The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javier Leung and Kassy Tyler University of West Florida Educational Statistics III Dr. Carla Thompson.
Advertisements

MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Applying EBP In The Field Midge Christianson, Director 6W Community Corrections Montevideo, Minnesota , extension 212
COMPASS: COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV LEAVING THE JAIL SETTING Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence,
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
Hamilton County, Ohio Correctional Master Plan Pre-architectural Program Analysis of Options.
Larimer 101 April 23, 2015 Gary A. Darling, Division Director.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Harri-Ann Ellis April 28 th, 2011 Meth and More Conference.
Reentry Strategies for Tribal Communities Presented by: Tracy Mullins, Senior Research Associate & Kimberly Cobb, Research Associate American Probation.
Evaluation research Using research methods in combinations Policy analysis.
Juvenile Corrections. Correctional options Probation Intensive probation Day treatment Group homes Wilderness programs Foster care Shelter care.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Introduction to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
Enhancing Health Coverage for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth OJJDP Coordinating Council November 13, 2013 Diane Justice, Senior Program Director National.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.
The 10 Key Components of Veteran’s Treatment Court Presented by: The Honorable Robert Russell.
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.
Community Corrections Campus
Indiana Reentry Courts: How to? 2012 IACCAC Fall Conference November 8, 2012 Indianapolis, IN.
By Jacqueline Gallegos ……to  Chaired by Judge Wells  Invited Executive Level Management  Working toward Local Implementation ◦ Local government.
NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.
BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Aimed at a reduction in alcohol and drug use and criminal activity.
Criminal Justice and Co- Occurring Disorders. The Situation 42-52% of people with serious m.i. have been arrested at least once % of people with.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Chapter 12 Parole and Release to the Community 1.
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
Larry J. Siegel Brandon C. Welsh David R. Montague, Lisa Hutchinson & Sharniece R. Hughes University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
JUVENILE ASSESSMENT CENTER FY Budget Worksession July 18, 2007 Scott Bradstreet Deputy Chief of Operations.
EMPOWERING TEAMS TO CAUSE THRIVING MENTAL HEALTH COURTS By Christine O’Hanlon Marin County Public Defender.
History and Background Formed in 2006 as a joint collaboration of San Mateo County Courts, Probation Department, District Attorney Office, Sheriff’s Office,
Mental Health Diversionary Program Purpose: To reduce the number of mentally ill clients incarcerated or insufficiently served while aiding in recovery.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Broward Sheriff’s Office Department of Detention and Community Control In-Custody Behavioral Services Division Presentation for the Florida Partners in.
U NIT 6 By: Amy Ng, ABD, MSCJA. O BJECTIVES Weekly Reminders Holiday Info Drug Treatment.
Strategies for Special Populations Ray Roberts, Secretary Kansas Department of Corrections.
E ffective J ustice S trategies in WisconsinWisconsin Legislative Council Symposium on Effective Criminal Justice Strategies March 21, 2007.
Prison Rape Elimination Act The Prison and the Community.
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
Juvenile Crime.  Juvenile: a person under the age of 18  Some states have it as 16, but regardless there are special laws that deal with juveniles who.
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION PHASE 1 Merced County Mental Health Alcohol and Drug Services.
Improving Access to Mental Health Services: A Community Systems Approach Leslie Mahlmeister, MBA PhD Student Department of Political Science Wayne State.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
The default solution?. Who do you call when there’s a crisis you can’t handle on your own?
Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.
MIDD 1e Chemical Dependency Professional (CDP) Education and Training MIDD Oversight Committee April 25, 2013 Margaret Soukup, MA.
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
MEDICS CATALONIA PROJECT
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
Release Advance Planning
Incarcerated Men and Their Partners: A Relationship Intervention Study
California Jail Programs Association General Membership Conference
Emily Patry, BS The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI
Community Corrections
Community Corrections Alternative Program
RSAT History, Best Practices and Future
Bridging the Return Through lived experience and community partnerships Steve Miccio, CEO, PEOPLe, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

The Honorable John R. Roach, Jr. 296 th Judicial District Court Alyse Ferguson, Esq. Attorney Director, MHMC Program

 High Recidivism Rates  High Jail Population  Overcrowded Courts  Increase in MI and ID Inmates

How it Came to our Attention MRT™ was initially mentioned in medical contract negotiations We found out that probation had simultaneously discovered MRT™ as well Discussed the concept Visited MRT™ program in Pueblo

 MRT™ : Moral Reconation Therapy™ – the name  Conation was a word used in the ‘30s before ego, meaning the conscious process of decision making - a purposeful behavior  Moral Reasoning – represents how a person makes decisions about what he or she should or should not do in a given situation  Underlying Goal with MRT™ was to change conscious decision-making to higher levels of moral reasoning = Moral Reconation

 Developed in 1985 by Gregory Little, Ed.D and Kenneth Robinson, Ed.D  More than 120 published reports documenting significantly lower recidivism for MRT™ treated offenders for periods as long as 20 years after  Used in 49 States and 7 Countries

Combines: Education Group and individual counseling Structured exercises designed to foster moral development in treatment- resistant clients

 Initially developed in the prison-based therapeutic community, it was then tested and widely implemented in general inmate population  Juvenile Offenders  Parole and probation settings  In community corrections  In hospital and OP programs  Educational settings  Drug Courts  Used with both genders  Persons with Mental Illness Diagnosis  Persons with TBI

 Impact on Recidivism  Low Cost  Potential to help the MI population  High Recidivism

 Pueblo, CO has established MRT™ in the jails  Use Assessment Tools to screen for eligible participants  Low to medium risk - inmates with at least 30-day stay  Groups facilitated by deputies  Part of inmate Behavior Modification  Meeting with participants  Meetings with Deputy Facilitators and Jail Administration  Program information

 Requests for class admission  Requests to stay in jail to complete  Requests to Return to jail for classes

 Targets issues specific to offender population  Designed to address issues of treatment-resistant population  Reduce recidivism 30%-50% for periods up to 20 years after release  Effectively used in different programs at many sites  Improves offender compliance to rules in custody and while under supervision in the community  Open-ended groups  Increase moral reasoning  Decrease dropout rates  Increase sense of purpose  Reduce antisocial thinking and behavior  Continuum of care when implemented in a variety of settings  Does not require a high reading level

Peer Driven  Participants own the group Accountability  The group members hold each other accountable

Objectively-defined steps focusing on seven basic treatment issues Confrontation of beliefs, attitudes and behaviors Assessment of current relationships Reinforcement of positive behavior and habits Positive identity formation Enhancement of self-concept Decrease in hedonism and development of frustration tolerance Development of higher stages of moral reasoning

 The classes are open-ended  Learning from Others  Peer Driven  Groups usually have participants  Basic MRT™ has 12 steps  Each step has a general written discussion and homework exercises and requirements  Additional steps to 16  Classes are 1-2 times per week  Facilitators are all trained the exact way allowing facilitators to step easily into a group  Sense of pride develops

 Phase 1 Training Multi-department Training  Sheriff’s Office Detention Staff, Juvenile Detention Staff, Community Treatment Providers and Counseling Providers for Court Programs, Probation Demand for Additional Training

 Phase 2-Identification and Implementation of Jail-based classes MH Population: Males Expanded to Females  General Population Classes Added additional classes Began with counselor-facilitated classes - added detention officer facilitators

 Probation/Courts  SCORE  Community  Juvenile

Initial Startup Deciding on the criteria  Jail Population/Community Who will you target How will you identify Will they be housed together Books $$

 Buy In  Develop a plan  General education meeting  Meet with community providers  Meetings with the Judges  Everyone should agree to keep data  The Numbers  Training

 Just as predicted by Pueblo:  We have had inmates ask to stay in jail to complete  Ask to enter the program  Ask to return to the jail for classes

 Continued expansion of the classes  Final step presented to the Court