CJD: Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prions (CJD) and Processing of Reusable Medical Products
Advertisements

Unit Aseptic Techniques
Validating Sterilization of Medical Devices
Infection control Antiseptics and disinfectants Antiseptics and disinfectants.
Hand Hygiene In-Service for Staff
OSHAs blood borne pathogens standard A written exposure control plan designed to eliminate or minimize worker exposure Compliance with universal precautions.
1 Prevention of Nosocomial Infection PharMed Parto Co.,Ltd. Atrineh Saziba Co., Ltd Dr. Farzan Ravanasa.
Sterilization and disinfection. Sterilization can be define as the process by which all forms of microbial life including bacterial spores & vegetative.
Control of Microbial Growth Tim Ho University of Alberta, Canada * The materials are mostly based on Dr. Brian Lanoil’s Microb Part.
TSE: Instrument Management in Surgery and Dentistry Current CDC Recommendations Lynne Sehulster, PhD, M(ASCP) Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion.
Multi-Clean Clostridium Difficile INTRODUCTION At times, special sanitation procedures may be implemented when directed by Hospital Infection Control Personnel.
RAHEEL KHAN Roll # 102 FINAL YEAR BATCH :D. STERLIZATION.
By Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi DNT 356. Infection control Infection control is a way to minimize the transmission of microbes in the dental office The.
SURFACE DISINFECTION AND TREATMENT ROOM PREPARATION CHAPTER 7.
Disinfection. Why Disinfect? To reduce or eliminate exposure risk To reduce or eliminate exposure risk  Biohazard waste disposal  Spill cleanup  Routine.
Disinfection and Sterilization of Patient-Care Equipment
Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 6 Infection Control: Clinical Procedures.
Methods for Control of Microbial Growth
Clean? Disinfect? Sterilize? What does it all mean??
WY MSHA State Grant Program BLOOD BORNE PATHOGENS AND UNIVERSAL PRECAUTIONS TRAINING.
Control of Microbial Growth Chapter Approaches to Control Physical methods Heat Irradiation Filtration Mechanical (e.g., washing) Chemical methods.
Sterilization And Disinfection G. Jamjoom. Disinfection: Use of physical procedures or chemical agents to destroy most microbial forms; bacterial spores.
Antoinette Barton-Gooden Patient and Health Care worker Safety.
Aseptic Techniques. Cross infection: The transmittal of an infection from one patient i n a hospital or health care setting to another p patient with.
Topic 1. Validation of Procedures to Prevent Contamination and Cross-Contamination with TSE Agents of Human Tissue Intended for Transplantation TSEAC June.
Infection Control and the Bugs. Blanche Lenard RN, CIC Education Session Infection Control in Healthcare  Environmental Cleaning  Routes of Transmission.
Infection Control Unit 13
Disinfection and Sterilization.
Physical and Chemical Control of Microorganisms
By: Hibah A. W. Abusulaiman Second year Lab Medicine (Females) A.H. / Microbiology Practical (Course I)
SUR 111 Lecture 2. Terminology Related to Asepsis and Sterile Technique  Review and learn the terms in table 7-1 page 143  You must be familiar with.
DISINFECTION & STERILIZATION
Introduction To the pr EN ISO Project norm
Hazards of Working with Biological Organisms and Material pedia/commons/e/ee/Reconstru cted_Spanish_Flu_Virus.jpg Reconstructed.
Decontamination of Surfaces Contaminated with Prions Dr. Gerald McDonnell.
INFECTION CONTROL IN DENTISTRY Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi
Disinfection, Sterilization and Antisepsis İ. Çağatay Acuner M.D., Clinical Microbiologist, Associate Professor Department of Microbiology Faculty of Medicine,
O BJECTIVES (39 Q UESTIONS ) Develop and review infection prevention and control policies and procedures Collaborate with public health agencies in.
1 Infection Prevention (IP). 2 IP: Objectives To prevent major postoperative infections when providing surgical contraceptive methods To prevent major.
Play Instructions: 1) Divide into Teams 2) Ask a Question to a Team 3) If correct, click the Spin Wheel Button to choose the number of points that team.
Sterilization of Medical Devices: Bodhisatwa Das.
TSEAC Meeting July 18, 2003 Topic 4 Ruth Solomon, M.D. DHT/OCTGT Methods to decontaminate facilities and equipment used in recovery and processing of HCT/Ps.
Low-Temperature Sterilization: Characteristics, Benefits, Monitoring William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH Director, Hospital Epidemiology, Occupational Health and.
SterilizationPhysical Heat dry & moist FiltrationIrradiation Chemical.
Visible Light Disinfection System Rutala, Gergen, Kanamori, Sickbert-Bennett, Weber Uses blue-violet range of visible light in nm region through.
What Should We Do Now?. How Can We Prevent ERCP-Related Infections? Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36: No single, simple.
SOURCES OF INFECTION AND DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION IN HOME CARE AND HOSPICE SETTINGS Module E.
Sterilization and Disinfections. Sterilization Freeing of an environment from all living microorganisms includes bacteria and their spores, fungi, parasites.
Sources of Infection in Long-Term Care Facility - Environmental Issues William A. Rutala, Ph.D, M.P.H. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill UNC.
Disinfection and Sterilization
Infection Control And Sterilization In Dentistry
Infection Control and Medical Asepsis
STERILIZATION AND DISINFECTION DECONTAMINATION. Decontamination is the process by which contaminated items are rendered safe for handling by personnel.
ASEPTIC TECHNIQUE IN HEALTHCARE. MICROBIAL GROWTH FOLLOWING FACTORS INFLUENCE MICROBIAL GROWTH: TEMPERATURE PH, OR THE VALUES USED IN CHEMISTRY TO EXPRESS.
Larissa Lewis, RN, BSN, CIC Infection Preventionist
STRILIZATION AND DISINFECTION IN A DENTAL CLINIC
Chain of infection 1 Prof. Hamed Adetunji. Course Overview At the end of this lecture and the activities that follow, student will be able to: List the.
CHAPTER 4 Infection Prevention 4-2 Introduction Infection prevention terminology is required for understanding microbiology in practice ─Infection prevention.
Sterilization Lab 3 Abeer Saati.
APIC Greater NY Chapter 13 Journal Club Session January 20, 2016 by Yuri Castillo RN BSN CIC Infection Prevention and Control Department /
Housekeeping.
Managing Instrument (Semicritical and Critical) Reprocessing Competencies and Lists Managers should: Keep list of HCP that reprocess semicritical or critical.
Table 24. Standardized methods of sterilization and disinfection, according to APIC guidelines for infection control practice* Niveen M. Masri et al. The.
Presented to: Dr. Manzar Anwar Dr. Shakeel Anwar Dr. Shazia Makhdoom Presented By: Jawad Ullah Shah Class # 04 1.
Chapter 11 Infection Control. 2 The Infection Cycle Infection cycle: chain of events allowing a pathogen to infect a host: –Pathogen is present –Reservoir.
William A. Rutala, PhD, MPH
Sterilization &Disinfection
19 April 2017 Kyle Willey, CIC.
Types of Sterilisation & Sanitation
Lab.2- Types of Chemical Methods Sterilization
Presentation transcript:

CJD: Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization in Health Care William A. Rutala, Ph.D., M.P.H. University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals and UNC School of Medicine

CJD: Disinfection and Sterilization Topics Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Recommendations to prevent cross-transmission from medical devices contaminated with prions Methodology-how methodology affects results

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

Transmissibility of Prions Transmission Not spread by contact (direct, indirect, droplet) or airborne Not spread by the environment Experimentally-all TSEs are transmissible to animals, including the inherited forms Epidemiology of CJD: sporadic-85%; familial-15%; iatrogenic-1% (primarily transplant of high risk tissues, ~250 cases worldwide)

Iatrogenic Transmission of CJD Contaminated medical instruments Electrodes in brain (2) Neurosurgical instruments in brain (4) Dura mater grafts (>110) Corneal grafts (3) Human growth hormone and gonadotropin (>130)

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

CJD and Medical Devices Six cases of CJD associated with medical devices 2 confirmed cases-depth electrodes; reprocessed by benzene, alcohol and formaldehyde vapor 4 cases-CJD following brain surgery, index CJD identified-1, suspect neurosurgical instruments Cases occurred before 1980 in Europe No known cases since 1980 and no known failure of steam sterilization

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

Risk of CJD Transmission Epidemiologic evidence (eye, brain) linking specific body tissue or fluids to CJD transmission Experimental evidence in animals demonstrating that body tissues or fluids transmit CJD Infectivity assays a function of the relative concentration of CJD tissue or fluid

Risk of CJD Transmission Risk of Infection Tissue High Brain (including dura mater), spinal cord, and eye Low CSF, liver, lymph node, kidney, lung, spleen, placenta, olfactory epithelium No Peripheral nerve, intestine, bone marrow, whole blood, leukocytes, serum, thyroid gland, adrenal gland, heart, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, gingiva, prostate, testis, tears, nasal mucus, saliva, sputum, urine, feces, semen, vaginal secretions, and milk High-transmission to inoc animals >50%; Low-transmission to inoc animals >10-20% but no epid evidence of human inf

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Effectiveness must consider both removal by cleaning and inactivation Probability of a device remaining capable of transmitting disease depends on the initial contamination and effectiveness of C/D/S. Cleaning results in a 4 log10 reduction of microbes and ~2 log10 reduction in protein contamination

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

Non-Enveloped Viruses Decreasing Order of Resistance of Microorganisms to Disinfectants/Sterilants Prions Spores Mycobacteria Non-Enveloped Viruses Fungi Bacteria Enveloped Viruses

Ineffective or Partially-Effective Disinfectants: CJD Alcohol Ammonia Chlorine dioxide Formalin Glutaraldehyde Hydrogen peroxide Iodophors/Iodine Peracetic acid Phenolics

Ineffective or Partially Effective Processes: CJD Gases Ethylene oxide Formaldehyde Physical Dry heat UV Microwave Ionizing Glass bead sterilizers Autoclave at 121oC, 15m

Effective Disinfectants (>4 log10 decrease in LD50 with 1 hour) Sodium hydroxide 1 N for 1h (variable results) Sodium hypochorite 5000 ppm for 15m Guanidine thiocyanate 4M Phenolic (LpH) 0.9% for 30m

Effective Processes: CJD Autoclave 134oC-138oC for 18m (prevacuum) 132oC for 60m (gravity) Combination (chemical exposure then steam autoclave, potentially deleterious to staff, instruments, sterilizer) Soak in 1N NaOH, autoclave 134oC for 18m Soak in 1N NaOH, autoclave 121oC for 30m

CJD: DISINFECTION AND STERILIZATION Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Epidemiological studies of prion transmission via surgical instruments Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Risk associated with instruments

Disinfection and Sterilization EH Spaulding believed how an object will be D/S depended on the objects intended use CRITICAL-objects that enter normally sterile tissue or the vascular system should be sterile SEMICRITICAL-objects that touch mucous membranes or skin that is not intact requires a disinfection process (high level disinfection) that kills all but bacterial spores (prions?) NONCRITICAL-objects that touch only intact skin require low-level disinfection

CJD : potential for secondary spread through contaminated surgical instruments

Risk Assessment: Patient, Tissue, Device Known or suspected CJD or other TSEs Rapidly progressive dementia Dura mater transplant, HGH injection Tissue High risk-brain, spinal cord, eyes Device Critical or semicritical

Examples: CJD D/S High risk patient, high risk tissue, critical/semicritical device-special prion reprocessing High risk patient, low/no risk tissue, critical/semicritical device-conventional D/S Low risk patient, high risk tissue, critical/semicritical device-conventional D/S High risk patient, high risk tissue, noncritical device-conventional disinfection

Conclusions Epidemiologic evidence suggests nosocomial CJD transmission via medical devices is very rare Guidelines based on epidemiologic evidence, tissue infectivity, risk of disease via medical devices, and inactivation data Risk assessment based on patient, tissue and device Only critical/semicritical devices contacting high risk tissue from high risk patients require special prion reprocessing

CJD: Disinfection and Sterilization Conclusions Cleaning with special prion reprocessing NaOH and steam sterilization (e.g., 1N NaOH 1h, 121oC 30 m) 134oC for 18m (prevacuum) 132oC for 60m (gravity) No low temperature sterilization technology effective Four disinfectants (e.g., chlorine) effective (4 log decrease in LD50 within 1h)

CJD: Sterilization in Health Care Used Instrument  Keep Wet (do not let tissue/fluid dry) Clean (Washer Disinfector) Steam Sterilize (NaOH and SS; 134oC, 18 min) Sterile Instrument

CJD: Environmental Surfaces High/Low/No Risk Tissue, High Risk Patient, Noncritical Surface/Device Environmental surfaces contaminated with high risk tissues (autopsy table in contact with brain tissue) should be cleaned and then spot decontaminated with a 1:10 dilution of bleach Environmental surfaces contaminated with low/no risk tissue require only routine disinfection

CJD: Disinfection and Sterilization Topics Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Recommendations to prevent cross-transmission from medical devices contaminated with prions Methodology-how methodology affects results

Non-Enveloped Viruses Decreasing Order of Resistance of Microorganisms to Disinfectants/Sterilants Prions Spores Mycobacteria Non-Enveloped Viruses Fungi Bacteria Enveloped Viruses

Prion Inactivation Studies Problems Investigators used aliquots of brain tissue macerates vs. intact tissue (smearing, drying); weights of tissue (50mg-375mg) Studies do not reflect reprocessing procedures in a clinical setting (e.g., no cleaning) Factors that affect results include: strain of prion (22A), prion conc in brain tissue, animal used, exposure conditions, validation and cycle parameters of sterilizers, resistant subpopulation, different test tissues, different duration of observations, screw cap tubes with tissue (air), etc

STERILIZATION Factors affecting the efficacy of sterilization Bioburden Cleaning Pathogen type Protein and salt Biofilm accumulation Lumen length and diameter Restricted flow

Penicylinders Sterilized by Various Low-Temperature Sterilization Methods Challenge: 12/88 100%ETO HCFC-ETO Sterrad 10% Serum, 0.65% Salt (7 organisms, N=63) 97% 60.3% 95.2% 37% No Serum or Salt, (3 organisms, N=27) 100% 100% 96% 100% Alfa et al. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:92-100. The three organisms included: E. faecalis, M. chelonei, B. subtilis spores. The seven organisms included: E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, E.coli, M. chelonei, B. subtilis spores, B. stearothermophilus spores, B. circulans spores

Lumens Sterilized by Various Low-Temperature Sterilization Methods Challenge: 12/88 100%ETO HCFC-ETO Sterrad 10% Serum, 0.65% Salt (7 organisms, N=63) 44% 39.7% 49.2% 35% No Serum or Salt, (3 organisms, N=27) ND 96.3% 96.3% ND Alfa et al. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:92-100. The three organisms included: E. faecalis, M. chelonei, B. subtilis spores. The seven organisms included: E. faecalis, P. aeruginosa, E.coli, M. chelonei, B. subtilis spores, B. stearothermophilus spores, B. circulans spores

Low-Temperature Sterilization Technologies (LTST) Conclusions All technologies have limitations LTST (ETO, HP gas plasma) demonstrate a significant number of failures in presence of serum or salt Salt and serum provide protection for spores and bacteria Salt and serum combined with a narrow lumen provide extraordinary protection with LTST

STERILIZATION Factors affecting the efficacy of sterilization Bioburden Cleaning Pathogen type Protein and salt Biofilm accumulation Lumen length and diameter Restricted flow

