Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
World’s Largest Educational Community
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
INCORPORATING INDUSTRY NEEDS IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Dr. Samir Al-Baiyat Dean College of Engineering Sciences and Acting Dean College of Applied Engineering.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Amanda Reid, Esq. ABET Adjunct Accreditation Director for Applied Science BACKGROUND.
ABET Accreditation for Surveying/Geomatics Programs in the US.
ABET PRIMER What is ABET, What Does ABET Do, How Do We Do Well With ABET.
Eric Guilbeau, Professor and Chair, Arizona State University, Chair BMES Accreditation Committee, ABET examiner Art Rosenthal, Senior VP and Chief Scientific.
© Copyright CSAB 2013 Future Directions for the Computing Accreditation Criteria Report from CAC and CSAB Joint Criteria Committee Gayle Yaverbaum Barbara.
Assessing Students Preparedness to Compete and Succeed in a Global Economy Through Written Communications Robert A. Chin & Carolyn Dunn Donna Hollar Department.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
A. ABET Update i. Overview of documents submitted to ABET (Self-Study) EWRE Retreat 8/2/2005 ii. What we need to do between now and ABET visit in November.
College Strategic Plan by
Why You Should Care About ABET And how you can help with ABET accreditation of the Civil and Environmental Engineering undergraduate degrees A quick orientation.
ABET Introduction of ABET to CE 203 Tim Ellis, Ph.D., P.E.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
What is ABET Accreditation and Why Should I Care?
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
وحدة الاعتماد الأكاديمي 8/16/2015. ACCREDITATION Dr. ABD EL-SLAM HEMAID BADR A.A.U. DIRECTOR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING JAZAN UNIVERSITY 8/16/2015.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
ME Assessment Process Presented to the College Advisory Council, Sept. 18, 2003 Overview Overview ME Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) Revision Process.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Opening Doors to the Future Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Building a Program Assessment Plan Jack McGourty Associate Dean Fu Foundation School.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
معايير ABET المعتمدة لكليات الهندسة للحصول على الاعتمادية الدولية
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Dr. Mohorjy, Prof. Reda, Dr. Ahmed EC بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
ABET Accreditation Process Chemical Engineering Department Prof. Emad Ali.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT FIRST SEMESTER 2014/2015 Medical Equipment Department November 2015.
Using Performance Criteria to Assess Student Outcomes Teaching & Learning Symposium May 20, 2009.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
ABET 101 What has happened so far? When is the ABET visit? Faculty Responsibilities Assessment Process.
Perkins End of Year Evaluation Southwestern Community College May 18, 2016.
Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia Dept. of Computer.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Advisory Boards – The Good, The Bad, and The Reality
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
EMU Computer Engineering Dept.
Presentation transcript:

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition2 What are ABET & EC 2000 ? Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology EC Criteria for Evaluating Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs Web Source -

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition3 Primary organization responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and certifying the quality of engineering, engineering technology, and engineering related education in the U.S. Recognized by the U.S. Dept. of Education Federation of 28+ professional technical societies representing over 1.8 million practicing engineering professionals What are ABET & EC 2000?

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition4 Vision ABET will provide world leadership to assure quality and stimulate innovation in engineering, technology and applied science education.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition5 Mission ABET serves the public through the promotion and advancement of education in applied science, computing, engineering and technology.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition6 Mission ABET will: Accredit educational programs Promote quality and innovation in education Consult and assist in the development and advancement of education worldwide in a financially self-sustaining manner Communicate with our constituencies and the public regarding activities and accomplishments Anticipate and prepare for the changing environment and the future needs of constituencies Manage the operations and resources to be effective and fiscally responsible

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition7 Accreditation Objectives Serve the public, industry, and the profession by stimulating the development of improved engineering education Encourage new and innovative approaches to engineering education Assure that graduates of an accredited program are adequately prepared to enter and continue the practice of engineering Identify programs that meet the ABET criteria for accreditation

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition8 ABET Today (1999 data) 1555 accredited engineering programs at 323 institutions 729 accredited engineering technology programs at 242 institutions 53 accredited related-engineering programs at 37 institutions Staff of 19 Home Page on the World Wide Web

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition9 Other Standing and Ad-hoc Committees Engineering Accreditation Commission Technology Accreditation Commission Computing Accreditation Commission Related Accreditation Commission Industrial Advisory Council International Activities Committees Executive Committee Board of Directors Participating Societies ABET Structure

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition10 What does ABET accredit? ABET accredits programs of study that lead to degrees in engineering ABET does not accredit departments, colleges, degrees, or institutions

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition11 ABET EC 2000 Input Accounting Focus on having the right courses Every six years get information ready for review Outcomes Assessment – EC 2000 Focus on graduates and program’s components Continuous assessment OldNew vs

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition12 Engineering Criteria 2000 Philosophy & Emphasis

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition13 Philosophy Institutions and Programs define mission and objectives to meet needs of constituencies – enable program differentiation Emphasis on outcomes – preparation for professional practice Curricular requirements limited to 3 years Programs demonstrate how criteria and educational objectives are being met

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition14 Emphasis Practice of continuous improvement Input of Constituencies Process focus Outcomes and Assessment linked to Objectives Knowledge required for entry to the engineering profession Student, Faculty, Facilities, Institutional Support and Financial Resource issues linked to Program Objectives

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition15 Evaluation & Assessment Cycles “A 2-loop Process” Establish Indicators for Outcomes to Lead to Achievement of Objectives Determine How Outcomes will be Assessed Determine How Outcomes will be Achieved Determine Outcomes Required to Achieve Objectives Determine educational objectives Assess Outcomes/ Evaluate Objectives Input from Constituencies Formal Instruction Student Activities

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition16 Educational Objectives – Criterion 2 Development Process to include inputs gained from Constituencies Advisory Groups Students All faculty Alumni Industry

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition17 Process Perspective for Evaluation and Improvement - The OSU Approach (PEOS) Program Educational Objectives System Assessment of Student Learning (POS) Program Outcomes System Program Outcomes Program Educational Objectives Long Term Short Term Input from Constituencies

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition18 Inputs Suggested Exit Survey of all Graduating Seniors Monitoring of Professional Exam Results Monitoring of Student Progress Monitoring of Student Co-op/Intern Performance and Placement

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition19 A series of surveys were developed to seek data on 1)The perceived importance of program outcomes and objectives and 2)How well each program is doing relative to these.

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition20 Survey Groups Focus on four groups Seniors Exiting seniors Recent alumni (2 nd and 6 th year) Managers/Supervisors (15 th year alumni)

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition21 Survey Elements Educational Outcomes – General – Focus on ABET EC 2000 Criterion 3 Program Outcomes Educational Experience – Quality of Instruction at The Ohio State University Program Specific Questions – Focus on ABET EC2000 Criterion 2 and Program Specific Objectives Additional Comments and Suggestions Background/Demographic Information

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition22 Educational Outcomes Questions Skills, Abilities, and Attributes ImportancePreparation A.An understanding of and ability to apply knowledge of: 1. Mathematics 2. Chemistry 3. Physics 4. Engineering sciences 5. Computer science

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition23 Educational Outcomes Summary

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition24 Six High Priority Areas Area(Ability/Prep – Importance) Communications– Team Work– Basic Sciences+ Business– Stay Current– Ethics –

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition25 Educational Experience Questions A.Quality of Instruction provided in your major: 1. Faculty 2. Teaching Assistants B.The quality of instruction provided by FACULTY outside your major: 1. Computer Science 2. Engineering Graphics 3. Engineering Mechanics

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition26 Educational Experience Results Exit Yr 0 Alumni Yr 2 Alumni Yr 6 Mean Quality of instruction provided in MAJOR : Faculty TAs Quality of Advising with respect to: Academic Overall Preparation: Be an engineer

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition27 Common Comments by Graduates Communication skills (oral and written) are critical Add business courses & relate to engineering problems Practical experience/co-op very important ability to apply knowledge to real world OSU graduates are well prepared Ability to work on a multifunctional team is critical Have not observed a recent OSU graduate so comments based on own experience

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition28 Comments on the Survey Put survey on web Survey is a good start Make results into a magazine(s) article Make it more discipline specific Show that OSU acts upon the suggestions Add government service Ask what degrees are in most demand

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition29 Educational Experience Alumni 4. & 8. Curriculum 5. Faculty 6. Facilities 7. Support 1. Students Resource Perspective

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition30 Transcript Analysis Step 1 – Label Each Course MB – Math & Basic Science ETD – Engineering Topic with Design ET – Engineering Topics GE – General Education OE – Other Education Step 2 – Do a sum of each category

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition31 Evaluation Summary CategoryABET Req.Your Program Math and Basic Science 32 sem hr 48 qtr hr Engineering Topics 48 sem hr 72 qtr hr Gen Ed Other Capstone Design Yes

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition32 Conclusions Feedback is now a continuous process in Ohio State’s College of Engineering. The Outcomes Assessment Committee has been permanently established to work on the data gathering and program modification annually. The College would be pleased to share its forms and procedures with other Colleges of Engineering.