A Million Second Chandra View of Cassiopeia A Una Hwang (NASA/GSFC, JHU) & J Martin Laming (NRL) Boston AAS 24 May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SN 1987A spectacular physics Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Advertisements

Supernova Remnants Shell-type versus Crab-like Phases of shell-type SNR.
X Y i M82 Blue: Chandra Red: Spitzer Green & Orange: Hubble Face-on i = 0 Edge-on i = 90 Absorption-line probes of the prevalence and properties of outflows.
Suzaku Discovery of Fe K-Shell Line from the O-rich SNR G Arxiv: Fumiyoshi Kamitukasa et al.
Shocks Jets and Active Galaxies By Drew Brumm. Shocks Strong Shocks Shocks in accretion –Compact objects –Supernova explosions Accretion of binary systems.
Multi-wavelength Observations of Composite Supernova Remnants Collaborators: Patrick Slane (CfA) Eli Dwek (GSFC) George Sonneborn (GSFC) Richard Arendt.
European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC) May 23, 2013.
Spitzer Imaging of Kepler’s Supernova Remnant W.P. Blair, R. Sankrit, P.Ghavamian (JHU), K.S. Long (STScI), K. Borkowski & S.P. Reynolds (NCSU) Summary:
Strange Galactic Supernova Remnants G (the Tornado) & G in X-rays Anant Tanna Physics IV 2007 Supervisor: Prof. Bryan Gaensler.
2009 July 8 Supernova Remants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era 1 Modeling the Dynamical and Radiative Evolution of a Pulsar Wind Nebula inside.
Supernova 1987A at 25 years. 1.Highlights of the past 25 years 2.Outstanding mysteries and surprises 3.What we can expect to learn, sooner and later TOPICS.
X-ray Properties of Five Galactic SNRs arXiv: Thomas G. Pannuti et al.
From Progenitor to Afterlife Roger Chevalier SN 1987AHST/SINS.
Herschel study of the dust content of Cassiopeia A Ref: arxiv: v1 Oliver Krause PPT.
Supernovae from Massive Stars: light curves and spectral evolution Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
October 10, 2002COSPAR Houston, TX1 X-Ray Spectral Morphologies of Young Supernova Remnants John P. Hughes Rutgers University  Cara Rakowski, Rutgers.
SN 1987A the excitement continues Bruno Leibundgut ESO.
Cosmic ray acceleration in the MSH supernova remnant (RCW 86) Eveline Helder together with: Jacco Vink, Cees Bassa, Aya Bamba,
NASA's Chandra Sees Brightest Supernova Ever N. Smith et al. 2007, astro-ph/ v2.
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 17 – AGB evolution: … MS mass > 8 solar masses … explosive nucleosynthesis … MS.
IR Shell Surrounding the Pulsar Wind Nebula G SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, July 8, 2009 Tea Temim (CfA, Univ. of MN) Collaborators:
March 11-13, 2002 Astro-E2 SWG 1 John P. Hughes Rutgers University Some Possible Astro-E2 Studies of Supernova Remnants.
Spectral analysis of non-thermal filaments in Cas A Miguel Araya D. Lomiashvili, C. Chang, M. Lyutikov, W. Cui Department of Physics, Purdue University.
January 8, st AAS Meeting1 Nucleosynthesis, Pulsars, Cosmic Rays, and Shock Physics: High Energy Studies of Supernova Remnants with Chandra and.
May 6, 2003Constellation-X Workshop1 Spatial/Spectral Studies of Supernova Remnants with Chandra and XMM-Newton John P. Hughes Rutgers University.
An X-ray Study of the Bright Supernova Remnant G with XMM-Newton SNRs and PWNe in the Chandra Era Boston, MA – July 8 th, 2009 Daniel Castro,
Cosmic Rays Discovery of cosmic rays Local measurements Gamma-ray sky (and radio sky) Origin of cosmic rays.
Stellar Winds and Mass Loss Brian Baptista. Summary Observations of mass loss Mass loss parameters for different types of stars Winds colliding with the.
Death of Stars I Physics 113 Goderya Chapter(s): 13 Learning Outcomes:
Zhang Ningxiao.  Emission of Tycho from Radio to γ-ray.  The γ-ray is mainly accelerated from hadronic processes.
Tycho’s SNR SNR G "To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe." ~Carl Sagan.
Saclay Irfu Supernova Remnants and Pulsar Wind Nebulae in the Chandra Era, Boston, July 2009 X-ray Observations of Supernova Remnants Anne Decourchelle.
Radio and X-Ray Properties of Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnants John R. Dickel Univ. of Illinois with: D. Milne. R. Williams, V. McIntyre, J. Lazendic,
Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. Summary of Post-Main-Sequence Evolution of Stars M > 8 M sun M < 4 M sun Subsequent ignition of nuclear reactions involving.
X-ray Studies of Supernova Remnants Una Hwang (NASA/GSFC, JHU) X-ray Astronomy School 2007 George Washington University.
Cas A 超新星残骸中の ダストの進化と熱放射 野沢 貴也 東京大学数物連携宇宙研究機構(IPMU) 共同研究者 小笹 隆司 ( 北大 ), 冨永望 ( 国立天文台 ), 前田啓一 (IPMU), 梅田秀之 ( 東大 ), 野本憲一 (IPMU/ 東大 )
THE EXPANSION ASYMMETRY AND AGE OF THE CASSIOPEIA A SUPERNOVA REMNANT XinZhou
COS Observations of the Chemical Composition of SNR LMC N132D France et al. Ben Folsom and Sharlene Rubio.
Solar System Shifts in Oxygen Isotopes Associated with Supernova Injection of Aluminum 26 Carola Ellinger, Patrick Young & Steve Desch School of Earth.
Introduction Star itself Ejecta, Great Eruption in 1840 formed the Homunculus The 5.52 yr periodicity Binary vs shell D = 2.3 kpc.
Observations of supernova remnants Anne Decourchelle Service d’Astrophysique, CEA Saclay I- Ejecta dominated SNRs: Cas A, Tycho and Kepler II- Synchrotron-dominated.
Formation of Dust in Various Types of Supernovae Takaya Nozawa IPMU (Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators.
Sgr B2 Galactic Center Survey with Chandr Radio Arc 1 Sgr A East : Young SNR 2 The GC Hot Plasma : 10keV 3 Sgr B2, Radio Arc : Molecular Clouds ~2 x 1.
Gilles Maurin – CEA Saclay - MODE10 - SNR session - November 2010 Geometry of acceleration in the bipolar remnant of SN1006 with XMM-Newton Gilles Maurin,
Image: Toward high-resolved hydrodynamic Simulations of Supernova remnants such as Cas A, Tycho.. Masaomi Ono.
Progenitor stars of supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada.
C. Y. Hui & W. Becker X-Ray Studies of the Central Compact Objects in Puppis-A & RX J Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse.
A Pulsar Wind Nebula Origin for Luminous TeV Source HESS J Joseph Gelfand (NYUAD / CCPP) Eric Gotthelf, Jules Halpern (Columbia University), Dean.
X-ray observation of the Cygnus Loop with Suzaku and XMM-Newton
Expected Gamma-Ray Emission of SN 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (d = 50 kpc) E.G.Berezhko 1, L.T. Ksenofontov 1, and H.J.Völk 2 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute.
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Patrick Slane The Remnants of Supernovae.
Y. Matsuo A), M. Hashimoto A), M. Ono A), S. Nagataki B), K. Kotake C), S. Yamada D), K. Yamashita E) Long Time Evolutionary Simulations in Supernova until.
Formation of Dust in Supernovae and Its Ejection into the ISM Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N. Tominaga.
14 may 2007Simbol-X workshop - Bologna1 44 Ti nucleosynthesis γ –ray lines with Simbol-X Matthieu Renaud Max-Planck-Institute für Kernphysik Heidelberg,
Evolution of Newly Formed Dust in Population III Supernova Remnants and Its Impact on the Elemental Composition of Population II.5 Stars Takaya Nozawa.
「すざく」 による超新星残骸 RCW86 の観測 Suzaku Observations of Supernova Remnant RCW86 山口 弘悦 (理研) Hiroya Yamaguchi (RIKEN) ← Preliminary image of the Suzaku mapping observation.
A New Window on Radio and X-ray emission from Strongly Interacting Supernovae Poonam Chandra Royal Military College of Canada Collaborators: Roger Chevalier,
Formation and evolution of dust in Type IIb SN: Application to Cas A Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N.
The Deaths of Stars Please press “1” to test your transmitter.
American Astronomical Society – Austin, TX (2008) Patrick Slane (CfA) In collaboration with: D. Helfand (Columbia) S. Reynolds (NC State) B. Gaensler (U.
Formation and evolution of dust in hydrogen-poor supernovae Takaya Nozawa (IPMU, Univ. of Tokyo) Collaborators; T. Kozasa (Hokkaido Univ.), N. Tominaga.
High energy Astrophysics Mat Page Mullard Space Science Lab, UCL 7. Supernova Remnants.
The “youngest” Ia SNR in the Galaxy. The best to study early phase of Type Ia Cosmic Ray acceleration at the Shell The best to study the cosmic ray origin.
ALMA observations of Molecules in Supernova 1987A
Asami Hayato (RIKEN / Tokyo Univ. of Sci.)
X-ray and Radio (and Optical) Observations of Cassiopeia A
IIb型超新星爆発時のダスト形成と その放出過程
Gas and Dust Layers from Cassiopeia A’s Explosive Nucleosynthesis
東京大学数物連携宇宙研究機構(IPMU)
Gas and Dust Layers from Cassiopeia A’s Explosive Nucleosynthesis
Presentation transcript:

A Million Second Chandra View of Cassiopeia A Una Hwang (NASA/GSFC, JHU) & J Martin Laming (NRL) Boston AAS 24 May 2011

Cas A First-light Chandra image (Hughes+ 2000) Red: Fe, Green: Si Cassiopeia A Core-collapse SNR with the most prominent Fe ejecta emission Si and Fe distributions are distinct (Hughes+ 2000, Hwang+ 2000, Willingale+ 2002) Advanced evolutionary state: reverse shock has heated a substantial portion of ejecta (Laming & Hwang 2003, Chevalier & Oishi 2003) Best studied SNR at all wavelengths Explosion date: 1671 (to 1681; Thorstensen+ 2001, Fesen 2006) Distance: 3.4 kpc (Reed+ 1995) Shock velocities, radii (Gotthelf+ 2001, DeLaney & Rudnick 2003; Helder & Vink 2008, Morse+ 2004)

Extensive progenitor mass loss: Aided by a binary companion (Young+ 2006) SNR expansion into circumstellar wind matches dynamics (Laming & Hwang 2003, Chevalier & Oishi 2003) CSM modified by bubble (Hwang & Laming 2009) or dynamics modified by particle acceleration (Patnaude & Fesen 2009) Shocked CSM mass: ~10 M sun Likely mass at explosion: ~ 4 M sun (Willingale+ 2003, Laming & Hwang 2003, Chevalier & Oishi 2003) Infrared light echo spectrum: Cas A was Type IIb (core-collapse with partial H envelope) Krause+2008

XMM-Newton spectral survey of Cas A Willingale+2002, x15 grid two component fits Total mass: 2.2 M sun ejecta 7.9 M sun CSM

Cas A X-ray Emitting Ejecta Census 1 million second VLP observation with Chandra ACIS 2004 nine OBSIDs 2.8x10 8 photons 6202 extraction regions: 2.5, 5, or 10” along one side customized spectral response off-source background scattered source spectrum selected by azimuth Plane-parallel shock model with variable abundances, elements O and heavier

Cas A Chandra Fitted Element Abundances

Classify each region by dominant spectral type Possible contributions to each spectrum include: forward shocked thermal emission from CSM nonthermal emission reverse shocked thermal emission from ejecta Eliminate 1500 forward shock/nonthermal dominated regions: plane-parallel shock with CSM-type abundances optional power-law Consider >4000 remaining regions as ejecta: plane-parallel shock with O as lightest element

