UPA’s vision of Coexistence for Powerline Communications ISPLC 2006 - Florida Chano Gómez – DS2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2004, HomePlug Inc Standards provide the fundamental framework within which all of these competing services can co- exist without interfering.
Advertisements

Consumer Electronics Powerline Communication Alliance An Overview Michael Stelts, President Copyright ©2006 CEPCA, All rights reserved.
USNAP Overview October 26, Smart Meters Utility HAN Devices HVAC & Hot Water White Appliances Consumer Electronics/PCs Home Automation.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.ICND1 v1.0—3-1 Wireless LANs Exploring Wireless Networking.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All Home networking standards in ITU-T SG15 Yoichi MAEDA ITU-T SG15 Document No: GSC16-GTSC9-04 Source:
“Driving Global Standards and the Ingredients for Ubiquity” Matt Theall President, HomePlug Alliance.
Wireless Fundamentals Chapter 6 Introducing Wireless Regulation Bodies, Standards, and Certifications.
Powerline Communications: Channel Characterization and Modem Design Yangpo Gao Helsinki University of Technology
Wireless Sensor Network Deployment Lessons Learned Steven Lanzisera Environmental Energy Technologies Division, LBNL 21 January 2011.
International Organization for Standardization AIMS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Vijay Garg ,
WiMAX Presented By Ch.Srinivas Koundinya 118T1A0435.
IEEE ZigBee. Introduction It is a control technology that works by standardizing an existing wireless networking powered by small batteries It.
JFSA XBRL Project Dec 3, 2007 Hirofumi Gomi. 2 2 The role of JFSA Planning and policymaking in relation to the financial system Inspection and supervision.
Consumer Electronics Powerline Communication Alliance An Overview Michael Stelts, President ©2006 CEPCA, All rights reserved.
IEEE 802 Smart Grid Adhoc. SGIP SGIP formed in 2009 by NIST – Provide support to meet requirements of Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)
Co-existence and PAP 15 IEEE P Oleg Logvinov, Arkados July 7, 2010, Meeting.
Hamida SEBA - ICPS06 June 26 th -29 th Lyon France 1 ARMP: an Adaptive Routing Protocol for MANETs Hamida SEBA PRISMa Lab. – G2Ap team
OPERA Open PLC European Research Alliance 6TH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Author: Luis J. Legorburu Date: October 14 th 2004 OPERA-COPRAS Brussels October 14th.
IEEE & Priyanka Vanjani CST 554: Short Presentation ASU Id #
 Midterm 30%  Final 40%  LAB 15%  Assignment 15%  Text Book – Designing and Deploying n Wireless Networks  Jim Geier (ciscopress)
CSCI-235 Micro-Computer in Science The Network. © Prentice-Hall, Inc Communications  Communication is the process of sending and receiving messages 
Emerging Wireless Standards Understanding the Role of IEEE & ZigBee™ in AMR & Submetering Mapping Your Future: From Data to Value AMRA 2003 International.
By Omkar KiraniSridhara Chaitanya Sannapureddy Vivek Gupta 1.
The Only Home Entertainment Networking Standard In Use By All Three Pay TV Segments—Cable, Satellite, IPTV Dr. Anton Monk CTO, MoCA Co-founder / VP Technology,
Wireless Sensor Monitoring Group Members: Steven Shih (ECE) Brian Reilly (ECE) Dan Eke (COMPE) Sponsored by:
CIS 6930 Powerline Communications Introduction
Vermont Electric Power Company, Inc Vermont’s eEnergy Smart Grid Initiative Kerrick Johnson Vice President for External Affairs.
Power Line Communication (PLC) Hess GuillaumeIUP 1 – 2004/200529/04/05.
Doc.: IEEE /441r0 Submission September 2001 Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Slide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE /036r0 Submission May 1999 Dr. Robert F. Heile, GTESlide 1 IEEE Charter Build on emerging industry specifications Provide an.
