Mental Health Court 101 2007 Georgia Drug & DUI Court Conference – Peachtree City, GA Honorable Kathlene Gosselin, Hall County Superior Court & H.E.L.P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DHSS DSAMH Department of Health and Social Services Division of Substance Abuse and Mental Health.
Advertisements

Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.
1 Michigan Department of Corrections Office of Community Corrections  Office of Community Corrections was created pursuant to Public Act 511 of 1988,
Presented By: Aki Nearchou, LBSW & Brian Fuller, PH.D. KCMHSAS
Justice Involved Veterans Recovery & Support Camila L. Lopez, LISW Veterans Justice Outreach Coordinator New Mexico VA Health Care System.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Georgia Behavioral Health Legislative Caucus. Mental Health Courts in Georgia Appalachian Circuit Superior Court (Pickens, Gilmer and Fannin Counties)
Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.
Introduction to Kenosha County Behavioral Health Courts Kenosha County Division of Aging & Disability Jim Truchan (LMFT,LPC,LCSW) Human Services Manager.
Central Receiving Center (CRC) System of Care Donna P. Wyche, MS, CAP Manager, Mental Health and Homeless Issues Division Orange County Family Services.
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
VETERANS COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY VETERANS COURT OF ORANGE COUNTY Community Court Superior Court of California 909 N. Main Street Santa Ana, CA
Alternatives to Incarceration and Care Coordination May 12, 2015.
Georgia Division of Child Support Services Department of Human Services Outreach Services.
1 Diversion and Jail Discharge Strategies Presentation by Ron Honberg, NAMI National Alliance to End Homelessness Conference Washington, DC July 18, 2006.
REALIGNING RESOURCES TO FUND YOUR DTC CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROFESSIONALS – NATIONAL CONFERENCE BANFF, ALBERTA OCTOBER 24 – 27,
King County Regional Mental Health Court Navigating the mental health and chemical dependency communities.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Downtown Community Court Canadian Criminal Justice Association CONGRESS 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009 Honourable Judge Tom Gove Provincial.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Nathaniel Assertive Community Treatment New York County Alternatives to Incarceration Program Bradley Jacobs Deputy Director, Behavioral Health Programs.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ADULT SYSTEMS OF CARE – JAIL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT Full Service Partnership.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
January 25, 2011 Georgia Behavioral Health Caucus Community Care Joseph Bona, MD, MBA Chief Medical Officer DeKalb Community Service Board.
1 Ed Monahan Public Advocate Substance Abuse: Senate Bill 4 (2009) Treatment options expanded Ernie Lewis KY Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers June.
MISSION To make jail the last resort for people with severe mental illnesses and co-occurring substance use disorders ama 2.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Criminal Justice, Mental Health Substance Abuse & Reinvestment Act Charlotte County Implementation Grant Presented by: Charlotte County.
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
PREPARED BY NPC RESEARCH PORTLAND, OR MAY 2013 Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Results.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Treatment is the Key: Addressing Drug Abuse in Criminal Justice Settings Redonna K. Chandler, Ph.D. Branch Chief Services Research Branch Division of Epidemiology,
FAUQUIER COUNTY. OFFICE OF ADULT COURT SERVICES WHAT THE HECK IS IT ANYWAY?
History and Background Formed in 2006 as a joint collaboration of San Mateo County Courts, Probation Department, District Attorney Office, Sheriff’s Office,
LJIC Intercept Filter 2 October 1, 2007 Brenda Desmond Leslie Halligan Dr. Laura Wendlandt.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
LEON COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM.
Behavioral Health Integration of Services for Justice Involved Clients Veronica Kelley, LCSW Assistant Director San Bernardino County.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Presented by: Michael Kennedy, MFT Director. Psychiatric Emergency Services 24/7 availability Access to  Crisis Stabilization  Crisis Residential Services.
ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CRIMINAL MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.
The Kansas City VA Medical Center And Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Court.
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Court Services Stepping Up InitiativeStepping Up Initiative Alachua County Answers The CallAlachua County Answers The Call.
Gathering Community Support
Jail Diversion Programs
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
Sentencing Reform in CA
Community Corrections Alternative Program
Beyond the referral Presented by:
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
What works across Intercepts
Presentation transcript:

Mental Health Court Georgia Drug & DUI Court Conference – Peachtree City, GA Honorable Kathlene Gosselin, Hall County Superior Court & H.E.L.P. Program Team

 1955 census included geriatric patients and some patients with MR  21,000 (1/3) of the 70,000 patients in hospitals in 1995 were forensic patients  Does not include community or private hospitals While the number of patients in psychiatric hospitals has decreased dramatically since Source: Torrey, Out of the Shadows, 1997

... jails and prisons have become the new “psychiatric hospitals”

Non-Traditional Allies  Police, judges, correctional officials have become strong allies of NAMI advocates in many states and communities.  Significant growth of pre and post-booking jail diversion programs, e.g. CIT programs MH Courts.  Enactment of federal legislation (P.L ).

Mental Health Courts  Treatment is better than jail. For many of these offenders, mental illness is their primary issue, not criminality – not addressing the primary issue destines the offender to a revolving door at the jail.  Important differences from drug courts. Psychiatric relapse is not a crime.

Drug Courts vs. Mental Health Courts Similarities  Ongoing judicial interaction  Use of sanctions/incentives  Integration of services with judicial case processing  Non-adversarial approach of prosecution and defense  Use of drug testing  Coordinated strategy of court team  Necessary coordination with community resources Differences  Level and type of sanctions  Court atmosphere  Intensity of case management  Lack of emphasis on payment of fees  Judicial demeanor  Inclusion of mental health system, consumer and advocacy partners  Focus on medication compliance  Need for treatment specific to co-occurring disorders

Mental Health Program Principles  Divert persons with mental illness from unnecessary and inappropriate incarceration  Improve treatment access and recovery options  Reduce cost and risk for jail and law enforcement  Reduce recidivism and problem behaviors

Benefits of MH Courts  Help people with mental illness who are in the criminal justice system BECAUSE of their illness, out of jails and into treatment and more stable lives in the community.  Better treatment outcomes, reduced recidivism, enhanced public safety.  Provides options for other specialty courts (e.g. drug courts, domestic violence courts).

H.E.L.P Program  A pilot program of the Georgia Department of Corrections in partnership with the Hall County Superior Court  Services provided by MHM Correctional Services, Inc., a national vendor of mental health services to correctional systems and the current vendor to the Georgia Department of Corrections

Background  High recidivism rates for offenders with mental illness (16-18% in HCDC diagnosed MI)  GDOC desired pilot program to prevent the return to prison of offenders with mental illness  GDOC received grant from the Governor’s Criminal Justice Coordinating Council  Hall County selected as pilot site

Coordination  18 months planning and coordination prior to start  Stakeholders attend training conference  Retention of vendor (MHM)  Development of service provider team and program procedures

Mission Statement It is the mission of the HELP Program to provide alternatives to incarceration for defendants who are involved in the criminal justice system as a result of their mental health or mental retardation issues. We accomplish this by linking those individuals to local, community based treatment resources with the goals of reducing recidivism and helping the participants become stable, productive members of the community.

Program Objectives 1. Provide offenders with community-based case management and treatment services as an alternative to incarceration 2. Stop the cycle of imprisonment of individuals with serious mental illness

Initial Program Staffing  Project Coordinator (licensed masters level)  Two full-time case managers (licensed masters level)  Half-time clinical psychologist (doctoral level)

Current Program Staffing  Project Clinical Coordinator (licensed masters level)  Clinical Case Manager  Community Support Person Additional Support:  Working with Georgia Mountains Community Service Board – GMCSB Team is similar in make-up Psychiatric Social Worker Community Support Individual Access to psychiatric support and other therapeutic support

Eligibility Requirements 1. Incarcerated, charged, or on probation/parole in Hall County (Misdemeanor or Felony) 2. Not charged with one of seven serious or violent crimes (prosecutor consent required for enrollment) 3. Hall County residency 4. Voluntary participation 5. Criminal Adult Population

