Data on morphological features of judokas of various weight categories are often used to select athletes and determine the course of their training. Such.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anthropometric Measurements By Majed Awad. Introduction With the increased objective of creating more efficient man-machine systems, the need to collect.
Advertisements

The mortality associated with body size and muscle mass, fat mass and abdominal obesity in patients receiving hemodialysis Date: 2012/12/21 實習生:余萍 指導老師:蕭佩珍營養師.
Chapter 13: Body Composition
PREDICTING BODY COMPOSITION USING SIMPLE MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES TIM JOHNSON, JAVIER NAVARRO, IDIONG IDONGESIT, MARK WEEKS.
Anthropometric Assessment Systems BPK 303. Anthropometric Assessments  Comparison of Anthropometric measures to normative data.  Measures intended to.
Purpose: The purpose of this experiment was to compare the strength of the right quadriceps and hamstring muscles of soccer players in the forward (F)
Through Thick and Thin By:Mark Bergman Thomas Bursey Jay LaPorte Paul Miller Aaron Sinz.
Lab 3 Skinfold Estimations of Body Composition. Skinfold Measurement Is simple and relatively accurate Requires a minimal amount of equipment Can be used.
Human Variation Sexual Dimorphism 1. KIN-Scale Proportionality Profile KIN-Scale data composed of data from Kin 303 students Means and SEMs.
Atlas B Surface Anatomy
KINE 3301 Biomechanics of Human Movement Center of Mass Chapter 12.
Dr. Katie Cahill Science 295. The History of Ergonomics Foundations of ergonomic science observed in Ancient Greece - Hippocrates - Egyptian Dynasties.
Summary And Conclusions
Gender Influences on Gait when Walking Normally versus Carrying Weight Andrea L. Homan, 1 Chelsea L. Smith, 2 Emily E. Heffernen, 2 Elena E. Leon, 3 David.
In this tutorial you will learn how to go from this table to Click here!
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia King Saud University College of Engineering Industrial Engineering department ERGONOMICALLY DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND IMPLEMENTATION.
Psyc 552 Ergonomics & Biomechanics Lecture 10. The Roger Problem – Weights  Body mass: 50 kg  Body weight: (50kg)(9.8m/s 2 )=490N  Load mass:10kg 
Anthropometric Assessment Systems
Re-cap BMI WHR Definitions Mass: the body’s total weight. Body composition: The relative percentage of muscle, fat, bone, and other tissues that comprise.
Body Composition Continued BMI, BIA, and Skinfolds.
Skinfold Measurements and Girth
Daily Trivia This little girl is sick. And sad .
Sport Books Publisher1 Body Composition. Sport Books Publisher2 Body Composition There are three interrelated aspects of the human physique: Size (volume,
NATIONAL SPORTS ACADEMY ‘VASSIL LEVSKI’ - SOFIA
Nutrition/Fitness Calculations Sports med 2. Calculations With each calculation: – Read the formulas together and then do the math – Use yourself for.
Body Composition. Female vs. Males 3-4 inches shorter Weighs 25 – 30 lbs less 10 – 15 lbs more fat tissue Both Men and Women’s increase with age.
Effect of Coffee on Caloric Expenditure in College-Aged Adults during Moderate Exercise Nicole Gutzman, Maggie Meitzen, Tiffany Moy, and Casey Wick Faculty.
Results (cont’d) Results. Abstract Methods Methods (cont’d) Purpose Conclusions Author: Aderemi, Eunice T., Faculty sponsors: J.R. Wilson, Ph.D, Mark Ricard,
Testing & Physiology of Cyclists. What is Fitness? Physical Fitness: Attributes that allow the performance of physical activity/exercise. Physical Activity:
Results (cont’d). AbstractMethods (cont’d) Purpose Conclusions Authors here: Allison Jack Biomechanics Research Laboratory, The University of Texas at.