An Overview of the Smart Grid David K. Owens Chair, AABE Legislative Issues and Public Policy Committee AABE Smart Grid Working Group Webinar September.
A small chip a big change in energy efficiency Overview of the Smart Grid Smarter Networks, Bristol, June th Guillaume d’Eyssautier, CEO.
Power Line Carrier Communication VAIBHAV RAI EN VI-B
IEEE &
ISPLC 2001 PLC in the IST Programme Thierry Devars DG INFSO/E1
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 Standardization activities on Home Networking in CCSA Duo LIU, Deputy Secretary General of.
Doc.: IEEE g Submission: Possible PAR changes for g 13 May 2009 Kendall Smith, Mark Thompson, Aclara RF Project: IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
JEMMA: an open platform for a connected Smart Grid Gateway GRUPPO TELECOM ITALIA MAS2TERING Smart Grid Workshop Brussels, September Strategy &
Doc.: IEEE e Submission: NAN Application Description 11 November 2008 RolfeSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Critical Communications World, 21st-24th May © 3GPP 2012 © 3GPP 2013 LTE Standards for Public Safety – 3GPP view Balazs Bertenyi Chairman of 3GPP.
Doc.: IEEE /087 Submission September 1999 Richard J. Holleman, IEEE-SASlide 1 IEEE Standards Association IEEE, ETSI, and Bluetooth Meeting August.
May 2006 doc:IEEE wng0 Slide 1 Submission Liang Li, Vinno Technologies Inc. Bob Heile IEEE WG. Project: IEEE P Working Group.
WiMedia Alliance
Doc.: IEEE /310r0 Submission C. Ware, et.al, Motorola Slide 1 May 2002 Requirements for Home Networking Chris Ware, Eryk Dutkiewicz, Alistair.
Driving the Sustainable Future The commitment to sustainability of the European Telecommunications Network Operators’ Association Danilo Riva – ETNO WG.
1 BPL Standards Parsing Points of discussion from Ambient Corp.
Tutorial. Month Year Copyright 2003 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc. 2 Mission Statement ZigBee Alliance members are defining global standards for reliable,
An Overview of the Smart Metering Programme in GB.
Wireless Networks Standards and Protocols & x Standards and x refers to a family of specifications developed by the IEEE for.
Dependability in Wireless Networks By Mohammed Al-Ghamdi.
Improving the scalability of MAC protocols in Wireless Mesh Networks Mthulisi Velempini (Mr.)
1 May 2009 Doc: IEEE g Submission Scott Weikel, Elster Electricty Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Standardization activities on Home Networking in CCSA CCSA DOCUMENT #:GSC13-GTSC6-08 FOR:Presentation or Information SOURCE:CCSA AGENDA ITEM:GTSC; 4.3.
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Jan 2013 Bo Sun, ZTE/CWPANSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Proposal of Channelization for aj.
Doc.: IEEE j Submission July 2011 Dave Evans, PhilipsSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
© 2014 Utilities Telecom Council State of the Industry “WHY TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND NETWORKS ARE CRITICAL TO THE UTILITY OF THE FUTURE: TECHNICAL,
SEM PLT TECHNOLOGY AND STANDARDS. SEM TECHNICAL OVERVIEW.
Bluetooth Low Energy RTLAB YuJin Park.
-1/16- Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks C.-K. Toh, Georgia Institute of Technology IEEE.
Objective of this Presentation To understand what is Wi-Fi and what is Bluetooth. Difference between Bluetooth and Wi-Fi.
ETSI TC Cable in a nutshell
Introduction to SEAMCAT
Submission Title: [TG4a General Framework]
Internet Access Technology
BLUETOOTH (I) Bluetooth technology aims at so-called ad hoc piconets, which are local area networks with a very limited coverage and without the need for.
IEEE Introduction to IEEE P1905.1
G.hn The New ITU-T Home Networking Standard
Source: [Liang Li, Chenyang Yang] Company: [ Vinno Technologies Inc. ]
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Presentation transcript:

