1 Xuyao Zheng Institute of Geophysics of CEA. 2 Outline 1.Motivation 2.Model and synthetic data 3.Calculation of Green functions 4.Pre-stack depth migration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Traditional practice separates seismic data processing and further interpretation. However the most efficient processing methods utilize a-priori information.
Advertisements

Seismic Resolution Lecture 8 * Layer Thickness top 20 ms base
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Introduction to GeoProbe
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
The Earth’s Structure Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure from Travel Times Spherically symmetric structure: PREM - Crustal.
Processing: zero-offset gathers
SAGEEP 2014 Refraction/Reflection Session Optimized interpretation of SAGEEP 2011 blind refraction data with Fresnel Volume Tomography and Plus-Minus refraction.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency signals: Applications in migration velocity updating and tomography Xiao-Bi Xie University of California at Santa.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Anisotropic seismic tomography: Potentials and pitfalls Mark Panning University of Florida CIDER Research Talk 7/5/2010.
الانعكاس السيزمي Receivers source reflector.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Xi’an Jiaotong University 1 Quality Factor Inversion from Prestack CMP data using EPIF Matching Jing Zhao, Jinghuai Gao Institute of Wave and Information,
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
Wave Imaging Technology Inc. PSDM for “Easy” Unconventional Reservoirs? Morgan Brown Rocky Mountain Section, AAPG September 10, 2012.
H. Sadi Kuleli, W Rodi, Fuxian Song, M. Nafi Toksoz Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,MA,
2015 Workplan for “VVAz” Analysis of Prestack Migrated Data
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Supergranulation Waves in the Subsurface Shear Layer Cristina Green Alexander Kosovichev Stanford University.
New Trends in AVO Brian Russell and Dan Hampson
© 2013, PARADIGM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Long Offset Moveout Approximation in Layered Elastic Orthorhombic Media Zvi Koren and Igor Ravve.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 19 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 21 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
SPICE Research and Training Workshop III, July 22-28, Kinsale, Ireland Seismic wave Propagation and Imaging in Complex media: a European.
Seismic reflections. Seismic waves will be reflected at “discontinuities” in elastic properties A new ray emerges, heading back to the surface Energy.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
6. Seismic Anisotropy A.Stovas, NTNU Definition (1) Seismic anisotropy is the dependence of seismic velocity upon angle This definition yields both.
Elasticity and Anisotropy of Common Crustal Minerals Alex Teel; Earth and Space Sciences, Physics Mentor: J. Michael Brown; Earth and Space Sciences What.
Mapping the P-S Conversion Point in VTI Media * Jianli Yang Don C. Lawton.
Shibo Xu & Alexey Stovas, NTNU , Loucen, Czech Republic Estimation of anisotropy parameters by using the CRS approximation NTNU, Trondheim1.
Wave-Equation Migration in Anisotropic Media Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
1 Prestack migrations to inversion John C. Bancroft CREWES 20 November 2001.
Shot-profile migration of GPR data Jeff Shragge, James Irving, and Brad Artman Geophysics Department Stanford University.
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical Company Seismic Imaging: How we use waves to see the interior of the earth Apache Symposium on Imaging November 6, 2008 Y. C. Kim,
Insight into the lithospheric structure and deformation in Eastern Tibet from splitting and traveltime variations of core phases S. Sol, A. Meltzer, B.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Lithospheric Layering
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Fang Liu and Arthur Weglein Houston, Texas May 12th, 2006
Time and Depth Imaging Algorithms in a Hardware Accelerator Paradigm
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Migration-driven azimuthal velocity analysis
R. G. Pratt1, L. Sirgue2, B. Hornby2, J. Wolfe3
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Sisgbee2b / Data Release
SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Haiyan Zhang and Arthur B. Weglein
Interferometric Least Squares Migration
Modeling of free-surface multiples
Source wavelet effects on the ISS internal multiple leading-order attenuation algorithm and its higher-order modification that accommodate issues that.
A first step towards the P wave only modeling plan
Prestack Depth Migration in a Viscoacoustic Medium
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
Passive seismic imaging
Azimuthally varying velocity is probably the most significant property of the seismic data that affects the seismic interpretation. A stacking velocity.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Velocity and anisotropy parameter scan
The general output of the leading-order attenuator
Reflected, Refracted and Diffracted waves
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

1 Xuyao Zheng Institute of Geophysics of CEA

2 Outline 1.Motivation 2.Model and synthetic data 3.Calculation of Green functions 4.Pre-stack depth migration in arbitrary anisotropy media 5. Conclusions

3 Motivation It is well-known that much of the Earth’s crust appears to have some degree of seismic anisotropy Seismic anisotropy arises from partial alignment of minerals, grains, macrocracks and regular sequences of thin layers It would be better to describe the crustal material by anisotropy than isotropy, but it needs much more parameters

4 Motivation Goal: To get image of subsurface structures in 2-D or 3-D arbitrary anisotropy media Data: qP wave from 2-D or 3-D reflected profiles Tool: Parallel computer is absolutely necessary

5 Figure D model with a size of 10×10×5 km consists of 5 reflectors and 6 isotropic and anisotropic layers. The anisotropic layers are laterally inhomogeneous VTI media. Both shot and receiver intervals are 25 m. The maximum offset is 2750 m. water anisotropic isotropic anisotropic isotropic

6 layerVp (m/s)Vs (m/s)epsilonDelta Table 1. Vertical velocities of P and S waves and Thomsen parameters at the origin (Table 4) of each layer for VTI and isotropic media.

7 layer origin of gradient (m) gradient of Vp (x/s/km) gradient of Vs (x/s/km) gradient of ε (1/km) gradient of δ (1/km) xoZox-axisz-axisx-axisz-axisx-axisz-axisx-axisz-axis Table 2. Origin of gradient and the gradient of velocities and Thomsen parameters in each layer.

8 Figure 2. Distribution of vertical velocity (m/s) of P wave in six layers. The first layer is water, the fourth and the sixth layers are isotropic media.

9 Figure 3. Distribution of vertical velocity (m/s) of S wave in six layers. The first layer is water, the fourth and the sixth layers are isotropic media.

10 Figure 4. Distribution of Thomsen parameter ε in six layers. The first layer is water, the fourth and the sixth layers are isotropic media in which the values of ε are zero (red areas).

11 Figure 5. Distribution of Thomsen parameter δ in six layers, the first layer is water, the fourth and the sixth layers are isotropic media in which δ is zero (green areas). The values of δ in the third layer are negative.

12 Figure 6. Common shot gather seismograms obtained by finite differential method. For each shot there are 110 receivers. The interval of two adjacent receivers is 25 m and the maximum offset is 2750 m.

13 Figure 7. Migration result from anisotropy model. The image of the fourth reflector is not clear since the contrast of the medium above and below the reflector is small. Image from multiple waves can be observed around the second reflector.

14 Figure 8. Migration result from isotropy model.

15 Made seismic data interpretation easier and more reliable High quality image of subsurface structures Parallel calculation is absolutely necessary for carrying out pre-stack depth migration in 3-D anisotropic media, Conclusions 10 nodes (20 CPUs) Synthetic seismograms Green functionsMigration 13 hours5 hours21 hours

16