Gallery of Spectral Types Normal CSM Nonthermal (not NS) Mixed CSM nonthermal Fe dominated ejecta “Normal” composition O, Ne, Mg, Si, etc Mixed ejecta “Normal” and Fe rich Two ejecta components: “normal” + pure Fe (see also Hwang & Laming 2009)

“Pure” (very highly enriched) Fe Ejecta Chandra 50 ks (BG subtracted) Hwang & Laming (2003) Fe/Si > 16 solar by # Plausible site of  -rich freeze out (products include Fe, 44 Ti,  Chandra Ms (BG modelled) Fe/Si ~ 20 solar by # src+bg src

Ejecta Mass Calculations Ejecta fits with (1) single vpshock or (2) vpshock + NEI (Fe, Ni only): evaluate with f-test Use fitted emission measure assume V=A 2/3 filling factor for 2.5” shell front and back Total shocked ejecta mass = 2.8 M sun Mostly O (2.55 M sun ) Fe= 0.10 M sun (normal Si-burning) M sun (pure,  -rich freezeout) (Chevalier & Oishi 2003) Narrow density peak at contact discontinuity Total ejecta mass = 3.1 M sun Unshocked ejecta mass = 0.3 M sun

Unshocked ejecta is probably Si Spitzer Observatory Smith+2009, Rho+2008 Infrared observations show unshocked ejecta at remnant center, primarily in [Si II] Little optical or infrared evidence for Fe (Ennis+ 2006, Rho+ 2003, Isensee+ 2010, Hurford & Fesen 1996, Gerardy & Fesen 2001) Cool 35 K dust component consistent with Si (Nozawa+ 2010; Sibthorpe+ 2010, Barlow+ 2010) Radioactive heating of Fe ejecta by 56 Ni decay inhibits Fe dust condensation Condensation less efficient in IIb events vs those without mass loss

X-ray inferred mass of shocked Fe is – 0.14 M sun depending on assumptions consistent with expected mass of Fe M sun (Eriksen+ 2009) Fe associated with low or high Si about evenly (consistent with Magkotsios+ 2010) All the Fe ejecta are found well outside the center 44 Ti associated with pure Fe will also be outside the center small LOS velocity (INTEGRAL; Martin & Vink 2008, Martin+ 2009) may be tested with NUSTAR Two other remnants with 44 Ti are different from Cas A: SN 1987A : all the 44 Ti are in the center (Kjaer ) G : most of the 44 Ti are outside (Borkowski+ 2010) Strong instabilities must operate to mix the Fe far outwards

Neutron Star Kick Velocities of 1825 optical knots (Fesen+ 2006) Inferred motion of NS (Thorstensen+ 2001) Neutron star speed is inferred to be 330 km/s, roughly perpendicular to axis of ejecta “jets”, fast optical knots Hydrodynamical simulations (3D, non-rotating progenitor; Wongwathanarat+2010): Predict NS recoil opposite maximum explosion strength (ie, opposite the Fe?)

 Fe ejecta Due east Between NS motion and jet  All ejecta East of North 700 km/s 150 degrees from NS motion Remnant as a whole moves opposite to NS: Suggests hydrodynamic origin for NS kick NS motion

Three Dimensional Structure of Cas A Si/”Mg” ratio DeLaney D structure from Doppler shifts: Infrared [Ar II] (Spitzer) High [Ne II]/[Ar II] [Si II] X-ray Fe K (Chandra Ms) outer optical knots (Fesen 2001, Fesen & Gunderson 1996) Si in center, in rings on the surface Fe ejecta, high-velocity “jets” in outflows encircled by outlying material

Summary 3 M sun ejecta is inferred from census of X-ray emission and is also consistent with the observed remnant dynamics Most of the Fe ejecta is already shocked, and sits well outside the reverse shock; some of the Fe is “pure” 44 Ti is expected to have the same distribution as pure Fe Long exposure crucial to find pure Fe via Fe K emission Inferred momentum of Fe ejecta is perpendicular to the jet axis, not opposite the NS; momentum of total ejecta opposes NS Hydrodynamic mechanism for the kick looks likely Cas A provides constraints on hydrodynamics of the explosion and is ripe for targeted explosion models including progenitor rotation

Abstract Deadline: 31 May 2011