Perception of Body Type Compared to What it Actually is By: Jacob Higgs.
ESTIMATING BODY COMPOSITION. What is Body Composition? Refers to the relative amounts of the different compounds in the body Why Study Body Composition?
The effect of myotonia on muscle mass in the myotonic goat Sarah Winningham Dobbins Tennessee Technological University Department of Biology Cookeville,
Body composition Fitness testing for Year 10 What equipment will you use? What are the pre-test procedures? What are the instructions? How do you record.
Results (cont’d) Results. Abstract Methods Methods (cont’d) Purpose Conclusions Author: Connie Fair Faculty Sponsor: J. R. Wilson, Ph.D Exercise Science.
By Nathan Maths about me. My age at 12:25 AM Vital Statistics My circumference of my head 55+1/2 My height is 1m and 43cm Length of my leg 40cm Length.
Flexibility Muscle Strength SMD /04/2012.
Research & Revise Activity 2
NS 270 Unit 4 Seminar Nutrition Screening & Assessment of the Hospitalized Patient.
The features interaction of foot and ground mostly determine efficiency of high speed run (Bates, 1983; Lee & Piazza, 2009). But now there aren't justified.
Statistics & Probability Level I Parts 1,2,3. School Numerical  Money earned  Pulse rate  Height  Height (belly button)  Arm span  Length.
Nutrition assessment of pre-school and primary school children practising artistic gymnastics Supervisor: D-r Lubomir Petrov, PhD Author: Stefan Kolimechkov.
Variation in Human Size and Body Proportions
HOW DOES YOUR GARDEN GROW? ASSESSING PHYSICAL GROWTH IN CHILDREN.
APPENDIX A. Measuring tape position for abdominal (waist) circumference WIHS Q x Q Form 7: Physical Exam – 04/01/02 Page 11 of 16.
Multiple Regression Example A hospital administrator wished to study the relation between patient satisfaction (Y) and the patient’s age (X 1 ), severity.
Diagnostic Tools to Evaluate Health and Diet
Anthropometric Assessment Systems BPK 303. Anthropometric Assessments  Comparison of Anthropometric measures to normative data.  Measures intended to.
C H A P T E R Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation of Selected Tests.
HUMAN ANATOMY Fifth Edition Chapter 1 Lecture Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Chapter 12 Lecture Chapter 12 Surface.
Relations Between Performance and Physiological Parameters For Tennis Players Tolga Akşit 1, Emine Kutlay 1, Faruk Turgay 1, M. Zeki Özkol 1, Faik Vural.
Validation of Methods of Estimating % Body Fat. How do you validate these techniques? There can be no direct validation – Measure subjects with technique.
ESTIMATING BODY COMPOSITION
Stats Methods at IC Lecture 3: Regression.
Anthropometric Assessment Systems
R. Morris1, B. Jones1, J. Lake2, S. Emmonds1, K. Till1. 1.
UNDERSTANDING THE BODY COMPOSITION: A Fundamental Concept
Variation in Human Size and Body Proportions
Validation of Methods of Estimating % Body Fat
Anatomical Model Labeled
Variation in Human Size and Body Proportions
Validation of Methods of Estimating % Body Fat
Circumference and Skinfold Measurements Project
Variation in Human Size and Body Proportions
Validation of Methods of Estimating % Body Fat
Nutritional assessment in hospitalized patients
Table 1. General Characteristics of the Study Subjects
Welcome.
Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants
Presentation transcript:

Data on morphological features of judokas of various weight categories are often used to select athletes and determine the course of their training. Such studies have been done mainly for male judokas (Franchini, Nunes, Moraes & Del Vecchio, 2007 et al.). Yet, morphological features of female judokas still remain poorly researched. So the aim of this study was to compare the lengths and circumferences of body segments, skinfolds, and body fat percentage of high- rank female judokas of various weight classes. Introduction Methods Twenty-three Russian female judokas (Masters of Sports of Russia and Masters of Sports of Russia of International Class) took part in the investigation. Morphological characteristics of 11 (age 22.3 ± 4.2 years old, height ± 4.6 cm, weight 55.1 ± 4.1 kg) judokas of lighter weight classes (under 52, 57, and 63 kg) and 12 judokas (age 21.9 ± 2.6 years old, height ± 5.5 cm, weight 68.3 ± 4.4 kg) of heavier weight classes (under 70 and 78 kg) were compared. Measurements were taken in accordance with ISAK guidelines. Body fat percentage was calculated from the measurements of four skinfolds (Jackson, Pollock & Ward, 1980). One-way analysis of variance was used to examine statistical differences of data. Comparison of morphological characteristics of high-rank female judokas of various weight classes Salman Elipkhanov & Oleg Nemtsev Adyghe State University (Maykop, Russia) Results No significant differences in lengths of upper arms, forearms, hands, thighs, and shins were found for the judokas of both groups (Table 1). Yet, heavier judokas appeared to have significantly larger lengths of feet (Table 1). Circumferences of neck, thorax at forced inspiration, arm relaxed, forearm, mid-thigh and calf were significantly larger in case of heavier judokas (Table 1). No significant differences in hand circumferences were found (Table 1). The following skinfolds were significantly larger in case of heavier judokas: triceps, forearm, subscapular, chest, abdominal, thigh, medial calf. Body fat percentage was significantly larger for judokas of heavier weight classes (Table 1). Table 1 Morphological characteristics of female judokas of various weight classes (Mean ± Standard Deviation, cm) Discussion The absence of significant differences in the lengths of body segments between female judokas of lighter and heavier weight classes (except for feet) has shown that there is no need to rely on these characteristics when selecting athletes of different weight categories. Significantly larger circumferences of most body segments, larger skinfolds and body fat percentage of heavier judokas might result in lower mobility and deficiencies in competitive performance. Big values of body fat in judokas of heavier weight classes might be the consequence of their insufficient competitive readiness, and thus might be viewed upon as a reason to adjust their training processes. Morphological characteristics Lighter weight classes Heavier weight classes p Upper arm length 30,0 ± 2,231,3 ± 1,8p>0.05 Forearm length 23,7 ± 1,624,5 ± 1,6p>0.05 Hand length 19,1 ± 1,419,7 ± 1,1p>0.05 Thigh length 37,2 ± 2,437,2 ± 2,8p>0.05 Shin length 39,1 ± 2,840,7 ± 2,8p>0.05 Foot length 24,0 ± 0,825,2 ± 1,0p<0.01 Neck circumference 33,5 ± 1,036,1 ± 1,6p<0.001 Thorax at forced inspiration 90,7 ± 2,898,3 ± 3,9p<0.001 Arm relaxed circumference 26,1 ± 1,929,4 ± 1,8p<0.001 Forearm circumference 24,0 ± 1,425,8 ± 1,4p<0.01 Mid-thigh circumference 47,0 ± 2,352,3 ± 2,2p<0.001 Calf circumference 32,4 ± 1,235,6 ± 1,4p<0.001 Hand circumference 19,4 ± 0,919,9 ± 1,2p>0.05 Triceps skinfold 12,3 ± 3,615,9 ± 3,1p<0.05 Forearm skinfold 4,6 ± 0,87,1 ± 2,0p<0.01 Subscapular skinfold 11,4 ± 3,215,3 ± 4,6p<0.05 Chest skinfold 6,9 ± 1,89,5 ± 2,9p<0.05 Abdominal skinfold 17,5 ± 4,125,4 ± 9,4p<0.05 Thigh skinfold 13,0 ± 3,919,3 ± 5,8p<0.01 Medial calf skinfold 13,7 ± 3,018,3 ± 4,2p<0.01 Body fat percentage 17,1 ± 2,922,5 ± 3,9p<0.01 contacts: