LANSCE Short-Pulse Target Operation High-power Targetry for Future Accelerators September 11, June 2003 Richard Werbeck Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Procuring a Design Project engineers perspective on starting the design process and establishing the A/E scope of work Frank C. Quigley General Engineer.
Advertisements

Damaged Fuel Storage and Recovery A Case Study Natraj C. Iyer Savannah River National Laboratory June 2, 2010 May 31,- June 4, 2010, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
SNS Experimental FacilitiesOak Ridge Target Systems for the Spallation Neutron Source Presented by John R. Haines at the High-Power Targetry for Future.
INRNE-BAS MELCOR Pre -Test Calculation of Boil-off test at Quench facility 11th International QUENCH Workshop Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe (FZK), October.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
Oak Ridge SNS Experimental Facilities X /arb 1 SNS MPS Review Target-MPS Review WBS Ron Battle Target Controls, Target Systems Experimental.
5/19/2015 Segmentation of the Legacy C Area Disassembly Spent Fuel Pool Prepared by: Jon Guy, N&CSE Spent Fuel Project Lead UNCLASSIFIED DOES NOT CONTAIN.
A Neutrino Factory Target Station Design based on Solid Targets J. R. J. Bennett STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science.
1 The CNGS Reflector Water distribution system Outer conductor Inner conductor Drain connections  5 Drain tube Support and alignment frame Transport chassis.
NPDgamma Liquid Hydrogen Target Safety Review Project and Safety At LANL November 29-30, 2005.
Radiation Effects in a Couple Solid Spallation Target Materials S.A. Maloy, W. F. Sommer, M.R. James, T.J. Romero, M.L. Lopez Los Alamos National Laboratory,
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
11/26/2002Edgar L Black IIT MICE Video Conference November 27, 2002 Summary of safety implementation for proposal.
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Proton Source Workshop December 7 & 8, 2010 John Reid December 8, 2010.
NBI March 2002 The MiniBooNE Horn Ioanis Kourbanis For The MiniBooNE Collaboration.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
ISIS Second Target Station
WAO, Trieste, 24th - 28th September 2007 An Overview of the Reliability and the Fault Trends of the SRS Cheryl Hodgkinson Daresbury Laboratory Synchrotron.
Introduction and Charge to the Review of ESS Target building and Instrument Hall design requirements Roland Garoby November 2014, Lund
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb TRT Barrel assembly status & schedule Feb. 9, 2005.
NuMI NBI2006 September 9, 2006 NuMI Repairs for Hot Components Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Repairs for Hot Components (1 sievert = 100 rem) Problem On.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II ASAC Review Conventional Facilities Briefing Marty Fallier Director for Conventional Facilities National Synchrotron.
The Proposed Materials Test Station at LANSCE Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at the Workshop on High-Power Targetry for Future.
PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT CERN / Oct / P.A.Schmelzbach.
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
LANSCE Update for BESAC July 23, 2002 Paul W. Lisowski LANSCE Division Leader Los Alamos National Laboratory.
ISIS operational update David Findlay Accelerator Division ISIS Department Rutherford Appleton Laboratory / STFC DL-RAL Joint Accelerator Workshop, RAL.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE The Making of the Spallation Neutron Source A 25-Year Journey Patricia Dehmer Deputy Director for Science Programs & Acting Director.
The Materials Test Station: An Accelerator Driven Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing Eric Pitcher Presented at: Sixth US-PRC Magnetic Fusion Collaboration.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
RaDIATE October Technical MeetingOctober BLIP Irradiation Planning Radiation Damage In Accelerator Target Environments.
1-1-Why Maintenance HVAC ? Increases equipment life & reliability Reduces size & scale & number of repairs Lowers maintenance costs through better.
Refurbished Booster RF John Reid October 24, 2012.
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
Status of the new Target Design n_TOF Collaboration meeting, Paris 4-5 December 2006 P. Cennini AB-ATB Status of the old Target Removal Status of the old.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of Research Reactors Lisbon, Portugal, 2-6 November 2015 Diakov Oleksii, Institute for.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
A. Leveling - Fermilab Recent Operating Experience at the Antiproton Source Target Hall 3 rd High Power Targetry Workshop September 12, 2007 Fermilab Accelerator.
Overview of the main events related to TS equipment during 2007 Definition Number and category of the events Events and measures taken for each machine.
December 13, 2006 Blanket and Shield Design Considerations for Magnetic Intervention G. Sviatoslavsky, I.N. Sviatoslavsky, M. Sawan (UW), A.R. Raffray.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
Booster Status, September 4, 2003 – E. Prebys 1 Frantic Shutdown Preparations Continue…
CSNS cryogenic system Institute of High Energy Physics Guoping Wang June 21, 2016.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
LBNE Target Pile & Decay Pipe Cooling Andy Stefanik and Ang Lee – Fermilab September 25, 2014.
Tailoring the ESS Reliability and Availability needs to satisfy the users Enric Bargalló WAO October 27, 2014.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months Vaia Papadimitriou Beamline Technical Board Meeting.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Nuclear Physics LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY 1 Line B preparations Hardware issues Install Fast Kicker (up to 200  C/sec). Reinstall Line B transport.
ISIS operational update
Completion of the MICE-US construction project
Jefferson Lab Overview
Analyses to Support Waste Disposition of SNS Inner Reflector Plug
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
Control Blade Design and Fabrication Improvements using Laser Welding
Cryogenic System Commissioning Summary Report
Piping and Instrumentation for Process Industries
APTM and GRID interface requirement PBIP and PBW
Door Heat Exchanger: Specification
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
Presentation transcript:

LANSCE Short-Pulse Target Operation High-power Targetry for Future Accelerators September 11, June 2003 Richard Werbeck Los Alamos National Laboratory

The Los Alamos Neutron Science Center serves several scientific communities. 800-MeV Linear Accelerator LANSCE Visitor’s Center Manuel Lujan Jr. Neutron Scattering Center Weapons Neutron Research Proton Storage Ring Proton Radiography Neutron Resonance Spectroscopy Future Isotope Production Facility APT Materials Irradiation

An overview of Line D, the PSR, 1L Target and ER-1 and 2. ER-2 Proton Storage Ring 1L Target Line D

There have been four different targets for the Lujan short- pulse spallation source. Mark 0a –Installed 1985 –Provided neutrons for 12 flight paths, flux-trap design –3 water moderators, 1 liquid hydrogen moderator Mark 0b –Installed 1991 –Rebuild of Mark 0a Mark I –Installed 1998 –Major redesign: All TMRS components on a single insert –Provide neutrons for 16 flight paths –4 water moderators, 2 liquid hydrogen moderators Mark II –Installed 2002 –Same as Mark I except for upper target cooling manifold and beryllium/stainless-steel reflectors

The target now serves 16 flight paths at the Lujan Center

The LANSCE reliability upgrade (Mark 1) had the following goals. Add capability for more neutron beam lines –Provide upper tier moderators for four new flight paths –Preserve performance of lower-tier moderators 100  A operation at 20 Hz –Design Target-Moderator-Reflector-System (TMRS) module for 200  A and 30 Hz Beam availability > 85% –Target change in 2 to 3 weeks –Reliable support systems

The Mark I design had all of the major components on a single insert. Proton beam pipe Service connections Beam diagnostic & beam window Upper tungsten target Upper-tier cryo moderator Lower-tier flight-path liner Outer reflector Inner reflector Lower tungsten target Outer reflector

