The U.S. has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of its prisoners. 2.7 million U.S. children have an incarcerated parent. 2.3 million people are now incarcerated,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practice Guidelines for Attorneys Representing Parents in Abuse, Neglect and Termination of Parental Rights Cases Cindi Wood, JD John Chambers, JD February.
Advertisements

FUTURE OPTION LEFT OPEN Presented by: Honorable Bryan K. Murray Magistrate and Juvenile Judge - 6 th Judicial District.
Juvenile Justice 40+ Terms, Settings, and Definitions. Scott Scott Bernard Peterson CEO, Global Youth Justice Mobile:
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
REGIONAL REENTRY CONFERENCE JULY , 2013 PARENTING SENTENCING ALTERNATIVE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6639.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Overview of Juvenile Justice in Michigan John Evans, Director Bureau of Juvenile Justice Michigan Department of Human Services 1.
Children and Families Chapter 10. Social Welfare Policy and Social Programs: A Values Perspective, by Elizabeth Segal Copyright 2007, Brooks/Cole, a division.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Dependency Court – A Team Approach Presen Presented by: Judge Brantley S. Clark and Carol A. Dunaway, M.S. 1.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
CJI Reducing Trauma in Children by Ensuring Involvement of Fathers Nancy K. Jones, Hennepin County Attorney’s Office Kevin McTigue, Hennepin County Human.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Who Must Comply? When is a patient authorization NOT required?  As needed for the protection of federal and state elective constitutional officers and.
The Juvenile Justice System
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Child Trafficking Survivors: Civil Rights and Legislation Kathleen Kim, Project Attorney Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area.
Allianceforchildwelfare.org Adoptions.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.
The Health of Women Prisoners: Global Challenges and Solutions Nancy Stoller University of California, Santa Cruz.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
1 JUVENILE COURT PROTECTION CASES: THE PLAYERS POVERTY LAW Irene M. Opsahl.
OACCA Public Policy Presentation Theme: Fast & changing world of health care & social services.
Lost Opportunities: The Reality of Latinos in the U.S. Criminal Justice System Nancy E. Walker J. Michael Senger Francisco A. Villarruel Angela M. Arboleda.
 National Association of Counsel for Children  October 21, 2010  Developed by:  Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center  & University of Miami School of.
Georgia’s Juvenile Justice System STUDY PRESENTATION
Chapter 15 Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System  When first created was viewed as quasi-social welfare agency  Parens patriae – system.
Sharing confidential information Who DFCS can tell.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Juvenile Courts Chapter Nineteen.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Justice System
Juvenile Justice A special category in the justice system created for youth—that is, in most U.S. jurisdictions, persons between the ages of 7 and 18.
The Juvenile Justice System
Purpose and Scope of Juvenile Court Act
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
C.P.S. Safety Plan Model. MISSION: To protect abused and neglected children, to support the efforts of families to care for and parent their own children.
The Juvenile Justice System 4.1 – Introduction to Juvenile Justice System October 1,
Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.
Immigration Options, Service Models and Special Concerns in Immigration Guidelines for Child Welfare Staff California Family to Family Statewide Convening:
PARENTING BEYOND BARS Lillian Hewko, Incarcerated Parents Project, Washington Defender Association.
1 Using Title IV-E in the Juvenile Justice System ABA Center on Children and the Law National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues.
Objectives: SWBAT Analyze the impact of recidivism on society Identify key aspects of the Juvenile Justice System 1.
Chicago Legal Advocacy for Incarcerated Mothers (CLAIM) CBA Legal Aid Committee Women Prisoners and their Children.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Understanding the Criminal Justice System Part 14 Juvenile Justice.
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Juvenile Justice Week 1 CJ420.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
The Juvenile Justice System. When first created was viewed as quasi-social welfare agency Parens patriae – system acts as a surrogate parent in the interests.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Chippewa County Department of Human Services 2014 Budget Summary State of Wisconsin Joint Finance Action Health & Human Service Board.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Juvenile Justice It’s all about you!.
Presentation transcript:

The U.S. has 5% of the world’s population and 25% of its prisoners. 2.7 million U.S. children have an incarcerated parent. 2.3 million people are now incarcerated, up from 500,000 in About 11% of children of incarcerated mothers are in foster care; 2% of fathers’ children. Nationally, there is increased interest in children of incarcerated parents, and small progress toward considering reducing prison sentences for minor drug offenses, nationally and locally. (Bureau of Justice Statistics and Pew Research Center) Mass Incarceration

Incarcerated Parents and Reasonable Efforts Reunification services in light of 750 ILCS 50/1 D (m) Lack of services in prisons and jails Only 2% of Illinois correctional budget is devoted to programs. Substance abuse treatment Cook County Jail services Cook County Jail Division 17: 15% of the women and provides some parenting classes, group counseling on trauma, but no substance abuse treatment per se. Cook County Jail is the largest mental health care provider, due to lack of services in the community. Parenting classes in jails and prisons are not DCFS certified, except for one class at Logan.

Visits between children and incarcerated parents Distance: 50% of incarcerated parents in state prisons are imprisoned between 100 and 500 miles from home, and 11% are incarcerated more than 500 miles away. For federal prisoners, 43% are incarcerated more than 500 miles from home (Bureau of Justice Statistics). Implications for case workers and permanency planning. Prison visits and best interest; educating judges Cook County Jail “Bright Spaces” program in Div. 17 Barrier visits for all other parents in pretrial detention Judges and “best interest” Increase in “no contact” orders

In the community: ~ Closure of City of Chicago mental health clinics. ~ “ Through changes in health care financing brought about by the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), there are unprecedented opportunities to treat the chronic illnesses often underlying repeated justice involvement and recidivism.” (TASC) To download the report: impact-health-care-reform-criminal-justice-system impact-health-care-reform-criminal-justice-system

~ Court writs and testimony as to efforts; documentation of efforts ~ Addition to 750 ILCS 50/1 D (m) to be introduced this term: It shall be an affirmative defense to an unfitness finding under this subsection (m) that services under the service plan were not offered and available to the parent during the 9-month period.

20 ILCS 1305/1-35 (2009) Families of incarcerated parents Department of Human Services and the Illinois Department of Corrections shall work cooperatively with community organizations and service providers to ~ identify local service providers ~ develop informational materials for families and children of incarcerated parents, on visitation programs, family counseling, mentoring, school-based programs, and others. ~ develop materials to reduce stigma and provide support for children of prisoners ~ provide telephone and Internet contacts for the children's caregivers and assist them in locating and accessing services for the children. ~ provide materials to inmates at orientation in a sealed envelope to be mailed to caregivers and make materials available in facility visiting rooms and waiting areas.

Increase in private adoption petitions filed against incarcerated parents Right to counsel under In re ADOPTION OF L.T.M., 824 N.E.2d 221, 214 Ill.2d 60, 291 Ill. Dec. 645 (2005) ~ Incarcerated father appeals step-parent adoption; appointed counsel on appeal is denied payment. ~ Enactment of the state statute is sufficient state action for the purposes of an equal protection claim. ~ Parent facing TPR brought by private parties under the Adoption Act is similarly situated to parents facing TPR under the Juvenile Court Act. ~ Controlling state expenditures on appointed counsel is not a compelling state interest. ~ “Accordingly, we hold the state is required by the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to provide appointed counsel to indigent parents who face the loss of parental rights in proceedings under the Adoption Act.” “Pregnancy Options” classes in Cook County Jail women’s divisions

Parental Rights of Immigrant Parents Facing Deportation 2013 Federal Directive ~ US Immigration and Customs Enforcement : Facilitating Parental Interests in the Course of Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities Responds to problem of families separated by detention/deportation Applies to parents and legal guardians without regard to the child’s citizenship. Ensure that immigration enforcement activities do not unnecessarily disrupt parental rights of parents and legal guardians. Safeguard parental rights through prosecutorial discretion and ensuring participation in child welfare proceedings. See handouts: ICE Directive and “Guide for Detained and Removed Parents with Child Custody Concerns”

California Senate Bill 1064, the Reuniting Immigrant Families Act (SB 1064) 10/1/2012 ~ Extends the period for reunification during immigration detention or deportation for up to two years, if the parent has made reasonable efforts or if termination of parental rights is not in the child’s best interest; provides exceptions if the parent is charged with certain crimes and court discretion if the child or a member of the sibling group is under age three. ~ Allows children to be placed with relatives regardless of the relatives’ immigration status ~ Requires child welfare agency to give guidance to counties and to establish MOUs with foreign consulates as to how to contact a detained parent, how to assess the child’s status, how to assist with parent-child reunification after a parent is deported, and how to assist children eligible for special immigrant juvenile status. ~ Requires the state to reimburse counties for costs See handout Children of Undocumented Immigrants and California’s Reuniting Immigrant Families Act. ~ Illinois exploring possible legislation.

Policy Reform to preserve parental rights Exceptions to the 15-month ASFA timeframes: California Welfare and Institutions Code Section (b)(6) The social worker is not required to submit the recommendation to set a TPR hearing if... : The incarceration or institutionalization of the parent or parents, or the court-ordered participation of the parent or parents in a residential substance abuse treatment program, constitutes a significant factor in the child's placement in foster care for a period of 15 of the most recent 22 months, and termination of parental rights is not in the child's best interests, considering factors such as the age of the child, the degree of parent and child bonding, the length of the sentence, and the nature of the treatment and the nature of the crime or illness.

Exceptions to the 15-month ASFA timeframes NY June 2010 §384-b(3)(l)(i) ~ Allows foster care agencies to refrain from filing for TPR if a parent is in prison or a residential drug treatment program or if a parent’s prior incarceration or program participation is a significant factor in why the child has been in foster care for 15 of the last 22 months. ~ Foster care agencies are required to inform parents in prison and residential drug treatment of their rights and responsibilities and to provide referrals to social services and family visiting programs. NY State Office of Children and Family Services information “You don’t have to stop being a parent while you are incarcerated” (two handouts)

Reduce parental incarceration through: ~ family-based treatment ~ house arrest and ~ sentencing reform Local and national efforts

Chicago Legal Advocacy for Incarcerated Mothers (CLAIM) Gail T. Smith CLAIM 70 E. Lake Street, Suite 1120 Chicago, IL Facebook group: Chicago Legal Advocacy for Incarcerated Mothers