Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) magnets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
3nd KEK-CEA Workshop on Superconducting magnets and cryogenics for accelerator frontier - 24/03/2009 Ceramic insulation for Nb3Sn accelerator magnets F.Rondeaux.
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
Prospects of a 16T CCT Magnet for FCC
Block-coil NbTi dipoles for 6 Tesla Rapid-cycling SuperSPS
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Preliminary Design of Nb 3 Sn Quadrupoles for FCC-hh M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC.
Aug 29, 2006S. Kahn T HTS Solenoid1 A Proposal for a 50 T HTS Solenoid Steve Kahn Muons Inc. August 29, 2006.
Development of Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators and Detectors in High Energy Physics Takakazu Shintomi and Akira Yamamoto On behalf of.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb. 4, 2009 V. Kashikhin 1 Fermilab AAC  V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team Superconducting Helical Solenoids.
EuCARD2 Magnet Status and action plan
Status of CEPC Detector magnet
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
FCC Week 2015Design Options for 16 T LTS Dipoles – G. Sabbi 1 Overview of Magnet Design Options for LTS Dipoles in the 16 T Range GianLuca Sabbi, LBNL.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
Superconducting R&D – Now Strand and Cable R&D FERMILAB Magnet Systems Department – Now SC Materials Department (TD) HTS Insert Coil Test in External Solenoid.
Towards Nb 3 Sn accelerator magnets, challenges & solutions, history & forecast Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
HiLumi-LHC / LARP Conductor and Cable Internal Review October 16 th and 17 th 2013 H. Felice LARP Short Magnets Fabrication and Test experience relevant.
Recent Developments in Nb 3 Sn Dipole Technology at Texas A&M Peter McIntyre Dept. of Physics Texas A&M University
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
ASC 2014Nb 3 Sn Block Coil Dipoles for a 100 TeV Hadron Collider – G. Sabbi 1 Performance characteristics of Nb 3 Sn block-coil dipoles for a 100 TeV hadron.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Concepts for 20 T dipoles SnowMass Preparation J. Van Nugteren.
Magnetic Design S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers, R. Oort, M. Morsch, E. Rochepault, H. Pan, T. Ki, R. Schlueter (LBNL) Superconducting Undulator Integrated.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study introduction Paolo Ferracin CERN, Geneva Claire Antoine
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
LARP Collaboration Meeting, April 26-28, 2006Gian Luca Sabbi HQ Design Study (WBS ) LARP Collaboration Meeting April 26-28, 2006 N. Andreev, E.
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
BNL High Field and HTS Magnet Program Ramesh Gupta BNL, NY USA H T.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
ECC Clément Lorin – Maria Durante Acknowledgements: Fresca2 team.
S. Caspi, LBNL TQS – Progress and plans Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration meeting FNAL April
Next Steps in Magnet R&D Steve Gourlay LBNL EuCARD Workshop on a High Energy LHC Malta October 14, 2010.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
Magnets meet beams in gantries for medical application Shlomo Caspi and Lucas Brouwer * Beam Dynamics meets Magnets-II 1-4 December 2014, Bad Zurzach Swisserland.
Program overview: motivation, target parameters, timeline A.V. Zlobin 15 T dipole design review 28 April 2016.
Medical Applications 6 contributions on Particle therapy: Magnets for
1 1 Office of Science CCT Magnet Development at LBNL Daniel R. Dietderich Superconducting Magnet Program ICFA Mini Workshop on High Field Magnets for Future.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Rome, April 11-15, 2016 Status and Development of a Nb 3 Sn Canted-Cosine-Theta.
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
TQS Overview and recent progress
Model magnet test results at FNAL
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
Superconducting Helical Solenoids
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Conceptual Design of CEPC Interaction Region Superconducting Magnets
Block design status EuroCirCol
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Presentation transcript:

Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) magnets Shlomo Caspi Superconducting Magnet Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Kyoto Japan, November 13-14, 2014 2014 Kyoto Workshop on HTS Magnet Technology for High Energy Physics The 2nd Workshop on Accelerator Magnet in HTS (WAMHTS-2) For the superconducting magnet group: D. Arbelaez, L. Brouwer, D. Dietderich, H. Felice, A. Godeke, S. Gourlay, A. Hafalia Jr, M. Marchevsky, H. Pan, S. Prestemon, X. Wang

Superconducting Magnet Beyond the LHC The Future-Circular-Collider (FCC) is a mandate for a change Some critical performance questions: How much margin can we afford ? short-sample? How much training can we afford ? first quench is the last quench? Technology – “magnet business” not as usual. Technology wish list: Perfect field - a Cosine-n-Theta like - effective use of the bore Low conductor stress at any field – magnet is strain independent No need for pre-stress – easy assembly and cool-down Reduce cost – reduce number of parts, tooling, R&D Reduce complexity – less analysis, less optimization 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

The Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) – a paradigm shift The CCT comes close to answer the technology wish list The CCT is yet to prove it can meet the performance wish list Perfect field: As “true” a cosine-theta current density distribution Field quality over the straight section and “ends” Low conductor stress: Structure intercepts Lorentz-Forces, reduced coil stress by an order of magnitude No need for pre-stress Small or large bores Grading - same strand in all cables Cost-effective: All poles inclusive – just like solenoids, Inherently a 3D structure Fewer parts, simplified tooling and assembly Compatibility between NbTi, Nb3Sn and HTS Original paper by D.I. Meyer and R. Flasck “A new configuration for a dipole magnet for use in high energy physics application”, Nucl. Instr. and Methods 80, pp. 339-341, 1970.) 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

What is the Canted-Cosine-Theta (CCT) Magnet Solenoid Canted solenoid Canted ~15 degrees Canted-Cosine-Theta Two superimposed coils, oppositely skewed, achieve a pure cosine-theta field and eliminate axial field. 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

The CCT Magnet Ribs (wedges) create a “perfect” magnetic field and intercept the Lorentz forces Turns Ribs or “wedges” The Spar integrates forces Spiral channels are cut into a cylinder. 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

CCT Magnetic Length and “ends” (Nb3Sn) End-length Straight-section-length Magnetic-length Magnet length dipole Magnetic-length = pitch*Nturns harmonics Straight-section Harmonics over each “end” integrate to zero 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

CCT – Stress Interception Where the force is large the rib is thick The conductor (cable) is placed into a channel that is cut normal to a cylinder. Turn normal to cylinder Stress integrator (Spar) Tangential (bi-normal) forces are intercepted by the channel walls that are held by the inner spar thereby intercepting the turn to turn force. Where the force is small the rib is thin Radial Stress Max Bi-normal Stress 0 Bi-normal Stress ~ Sin(theta) Radial Stress ~ Cos(theta Bi-normal Stress (z direction) Max Radial Stress 0 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Lamination Conductor Impact: Construction Computation Laminations repeat every pitch length Mandrel = Internal structure = ribs and spar Conductor Impact: Construction Computation Conductor and structure 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

The CCT is a 3D object - lamination 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Summary – Nb3Sn Magnets Operation Non CCT CCT Winding tooling Mandrel, clamps, tension Mandrel Coil parts islands, “end” spacers, wedges Winding binding Curing cavity tooling, press Reaction Cavity tooling Wrap Potting Pre-assembly assemble poles with pads, align Final-assembly Outer structure -Iron, Shell Nest and align layers Pre-stress azimuthally axially 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

A High Field CCT Dipole Design 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

A 18T CCT 8 layers Nb3Sn 4 layers Bi2212 insert Clear bore ID=40mm, OD=274.3mm 8 layers Nb3Sn 4 layers Bi2212 insert 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

A 12 layers Nb3Sn-Bi2212 CCT Nb3Sn double layers graded Bi2212 not graded Field > 10T, cannot use NbTi 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

8 layers Nb3Sn + 4 layers Bi2212 Bybore |B|cond 8 layers of Nb3Sn contributing 1.9T/layer (7580A) 4 layers of Bi2212, contributing 0.7T/layer (2620A) Each layer has the same number of turns and angle Same magnetic length each layer 1m=pitchXturns The magnet has no-iron Conductor |Bmod| is at the magnet center Bore field is 17.7T |Bmod|max=18.1T (2.2% higher)) Pitch=7.63mm, 131 turns |B|cond 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

~18T CCT with 8 layers Nb3Sn + 4 layers Bi2212 Material I (A) Jsc (A/mm2) Jstrand Jchannel |B-cond-max| (T) strand (m/m) Cable Conductor (Kg/m) 1 Bi-2212 2620 651 455 18.1 395.8 49.48 2 17.8 495.6 61.95 3 17.5 595.3 74.42 4 17.1 695.1 86.9 Nb3Sn 7580 1395 655 364 16.3 2450.1 106.5 10.85 15.4 3046.0 132.4 13.49 1887 887 493 14.4 2650.4 155.9 11.73 13.5 3007.9 176.9 13.32 5 2673 1256 698 12.6 2351.1 195.9 10.41 6 11.8 2554.7 212.8 11.31 7 3565 1675 931 11.2 2057.7 228.6 9.11 8 10.1 2188.4 243.1 9.69 *|B-cond-max| is the maximum conductor field at the pole. ***strand, cable and conductor weight are per 1m magnetic length Total length of Nb3Sn strand (0.8mm) 20.3Km/1m-magnetic-length (~180k$) Total length of Bi2212 strand (0.8mm) 2.2Km/1m-magnetic-length (factor of 10 ?) 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

