PRT System Capacity March 6, 2009 J. Sam Lott, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Capacity Source: REES Module 6 & An Enhanced Parametric Railway Capacity Evaluation Tool
Advertisements

D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
OPSM 301: Operations Management Session 12: Service processes and flow variability Koç University Graduate School of Business MBA Program Zeynep Aksin.
Train platforming problem Ľudmila Jánošíková Michal Krempl University of Žilina, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Slovak Republic Czech Republic.
NFPA Standard 1710: Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, EMS and Special Ops The Right Description.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
The aerodynamics of freight trains David Soper, Chris Baker and Mark Sterling - School of Civil Engineering The aerodynamics of freight trains David Soper,
Implementing ERTMS in the UK: Human Factors Implications for Train Drivers Derek Porter Human Factors Skill Leader AEA Technology Rail.
CE 515x Train Acceleration, Deceleration, and Impact on Capacity Initial Instructions Work in teams of 2 - Get a new team mate (i.e., one who is not your.
Vehicle Flow.
Chapter 221 Chapter 22: Fundamentals of Signal Timing: Actuated Signals Explain terms related to actuated signals Explain why and where actuated signals.
1 Design of Evacuation System for High-Rise Building Danqing Yu.
How to get a smoother ride on BART Pamela Williams Susanna Gordon Sandia National Laboratories, CA.
Computational Modelling of Road Traffic SS Computational Project by David Clarke Supervisor Mauro Ferreira - Merging Two Roads into One As economies grow.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
Reliability Analysis of Multi-state Systems with Heterogeneous Multi-state Elements Dmitrij Birjukov National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv Faculty.
Intermodal terminals Unit 1: Defining the Freight System.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Some Issues to Consider with Close Headway Operation Tom McGean APM Standards Meeting February 2008, Miami FL.
Navigating SB 375: CEQA Streamlining and SB 743 Transportation Analysis 2014 San Joaquin Valley Fall Policy Conference.
Forecasting Travel Time Index using a Travel Demand Model to Measure Plan Performance Thomas Williams, AICP Texas A&M Transportation Institute 2015 TRB.
Transport-Based Load Modeling and Sliding Mode Control of Plug-In Electric Vehicles for Robust Renewable Power Tracking Presenter: qinghua shen BBCR SmartGrid0.
automated Vehicles and transportation system sustainability
Chapter 3 Network and System Design. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Understand.
Simulation Analysis of Truck Driver Scheduling Rules Eric C. Ervin Russell C. Harris J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 615 J.B. Hunt Corporate Drive P.O. Box 130.
Synergies Between PRT and Driverless Cars Prof. Em. Ingmar Andreasson LogistikCentrum AB.
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Vamsee Modugula Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
Educating Engineers in Sustainability Dr. Carol Boyle International Centre for Sustainability Engineering and Research University of Auckland.
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Emerging Trends: The Demographics and Needs of Seniors Richard Weiner Nelson/Nygaard Grady Tarbutton Washoe.
Coordinated Operations, notes from the field Edward Fok Resource Center Operations Technical Service Team 2005 TRB Annual Meeting.
TRB 88th Annual Meeting, Washington DC January, 2009 Huan Li and Robert L. Bertini Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting Washington, DC January.
1 TRB Workshop on Road Vehicle Automation Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program University of California, Berkeley Jane Lappin Volpe National.
Chapter 20: Actuated Signal Control and Detection
0 Christopher A. Pangilinan, P.E. Special Assistant to the Deputy Administrator Research and Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
A New Handover Mechanism for Femtocell-to-Femtocell Adviser: Frank, Yeong - Sung Lin Presented by Li Wen Fang.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Railway Operations: Issues and Objectives Capacity management Infrastructure planning Timetable preparation Management of day-to-day movement of trains.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Timetabling Components Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
Planning Applications Conference, Reno, NV, May Impact of Crowding on Rail Ridership: Sydney Metro Experience and Forecasting Approach William Davidson,
Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J Protection of distributed generation connected networks with coordination of overcurrent relays.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Enlarging the Options in the Strategy-based Transit Assignment TRB Applications Conference Reno 2011 Isabelle Constantin and Michael Florian INRO.
State Departments of Transportation Perspective: Economic and Transportation Infrastructure Considerations By Dr. Tony Kane American Association of State.
Hcm 2010: BASIC CONCEPTS praveen edara, ph.d., p.e., PTOE
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Inventory and Models in Project 3 Load Driven Systems John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001.
S.A.T.U.R.N. Simulation and Analysis Tools for Urban Automated Rapid Transit Networks.
12/08/ J/ESD.204J1 Real-Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Outline: Problem Description and Motivation Model Formulation Model Application.
14/02/20081 Urban mobility Griet De Ceuster. 14/02/20082 CONTENTS Mobility concepts in a city: technologies in a mobility perspective Challenges for implementation.
Special Topics on HMI and Behavioural Aspects Anabela Simões Universidqde Técnica de Lisboa FMH.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
Enhanced Availability With RAID CC5493/7493. RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks RAID is implemented to improve: –IO throughput (speed) and –Availability.
Master Plan Personal Rapid Transit Analysis for Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport by Peter Muller, P.E. President, PRT.
Level Two Supply Chain Management
Red Line Customer Capacity Update
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Design of Evacuation System for High-Rise Building Danqing Yu
World-Views of Simulation
ECOMM 2014 Mobility management as a tool for facilitating cycling in the sector of home care (cleaning services and family care) TRAJECT Katrien Backx.
LRT, GRT, PRT Comparison Peter Muller, PE Ingmar Andreasson, Ph. D.
Red and Orange Future Reliability
Requirements Definition
Comparative Visualization
Presentation transcript:

