Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY12 Annual Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY10 Annual Report.
Advertisements

1 Implementation of HB 1736 September 1, OVERVIEW H.B. 1736, enacted during the 81 st Legislative Session, provided the following support for.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY11 Annual Report.
Reentry Division Update To: Reentry Task Force April 20, 2010.
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force. Chief Justice Led Mental Health Task Force Members Judge Sharon Keller, Presiding Judge, Texas Court of Criminal.
REGIONAL REENTRY CONFERENCE JULY , 2013 PARENTING SENTENCING ALTERNATIVE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6639.
1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2012 National Association of Sentencing Commissions Terri McDonald, Undersecretary, Operations.
MONEYBALLING CRIMINAL JUSTICE Anne Milgram Vice President of Criminal Justice Laura and John Arnold Milgram.
SENTENCING REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA Thomas W. Ross.
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Chapter 12 Preparing for Prisoner Reentry: Discretionary Parole and Mandatory Release.
Background The Sentencing Commission is a public governor and legislature- appointed body whose purpose is to study Louisiana sentencing and incarceration.
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
The Juvenile Justice System
Public Safety Realignment Local custody for non-violent, non- serious, non-sex offenders Changes to State Parole Local Post-release Supervision Local.
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Virginia’s Geriatric Release Provision. 2 Geriatric Release Provision & Truth-in-Sentencing  The Geriatric Release Provision was adopted as part of the.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
Hamilton County Veterans’ Treatment Court Structure, Process, and Purpose.
BOPPPS W&M Presentation - 1 Key Performance Measure #1 Parole Recidivism  Percentage of Matrix Inmates (applies to offenders whose crime(s) were.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Pre-Sentence Investigation Proposal Purpose: To gather and provide information to the Courts and to other Criminal Justice stakeholders that will aid at.
Texas Department of Public Safety DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Texas Silver Alert Program How Prepared Are You?
Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.
State of CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division Major Initiatives Update Presented to the Criminal Justice Policy Advisory Commission September.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Basic Supervision Funding We will receive the following amounts in basic supervision: FY 2008 FY 2009 $105,744,392 $107,326,403 Currently we are receiving.
The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Michigan Department of Corrections Institutional and Community Corrections.
Higher Education and Second Chances Center for Community Alternatives, Justice Strategies.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Chapter 2 Sentencing and the Correctional Process Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter ©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Define community corrections and discuss its role in the criminal justice system  LO2 Describe.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
Mental Health Diversionary Program Purpose: To reduce the number of mentally ill clients incarcerated or insufficiently served while aiding in recovery.
Flowood Satellite Facility Kevin Jackson, Deputy Warden Restitution Program.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Early Release Schemes in Hong Kong Mr. Kenneth LEUNG Principal Officer Hong Kong Correctional Services Department.
Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY13 Annual Report.
OBJECTIVE CLASSIFICATION AR’s 503, 521 & 523. Learning Objectives What is objective classification? What is objective classification? What is the purpose.
Educational training on Voting Rights for people currently or previously involved in the criminal justice system.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
JUVENILE JUSTICE Juvenile Records Sealing and Restricted Access 2016.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
The Criminal Justice System Chapter 12. Elements of the Criminal Justice System  Criminal Justice Law  Texas criminal justice system: The system of.
Chapter 11 Criminal Justice
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
California State Association of Counties
SMI Determination Form Clinical Guide
The Federal Court System & the Judicial Branch
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Parole.
Chapter 11 – Criminal Justice
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Washington State Three Strikes Law
Assertive community treatment webinar
Department of Children and Families
Overview of Community Supervision and Corrections Departments (Adult Probation) in Texas South Texas Judges and Commissioners Association Conference.
The United States has the highest incarceration rates of
Presentation transcript:

Texas Correctional Office on Offenders with Medical or Mental Impairments (TCOOMMI) Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) FY12 Annual Report Texas Department of Criminal Justice Reentry and Integration Division

Medically Recommended Intensive Supervision (MRIS) provides for the early parole review and release of certain categories of offenders who are mentally ill, mentally retarded, elderly, terminally ill, long term care or physically handicapped. The purpose of MRIS is to release offenders, who pose minimal public safety risk, from incarceration to more cost effective alternatives. 1 Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if “in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment”. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if “in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment”. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Legislative Updates (Effective September 1, 2007) As the result of HB 1670, offenders with a reportable conviction or adjudication under Chapter 62, Code of Criminal Procedure, were previously ineligible for MRIS consideration. During the 80 th Legislative Session, HB 2611 was passed allowing MRIS consideration for such offenders if “in a persistent vegetative state or being a person with an organic brain syndrome with significant to total mobility impairment”. HB 431, also enacted during the 80 th Legislative Session, allows MRIS consideration for defendants convicted of a state jail felony.

MRIS Data Comparison (by fiscal year) 2 There were a total of 72 MRIS approvals during FY12. Of those, 64 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 8 were State Jail confinees approved by sentencing Judges. **Includes ineligible referrals with no qualifying medical condition

MRIS Offender Data 3 MRIS Referrals1857* Individual Offenders Referred1167 Presentations for MRIS consideration491** Individual Offenders Presented406 * Includes multiple referrals for 405 “individual” offenders ** Includes multiple presentations for 69 “individual” offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration

MRIS FY12 Referral Status 4 ELIGIBLE REFERRALSINELIGIBLE REFERRALS Presented to Board/Judge for consideration491Sex Offender; HB2611 criteria not met308 Clinical Criteria Not Met6573G / Not Long Term Care or Terminally Ill136 Offender referred to unit medical provider88Parole Approved66 Deceased prior to presentation for MRIS consideration43Not an Offender (SAFPF / ISF)4 Pending Presentation to Board/Judge at close of FY1118Pending Discharge2 Active Detainer / Not Legal US Citizen13 Pending response from unit medical provider at close of FY1126 Offender refused MRIS5 Total Eligible1341Total Ineligible516 Total Referrals ** * Includes multiple presentations for 69 “individual” offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration ** Includes multiple referrals for 405 “individual” offenders Note: Clinical Criteria Not Met may include offenders who were previously presented and denied MRIS with next review indicating no change in offender’s condition.

5 Unit Direct % of Total Referrals 30% 44% 42% 40% * Includes multiple referrals for 405 “individual” offenders

6 * A total of 72 offenders were approved during FY12. Of those, 70 of those cases were presented for consideration during FY12 and 2 were pending decision from presentation in FY11.. MRIS Referrals for FY12 Approved by Source

MRIS FY12 Presented for MRIS Consideration by Diagnosis 7 *Includes presentations for 406 “individual” offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration. Of those, 69 had multiple presentations.

MRIS Approval Rates by Diagnosis (Comparison by fiscal year) 8 There were a total of 72 MRIS approvals during FY12. Of those, 64 were CID offenders approved by the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. The remaining 8 were State Jail Confinees approved by sentencing Judges.

Status of FY12 Presentations 9 A total of 491 cases were presented for MRIS consideration during FY12. Of those, 475 were referred in FY12 and 16 were FY11 referrals pending presentation. The following reflects the status of all cases presented for vote during FY12. FY12 TOTALSCIDState Jail Presented FY12:491*47912 Approved72648 Consideration denied386 0 Denied MRIS26251 Deceased pending decision752 Pending decision at close of FY11000 *Includes presentations for 406 “individual” offenders to Board/Judge for MRIS consideration. Of those, 69 had multiple presentations

Status of FY12 Approved Cases 10 Reflects status of approved cases as of 08/31/2012 A total of 72 offenders were approved during FY12. Of those, 70 of those cases were presented for consideration during FY12 and two were pending decision from presentation in FY11. FY12 TOTALSCIDState Jail Approved72648  Released34286  Deceased pending release25241  Vote withdrawn770  Pending release at close of FY1266 0

11 FY12 Offender Deaths Sex Offender – Did not meet criteria as set for by House Bill MRIS Consideration Denied / Denied MRIS24 Deceased after receipt of MRIS medical summary and during processing of case for presentation to Board of Pardons and Paroles / Presiding Judge 34 Deceased after referral – prior to receipt of MRIS medical summary9 Deceased within 48 hours of receipt of MRIS medical summary2 Medical Summary indicated Clinical Criteria Not Met7 Deceased pending decision7 MRIS Approved – Deceased pending release20 No significant change in condition since prior denial – Not presented for vote14 Not eligible (Parole Approved / Pending Discharge / ISF / SAFPF)11 Deceased pending disposition of ICE detainer3 Deceased within 24 hours of referral3 Deceased in voting process on day of Approval2 During FY12 a total of 456 offender deaths were reported to TCOOMMI by TDCJ Health Services Division. This number includes offenders who were not eligible for MRIS (i.e., death row, ISF, SAFPF), those who died as the result of suicide, unit incident, sudden death (i.e., cardiac arrest), etc. Of those reported offenders, 251 had been referred for MRIS one or more times during their incarceration. Of those, 187 received referrals during FY12. The following reflects status of the FY12 referrals.

Current Status of Offenders Released on MRIS Since the program’s inception on December 1, 1991, 1484 offenders have been released, seven of whom have released twice for a total of 1491 actual releases. The following chart depicts current status of each offender released. 12