3D ANSYS Stress Analysis Conductor Azimuthal Stress Structure Azimuthal Stress Meshed layer See L. Brouwer, S. Caspi, and S. Prestemon “Structural Analysis of a 18 T Hybrid Canted-Cosine-Theta Superconducting Dipole” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity paper 4LPO2F-08 to be published ASC 2014 See L. Brouwer, D. Arbelaez, S. Caspi, H. Felice, S. Prestemon, and E. Rochepault “Structural Design and Analysis of Canted–Cosine–Theta Dipoles” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 24, no. 3, june 2014 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

ANSYS ~18T with 8 layers Nb3Sn + 4 layers Bi2212 t, r, b are stress along the path, radial and normal to the rib (bi-normal) ANSYS Stress plotted around a single turn for the innermost Bi2212 and Nb3Sn layer. 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Conductor stress for different layers – ANSYS* σt : Tangential Stress (along cable) σr : Radial Stress σb : Binormal Stress (perp. to rib) Stress at short-sample Max/Min σt Max/Min σr Max/Min σb Layer 2 Layer: 10 T (Nb3Sn) 60/-38 18/-42 27/-67 inner 8 Layer: 16 T (Nb3Sn) 102/-45 28/-51 72/-76 12 Layer: 18 T (Nb3Sn) 41/-28 27/-29 36/-48 5’th 12 Layer: 18 T (Bi2212) 74/-35 43/-48 60/-59 Depending on how the Lorentz force density and rigidity scale, going to higher field by increasing the number of layers could have very little effect, or even improve the situation * Courtesy of L. Brouwer 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Present and Future Plans 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Present and Future Plans What has been done and what is being done: Tested a 2.4-T NbTi CCT dipole. Designed a short 2 layer dipole 5T NbTi (CCT2) and a 10T Nb3Sn (CCT3) Fabricate identical mandrels for both magnets (Q1 2015) Designed an 18-T dipole - field quality, loads and mechanical stresses for the various stages. Develop fabrication processes and cost-effective tooling. 18T in sequential steps: 8 layers of Nb3Sn coils with progressive fields from 10T to 16T (several independent tests)) (2015-16) Develop a HTS insert raising the field to 18T (2016) 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

CCT1 NbTi Cable 1.3x3 mm (SSC outer strand) 2 aluminum mandrels No impregnation (cable free within the channel) 56mm clear bore Magnet reached 2.5T b3~7, b5~0, b7~0.5 units at 3900A (Ref=66%) 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

CCT Magnet Technology – in progress Reaction tooling Winding, no tension no curing Potting tooling Wind using a deeper channel --2x10mm Test reaction tooling and winding position Test potting tooling and winding position Reacted coil 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

The CCT – Plans # of layer Material I (A) |B-cond-max| (T) B-bore (T) JssXBss (N/mm^3) 1-2 NbTi 10600 5.9 5.3 Nb3Sn 20700 11.6 10.3 10 1-2-3-4 13550 13.8 13.1 1-2-3-4-5-6 10100 15.2 14.7 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8 8100 16.2 15.8 5 Bi-2212 3950 4.9 4.4 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Curved Accelerator Magnets Curved configuration Linear configuration Direction of current Toroidal coordinate system. A winding concept on a toroid that produces a combined function field and higher multipole fields (e.g. gantry magnets for proton-carbon beam therapy) Multipole Winding Path Combined function 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

CCT - Summary A New Magnet Type – Canted-Cosine-Theta Magnetic and structural elements (Islands, wedges, “end” spacers) replaced by spar and ribs Stress interception with applied Lorentz Force (large bore ok) Assembly and cool-down - no pre-stress required Grading not limited, the same strand in all cables 2D and 3D high field quality over an extended range (no optimization) Conductor insulation to ground only (ceramic coating=no cable insulation) Generic design for all conductor types – NbTi, Nb3Sn, HTS Simplified tooling A linear structure (e.g. dominated by structure not conductor properties) Combined function field, (handle geometric errors) Extended technology to curved coils and other magnet types 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi

Conclusions   The CCT is a paradigm shift in the design of high field SC magnets and the potential of high gain in SC magnet technology (reduce stress, improve training and “short-sample” expectation, field quality etc) The CCT has the potential of reducing cost especially at high fields We proposed a R&D program that demonstrate CCT technology with NbTi , Nb3Sn and HTS (we have addressed the choice of material, mandrel manufacturing, coil winding, reaction, impregnation and analysis) Part of a cost analysis of a high field option for the FCC 11/11/2014 Shlomo Caspi