PRT System Capacity March 6, 2009 J. Sam Lott, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Presentation Overview Capacity – Defining the Issues Station Operations Main Line Station/Main Line Transition Zone Vehicle Occupancy Conclusions Capacity – Defining the Issues Station Operations Main Line Station/Main Line Transition Zone Vehicle Occupancy Conclusions

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Capacity – Defining the Issues

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Capacity – Defining the Issues Safety Operational sustainability Failure mode recovery/work-around Redundant elements: More is not necessarily better Public perception may negate some solutions Safety Operational sustainability Failure mode recovery/work-around Redundant elements: More is not necessarily better Public perception may negate some solutions

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Station Operations

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Station Operational Capacity – A premise for the near term As important as line capacity issues are, the successful application of PRT systems will be determined by the practical and sustainable operational capacity limits of the stations serving the peak demand conditions of the system. Ref PT Expo “PRT Stations – System Capacity Implications” by J. Sam Lott and Jill Capelli As important as line capacity issues are, the successful application of PRT systems will be determined by the practical and sustainable operational capacity limits of the stations serving the peak demand conditions of the system. Ref PT Expo “PRT Stations – System Capacity Implications” by J. Sam Lott and Jill Capelli

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Operational Concept and Station Configuration Serial Station Berths –FIFO with head-end loading position(s) –FIFO with platooning and simultaneous loading positions Parallel Station Berths –Parallel In-Line –Parallel Only Berths Serial Station Berths –FIFO with head-end loading position(s) –FIFO with platooning and simultaneous loading positions Parallel Station Berths –Parallel In-Line –Parallel Only Berths

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Serial Berths - Head End Load Load and Unload Positions Unload only Positions

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Serial Berths – Platooning Receiving Track Staging Positions Dispatch Track Staging Positions Unload/ Load Berths

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Parallel Berths – In Line Parallel Berth Station Guideway Mainline Guideway

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Parallel Berths – With Reversing Receiving Track Staging Positions Dispatch Track Staging Positions Unload/ Load Berths Parallel Berths Serial Berths

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Conclusions on Station Capacity Dwell time is #1 variable 2 to 20 sec. in theoretical studies, but passenger interactions could increase these values Communication of loading berth location is complicated for visually impaired passengers Extended dwell times required for elderly and handicapped Loading and unloading of baggage significantly impacts dwell times Dwell time is #1 variable 2 to 20 sec. in theoretical studies, but passenger interactions could increase these values Communication of loading berth location is complicated for visually impaired passengers Extended dwell times required for elderly and handicapped Loading and unloading of baggage significantly impacts dwell times

