Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July CPOC Meeting. Key Changes to AB 109 AB 109 is modified by AB 117 Realignment is now operative on October 1, 2011 (budget also establishes the community.
Advertisements

AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
Criminal Justice Realignment: What Counties Need to Know to Implement Presented: September 2011.
Juvenile Justice system
Measuring 109 In Fresno County
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
1 _____ March 5, 2009 SC Sentencing Reform Commission Presenter South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster S206/H3166 _____.
Fresno County month data provided to Chief Probation Officers of California (CPOC) & ORE future work Owen Research & Evaluation October 26, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION Parole Violator Management and Hearings in Local Jails.
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission November 6, 2013.
The Juvenile Justice System
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Presented By: Chief Edward Medrano Gardena Police Department.
Community Supervision and Alternative Sanctions Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Sentencing and Punishment
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN 1 st Quarter Update October 1, 2011 – December 31,
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill CHAPTERCHAPTER EIGHTEIGHT.
September 20, 2011 Criminal Justice Realignment OCTOBER 1, 2011.
1 Division of Adult Parole Operations MARGARITA PEREZ Deputy Director Enhancing Public Safety through the Successful Reintegration of Offenders.
Pre-Sentence Investigation Proposal Purpose: To gather and provide information to the Courts and to other Criminal Justice stakeholders that will aid at.
ICAOS Rules Training Presented by: The Only Way to Go… Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision.
When Does Criminal Justice Realignment Take Effect? 1 Eligible felonies sentenced to county jail: applies to any person sentenced on or after October 1,
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
Measuring Realignment at the Two-Year Mark: Jail Population Trends Linda M. Penner, Chair Kathleen T. Howard, Executive Director Curtis J. Hill, Executive.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
Prop. 47 Criminal Sentences. The Question Should the penalties for certain offenders convicted of non-serious, nonviolent crimes be reduced from felonies.
Realignment: The Role of the BSCC and the Composition of Local Detention Facilities Patricia Mazzilli, Executive Director Board of State and Community.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System CJUS 101 Community-Based Corrections.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
Kevin Grassel March 20, Realignment redirected: non-serious, non-violent, non-sex registrant (non-non-non) offenders from State to local jurisdictions.
SENTENCING AND CORRECTIONS CHAPTER 15 PAGES
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Winters April 9 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
Presentation by: Hon. Stephen V. Manley Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara A Statewide Training for Local Mental Health Boards and Commissions.
Public Safety Realignment Act 2011 P UBLIC S AFETY R EALIGNMENT A SSEMBLY B ILLS : AB 109, AB 117, AB1 17 County of San Bernardino, Department of Behavioral.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
BUDGET TRAILER BILLS CHANGES TO PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT C ALIFORNIA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS AND R EHABILITATION.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation transcript:

Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local Planning (Executive Committee)

Community Corrections Partnership Shall recommend local plan to the county board of supervisors for the implementation of the 2011 public safety realignment. Executive committee: Chief Probation Officer (Chair), A Chief of Police, Sheriff, District Attorney, Public Defender, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court, and an additional county health and human service representative appointed by the Board of Supervisors

When Does it Begin Prospectively applied after October 1, 2011 or upon funding. AB 118 provides the statutory framework, allocation methodology and revenue to implement the 2011 public safety realignment.

Community Corrections Partnership The CCP plan is deemed accepted by the County Board of Supervisors unless the Board rejects the plan by a vote of four-fifths of the Board.

Who is sentenced to local custody?  Revises the definition of felony to include certain crimes that are punishable in jail for more than one year.  Maintains length of sentences.  Time served in jails instead of prisons:  Non-violent offenders  Non-serious offenders  Non-sex offenders

Additional Features of Realignment  Enhanced local custody and supervision tools:  Alternative custody tools for county jails  Home detention for low-level offenders  Local jail credits like current prison credits (Day-for-day).  Prospective from October 1, 2011.

Who is Sentenced to State Prison? The following sentences must be served in state prison:  Prior or current serious or violent felony as described in PC (c) or (c)  The defendant is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to PC 290  Excludes certain other specified crimes Note: “excluded crimes” are those for which a defendant can still be committed to state prison.

Sentences that must be served in State Prison Examples of non-serious, non- violent, non-sex offenses that would be required to serve time in prison: felony physical abuse of an elder or dependent, assault on a peace officer, possession of horse meat and bribing a legislator.

Contracting Back  Realignment allows counties to contract back with the State to send local offenders to state prison.  Counties are authorized to contract with public community correctional facilities (CCFs).  Contracting back does not include parole revocations.

Prospectively from October 1, 2011 No state prison inmates will be transferred to county jails. X

Post-release Supervision Board of Supervisors designate a county agency to be responsible for Post-release Supervision and inform CDCR by August 1, All 58 counties have identified Probation as the designated agency responsible for Post-release community supervision.

Post-release Community Supervision CDCR must notify counties who is being released on post-release supervision at least 30 days prior to release.

Post-release Supervision  County-level supervision upon release from prison  Current Non-violent offenders  Current Non-serious offenders  Sex offenders  Does NOT include:  3 rd strike  Individuals with a Serious Commitment Offense  Individuals with a Violent Commitment Offense  High risk sex offenders as defined by CDCR

Determining PRCS or Parole Supervision  If an offender is released from prison on October 1 st and completes the revocation on or after November 1 st the parolee will either remain on parole or if the parolee qualifies will be placed on PRCS.

Any parolee who is in a county jail serving a term of parole revocation on October 1 st and is released directly from county jail without returning to a state prison on or after October 1 st, that offender shall remain on parole.

 Allows revocations up to 180 days.  Graduated sanctions including flash incarceration at the local level (revocations lasting longer than 10 days require a court hearing).  Individuals on post-release supervision without any violations after six months can be discharged.  Courts may adjudicate violations and new conditions of release at the local level. Post-release Supervision (continued)

 Specifies CDCR shall have no jurisdiction over any person who is under post-release community supervision and no person shall be returned to prison except for persons previously sentenced to a term of life (and only after a BPH order).

State Parole Supervision  Commitment offense:  Current serious or violent felony as described in PC (c) or 667.5(c)  The offender has been convicted of a third strike  The person is classified as a mentally Disordered Offender (MDO)  Or the person is classified as a high risk sex offender.

State Parole Supervision Parole revocations will be served in county jail – not in state prison - for no more than 180 days. Contracting back from the state for revocations is not an option. Graduated sanctions including flash incarceration at the local level (revocations lasting longer than 10 days require a BPH hearing). Only persons previously sentenced to a term of life can be revoked to prison.

State Parole Supervision Parole revocation process remains with Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) until July 1, The revocation process will transition to the Courts after July 1, 2013.

State Parole Supervision For the remaining low level offenders on parole after implementation of realignment, parole has the authority to discharge after six months if no violations have occurred.

The six month discharge is prospective and only applies if he or she has either: been on parole continuously for six months after October 1 st and the person is not retained by BPH for good cause or the person has, on or October 1 st been on parole for one year and the BPH does not retain for good cause.

Juvenile Justice  AB 109 proposed limits future juvenile court commitments to DJJ.  AB 117 eliminates this provision and maintains the state’s process for committing youth to state facilities.

New Changes to Realignment  Allows Courts to propose split sentence to mandate probation as part of county low level offenders sentence.  Expands limitations on allowable hospital costs for jail inmates and removes sunset date  Elimination of Correctional Standards Authority and the new Board of State and Community Corrections (SB 92).  Authorizing the conversion of a female prison to a male prison if necessary