel in object is diffraction limit of optic, but can have many pixels simultaneously! Fluctuations of illumination from one pixel to its neighbor are therefore unimportant. Full-field Scanning

Effects of spatial incoherence on STXM How close must p=hθ be to  ? Effect on modulation transfer function MTF (50% central stop) Effect on point spread function PSF (50% central stop) Jacobsen et al., Ultramicroscopy 47, 55 (1992); Winn et al., J. Synch. Rad. 7, 395 (2000).

Controlling spatial coherence Diagram, photo from Newport catalog Coherent flux: phase space area of λ in each dimension. Coherent flux is Bλ 2. Green, BNL (1976); Kondratenko and Skrinsky, Opt. Spectr. 42, 189 (1977). Spatial filter: pinhole at the focus of a lens. Passes only the spatially coherent fraction of an incident beam.

Beam sharing at X1A Electron beam emittance determines photon source emittance. Horizontal emittance is about 100λ; vertical emittance is about 3λ. Incoherent flux for spectroscopy (X1B) One-mode slices for spatial coherence (X1A1 and X1A2) Flux losses: Because we cannot scan the gap, we often work 2-4x off of the spectral peak. Because of sharing with X1B we often lose around 2x from center of horizontal distribution, and our sensitivity to noise is magnified.

Optical configuration of X1A See Winn et al., J. Synch. Rad. 7, 395 (2000).

Beam stability has been inconsistent Aug. 27, 2004: discrete flux changes, ~100 Hz oscillations. Problem is intermittent; there are good beam days and bad beam days. Beam stability was much better in late 1990s/early 2000 than in the last few years. Accelerator physics staff has been unable to correlate any of their diagnostics with our problems, but that may reflect limitations in beam diagnostics.

8 What is needed for beam stability? Month-to-month, fill-to-fill, and hour-to-hour for steady flux levels. For present-day NSLS, STXM experiments work with 1-10 msec dwell time so need stability at much better than kHz. For NSLS II, scale the bandwidth requirements up by the brightness gain! 8

9 Fluctuations from pixel to pixel must be small compared to contrast variations. How many photons do you need to see something? Signal- to-noise goes like Contrast parameter is Number of photons required is Rose criterion: SNR=5 (but SNR=2 still recognizable) Requirements on fluctuations 9

10 Fluorescence or scattering Fluorescence or large-angle scattering detection with zero background has so. Thus exposure equals number of incident photons required to produce the fluorescent or scattered photons. Normalized fluctuation in incident beam equals normalized fluctuation in final image (few percent probably OK!) 10

11 Absorption contrast: 10 nm protein in ice

12 Absorption: 1 nm Au in 100 nm Si

13 Demands are tighter at high resolution As lateral sizes get smaller, longitudinal sizes are likely to as well. Thinner things require more photons to deliver a certain SNR, roughly as the square of making things thinner. 13

14 General comments If you have a multimode beam, and need only a single mode for your experiment, you gain tolerance by overfilling your beamline and selecting the single mode at the end. If you have a single mode beam, you have no such luxury of overfilling! NSLS II experiments will require more stability than is now needed at NSLS and even APS, ALS. 14

15 Angle stability requirements Image position does not shift, but flux accepted by beamline does. 15

16 Position stability requirements Shifts in the beam position produce both intensity fluctuations and image position fluctuations. 16 If multimode, prefer higher beta straight?

Fast phase contrast detector Silicon drift detector Simultaneous recording of bright field, dark field, differential contrast at msec pixel times No significant upper limit to signal rate. Acceptable dark noise (~8 photons/msec equivalent; room temperature) High quantum efficiency (>90%) M. Feser, B. Hornberger, C. Jacobsen (Stony Brook); P. Rehak, G. de Geronimo (BNL Instrumentation); L. Strüder, P. Holl (MPI München) Assembly: 40 mm across Active area: 600 μm

Simultaneous Availability Of Contrast Modes Silica spheres 1  m diameter or less Differential phase contrast filters out intensity fluctuations of the source!

19 Closing comments STXMs/nanoprobes are very demanding on beam stability. Overfilling the optical system is great if the beam is fat enough. Must have very stable flux on timescales of ,000 Hz (?) On that timescale, must have stability in flux to 1:10 4 or better for transmission experiments. 19