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Conclusions on Station Capacity Number of loading berths #2 variable Station dimensions are a practical limit Berth configuration (serial berths versus parallel berths) is #3 variable Parallel berths reduce dwell and reliability impacts, but slow down operating speeds Number of loading berths #2 variable Station dimensions are a practical limit Berth configuration (serial berths versus parallel berths) is #3 variable Parallel berths reduce dwell and reliability impacts, but slow down operating speeds

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Conclusions on Station Capacity For the first PRT Systems we will implement (i.e., next ten years), the following are proposed practical maximums for planning purposes: –Single-sided stations –6 to 8 berths –500 to 1000 vehicles/hr –1000 to 2000 passengers/hr For the first PRT Systems we will implement (i.e., next ten years), the following are proposed practical maximums for planning purposes: –Single-sided stations –6 to 8 berths –500 to 1000 vehicles/hr –1000 to 2000 passengers/hr

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Main Line

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Main Line Capacity Mainline throughput capacity issues include: –Sustainable operating headway –Empty vehicle mix –Average passenger occupancy of loaded vehicles Ref TRB “Capacity Analysis of Demand Responsive Systems” by J. Sam Lott and David S. Tai Mainline throughput capacity issues include: –Sustainable operating headway –Empty vehicle mix –Average passenger occupancy of loaded vehicles Ref TRB “Capacity Analysis of Demand Responsive Systems” by J. Sam Lott and David S. Tai

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Operating Headway Determined by: Synchronous control means that provides space (or “slot”) for merging vehicles to enter the Main Line flow Brick wall stop safety criteria Sustainable average spacing between vehicles that accounts for operational perturbations – i.e., the real world Determined by: Synchronous control means that provides space (or “slot”) for merging vehicles to enter the Main Line flow Brick wall stop safety criteria Sustainable average spacing between vehicles that accounts for operational perturbations – i.e., the real world

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Station/Main Line Transition Zone

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Designations of Operating Zones Station Guideway – Low speed operations with special train control considerations Main Line Guideway – Full speed operations under ATP safety functions Station/Main Line Transition Zone – Acceleration/deceleration zones where hand-off occurs between Station and Main Line control functions Station Guideway – Low speed operations with special train control considerations Main Line Guideway – Full speed operations under ATP safety functions Station/Main Line Transition Zone – Acceleration/deceleration zones where hand-off occurs between Station and Main Line control functions

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Vehicle Occupancy

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Vehicle Occupancy Determined by the local demographic effect on travel party size (e.g., % of families) Shared ride options heavily effected by: –Safety culture and physical context –Trip patterns conducive to shared ride –Surge flow characteristics Empty vehicle management and storage locations drive the mix of empty vehicles A new ASCE APM Conference paper by Ingmar Andréasson addresses some of these aspects Determined by the local demographic effect on travel party size (e.g., % of families) Shared ride options heavily effected by: –Safety culture and physical context –Trip patterns conducive to shared ride –Surge flow characteristics Empty vehicle management and storage locations drive the mix of empty vehicles A new ASCE APM Conference paper by Ingmar Andréasson addresses some of these aspects

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Conclusions

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES Message to Owners/Developers – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Suitability must be determined for each specific application Operations are very complex Hidden capacity constraints can exist Solutions applying redundant elements may penalize PRT effectiveness Message to Owners/Developers – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Suitability must be determined for each specific application Operations are very complex Hidden capacity constraints can exist Solutions applying redundant elements may penalize PRT effectiveness

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES Message to Planners/Suppliers – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Don’t force fit PRT to all applications Be patient and let PRT technology mature before assuming capacity capabilities Listen to what transit professionals have learned through experience Message to Planners/Suppliers – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Don’t force fit PRT to all applications Be patient and let PRT technology mature before assuming capacity capabilities Listen to what transit professionals have learned through experience

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE Is Capacity a Big Deal? YES Message to Transit Professionals – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Capacity vs. safety issues are critically important to understand Consider the world-wide design context Be open minded, while remaining protective of passenger safety Message to Transit Professionals – PRT is ready for consideration, however: Capacity vs. safety issues are critically important to understand Consider the world-wide design context Be open minded, while remaining protective of passenger safety

CARBON-FREE MOBILITY CONFERENCE PRT System Capacity March 6, 2009 J. Sam Lott, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.