Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments Ciarán Murray, DHI CONFIRM Workshop, Copenhagen 6 th March 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR The on-line HFA Monitor Walkthrough The Hyogo Framework for Action Progress Review and Reporting Framework for the Arab States Region.
Advertisements

Impact on Student Learning The conversation is about multiple indicators for this category BUT Few if any places actually have viable multiple indicators.
UNFCCC secretariat, programme Mayuresh Sarang, Team Lead - Accreditation Standards Team Module 2.2 Calibration regarding Accreditation Assessment Requirements.
Test Construction A workshop. Activity 1 Using the information you read Brown (2004) (particularly on pages 51-64), develop criteria for evaluating an.
The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, its implementation and some potential PPPs Jesper H. Andersen Head of unit (EU Water Policy) DHI Water Environment Health.
18-19 June 2007MARCOS 2, Ulriksdal Slott, Stockholm 1 European Marine Directives: Concepts, Overlap and Synergy Jesper H. Andersen DHI Water Environment.
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.
Post-Test Data Analysis Workshop. Agenda I. Analyze 2014 TerraNova Results II. Comparative Data Analysis: TerraNova & Explore Test Results III. Using.
1 Financial Mathematics Clicker review session, Final.
Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis David J Nutt, FMedSci, Leslie A King, PhD, Lawrence D Phillips, PhD and on behalf of the Independent.
DISTILLATE Appraisal Workshop 21 May 07 Michael Padgett, Regional Transport Advisor, Yorkshire & Humber Assembly.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Find the indicated z score: z = Find the indicated z score:.6331 z 0 z = –
Deviation = The sum of the variables on each side of the mean will add up to 0 X
Road To Success Florida School Leader Assessment (FSLA)
4. Establishing goals to guide & Measures to track.
Virginia Title III Statewide Consortium Conference Blacksburg, Virginia January 21-22, 2015 Virginia Department of Education: ACCESS for ELLs ® Teacher.
Workshop on: Marine environment and fisheries – applying the new CFP and environment policy together Carl O’Brien, Defra/Cefas Claus Hagebro, ICES.
Data mining as a tool in fraud investigation 29 June 2015.
Examples for the midterm. data = {4,3,6,3,9,6,3,2,6,9} Example 1 Mode = Median = Mean = Standard deviation = Variance = Z scores =
USPTO Patent Quality Composite presented to Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership September 5, 2012 by Martin Rater Statistician USPTO,
Correlation and Prediction Error The amount of prediction error is associated with the strength of the correlation between X and Y.
A Life Cycle and Cost Analysis of Preemptive Mitigation, Site Characterization, and Vapor Source Reduction Strategies at Industrial VI Sites with Multiple.
ENL1819T Progress Report Confidence in Our Success.
Summative Evaluation Configuration Washington Township Public Schools
I-Precision: Refers to how close a series of
Bellringer—Ten Week Reflection Answer the following: What did I do well the first ten weeks of school? What is an area in which I would like to improve?
1 Testing of Hypothesis Two Sample test Dr. T. T. Kachwala.
Math Department Data. Algebra II 1 st Period LEVEL I LEVEL II LEVEL III LEVEL IV # of students 1850 % PROFICIENT: 33% % NONPROFICIENT: 67%
1 BLA Sipuleucel-T (APC-8015) FDA Statistical Review and Findings Bo-Guang Zhen, PhD Statistical Reviewer, OBE, CBER March 29, 2007 Cellular, Tissue.
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
1 FY 2013 Call for Projects Candidate Evaluation and Selection Criteria March 20, 2012.
New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.
基 督 再 來 (一). 經文: 1 你們心裡不要憂愁;你們信神,也當信我。 2 在我父的家裡有許多住處;若是沒有,我就早 已告訴你們了。我去原是為你們預備地去 。 3 我 若去為你們預備了地方,就必再來接你們到我那 裡去,我在 那裡,叫你們也在那裡, ] ( 約 14 : 1-3)
Театр в России в XVIII -1пол.XIX вв. В начале 18 века, в Москве, на Красной площади впервые открылся публичный театр. В театре играла иностранная труппа.
Types of tests Risk Assessment Procedures – Auditors use the results of risk assessment procedures to determine the type and amount of further audit.
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
Load Balancing: List Scheduling
Chapter 13 Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
ФОНД ЗА РАЗВОЈ РЕПУБЛИКЕ СРБИЈЕ
عمل الطالبة : هايدى محمد عبد المنعم حسين
Applying a Backward Design Approach
September 1, 2013.
المبادئ الأساسية للصحة المهنية
Слайд-дәріс Қарағанды мемлекеттік техникалық университеті
.. -"""--..J '. / /I/I =---=-- -, _ --, _ = :;:.
KANSAS SB 123 Drug Possession Sentencing
Oral pentasa in the treatment of active Crohn’s disease: A meta-analysis of double- blind, placebo-controlled trials  Stephen B Hanauer, Ulf Strömberg 
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
II //II // \ Others Q.
Пасиви и пасивни операции Активи и активни операции
'III \-\- I ', I ,, - -
Chapter 13 Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program
I1I1 a 1·1,.,.,,I.,,I · I 1··n I J,-·
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
Principal Components Analysis
Confidence-Based Assessment of Two-Alternative Format Tests
Developing a Hiring System
数据的矩阵描述.
Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.
WHO Global HIV/AIDS Staff Meeting
Load Balancing: List Scheduling
,, 'III \-\-
Baltic GIG Progress report
. '. '. I;.,, - - "!' - -·-·,Ii '.....,,......, -,
Review Summary 29 elements achieved by courses
Exploring Rubrics Through Pizza
Presentation transcript:

Confidence Rating of Marine Eutrophication Assessments Ciarán Murray, DHI CONFIRM Workshop, Copenhagen 6 th March 2009

Confidence Rating Based on scoring of indicators RefCon, AcDev, and AcStat, are scored with respect to: extraordinary quality acceptable quality ‘indicator confidence’ poor quality ‘Indicator confidence’ is combined per quality element Quality elements are combined into a interim ’confidence assessment’: Class I = % = extraordinary quality Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

Scoring an Indicator

Indicator Confidence From scores to indicator confidence rating

Quality Element Confidence From Indicator to Quality Element confidence rating …including Indicator weighting

Overall Confidence Assessment Confidence for Quality Elements combined To give overall assessment Class I = % = extraordinary quality Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

Overall Confidence Assessment Another example… Class I = % = extraordinary quality Class II = 75-50% = acceptable quality Class III = 50-0% = poor quality

Only 1 indicator? A quality element with only 1 indicator has a reduced confidence rating. Reduction -25%

Only 1 Quality Element With only 1 quality element the overall confidence rating is reduced. Reduction -50%

Confidence Rating …any questions? Reference Conditions (RefCon) Confidence Score Indicator Confidence Rating (Ind_Conf) Actual Status (AcStat) Confidence Score Acceptable Deviation (AcDev) Confidence Score Quality Element Confidence Rating (QE_Conf) Final Confidence Rating