Eligibility Requirements Mental Health Criteria: a. Severe and Persistent Mental Illness (psychotic disorders and major mood disorders) b. Co-occurring Disorders c. Mental Retardation d. Other Axis I disorders that are primary to their involvement in the criminal justice system

Services Linkage and close supervision of:  Treatment – Inpatient/Outpatient  Counseling  Medication management  Vocational placement assistance  Housing placement assistance  Transportation linking  Length of program: 9 – 18 months or longer

Process  Referral: by police, attorney, DA, courts, probation, self- referral  Screening conducted by licensed staff  Assessment conducted for placement  Determination of suitability for program  Referral to HELP case management or declined services  Initiation of case management services  Court involvement  If not appropriate for Program – will be linked to services in community when possible to do so

Referral Sources  Hall County Public Defender Office 24%  Hall County Detention Center 23%  Private Attorneys 14%  Probation/Pretrial 13%  District Attorney/Solicitor 12%  Family/Self Referred 3%  Judicial3%  Other 8% (Defense Attorneys account for 37% of referrals)

Hall County, Georgia HELP Program Participants  Active24  Graduated30  Terminated 35  Opted Out 8  Enrolled (since inception) 97

Hall County, Georgia HELP Program - Jail Days 97 Participants:  Jail Days in 18 months prior to entry7183 AVG 74  Jail Days while in Program1333 AVG 14  Jail Days for 30 Graduates (in 18 months) 9  Jail Days for 30 Grads (prior 18 months) 1759 AVG 59

Hall County, Georgia HELP Program – Cost Benefit  These 92 persons spent 7183 days incarcerated in the 18 months prior to program entry, costing $359,150 in jail costs alone (does not include costs associated with officers dealing with issues these offenders caused while incarcerated, medical staff costs, transportation costs, or other jail related costs other than standard cost for an offender per day of $50)

Hall County, Georgia HELP Program – Cost Benefit  Jail Costs for participants in 18 months immediately prior to entry $ 359,150  Active participants have spent 1333 days in jail while active in program $ 66,650  30 Graduates have spent 9 days in jail $ 450 Program has been operational for 30 months and first graduation was 12/2005

Participants  65% of women have been victims of trauma Childhood physical/sexual abuse and/or adult abuse  Co-occurring Nearly 60% have co-occurring substance abuse issues in conjunction with their mental illness diagnosis  50% Female – Male

William M. Hall County Arrest Record:  Drunk in Public  Convicted – Armed Robbery in GDC from 6/11/98 until 3/23/05  Committed Simple Assault 6/13/05 (1 day in jail); Probation Warrant 7/8/05 (7 days in jail)  Entered HELP 7/15/05  1 day in jail during program  Graduated 6/29/06 – 0 days incarcerated since graduation  Jail Days in 18 months prior to entry 447  Jail Days in Program 1  Jail Days since Graduation (9+ months) 0

Christie M.

Keys to Successful Diversion Programs  Fixed Point of Accountability  Sufficient Case Management Resources  24/7 Staffing, On Call and On Site  Low Patient-to-Staff Ratios  Access to Full Range of MH/SA Services

Keys to Successful Diversion Programs  Safe, transitional housing  Job placement opportunities  Supportive law enforcement community  Focus on recovery  Certain discretionary resources

Governor’s Mental Health Diversion Program Conceptual Model for Comprehensive Hall County Program Funded through and managed by Hall County Superior Court Key Program Supports

Successes and Challenges  Successes to-date  On-going challenges  Future of the program

Mental Health Court Issues The Great Unknowns  The issue of perception  The effect of medications  Learned helplessness  Identifying target behaviors  “½ the sanctions and twice the patience”

It Just Makes Sense 97 Participants:  Jail Days in 18 months prior to entry7183 (AVG. 74)  Jail Days while in Program1333 (AVG. 14)  Jail Days for 30 Graduates (in 18 months) 9  Jail Days for 30 Grads (prior 18 months)1759 (AVG. 59)  Jail Costs for participants in 18 months immediately prior to entry $ 359,150  Active participants have spent 1333 days in jail while active in program $ 66,650  30 Graduates have spent 9 days in jail $ 450

Questions