1 ACPR1000 + Advanced, cost competitive, proven technology, and reliable The Third Generation Nuclear Reactor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proprietary and Confidential New Jersey Clean Air Council Public Hearing April 1, 2009 Jeff Halfinger Babcock & Wilcox.
Advertisements

Region II WIN Feb © 2011 Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. A practical, scalable, modular ALWR.
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory SCWR Preliminary Safety Considerations Cliff Davis, Jacopo Buongiorno, INEEL Luca Oriani, Westinghouse.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Role of PSA in Ensuring Safety of Future NPPs J K Jena Senior Consultant Nuclear Risk Management Lloyd’s Register Consulting Date 06 th September, 2013.
Electrical, Control and Information Systems in the Enhanced CANDU 6 ® Electrical, Control and Information Systems in the Enhanced CANDU 6 ® Candu – Official.
GENERATION III AND III+ NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DESIGNS ACR-1000 (Advanced CANDU Reactor) Dr. Şule Ergün Hacettepe University Department of Nuclear Engineering.
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
LFR plant assessment against a Fukushima-like scenario Technical Workshop to Review Safety and Design Aspects of European LFR Demonstrator (ALFRED), European.
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
Engineering Technology Division
© ABB Group August 13, 2015 | Slide 1 Power Generation Service Life Cycle Management for Power Plants Daniel Looser, Power Gen Europe in Amsterdam, June.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/2 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
BNFL/Westinghouse’s Perspective on the Nuclear Hydrogen Economy Dr PJA Howarth Head of Group Science Strategy.
Can Egypt share the Construction of Power Reactors as Korea ?
Energy for the Future Belene NPP Design Features May, 2008 Riviera Holiday Club, Varna, Bulgaria Jordan Georgiev BNPP Manager.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
SAFETY OBJECTIVES FOR GENERATION III NPP APPLIED TO EPR DESIGN OPTIONS PRESENTATION 26 – 29 September 2010, Nesebar, Bulgaria WATTELLE Emmanuel IRSN, France.
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
Fleet Performance and Reliability in Generation Utilities
1 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2005 October 12, 2006 Shigeyuki Wada Safety Information Division Japan Nuclear Energy Safety.
Why are you trying so hard to fit in, when you were born to stand out?
Chapter 4 Nuclear Energy. Objectives Describe how nuclear fuel is produced. List the environmental concerns associated with nuclear power. Analyze the.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
Westinghouse Operational Experience and Prospects for New Build
AREVA: Steps towards a global leadership in the energy industry
Nuclear Energy. The Nearest Nuclear Power Plant DTE Fermi II is just about 40 miles from us.
San Diego Workshop, 11 September 2003 Results of the European Power Plant Conceptual Study Presented by Ian Cook on behalf of David Maisonnier (Project.
1 BREI Conducted Comprehensive Independent Reviews of Passive Heat Removal Systems with Ejectors-Condensers Euratom DEEPSSI Project for the design and.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.7 – slide 1 of 48 Session I.4.7 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 7Nuclear Reactors IAEA Post Graduate.
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
,Yalta,17-th Symposium of AER1 IMPACT OF CHANGED FUEL PERFORMANCES ON SAFETY BARRIER EFFECTIVENESS AT NORMAL OPERATION OF NPP WITH VVER A.V.
Priority Programs of the Nuclear Power Industry Branch of Russia Vladimir Asmolov 17 th Symposium of AER on VVER Reactor Physics and Reactor Safety
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Chapter 4. Power From Fission 1.Introduction 2.Characteristics of Fission 3. General Features 4. Commercial Reactors 5. Nuclear Reactor Safety 6. Nuclear.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles Y.
DAVID VAN WAGENER NOVEMBER 26, 2008 CHE 384: TECHNOLOGY REPORT Nuclear Power: Advanced Generations and Outlook.
Nuclear Power Plant Orientation
Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of Research Reactors Lisbon, Portugal, 2-6 November 2015 Diakov Oleksii, Institute for.
Natural Convection as a Passive Safety Design in Nuclear Reactors
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Defence in Depth Safety Culture Lecturer.
I & C.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works. Pressurized Water Reactor - Nuclear Power Plant.
THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1.IRSHAD NURHAKIM BIN NORAHIM (ME088151) 2.LEE SZE TENG (ME087909)
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
A generation ahead by design SMR -160 An Unconditionally Safe Source of Pollution-Free Nuclear Energy for the Post-Fukushima Age 1 By Dr. Kris Singh Holtec.
1 Nuclear Power Technology Development Westinghouse View Kiev March 2012 Dr. Nick Shulyak AP1000® is a registered trademark in the United States of Westinghouse.
UNIVERSITI TENAGA NASIONAL MEHB513 Introduction to Nuclear Technology SEM /2015 Group Assignment Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident GROUP MEMBERS:
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
NuScale Generator A Practical Energy Alternative for the Future
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Complementarity of deterministic and probabilistic approaches
Diversity analysis for advanced reactor design
IVR Design and Safety Demonstration of Advanced NPPs in China
Review of the upgraded severe accident mitigation strategies for the generation II PWRs in France foreseen in the framework of plant life extension International.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
LOW-POWER RESEARCH REACTOR FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Severe accident management at Paks NPP
Instrumentation and control
(INDIAN PRESSURISED WATER REACTOR) Distinguished Scientist & RRF
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

