Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implications of climate change on fire and thinning prescriptions
Advertisements

Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems Presented By Cindy Donegan U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
From Ignition to Spread Wildland Fire Forecasting and Color Maps Managing fire on populated forest landscapes October , 2013 Banff International.
Watershed Wildland Urban Interface Modeling Impacts of Potential Climate Change and Associated Wildfire Occurrences on the Levels of Sustainable Resources.
H EURISTIC S OLVER  Builds and tests alternative fuel treatment schedules (solutions) at each iteration  In each iteration:  Evaluates the effects of.
Evaluating landscape flammability through simulation modeling Marc Parisien 1, Victor Kafka 2, Bernie Todd 1, Kelvin Hirsch 1, and Suzanne Lavoie 1 1 Canadian.
The False Promise of SPLATs (Strategically Placed Area Treatments ) By George Terhune.
Interagency Prescribed Fire Training/ Fire Ecology and Management, University of Florida Ignition Techniques (adapted from FL DOF)
Key Recommendations and Products From a Series of Dry-Forest Workshops in Oregon and Washington Redmond, OR October 14, 2009.
Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center Wildfire Risk Analysis and Fuel Treatment Planning Alan Ager, Western Wildlands Environmental.
Modeling bark beetle effects in a fireshed assessment An application of the Westwide Pine Beetle Model & the FFE in the Deschutes National Forest Andrew.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Wildland Fire Decision Support Tools Managing Long Duration Wildfires Workshop Salt Lake City, UT April 30 – May 1, 2008 Missoula, MT May 6-7, 2008 Wildland.
Forest Fire Detection Economics David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry University of Toronto Robert S. McAlpine Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Fire.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
EXPECTATIONS -FS Training course for FARSITE is 60hrs long. -It's own software separate from ArcGIS with it's own quirks and limitations. -Two week lab.
Fire in the news. Daily Statisti cs 7/10/02 Year-to-Date Statistics 1/1/02 - 7/10/02 Num ber of New Larg e Fires 3 Num ber of Fires 46,062 Num ber of.
What are the key/critical elements?
1 Spatially Explicit Burn Probability across A Landscape in Extreme Fire Weather Year Wenbin Cui, David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.
Controls on Fire in the Pacific Northwest: Climate, Fuels, and Land Management Dave Peterson & Don McKenzie Forest Service – PNW Research Station Pacific.
Mark Finney, Fire Sciences Lab, Missoula, MT.
W ildland F ire D ecision S upport S ystem Overview April, 2008.
An overview of a few of the methods used in landscape ecology studies.
Incorporating Landscape Fuel Treatment Modeling into the Forest Vegetation Simulator Robert C. Seli Alan A. Ager Nicholas L. Crookston Mark A. Finney Berni.
Communicating Fire Hazard Severity Zones and Wildland-Urban Interface Building Standards CAL FIRE Communications Office This presentation is for INTERNAL.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
Centre for Non-Timber Resources Royal Roads University Victoria, BC Cost Benefit Analysis of Wildland Urban Interface Operations.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
UPPER MONUMENT CREEK LANDSCAPE RESTORATION Allan Hahn – District Ranger Mike Picard – ID Team Leader.
Geospatial Decision Support Tools: A Geographic Area Coordination Center (GACC) Perspective Kim Kelly Northwest Wildland Fire Coordination Center & BIA.
Southern Lakes Wildfire Threat Assessment Model November 2014.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
Application Landscape Ecology in Forest Management: A Glass Half Empty? Thomas Spies USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.
March 2008 FY 2008 Hazardous Fuels Program Direction Unified Targets/Accomplishments.
GIS Applications in Interagency Fire Management Planning EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI Jeff Baranyi - ESRI EastFIRE 2005 Michael A. da Luz – ESRI.
Considering Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity in fire-prone communities along Colorado’s Front Range Hannah Brenkert-Smith University of Colorado November.
Fuel Treatment Making a Difference Steve Harbert Tim Rich Burn Boss Refresher February Burn Boss Refresher 2009.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Landscape Fuel Treatments on Fire Growth and Behavior Rick D. Stratton Presented by Jacob J. LaCroix.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Jonathan Long and Carl Skinner With Contributions from the Science Synthesis Team USDA FS Pacific Southwest Research Station SocialEcological.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
8-1 MFIRS 8 Wildland Fire Module. 8-2 Optional Wildland Fire Module The State Fire Marshal will accept this data… Currently this module does not replace.
Treatments and methods to manipulate stand structure suitable for fuel reduction.
A Brief Look at Federal Wildland Fire Policy & WFDSS One Approach to Successful Implementation Dan O’Brien NWCC Fire Analyst March 31, 2008.
Public and Private Wildfire Risk Management: Spatial and Strategic Interaction Gwen Busby, H.J. Albers, Claire Montgomery May 8, 2007.
Climate change and wildfire Research at the PNW Station: past, present, future Don McKenzie (TCM/FERA) with contributions from PNW Science Day March 12,
Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Fairbanks-North Star Borough CWPP Risk Assessment Update And Plan Evaluation.
Smoke Education Communication Strategy 2007 Key Messages.
Landscape Treatment Prioritization to Reduce Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Loss from Wildfire: A Test Case Using Fire Regime and Condition Class on the.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Introduction to Models Lecture 8 February 22, 2005.
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 15, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
What Drives Fire Frequency, Intensity, and Spread (focused on the Rocky Mountains) Aka: Fuels vs. Climate Bottom up or Top down Local vs Regional.
Decision support for strategic forest-fuels management in the Pacific Northwest Keith Reynolds, Paul Hessburg, James Dickinson, Brion Salter USDA-Forest.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
New Millenium Wildfires: Paradigm Shifts for the 21 st Century: Assessing the Home Ignition Zone February 13, 2013 Austin, Texas Hank Blackwell Wildfire.
SIMulating Patterns and Processes at Landscape scaLEs HISTORIC RANGE of VARIABILITY.
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
The 21 st Century Wildland Firefighting Triangle.
COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLANS New Mexico WUI Summit Silver City, NM.
Crown Fire Methods LaWen Hollingsworth Rocky Mountain Research Station Fire Modeling Institute Missoula, MT Sharing Fire Behavior Practices and Lessons.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
Large Fire Simulator (FSIM)
ECOSYSTEM MODEL EVALUATION TEMPLATE
Katie Collins1, Trent Penman2, Owen Price1
Engaging Your Community To Reduce The Risk Of Wildfires
Forest fuels evaluation and fuel treatment planning for DOI bureaus in 2008 Keith Reynolds, USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station Jim Menakis,
Keith Reynolds Pacific Northwest Research Station USDA Forest Service
Keith Reynolds, Paul Hessburg, James Dickinson, Brion Salter
Presentation transcript:

Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Prineville Oregon, OR USA Nicole Vaillant, Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team Reno NV Mark Finney, Missoula Fire Lab, Rocky Mountain Research Station

Landscape Planning Process 1.Define restoration and protection framework and goals 2.Quantify wildfire risk and prioritize landscapes for management activities 3.Design projects and specific treatment alternatives 4.Examine treatment effectiveness

Key Metric: Wildfire Risk Risk = wildfire probability x consequence Wildfire probability is driven by a series of events –Ignition –Weather and fuels conditions conducive to spread –Escape initial attack (10 AM rule) –Weather and fuel conditions favor rapid spread –Subsequent suppression fails –Large fire event Probability of a point burning on a landscape p(F xyt ) = p(I) + p(W,F) + p(Sp) + p(Su) + interactions Extensive literature for all these components Too complicated for operational planning

Umatilla National Forest Fire History Relatively few large fires account for most of the acres burned Nationally, 99 percent of wildland fires are contained to < 300 acres acres or

And, escaped fires grow in a few large spread events where suppression is ineffective

Several inferences from wildfire statistics – Wildfire spread during large fire events is the primary contributor to wildfire risk – We can model wildfire risk by just considering the burn events, i.e. we do not need to simulate complex multi-day wildfire events with ignition grids, suppression, changing weather etc. – By simulating lots of burn events we can estimate conditional burn probabilities for risk analyses

Burn probability analysis  50,000 burn periods  Weather conditions mimic recent severe wildfire events  Random ignition location  BP = probability of a pixel burning given one ignition and a severe burn event  Fire intensity and fire size outputs also generated

Project Planning – Five Buttes

Burn Probability > 0.045

Minimum travel time routes

7, Fire Size (ha) Fire size

Strategic fuel treatments NERF treatments Treat 20% of the landscape to protect NERF

0% treatment 10% treatment 20% treatment50% treatment Burn probability for 3 treatment levels

Expected Loss of Spotted Owl Habitat for 6 Treatment Intensities

EXF Project

Random ~20% of landscape treated StripsStrategic No Treatment

Strategic Parallel Strips Random TreatmentROS Average Spread Rate Fraction of Landscape Treated

Treatment effects on fire growth SPOTS is a design concept Both spatial pattern and treatments dimensions are important Optimal treatments equalize the rate fire burns around versus through treatments Automated with TOM in FlamMap 3

Gil Dustin, Salt Lake City BLM

Gil Dustin, BLM Salt Lake City UT

SPOTS = Strategic fuel treatment strategy – SPOTS is an optimized strategic fuel treatment strategy – Most effective when < 30% of the landscape is treated. – Not effective when more than 40% - 60% of the project area is not available for locating treatments – options too limited – Be based on a problem fire – Leverage natural fire breaks and other expected fire behaviors – Can be applied at multiple scales

Optimal treatment patches within a treatment unit equalize the rate fire burns around versus through patches

Strategic fuel treatments and restoration projects The original SPOTS concept is not applicable to landscape restoration projects where landscapes are being managed to resume natural fire regimes. Landscape restoration needs to create contiguous areas with acceptable fuel loads and fire behavior (not block the spread of a large fire) so that fires are not suppressed

Goal: Allocate treatments to build the largest possible contiguous area within which fire behavior does not exceed a specified threshold Optimized fuel treatments for restoration

The WUI Problem Dynamics of home ignition are not incorporated into landscape fire spread models Home ignition dependent on microfuels around the home and building materials Other than ignition, landscape fire spread contributes little to home ignition event

Missionary Ridge Fire June 2002

ArcFuels

Thanks……………. Dave Owens Deana Wall Geoff Babb Dana Simon Lauren Miller Leo Yanez Helen Maffei Amy Walz Chris Zanger