®. ® 2 3 4 First-Class Service Performance - - - - - - - - 96.04 95.89 95.35 95.22 93.17 93.26 95.25 * Targets Shown are FY 2014 96.80 96.50 5 (.15)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting February 18, Agenda Update from Southern Pacific Area MTEOR Enhancements Full Implementation.
Advertisements

1 Scheme Combination Product and Labeling Lists. 2 Agenda Scheme Combination Background Task Team 11 Current Update Process Interim Update Process Future.
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting January 28, Agenda  Inventory Roll-up Reports  MTEOR Launch in Southern Pacific Area  Mailer Implementation Plan.
® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
® 1 Mail Prep and Entry Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2013.
Registered Mail Redesign Program MDPS Briefing August 7 th, 2008.
® MTEOR Overview. 2 Agenda  MTEOR Overview  MTEOR History  MTEOR Applications and Users  MTEOR Success  Tools and Resources.
Progress with the Postal Act of 2006 November 18, 2009.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Postal/MTAC Update.
Price Change Effective April 26, 2015 Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting February 25,
® New MTAC User Groups/Work Groups/Task Teams Work Group #167: Solutions for Pieces Excluded from Service Measurement Start date: 1/21/2015 Target Completion.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Update – May 16, 2007.
® Western Area Mailing Industry Focus Group July
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Status of NDC Activations MTAC Briefing August 12, 2009.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
® Flats Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS Krista Finazzo Manager, Operational Requirements MTAC – November 2010.
® Flats Track for Periodicals, Catalogs & Printers David Mastervich Manager, Periodicals, Catalogs & Saturation Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS National.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
Corporate Flats Strategy MTAC November 7, Slide 2 Presentation Overview Background Near Term Actions (FY 2003 and 2004) Longer Term Planning (FY.
Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group February 25, 2015 New York, NY.
® MTAC User Group 007 MTEOR Enhancements July 23, 2013.
MTAC Meeting February 23, 2005 Integrated Mail Management.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations November 18, 2010.
Standard Mail Sub Group MTAC WG #114 May 7, 2007.
MTAC 117 Performance Based Verification Sept 17, 2007.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Network Rationalization.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Network Rationalization.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
® August 12, 2009 MTAC General Session August 12, 2009 MTAC General Session Update.
1 MTAC eVS®/PTS User Group Thursday November 10, 2011.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Service Performance Measurement Review and Discussion Full Workgroup Meeting July 31, 2007.
GLA FOCUS GROUP August 20, MAILING INDUSTRY ECOSYSTEM 2 Mail Owners E-Commerce Logistics Printers & Mailers Software Vendors Equipment Manufacturers.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup 87 Update Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
Growth Initiatives Mailing Services MTAC February 18, 2010.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
Request for Service (RFS) Process and Metrics Update June 24, 2008.
® MTEOR User Group 007 October 28, Agenda  Fall Mailing Season Update  MTEOR Local Mailer Launch Update  MTESC Mailer Inventory Report Compliance.
® Webinar #10 Commercial First-Class Mail and Standard Mail Measurement Presented by Tom Day Senior Vice President, Intelligent Mail and Address Quality.
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting August 13, Agenda  Questions/Answer Follow-Up from July 23 Meeting  Communications and Training Timeline Overview.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update November 5, Steering Committee Will Continue To Meet –Regular Updates And Feedback Regarding USPS Activity on Key.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations May 20, 2010.
1 MTAC May 26, 2011 Washington D.C. Kelly Sigmon Vice-President, Engineering USPS Operations Plan for Flats & Technology Update.
® MTEOR User Group 007 January 13, Agenda  Fall Mailing Season Recap  MTESC Mailer Inventory Report Compliance Update  Standing Requests in.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Western Area.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
A Joint USPS/NALC Agreement for an Expedited Route Evaluation and Adjustment Process Allows Swift Reaction to Unprecedented Volume Loss –Quick, Simple,
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP November 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th,
Manger, Processing Operations
… January 14 – 16, 2014 Wanda Senne NAAD Meeting, February 28, 2014
Capital metro Area focus group
Chief Operating Officer
MTAC User Group 007 Meeting
Chief Operating Officer
USPS Leadership Forum for Stakeholders
SOUTHERN Area Focus Group Chief Operating Officer
Price Change 2019 January 2019.
Chief Financial Officer & Executive Vice President
Network Rationalization
Presentation transcript:

®

® 2

3

4

First-Class Service Performance * Targets Shown are FY (.15) SPLY(.13) SPLY+.09 SPLY * Preliminary Qtr 1, FY 2014 Data

6

Standard Letters Service Performance * Targets Shown are FY SPLY+2.87 SPLY * Preliminary Qtr 1, FY 2014 Data

Standard Flats Service Performance * Targets Shown are FY SPLY+2.38 SPLY * Preliminary Qtr 1, FY 2014 Data

Periodicals 1-2 Day Service Performance * Targets Shown are FY SPLY * Preliminary Qtr 1, FY 2014 Data

10 Continuous Improvement Focus  Lean Mail Processing (LMP)  Improving efficiencies in mail flows and cycle times through application of LMP Principles throughput the network  Driving daily compliance to Run Plan Generator (RPG)  Planned vs. actual equipment Run Hours, Volumes, and Throughput per hour performance  Load Leveling  Leveling the Monday workload to improve efficiencies and predictability in delivery performance  Leveraging IMb  Enhanced diagnostics to enable course correction to ensure FIFO processing and prevent service failure Service Performance

11

Fall Mailing Season Update  Successful Fall Mailing Season!!!  No cancelled orders  Overall inventory exceeded demand, allowing us to fulfill every order  Strongest inventories of the past 5 years 12

MTEOR Full Implementation MTEOR moves toward full implementation MTEOR will be launched for Local Mailers in all Areas in 2014 using a phased approach by Area  Southern Pacific – February 3, 2014  Northern Pacific – March 3, 2014  Eastern Area – April 7, 2014  Great Lakes Area – May 5, 2014  Southern Area – June 2, 2014  Northeast Area – July 7, 2014  Capital Metro Area – August 4, 2014  Western Area – September 8,

14

15

16

Optimization Update 17  Network Rationalization – Phase 1  Completed 176 Consolidations  Network Rationalization – Phase 2  POSt Plan  7,995 Implementations Completed in FY 2013  Remaining 5,186 Will be Completed in FY 2014

18

19 Structured Release Cycle  Background  Task Team #11 re-opened per request of mailing industry  USPS agreed to 30-day notification period  USPS can be more agile with labeling list changes (5-digit) through monthly update cycle - Enables top down management of labeling lists - Ensures alignment of pre-sortation & internal USPS sort schemes  Benefits of Top Down Approach to L012 and L006 Lists - Enables deeper pre-sort levels - Fewer piece and tray handlings - More efficient use of containers & transportation

20

21 Flats Strategy Status Flats Strategy Document  Collaborative effort with Industry Association leaders  Will include overview of strategies  Sub-group exploring additional opportunities  Draft disseminated to workgroup for review on January 10, 2014  Joint strategy discussion January 13, 2014  Collaborative efforts will continue through 2014

22

DSCF Standard Mail Load Leveling  On average ~42% of DSCF Standard Mail volume is drop shipped by mailers on Friday. The disproportionate volumes committed for delivery on Monday results in: Overview  Service Variability  Operational Inefficiencies  Increased Cost 23

24 Current State FY13 Qtr 1 All Dropship Appointments / Vol for Full Service IMb Standard Mail 376.7M 65.8M 523.3M 357.9M 372.8M 434.1M 942.3M , ,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 SATSUNMONTUEWEDTHUFRI Mail Volume (millions) Number of Dropship Appointments Dropship Appointment CountsDestination Piece Counts

Impact on Delivery – Average % of Standard Mail Delivered by Day ,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 SATSUNMONTUEWEDTHUFRI Delivery Day Volumes DSCF Standard FlatsDSCF Standard Letters 12.6% Qtr 1, FY % 13.0% 5.2% 16.3% 10.5% 35.4% Standard Letters 52.4% Standard Flats Monday Delivered Volume Current State 25

26 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% MondayTotal Current State Impact Percentage of City Carriers Returning After 1700 In FY % of instances where a carrier returned to the office after 1700 occurred on a Monday Percent Returned

24 Hour Clock Impact Disproportionate Monday workload not only results in late delivery and added costs, it also impedes our ability to meet critical 24 hour clock parameters resulting in:  Late processing  Late / missed transportation  Service failure  Additional processing / transportation costs 27

28 Current ProposedThursday Friday, Saturday, Monday Friday Saturday, Monday Saturday, Monday, Tuesday Saturday Monday, Tuesday Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday Sunday *The current Critical Entry Time (CET) for Standard mail is 4 pm **For delivery in the continental United States DSCF Standard Mail** Dropped Before 4pm* on DELIVERY DAYS MEETING SERVICE STANDARD Expected Days of Delivery

29 Expected Days of Delivery  Standard Mail dropped at a DDU does not change  Standard Mail dropped at a NDC does not change  EDDM-Retail does not change  Periodical/Newspaper processing does not change  First-Class Mail does not change  Priority Mail does not change

South Jersey Test Test Location – South Jersey P&DC (First Lean Mail Processing Plant) Test Period – Sep 12 th through Sep 26 th, 2013 Delivery Zones Participating: 110 Delivery Routes Participating: 1,190 Scope: Evaluate the impact of load leveling the Standard Mail volumes received at the South Jersey P&DC across the days of the week. Standard Mail Volume in Evaluation: 5.3M pieces 30

 Trained Expeditors, Mail Handlers on new color code matrix  Changed all Signage  Developed comprehensive plan with local site to segregate mail by color code, stage at plant  Strict adherence to machine schedules allowed us to control what mail was advanced by sort program Load Leveling Standard Mail Test 31

Test Week – Avg Delivered Volume by Day 0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 SUNMON 20.8% TUE 15.2% WED 14.2% THU 17.3% FRI 15.4% SAT 17.1% South Jersey P&DC Sep 14 th – 20 th  Efficiency  Reduced Total Weekly Carrier Work Hours  Reduced Carrier OT and Penalty OT  Employee Satisfaction  Overwhelmingly Positive Feedback  Customer Service  Improved Carrier Return Times  Improved On-Time Service Performance Test Results 32

1/10 Industry Webinar 2/28 Publish Final Rule Load Leveling Initiative Timeline of Events 5/29 Telecom WG# 157 6/11 Telecom WG #157 7/12 Telecom WG# 157 7/24 Telecom WG# 157 8/7 Telecom WG# 157 8/28-29 MTAC Meeting WG# 157 Meeting 10/21 Telecom WG# /6 Telecom WG# /20-21 MTAC Meeting WG# 157 Meeting Load Level Test So Jersey P&DC 9/ MayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implement No earlier than 3/27 1/14-16 MTAC Meeting 12/10 BOG Approval 12/27 PRC Filing 2/13 Comments Proposed Rule 33

Next Steps 34  Review Comments to Proposed Rule – Feb 13, 2014  Publish Final Rule: February 28, 2014  Implement Change no Earlier Than March 27, 2014  Continue Stakeholder Engagement  Receive PRC Advisory Opinion  Add Additional Sites to Test Implementation Approach

35 Going Forward Commitment to Communicate  Provide Easy Access to Information and FAQs Updated Weekly on RIBBS  Committed to Collaboration/Communication 

 Cost Containment  Predictable Service  Customer Satisfaction 36 Expected Long Term Benefits

37

38 Collections  Modify current 24 hour clock parameters to reduce the cycle time expectations of: Processing Transportation Delivery Collective Effort

Charter 24 Hour Clock Compliance Charter 24 Hour Clock Compliance Charter Implement processes, technology and operational discipline to align with the 24hr clock parameters to drive consistent service and increase operational efficiency. OwnerWorkstreamOwner 1 DeliveryEd Phelan 4 Network Operations EngineeringDave Williams 2 Post Office OperationsEd Phelan 5Product VisibilityRobert Cintron 3 Processing OperationsDave Williams 6Engineering SystemsMike Amato Megan Brennan ELT Sponsor Initiative Lead Workstream Detailed project plans developed and tracked for key activities. Area and District project plans under development to coincide with all Headquarters activities for field implementation Provide weekly updates on key activities, risks, and next steps. Weekly meetings every Thursday starting January 2, 2014 Escalate any issues/barriers to success to ELT as needed Union / Management Associations engagement 39

40

41  Intense Focus on 24 Hour Clock Execution Summary  Our Commitment  Predictable Service  Industry Engagement  Effective Use of Data and Diagnostic Tools Going Forward  Drive Operational Efficiencies

® 42