Effect of Rinsing with Water on Sterilization Results Method Inoculate scalpel blade with tissue culture media with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 1.5x106 Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores dried for 12 hours at room temperature

Removal of Soil and Microorganisms from Medical Devices Method Inoculate 0.02 ml of FBS containing 106 B. stearothermophilus spores onto scalpel blade Dry for 30 min at 35oC followed by 30 min at RT Samples placed in distilled water at room temperature for specified time Chloride, protein and spore concentration measured

Removal of Soil and Microorganisms from Medical Devices Conclusions Inorganic, organic and microbial contaminants on a device are dramatically reduced during a washing process 96.3% (or 2.5 x 106 organisms) removed from blade in 150 sec

Removal of Soil and Microorganisms from Medical Devices Conclusions Inorganic, organic and microbial contaminants on a device are dramatically reduced during a washing process Contact with water for short period of time rapidly leads to the dissolution of salt crystals. Studies in 1950’s and 1960’s show that spores occluded inside crystals were very resistant to sterilization (e.g., ETO, steam). Minimal cleaning eliminates the effect of salt Simulated use tests that do not include washing would not represent conditions that exist in use situation

without sterilization You can clean without sterilization but you NEVER can sterilize without cleaning

Conclusions All sterilization processes effective in killing spores Salt favors crystal formation and impairs sterilization by occlusion of organisms Cleaning removes salts and proteins and must precede sterilization Failure to clean or ensure exposure of microorganisms to sterilant (e.g. connectors) could affect effectiveness of sterilization process CJD inactivation studies should be consistent with actual clinical practice

CJD: Disinfection and Sterilization Topics Rationale for US recommendations Epidemiological studies of prion transmission Infectivity of human tissues Efficacy of removing microbes by cleaning Prion inactivation studies Recommendations to prevent cross-transmission from medical devices contaminated with prions Methodology-how methodology affects results

Thank you

References Alfa MJ, Olson N, DeGagne P, Hizon R. New low temperature sterilization technologies: Microbicidal activity and clinical efficiency. In Rutala WA, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Antisepsis in Healthcare. Champlain, NY: Polyscience Publications. 1998:67-78. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Clinical effectiveness of low-temperature sterilization technologies. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:798-804. Jacobs P. Cleaning: principles and benefits. In: Rutala WA, ed. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Antisepsis in Healthcare. Champlain, NY: Polyscience Publications. 1998:165-182.

Disinfection and Sterilization for Prion Diseases References Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: Recommendations for Disinfection and Sterilization. Clin Inf Dis 2001;32:1348-1356. Rutala WA, Weber DJ, and HICPAC. CDC Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization. In preparation Weber DJ, Rutala WA. Managing the risks of nosocomial transmission of prion diseases. Current Opinions in Infectious Diseases. 2002;15:421-426.

Prevent Patient Exposure to CJD Contaminated Instruments How do you prevent patient exposure to neurosurgical instruments from a patient who is latter given a diagnosis of CJD? Hospitals should use the special prion reprocessing precautions for instruments from patients undergoing brain biopsy when a specific lesion has not been demonstrated (e.g., CT, MRI). Alternatively, neurosurgical instruments used in such cases could be disposable.

vCJD: Disinfection and Sterilization To date no reports of human-to-human transmission of vCJD by blood or tissue Unlike CJD, vCJD detectable in lymphoid tissues and prior to onset of clinical illness Special prion reprocessing (or single use instruments) proposed in the UK in dental, eye, or tonsillar surgery on high risk patients for CJD or vCJD If epidemiological and infectivity data show these tissues represent a transmission risk then special prion reprocessing could be extended to these procedure

Factors Affecting the Efficacy of LTST Cleaning - Failure to clean results in higher bioburden, protein load and salt concentration Bioburden - Natural bioburden on surgical devices 100 to 103 Pathogen - Spore forming organisms most resistant Protein - Residual protein decreases efficacy of sterilization Salt - Residual salt decreases efficacy of sterilization