Target upgrade operations began in August Remote handling removal operations took place in November and December of New target components were still under construction while old components were being removed. During final installation (July), the need for a nuclear authorization basis was discovered –The APT experiments on the 800kW proton line and the new target are Category 3 nuclear under DOE-STD-1027 –A credible mechanism for tungsten dispersion existed –A joint 1L / A6 BIO was prepared (DOE-STD-3009) –BIO submitted 24 Sep 1998 –SER issued 29 Sep 1998 –Contractor readiness assessment 28 Sep – 6 Oct 1998 –Pre-start findings closed on 21 Oct 1998

Commissioning of the Mark 1 target began in fall Commissioning began on 25 October  A (80kW) operation achieved on 19 Nov 1998 Performance of new components was excellent –Performance of lower-tier moderators was preserved –Target cooling as expected –Corrosion was down by at least a factor of 50 Many problems with legacy support systems –Reflector water-cooling system leaks –Hydrogen leaks and ice plugs Contamination incidents (and other incidents) led to 1999 stand down

We used the 1999 outage was to improve legacy systems. Water systems –“hand over hand” walkdown and documentation – formal procedures –compliance with ASME B31.3 Hydrogen system –replace compression fittings with metal-gasket face-seal fittings –welded joints wherever possible HVAC problems discovered during outage –pressure inversion observed at hot cell door –economy mode exchanged air between service area and occupied areas –no configuration control –deferred maintenance –unshielded HEPA filter bank

The radioactive drain system was also a serious problem. Lack of ownership –drains partially plugged with concrete –no interface agreement with users –deferred maintenance Major contamination incident (13 Oct 1999) –pressure release following pneumatic test –experimental areas contaminated with dust –mercury contamination was also detected Corrective actions –formal procedures –all drains cleaned out –interface agreements

The new issues required a new AB and a DOE-led RA. There were more controls required because of the HVAC issues Serious confusion with A6 which was no longer running beam DOE required ARF X RF = 1 Previous incidents demanded more formality DOE-led RA took place in March 2000 Pre-start findings closed and permission to operate by 17 June 2000

2000 target operation was excellent. Operated at nominal 100  A (80kW) Availability was 97.3% for the target –2.7% down time for gas removal –air separators not designed for gas production Overall availability of 74.7% was due to problems with site power and RF systems.

2001 operations had high availability but reduced current. The lower lead reflector suffered a loss of cooling capacity –temperature approached melting point of lead –beam current reduced to 55  A The upper target developed an internal coolant flow anomaly –suspected internal weld failure –upper target flow is safety significant –Justification for Continued Operation (JCO) required –JCO established current limit of 75  A Target performance –target 99.16%, Lujan Center overall 90.0%

Trend analysis of the upper target flow factor showed an increased conductance.

Several design problems were identified with the old upper target coolant passages. This weld on the inlet plenum crosses other welds and joins pieces of different thickness (suspected failure point) This protrusion interferes with e-beam access to the inlet plenum weld A weld failure in any of these internal welds will result in an internal shut that is not readily detectable during operation 100 mm

The design of the upper target coolant passages was changed to ensure a better weld preparation. Better weld prep on inlet cooling plenum Bottom of Inconel container has been shortened for better e-beam access to inlet plenum weld Inlet and outlet plena have been separated to eliminate the possibility of an internal shunt 100 mm

The TMRS insert was replaced in 2002 (Mark 2). Most components were identical to the Mark 1 Lead reflectors replaced –upper reflector changed to stainless steel –lower reflector changed to beryllium/stainless steel composite The upper target manifold was redesigned –no possibility for internal shunt –better weld preparation The target change operation will be discussed in another paper at this conference

2002 operations set a new record for beam current. Operation at 125  A (100kW) Target performance (through December) –target 99.21% –Lujan Center overall 86.6%

The path to 200  A depends upon the support systems and the safety basis. The TMRS insert was designed for 200  A Support systems –liquid hydrogen system not adequate –water systems may be difficult to maintain Beam lines –losses in extraction beam line requires new quads –source performance must improve if 20Hz We have an acceptance limit of 150  A –150  A limit set by minimum spot size –ARF x RF = 1 requires inventory limit –distance to site boundary may change