Watermelon Ripeness Sensor Melon Inc. In Search of Perfect Melons. Jason L. Firko Allan Cohen Matt Behr Dave Bartoski
Watermelon Ripeness Sensor Team #2 Members: Jason Firko Matt Behr Allan Cohen Dave Bartowski Customer: Ed Kee Advisor: Dr. James Glancey Mission: Develop a non-destructive method and apparatus for accurately determining the ripeness of watermelons. Approach: Use customer wants to research and develop the most useful solution to the problem of determining watermelon ripeness. Develop a prototype and test it in an actual working enviroment.
Background Watermelon market is a large, worldwide market Grown on 5 Continents Grown in 90 countries Annual production 50 Billion lbs./year 75% of the melons bought whole Large domestic and international market Problem with a long history - 1905 University of Georgia Study There are currently no accurate non-destructive testing methods available
Design Concept Review Introduction Concept Generation Customers, Wants, Constraints, Benchmarking, Target values, Concept generation Concept Selection Evaluation against Metrics/Target Values, Concept Development, Working Model Schedule Actuals, Schedule, Budget
Customers & Wants
Customers Top Wants 1. Accuracy 2. Portability 3. Food Quality 4. Cost 5. Durable 6. Easy to Use 7. Fast 8. Versatility 9. Maintenance 10. Service Life
Constraints Maximum - $3000 Budget Abide by all FDA Regulations Food Quality Abide by all OSHA Regulations Safety Standards
Metrics/Target Values Provide a Means of Objective Measurement Eliminate Ambiguity Target Values Derived From Customer Wants, Functional Benchmarking, Continued Customer Dialogue Contact Regulatory Agencies Listed With Related Wants (Ranked)
Metrics & Related Wants Accuracy/Portability % Correct Ripeness Readings (95%) % Error in Sugar Content ** (False Neg./False Pos.) Readings (3) Weight (51 lbs.) Size (Dimensions) (3’ Sides) # People - Transport/Operation (1) Production Cost [$700]
Durability/Ease of Use/Speed Metrics (Cont’d) Durability/Ease of Use/Speed Hours of Continuous Operation [12 hrs.) Impact Resistance (3 ft. Drop) Time to Train [1 hr.] Number of Steps [5] Level of Education Required [Grade 8) Time/Cycle [10 sec] Time per Shipment [2 hrs.]
Food Quality/ServiceLife/Versatility/Maintenance Metrics (Con’t) Food Quality/ServiceLife/Versatility/Maintenance Size of Intrusion (1mm) Bacteria Introduced * Visual Quality Inspection Rating (1-10) Estimated Years of Service (5 yrs.] # of Uses (melon types, sizes, etc.) (4) Cost/Cycle (parts, upkeep, etc) ($.001/cycle)
Initial Systems Benchmarking Current Methods Of Watermelon Testing Traditional - Thumping, stem color, skin color, other traditional methods Destructive Testing - Sucrometer readings Near Infrared Testing - Experimental technique of sensing sugar content Acoustic Testing - University of Oklahoma
Systems Benchmarking Cont. Related Procedures (Fruits and others) Thumping/Resonance Tires, Fruits Acoustic testing Acoustic Emission Testing Ultrasonic testing Materials, Medical Optoelectrics Apples Intrusive testing Medical(Syringes) Nuclear magnetic resonance Fruits, Medical Electronic sniffing Strawberries
Concept Generation - Framework Sensor is Critical Function/Element Concept Generation Primarily Deals With This Element
Functional Benchmarking Details of the Critical Element Acoustic/Impact Tests-Sound signature and Resonance Acoustic Sensors- microphones, AE sensors Impact Devices- pendulums, hammers,spring loaded, etc. Acoustic data acquisition devices Testing of Rind Quality Accelerometers and related tracking devices Resistivity Testing Available info. Of resistivity of biological materials Probes, measuring devices, necessary equipment
Functional Benchmarking (Cont’d) Ultrasonic testing Use on biological materials Available Machines Sizing Devices Oversized calipers Scales Sampling devices and methods Syringes, automated sucrometers
Concept Generation SONIC TESTING - WHITE NOISE ACOUSTIC RESONANCE INFARED ENERGY IMPACT STRAIN GAUGE FLUID EXTRACTION ACOUSTIC RESONANCE ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES ULTRASOUND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR) SONIC TESTING - SINGLE FREQUENCY
Concept Evaluation/Selection Process Is this a viable solution? Evaluate in terms of ranked metrics Presentation - Time Constraints Method - Comparison with metrics(related wants) Strong in metrics Weak in metrics Notes on concept SSD and Testing results lead to selection
Concept Evaluation Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Out of Budget - $60,000 - $1,000,000 Sonic Testing- Single Frequency Food Quality, Speed Easy to Use, Accuracy, Maintenance, Cost Difficult to Use- Need Proper Environment
Concepts Evaluation (Cont’d) Sonic Testing- White Noise Food Quality Speed, Cost, Accuracy, Portability, Easy to Use Need Controlled Conditions Infrared Accuracy, Speed, Food Quality Expensive(Cost & Maintenance], Easy, Portability High Power, Auxillary Equiptment Needed
Concept Evaluation (Cont’d) Energy Impact Quick, Easy, Food Quality, Portability, Durability Accuracy Related to External Properties, Not Internal Strain Gauge Portable, Food Quality Easy to Use, Speed, Accuracy Related to Rind Properties Fluid Extraction With Syringe Accuracy, Portability, Easy to Use Food Quality, Maintenance Intrusive
Ultrasound Testing - CCM Catch 22 Not a Viable Sensing Mechanism High Frequency - Cannot Penetrate Rind Low Frequency - Cannot Sense Density Changes Other Problems - Air Pockets, Seeds Food Quality, Service Life, Versatility Accuracy, Portability, Cost, Speed Not a Viable Sensing Mechanism
Electrical Properties Resistance Testing RC Modeling Data Normalized For Physical Parameters & Sugar Content Portability, Cost, Maintenance, Service Life Accuracy, Food Quality, Speed No Correlation Found - Not a Viable Sensing Mechanism
Electric Testing
Acoustic Resonance Testing Based on Traditional Method Acoustic Properties have been used to indicate ripeness Accuracy, Portability, Food Quality, Cost, Easy, Fast Maintenance
Concept Selection Acoustic Testing Scored Highest in SSD - Received 8.9 / 10.0 Historical Basis - Benchmarking Four main parts: Sensory, Data Acquisition, Data Analysis, Display/Interface Focus on Sensory Portion of Design Development
Concept Selection - Metrics Want/Metric Value Accuracy >present Portability 30lbs, 1 Person, 2’ sides Cost $950 Speed <10sec Food Quality 0 Bacteria, Non-Intrusive # of Uses Local Varieties
Concept Selection - Testing Performed Testing - 18 melons All melons were in ripe range (8 - 12% sugar) Determined Repeatability and Reliability Impact Height, Turning, Repeated Testing
Concept Selection - Testing Conclusions Audible Signature Noticeable No Negative Data Need Further Testing - Variety Grow green melons Possible Correlations - Secondary Spikes Damping Characteristics
Working Model Two Component Working Model (i) - Experimental Set up - Dr. Sun’s Lab (ii) - Working Model
Planned Schedule
Actual Schedule
Future Critical Tasks Continue iterative concept evaluation Develop further the data acquisition & analysis Determine if we Can use a PCI or ISA card for data acquisition tasks Order used laptop or microprocessor to perform our calculations Determine software or computer code / learn Obtain a shipment of melons of varying ripeness Grow watermelons in greenhouse & Obtain shipment of melons Perform further acoustic testing and refine correlation Refine the thumping device through continued testing Take a tour of the farm and working environment Attend the watermelon growers convention
Estimated Budget Total cost for Initial Concept Prototype $ 872.99 Microphone $ 2.99 Microprocessor/Laptop $ 350.00 Analog To Digital Converter $ 300.00 Digital Scale $ 100.00 Linear measuring Device $ 50.00 Base Plate w/attachments $ 40.00 Adjustable Thumper $ 20.00 Adjustable Microphone Mount $ 10.00 Testing/Analysis Hours 120 Hrs. Testing Materials $700.00 Machine Shop Hours 40 Hrs. Total cost for Initial Concept Prototype $ 872.99
Conclusion - Project Status Refinement of Wants/Benchmarking/Metrics Concept Generation Testing and Evaluation Physical Testing Metrics Concept Selection/ Design Working Model Future Activities - Scheduled
Project Goal Satisfied Customers!