Applications and communication patterns for WSN N. Reijers Consensus day TU Delft February 7, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 A Real-Time Communication Framework for Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks Edith C.H. Ngai 1, Michael R. Lyu 1, and Jiangchuan Liu 2 1 Department of Computer.
Advertisements

Advisor : Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Student : Yi-Chen Lu 12009/06/26.
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Decentralized Reactive Clustering in Sensor Networks Yingyue Xu April 26, 2015.
Sensor network Routing protocol A study on LEACH protocol and how to improve it.
Sensor Network 教育部資通訊科技人才培育先導型計畫. 1.Introduction General Purpose  A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a wireless network using sensors to cooperatively.
Range-Free Sensor Localization Simulations with ROCRSSI-based Algorithm Matt Magpayo
Coverage Estimation in Heterogeneous Visual Sensor Networks Mahmut Karakaya and Hairong Qi Advanced Imaging & Collaborative Information Processing Laboratory.
Range-Based and Range-Free Localization Schemes for Sensor Networks
Monday, June 01, 2015 ARRIVE: Algorithm for Robust Routing in Volatile Environments 1 NEST Retreat, Lake Tahoe, June
1 A Delay-Aware Reliable Event Reporting Framework for Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks Presented by Edith Ngai Supervised by Prof. Michael R. Lyu Term.
Directed Diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks Intanagonwiwat, Govindan, Estrin USC, Information Sciences Institute,
Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks
Range-free Localization Schemes for Large Scale Sensor Networks
Security in Wireless Sensor Networks Perrig, Stankovic, Wagner Jason Buckingham CSCI 7143: Secure Sensor Networks August 31, 2004.
MAC Protocols The Influence of Communication Patterns on the MAC Protocol Design.
Comb, Needle, and Haystacks: Balancing Push and Pull for Information Discovery Xin Liu Department of Computer Science University of California, Davis Joint.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha Presented by Ray Lam Oct 23, 2004.
Connected Dominating Sets in Wireless Networks My T. Thai Dept of Comp & Info Sci & Engineering University of Florida June 20, 2006.
CS2510 Fault Tolerance and Privacy in Wireless Sensor Networks partially based on presentation by Sameh Gobriel.
CS 712 | Fall 2007 Using Mobile Relays to Prolong the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Wang, Vikram Srinivasan, Kee-Chaing Chua. National University.
1 Chalermek Intanagonwiwat (USC/ISI) Ramesh Govindan (USC/ISI) Deborah Estrin (USC/ISI and UCLA) DARPA Sponsored SCADDS project Directed Diffusion
LPT for Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks Marc Lee and Vincent W.S. Wong Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British.
LOCALIZATION in Sensor Networking Hamid Karimi. Wireless sensor networks Wireless sensor node  power supply  sensors  embedded processor  wireless.
Project Introduction 이 상 신 Korea Electronics Technology Institute.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
Localization With Mobile Anchor Points in Wireless Sensor Networks
Gathering Data in Wireless Sensor Networks Madhu K. Jayaprakash.
Grammati Pantziou 1, Aristides Mpitziopoulos 2, Damianos Gavalas 2, Charalampos Konstantopoulos 3, and Basilis Mamalis 1 1 Department of Informatics, Technological.
Enhancing TCP Fairness in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks using Neighborhood RED Kaixin Xu, Mario Gerla UCLA Computer Science Department
Ubiquitous Networks WSN Routing Protocols Lynn Choi Korea University.
A Review by Raghu Rangan WPI CS525 September 19, 2012 An Early Warning System Based on Reputation for Energy Control Systems.
Why Visual Sensor Network & SMAC Implementation Group Presentation Raghul Gunasekaran.
Lan F.Akyildiz,Weilian Su, Erdal Cayirci,and Yogesh sankarasubramaniam IEEE Communications Magazine 2002 Speaker:earl A Survey on Sensor Networks.
 SNU INC Lab MOBICOM 2002 Directed Diffusion for Wireless Sensor Networking C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, John Heidemann, and Fabio Silva.
Presentation of Wireless sensor network A New Energy Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Supporting QoS 王 文 毅
S Master’s thesis seminar 8th August 2006 QUALITY OF SERVICE AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS Thesis Author: Shan Gong Supervisor:Sven-Gustav.
Efficient Energy Management Protocol for Target Tracking Sensor Networks X. Du, F. Lin Department of Computer Science North Dakota State University Fargo,
College of Engineering Anchor Nodes Placement for Effective Passive Localization Karthikeyan Pasupathy Major Advisor: Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer.
ELECTIONEL ECTI ON ELECTION: Energy-efficient and Low- latEncy sCheduling Technique for wIreless sensOr Networks Shamim Begum, Shao-Cheng Wang, Bhaskar.
Combs, Needles, Haystacks: Balancing Push and Pull for Discovery in Large Scale Sensor Networks Xin Liu Department of Computer Science University of California.
MMAC: A Mobility- Adaptive, Collision-Free MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Muneeb Ali, Tashfeen Suleman, and Zartash Afzal Uzmi IEEE Performance,
By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.
Multi-channel Wireless Sensor Network MAC protocol based on dynamic route.
An Energy-Efficient Geographic Routing with Location Errors in Wireless Sensor Networks Julien Champ and Clement Saad I-SPAN 2008, Sydney (The international.
MCEEC: MULTI-HOP CENTRALIZED ENERGY EFFICIENT CLUSTERING ROUTING PROTOCOL FOR WSNS N. Javaid, M. Aslam, K. Djouani, Z. A. Khan, T. A. Alghamdi.
By: Gang Zhou Computer Science Department University of Virginia 1 Medians and Beyond: New Aggregation Techniques for Sensor Networks CS851 Seminar Presentation.
Group Members Usman Nazir FA08-BET-179 M.Usman Saeed FA08-BET-173
A Security Framework with Trust Management for Sensor Networks Zhiying Yao, Daeyoung Kim, Insun Lee Information and Communication University (ICU) Kiyoung.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges
Using Ant Agents to Combine Reactive and Proactive strategies for Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Fredrick Ducatelle, Gianni di caro, and Luca Maria.
TreeCast: A Stateless Addressing and Routing Architecture for Sensor Networks Santashil PalChaudhuri, Shu Du, Ami K. Saha, and David B. Johnson Department.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Peter Pham and Sylvie Perreau, IEEE 2002 Mobile and Wireless Communications Network Multi-Path Routing Protocol with Load Balancing Policy in Mobile Ad.
Structure-Free Data Aggregation in Sensor Networks.
Energy-Aware Target Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks Yi Zou and Krishnendu Chakrabarty IEEE (PerCom’03) Speaker: Hsu-Jui Chang.
Repairing Sensor Network Using Mobile Robots Y. Mei, C. Xian, S. Das, Y. C. Hu and Y. H. Lu Purdue University, West Lafayette ICDCS 2006 Speaker : Shih-Yun.
Directed Diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks Presented by Barath Raghavan.
Doc.: IEEE /r0 Submission November 2005 Xin Yu and Hang LiuSlide 1 Implementation and Evaluation of AODV with Proactive Route Announcements.
Wireless Access and Networking Technology (WANT) Lab. An Efficient Data Aggregation Approach for Large Scale Wireless Sensor Networks Globecom 2010 Lutful.
KAIS T Location-Aided Flooding: An Energy-Efficient Data Dissemination Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Harshavardhan Sabbineni and Krishnendu Chakrabarty.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges Ian. F. Akyildiz, Ismail H. Kasimoglu
HoWL: An Efficient Route Discovery Scheme Using Routing History in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Faculty of Environmental Information Mika Minematsu
On the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks
A comparison of Ad-Hoc Routing Protocols
Distributed Energy Efficient Clustering (DEEC) Routing Protocol
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Coverage and Connectivity in Sensor Networks
Differences between WSN & MANET By: Dana Alotaibi.
Edinburgh Napier University
Presentation transcript:

Applications and communication patterns for WSN N. Reijers Consensus day TU Delft February 7, 2003

WSN applications and traffic MAC simulation requires generating realistic WSN traffic Routing Data aggregation OS Expected to have special characteristics

Application scenarios Intruder detection Forest fire detection Cattle herd Battle field Fire rescue Environmental monitoring Condition based maintenance Airconditioning sensors

Application types 3 types of applications Detection Tracking Active Passive Monitoring Push Pull Communication Event Periodic/event Periodic Query/response

Example: Sheep tracking Farmers want to know: Rough location of their sheep When a sheep wanders off from the herd When a sheep is lying on its back Sensor nodes spread throughout the meadow Sheep carry a node that periodically sends a beacon pulse

Sheep tracking approaches Raw data to sink Very inefficient Active node Cheap in terms of communication Rough location estimate Local triangulation More expensive in terms of communication More accurate location

Active node Sink Sheep

Active node Sink Sheep

Local triangulation Sink Sheep

WSN application characteristics Activity is often very localized both in space and time High latency is tolerable Available bandwidth >> required bandwidth Messages local or node->sink sink->node are rare

Application model Capture charateristics in application scenarios Generate traffic which is typical for WSN Scenario description Network description Traffic generation Active areas

Network model Number of nodes Placement of nodes Random Grid Radio range Number of sinks Placement of sinks Center / edge / corner

Traffic generation (1) Generate random messages Rate (msgs/sec) Type, selected according to given ratio Local broadcast Local unicast Node -> sink Sink -> node Sink -> all % 50 % 12 % 0 %

Traffic generation (2) For each message type, specify Message size Allowed latency For node->sink messages specify aggregation type None Concatenation Averaging

Active areas Active areas appear randomly Rate (new areas/sec) Avg lifetime Avg size 2 nd set of parameters for active areas Traffic generated for active areas is added to normal traffic

Conclusion Specific characteristics of WSN applications localized activity latency available bandwidth >> required bandwidth messages local or node->sink sink->node are rare Traffic generation algorithm to model these