S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y SR-35 Crossing Public Opinion Survey Results December 6, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Blissfield Community Schools December 2008/January 2009 Blissfield Community Schools Citizen Attitude and Opinion Study December 2008 Conducted by: EPIC.
Advertisements

Presentation N.S. Survey 1: 7/11/2014. How do you usually travel TO school?
Focus groups and intervention sessions March 2014 Stage 1: Qualitative payment and release Quantification of qual preferences April 2014 Stage 2: Payment.
Farm Media Research Studies Chapter 10. Summary of Farm Media Research Studies Communication technologies and the structure of farms and ranches have.
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
METRO Rail Intercept Survey Findings, Data Uses AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1, 2009.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Statewide Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Mountainland Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Bear River Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Southwestern Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Central Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Governor’s Trail Initiative Preliminary Results from the Statewide Telephone Poll Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Wasatch Front Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
2010 State of the Commute Survey Presentation National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board July 21, 2010 ITEM #12.
The Value of Online Resources to North Carolina Public Library Patrons Emily Guhde NCPLDA Conference March 29, 2012.
Attitudes to alternative transport funding Graeme Colman Principal, Horizon Research Limited NZCID 25 July 2012.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
The Moodie Report May Methodology and Sample  Online survey carried out with travellers at airports around the world  In total,
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
January Utah Statewide Household Travel Study Study overview and results.
Congestion Pricing I. Introduction II. Need and purpose of multimodal system Traffic gridlock reflects an imbalance between road supply and road demand.
National Travel Survey Past, Present & Future Presentation to the Transport Liaison Group Olive Loughnane 19/09/2013.
Seminar on Mid Term Evaluation in Objective 1 and 2 Regions Lessons from the Mid Term Evaluation of Merseyside Objective One.
MPO/RPC Directors Meeting Asadur Rahman Lead Worker-Traffic Forecasting Section, BPED, July 28, 2015.
Community Telephone Survey Public Preferences and Behaviors PREPARED FOR City of West Linn February
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
The Washington Poll: Health Care Reform Issues Analysis Sara Vaezy, MHA MPHc & Lauren Carr, MPHc University of Washington School of Public Health Department.
11.4 Collecting Data and Circle graphs E S: Gather and Organize Information 1.) What percent of the budget is spent on rent? 2.) How much money do the.
Salford Futures 2013/14 Evaluation John Reehill Dave Timperley.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
1 Potential User Benefits and Costs of Rising Fuel Prices in the Puget Sound Region TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 By Maren Outwater.
Marie-Odile GASCON, CertuSHANGHAI, Forum THNS, 11 – 14 Novembre /11/ Household travel surveys how to carry them out ? Method and a few results.
Chapter 5: NEEDS ASSESSMENT “Acting without thinking is like shooting without aiming.” B. C. Forbes.
Protestant church involvement in missions and support for church planting.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Healthcare Using New Technologies (HUNT): A survey to assess seniors’ readiness to use web-based methods of communicating about health and with the health.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Valuing the Environment: Methods.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Uintah Basin Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
What Day of the Week Would You Like to Answer Our Survey? Maria Andreasson, B.A. Laboratory of Opinion Research (LORE) Department of Political Science.
Changes to the collection of short walk data in the NTS Glenn Goodman, DfT.
Pastors Report Mixed Economic Signs Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors.
Travel Data and the Smartphone: Building an International Travel Dataset One Android User at a Time GIL TAL MICHAEL NICHOLAS MATTHEW FAVETTI.
Flash Eurobarometer 423/422 CITIZENS’ AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF EU REGIONAL POLICY/CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION IN THE EU Survey requested by the Directorate-General.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
Preferred Student Activities A Student Body Presentation September 2002.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
2/2/2016US DOT/Volpe Center1 Distributional Impacts of Congestion Pricing Douglass B. Lee, Jr. International Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, FL.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Attitudinal Evaluation Overview and Update Johanna Zmud / NuStats October 28, 2004 MnPass Copyright WSDOT © 2002.
Using Marketing Data. Working with Simmons Data Identifying potential consumers Segment prospect markets Narrow consumer targets Characteristics Media.
ACU Mobile Learning Research: Survey Results C. Brad Crisp, Ph.D. October 19, 2009.
Financial Downturn for Churches in 2010 Survey of 1,000 Protestant Pastors October 2010.
Demand for Tours Market Segments among Group Travellers.
European Program C OMENIUS Survey – Questionnaire “Renewable energy in its regional context, ways out of the energy crisis”
2004 City Budget Allocation Survey January Since 1997, tracking of City of Vancouver residents’ attitudes on: Main local issues of concern Perceptions.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey September 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office Nov 6, 2003.
Climate change perceptions in the Pacific Northwest: A study on general population concerns Student: Augusto Gabrielli, Advisors: J.D. Wulfhorst, Professor,
Call us on Toll-Free. Call Us Now Toll Free.
Toll Free Toll Free.
Call us on Toll-Free Call Us Now Toll Free.
Recover Yahoo Mail Password Forgotten Password
Presentation transcript:

S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y SR-35 Crossing Public Opinion Survey Results December 6, 2001

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Survey Purpose  Scientifically valid sample of public opinion  Measure perceived need for a new or improved crossing  Determine location preference for new or improved crossing  Assess opinions on tolls and financing options

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Research Methodology  Two survey efforts: –Motorist Intercept Study (255 respondents over 2 days - Sunday and Monday) –Telephone Survey (200 OR and 200 WA respondents)  Both surveys conducted in October 2001  Phone survey respondents randomly sampled  Very high cooperation rates for both studies  Captured bridge users and non-users

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Research Summary Highlights  Majority of those surveyed want an improved crossing  Support for new crossing is higher in Washington than in Oregon  Support for new crossing increases with existing bridge frequency of use

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Research Summary Highlights  Mixed opinions on where new crossing should go; highest support for current location  Majority stated they would not have made last bridge trip by walking or biking –Yet 10-20% may likely have traveled by bike/pedestrian modes if given the opportunity  Many bridge trips are for non-work purposes

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Public Supports a New Crossing Research Summary Highlights

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Results Show Some Potential for Mode Shift Research Summary Highlights

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Tolls and Financing Options  All respondents asked about willingness to pay a higher toll for most recent trip  Phone survey respondents received additional questions on tolls  Phone survey respondents also asked whether they support combinations of taxes and tolls Research Summary Highlights

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Willingness by All to Pay Higher Tolls Research Summary Highlights

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Willingness to Pay Tolls by Frequency of Use Research Summary Highlights

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Intercept and Phone Survey Toll Opinion Differences  Respondents from both surveys have about equal willingness to pay higher tolls for most recent trip  Trip frequency does not impact willingness to pay  WA phone respondents less willing to pay higher tolls for most recent trip than OR respondents  No difference in willingness to pay higher tolls between WA and OR intercepted bridge users  Phone respondents using the bridge in the past week were less willing to have paid a higher toll than intercepted bridge users.

S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Findings

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study  Conducted over two days: –Sunday October 21 –Monday October 22  Bridge users intercepted in both directions  Respondents given free trip for participation

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Destinations

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Destinations by Purpose

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Destinations by Usage

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Bridge Users Want a New Crossing

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Support From Frequent & Non-Frequent Users

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Mixed Opinions from Intercepted Users as to Where New Crossing Should Go Motorist Intercept Study Mixed Opinions from Intercepted Users as to Where New Crossing Should Go

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Less-Frequent Users Support Current Location

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y M otorist Intercept Study Weekday Users More Likely to Pay Higher Toll

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Willingness to Pay Tolls About Same by State

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Motorist Intercept Study Higher Willingness to Pay for Work Purposes Motorist Intercept Study Higher Willingness to Pay for Work Purposes

S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Findings

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey  Conducted during October 2001  Randomly sampled 400 area residents from Oregon and Washington  Similar sample sizes in OR and WA  Bridge users and non-users included –About 1/3 of phone respondents had not used the bridge in the past week

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Residence Locations

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Trip Purposes Telephone Survey Trip Purposes

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey General Public Supports New Crossing

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey General Support from Frequent, Infrequent and Non-Users

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Washington Residents See Great Need

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey WA Residents Less Likely to Pay Higher Tolls

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Higher Willingness to Pay for Work Purposes

P u b l i c O p i n i o n S u r v e y S R – 3 5 C o l u m b i a R i v e r C r o s s I n g F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y Telephone Survey Only 1/3 Support Local Tax Funding