THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT IN TRIAL OF IP CASES BY PRC COURTS —— IP-related anti-monopoly judicial review DING WENLIAN Shanghai High People’s Court.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Name / Date 1 Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Competition.
Advertisements

Managing Intellectual Property Assets in International Business Anil Sinha, Counsellor, SMEs Division World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
Creation of Offers Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
A universal human need. Rules and Regulations are required to provide firmness in our Mutual relationships. Rule of law is the essence of civilized society.
Standard Essential Patents in Infringement Litigations - Orange-Book-Approach and latest developments Conference on Information Technology, Innovation.
New Chilean Regulation of Liability Insurance Insurance Contract Act Statute Law Nr – May 9th, 2013 Under a Project written by Prof. Osvaldo Contreras-Strauch.
1 S.Tronchon Legal Considerations when drafting a standard.
Law I Chapter 18.
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.
Judicial Protection of Patent Rights in China --If Apple Sued Samsung in China, What would be the Remedies ? ZHANG Guangliang Renmin University of China.
CCPIT PATENT AND TRADEMARK LAW OFFICE 1 Risks of Enforcement of Standard Patent ----Update of a Recent Litigation Case Relating to Standard Patent in China.
EUROJARGON AL. Acquis communautaire This is a French term meaning, essentially, "the EU as it is" – in other words, the rights and obligations that EU.
Human Rights Mechanisms in Serbia Maja Micic Youth Initiative for Human Rights.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye1 A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 4: Intellectual Property.
The Legal System and Patent Damages Recent Developments Prof. Amy Landers University of the Pacific/McGeorge School of Law.
1 Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 38 – Intellectual Property.
CS 501: Software Engineering Fall 2000 Lecture 7 Management II Business and Legal Aspects of Software Engineering.
France: A Country on the Move Protecting your Intellectual Property Internationally.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
Tina Kraigher and Milena Podjed-Fabjančič 18 April 2010 Processing of Telephone Traffic Data of Employees ( a Case Study )
Understand the prospects of China's competition law related for intellectual property from the perspective of technical standards Wang-xiao ye Researcher.
An invention is a unique or novel device, method, composition or process. It may be an improvement upon a machine or product, or a new process for creating.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
Eric J. Pritchard One Liberty Place, 46 th Floor 1650 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (215)
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 1 PUBLIC POLICY AND COMPETITION  Government Anti-Trust Policy Schizophrenic government policy toward monopolistic.
Anti-trust Practice in China concerning SEP and FRAND China Patent Agent (H.K.) Ltd.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class IV, 27th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS Issues Covered in Chapter –Jurisdiction –Infringement and Cybersquatting –Internet Privacy and Database Protection –E-Commerce.
SUNITA K SREEDHARAN SKS LAW ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI 23 July 2014, Delhi.
The ECJ's Huawei/ZTE judgment (C-170/13) Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
InterDigital v. Arima Anne Layne-Farrar Demonstratives December 9, 2013.
Can a Competition Law Violation be Legally Insignificant? A U.S. Perspective Russell W. Damtoft Associate Director Office of International Affairs United.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
The Judicial System The Courts and Jurisdiction. Courts Trial Courts: Decides controversies by determining facts and applying appropriate rules Appellate.
China IP’s Challenge Since joining the World Trade Organization (2001), China has strengthened its legal framework and amended its IPR laws and regulations.
Mark Collins © 2015 Mark Collins.  Original, invented, creative, unique  Patents ◦ Protected through registration  Copyright ◦ Protected through litigation.
Chapter 8 Consideration. Gratuitous: Free Agreements Consideration : The exchange of benefits and detriments by the parties to an agreement. Benefit:
Unfair Trade Practices: Conceptualisation, Significance and Regional Perspectives March 11, 2011.
ASSOC. PROF. DR. DOVILE GAILIUTE MYKOLAS ROMERIS UNIVERSITY 2015 POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS ON HOUSING RIGHTS.
Intellectual Property. Confidential Information Duty not to disclose confidential information about a business that would cause harm to the business or.
Employee Inventions in Germany Dr. Udo Meyer BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Germany On behalf of UNICE (Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederation of Europe)
New Development of China’s Anti-monopoly Regulations on the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights WANG Xianlin Shanghai Jiao Tong University KoGuan Law.
1 The Relationship Between the Antitrust Law and the Intellectual Property Protection Wang Xianlin, Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Standards and competition policy EU-China Workshop on Application of Anti-monopoly Law in Intellectual Property Area Changsha, 11. – 12. March 2010 Peter.
Legal Framework of Intellectual Property Protection during Exhibition The Intellectual Property Center of Shanghai University of Political Science and.
Identification of Abuse of dominant market position involving IPR Wang Xianlin, KoGoan Law School of Shanghai Jiaotong University Dalian,June 11,2010.
Legal Framework of China Regulating the Abuse of Intellectual Property in License He Zhonglin IP Tribunal of Supreme Court Da Lian, June 10, 2010.
Sangmin Song, Director, Anti-Monopoly Div., KFTC MRFTA & IP Rights 1.
COMPETITION POLICY AND LAW 1 2 EXTANT COMPETITION LAW OF INDIA MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 BROUGHT INTO FORCE IN 1970.
Principles and methods of antitrust analysis of the abuse of intellectual property rights Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law school of UIBE UIBECLC March.
The Relationship Between Intellectual Property Rights Abuse and Monopoly Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
Types of Courts Unit A Objective Dual Court System Federal Court System State Court System.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
Competition Law and Cellphone Patents
Wang Xianlin, Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Chapter 06: LEGAL ISSUES FOR THE ENTREPRENEUR
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
IP and Antitrust (Competition Law)
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
IP Licensing and Competition Policy: Guidelines and the Cases in Japan
SEPs and Antitrust Enforcement in Taiwan: The Challenges and Unresolved Issues Recent Jurisprudence Related to SEPs in International Jurisdictions Ya-Lun.
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
“Revisiting Abuse of Dominance & IPRs: Emerging Jurisprudence of the Indian Competition Law” “Plenary 2: A comparative perspective to IPR and Competition:
STRUCTURE OF THE PRESENTATION
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Lecture No: 19 BY CH. SHAHZAD ANSAR
Open Source Software Legal Risks David McGuinness 13 November 2003.
Presentation transcript:

THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT IN TRIAL OF IP CASES BY PRC COURTS —— IP-related anti-monopoly judicial review DING WENLIAN Shanghai High People’s Court

A Few Important Changes in Trial of IP Cases  Patent Cases: more consideration is now given to patent claims  Trade Mark Cases: taking a more and more strict approach in prohibiting trademark confusion  Copyright Cases: be more concerned about the new issues arising out of new technologies and new business models

Another Equaling Important Change  IP-related anti-monopoly dispute is an emerging and growing issue in PRC courts.

Three Cases  Dexian v. Sony  Jingdiao v. Naikai  Huawei v. InterDigital

Dexian v. Sony  Does the defendant’s act constitute illegal tie-in sale ?

 the court adopted the test in the anti-monopoly law about the legality check on tie-in sale: even if the defendants successfully realized tie-in sale between the digital devices and batteries through their patent and technology secret, such tie-in sale cannot be further reviewed for its legality unless the defendant has dominance in the relevant market Dexian v. Sony

Jingdiao v. Naikai  Does the defendant’s act constitute infringement of copyright ?

a carving software named “JD-paint”a digital control systemA carving machine Jingdiao v. Naikai

work flow running the JD- Paint program to make a design creating a Eng format file reading the Eng format file turning it into machine instructions receiving the machine instructions executing the machine instructions (carving)

 If such technical measure is protected by court, then the plaintiff’s benefits associated with its software copyright will be inappropriately expanded to cover its machines, and hence such protection would exceed the boundaries of software copyright. Therefore, the technical measure taken by the plaintiff is different from the technical measures as protected under the copyright law, and the defendant’s decoding accordingly does not constitute copyright infringement. Jingdiao v. Naikai

 from copyright law perspective: whether the defendant’s developing its own software for decoding the Eng format files is within the contral of the plaintiff’s software copyright;  from competition law perspective: whether the plaintiff’s technical measure, if protected by the court, will restrict free competition in the carving machine market. Jingdiao v. Naikai

Huawei v. InterDigital  The plaintiff accused that: 1) high pricing and discriminatory pricing; 2) unreasonable trading condition; 3) tie-in sale; 4) denial of transaction.

 The court held that each of the standard essential patents as owned by the defendant is unique and irreplaceable, and hence the license market for each standard essential patent constitutes an independent relevant market. The relevant product market in this case is actually a cluster of all relevant markets of patent licenses. The Definition of Relevant Market

Dominant Position  The defendant has full market share in each of these standard essential patent license markets, and is capable of impeding or influencing access to the relevant market by other business operators. The court therefore recognized that the defendant has dominant position in the relevant market.

Determining the Defendant’s Act  High pricing: the royalty fee for the plaintiff charged by the defendant is much higher than those for Samsung and Apple, and in addition to that, the defendant also required the plaintiff to license all of its patents to the defendant for free  Tie-in sale: bundling licenses of essential patents and non-essential ones

 license of patents package including 3G standard essential patents, 4G ones, and its globally-owned patents, such practice is widely accepted in the market and hence does not constitute tie-in sale under market dominance abusing.  the lawsuits brought by the defendant in the US do not constitute denial of transaction. Determining the Defendant’s Act

Judgement  the court ruled that the defendant immediately cease its inappropriately high and discriminative pricing targeting the plaintiff, as well as its tie-in sale of bundling licenses of essential patents and non-essential ones, and compensate the plaintiff 20 million Yuan for its losses, while the remaining claims be rejected.

Attempts in This Trial  on the issue of relevant market definition, the court defined the license market for each standard essential patent as one independent relevant market based on the irreplaceability of such patent;  on whether the royalty fee for the plaintiff is inappropriately high and discriminative, the court made a reference to the obligation of equality, reasonableness and non-discrimination as required by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) to which both parties are members, and also made a comparison between the terms and conditions on the defendant’s license of its patents to the plaintiff and those for Samsung and Apple, and considered the inequality in patent cross-licensing between the two parties.

Inspirations of the Three Cases  two perspectives  to clarify the boundaries between justifiable exercise of IP rights and restriction on competition (to protect free competition in technologies)  to build the analytical framework

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE! DING WENLIAN Shanghai High People’s Court