1 ACPR Advanced, cost competitive, proven technology, and reliable The Third Generation Nuclear Reactor

2页2页 II. Main Features IV. Roadmap VI. Regulator Evaluation Content V. Technology Introduction I. Summary III. Key Figures of Comparative Reactors

3页3页 –ACPR is an advanced nuclear power technology developed by CGNPC with independent intellectual property right. –Main performances meet the technical standards of the third generation technology and the requirements of Post-Fukushima. –Its engineering work is being made taking advantage of proven technology and experience feedback, in line with the national and international laws and regulations. –Pursuing superb safety performance is focused, with due consideration to economic competitiveness, which satisfy the multiple requirements of the users in China and abroad. I. Summary

4页4页 1. Advanced –Meet the safety requirements of post-Fukushima –Meet the HAF102 and refer to relevant URD/EUR requirements –Fully achieve the third generation targets II. Main Features

5页5页 2. Mature Primary system design, loop configuration and main equipment are similar to the PWR NPPs in operation. Experience feedback from design, construction and operation of PWR NPPs, including EPR, are taken into account. Validated and proven technologies are referred to for its design. Over 1,000 reactor years operating experience of the similar NPPs Complete and mature industry systems for primary equipment manufacturing Extensive construction experience CPR1000+ EPR CPR1000

6页6页 3. Safe –Three independent trains of safety systems; –Decreased linear power density to increase core thermal margin; –Double containment to protect against airplane crash and external explosion; –Improved seismic capability; –Effective mitigation measures for severe accidents

7页7页 4. Economic –60 years of design lifetime –Metal reflector to reduce fast neutron flux in RPV –Online maintenance –18-month fuel cycle –Improved seismic capability to increase the site adaptability –Centralized disposal of radioactive waste to improve volume reduction ratio.

8页8页 ITEMACPR CPR AP1000EPRURD/EUR Core Damage Frequency , /(pile·year) < 1×10 -5 ~ 1×10 -5 ≤5.1× ×10 -7 < 1×10 -5 Large Release Frequency , /(pile·year) < 1×10 -6 ~ 1×10 -6 ≤5.9× ×10 -8 < 1×10 -6 Electrical Output , MWe Improved PWR upper limit 1350 Core Thermal Margin >15% 10 % >15 % Fuel Cycle , month III. Key Figures of Comparative Reactors

9页9页 ITEMACPR CPR AP1000EPRURD/EUR Capacity Factor , % 92≥9093≥9287 SSE , g EUR 0.25 URD 0.3 Period without operator actions 30min10min72hour30min At least 30min Solid waste generation , m 3 /(a·Unit) < 50 <50 >50 Design lifetime, Year 60

10 页 1. Reactor –157 fuel assemblies (active length 14 feet) Core thermal power is increased by 10.5% and core average linear power density (LPD) is decreased by 5.5%, comparing to CPR ; –In-core instrumentation inserted from the top; –Metal reflector to extend the RPV design lifetime to 60 years. Core safety margin and fuel burnup are increased, structure simplified, RPV design lifetime prolonged Core safety margin and fuel burnup are increased, structure simplified, RPV design lifetime prolonged IV. Technology Introduction

11 页 2. Nuclear Steam Supply System (NSSS) –Heat transfer area of steam generator (SG) is increased by 28% compared with CPR1000+ ; –Pressurizer cavity is increased by 26% compared with CPR ; –Large capacity pressure relief valve introduced to the pressure relief system for reactor coolant system to quick relief coolant in severe accident conditions ; –LBB technology is adopted to simplify the system design. Design basis is improved. Accident mitigation capacity is enhanced.

12 页 3. NI Auxiliary System –Residual heat removal system is combined with low pressure safety injection system; –RCV (Chemical and Volume Control) is simplified, to execute non–safety related functions only; –Two independent trains of spent fuel cooling systems are set up to improve the safety of spent fuel storage. 4. Engineered Safety Systems –Three independent trains of safety systems are installed in physical separation pattern, which are backup for each other, –Simplified system design, –In-containment water storage.

13 页 5. Advanced I&C Systems –Optimized DCS system and state-of-the-art operator information system –Sequence control technology, to improve automation and reduce the burden of the operator –DAS (Diversity Actuation System), to further improve safety and reliability –Improved ventilation system, to improve the habitability of main control room

14 页 6. Double Containments The outer containment can withstand large commercial aircraft crash and improve the safety. The cavity in containment is enlarged. The emergency response ability to design basis accident is improved. The double containment further reduces the radioactive release to environment during severe accident. CPR1000 ACPR1000 +

15 页 7. Site Adaptability –Improved SSE 0.2g→ 0.3g –Single reactor layout Physical separation pattern, to improve safety Flexible to the grid

16 页 8. Severe Accident Mitigation Measures –High-pressure core melting, hydrogen explosion, RPV melt wear, containment overpressure and heat discharge… Pressurizer pressure relief IVR (in-vessel retention) Passive autocatalytic recombiners and igniters –SAMG –Emergency response plan

17 页 9. Waste Management –Centralized disposal of radioactive wastes from the pile Less buildings, to shorten the construction period of NI Minimized waste release, solid waste generation for a reactor is less than 50m 3 /a 。 –Advanced tritium removal technology Meet the emission limits of inland plants.

18 页 10. Tests –Integral scaling of hydraulic test for RPV –CRDM drive line test –Internals flow-induced vibration test –IVR test (RPV bottom head cooling performance test)

19 页 Thanks!