UPA’s vision of Coexistence for Powerline Communications ISPLC Florida Chano Gómez – DS2

Introduction UPA was established by the founding members in May 2004 as an international non-profit trade association. The UPA was founded on the common belief of a set of leading companies who shared the vision of a PLC landscape based on:  World-wide standards for power line communications;  Integrating PLC into the telecommunications landscape  Providing consistent, credible and unifying communication on PLC;  Taking a universal view of the market and embracing all applications whether access, in-home, multimedia or other PLC application;  Ensuring speed of deployment of PLC worldwide. UNIVERSAL meaning Scope: Access and Home-networking, Coexistence and Interoperability Worldwide: America, Europe and Asia represented. Companies represented: manufacturers, utilities, chip providers, systems integrators…

Facts Members of UPA include:  AcBel Polytech Inc.  Ambient Corporation  Commax  Corinex Communications  Current Technologies International  DS2  EDF  Duke Energy  Itochu Corporation  Ilevo (Schneider Electric Powerline Communications)  PCN Technology  ST&T  Sumitomo Electric Industries  Tecnocom  Telekom Research and Development SDN BHD  Toshiba Electronics Europe GmbH  TOYO Network Systems. UPA Chairman of the Board  Eric Morel, ILEVO (Schneider company) Web site 

Why is there a need for coexistence at all? In an ideal world, everybody would use the same standard. In the real world, different organizations have designed their systems for specific applications, with different requirements, different cost constraints, etc. The result is that each one has designed its technology in a different and incompatible way. It’s difficult to agree on a single common standard, specially if each technology has an installed base and has already invested a large amount of money in product development. In the long term, the work of organizations like ETSI PLT and/or IEEE 1901 will create a single standard for PHY and MAC for all applications of powerline communications. In the short term there is a need for coexistence mechanisms that allow different technologies, based on different PHY/MAC layers, to share power lines.

History of the UPA Coexistence specifications Dec 2004Kick off of the Coexistence WG of UPA Jan 2005Description of network electricity networks topologies. Worldwide scope. Mar 2005First draft Apr 2005Performance simulation May 2005Last draft Jul 2005Approval by the BoD and Publication Improvement phase started

Coexistence issues addressed by UPA In-Home/Access issues  Between In-Home devices and Access equipment –in the same customer home –between neighbors In-Home/In-Home –in the same customer home –between neighbors

Coexistence main requirements Provide a fair and balanced sharing of resources  between one Access system and several In-home systems  between In-home systems (up to 3 different systems at the same time) Can be implemented with any technology at low cost & low impact on performance  minimize the additional hardware/software needed for adding coexistence to an existing implementation  compatible with the QoS requirements of the different systems Work with the most usual topologies Optimize the use of resources  activation limited to local area where interference takes place. No impact on the remaining parts of the networks.  re-use resources not used by idle nodes

Different Approaches to Coexistence Time-division approach Frequency-division approach Both have advantages and disadvantages for specific scenarios UPA supports both methods, so that the best one can be chosen in each specific case

Coexistence transmission area interference area Networks taking turns

Coexistence transmission area interference area accessin-home Networks sharing frequency

UPA mechanism is very flexible It takes benefit of both FDM and TDM A dynamic FDM-scheme provides isolation between Access devices and In-Home devices.  Each system manages its QoS independently  When only one system is installed, it can use the whole frequency band. A dynamic TDM is used between In-Home systems.  Different networks take turns for usage of the channel  Bandwidth is shared dynamically based on QoS requirements of each network and application. TDM between In-Home and Access systems is also supported for those scenarios where it is convenient.

Conclusions UPA coexistence specification is a flexible approach to the issue of coexistence both in the case of access vs in- home and in the case of in-home vs in-home networks. UPA coexistence specification supports both frequency- division and time-division coexistence mechanisms UPA coexistence specification was published on Jul 2006, and can be freely downloaded from UPA’s web-site [ UPA is open to discuss the specification with other industry organizations and is also contributing to official standardization bodies like IEEE and ETSI.