Tanzania Commission for Universities (TCU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality management implementation at University
Advertisements

The vision for Sri Lanka’s Tertiary and Vocational Education
Introduction to VET Quality Assurance in the UK Mark Novels 6 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study.
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) Internal quality assurance.
Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
The CHE’s Accreditation Criteria QA Forum: Professional bodies February 2012.
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
A Snapshot of TEQSA Dr Carol Nicoll Chief Commissioner Festival of Learning and Teaching University of Adelaide Tuesday 6 November 2012.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Launch of Quality Management System
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
NATIONAL AGENCY FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, BULGARIA The 4th meeting of the SEEVET-Net July, 2011 Chisinau, Moldova.
The role of governance in self-assessment NATSPEC conference Sue Preece HMI March
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
: Harmonization of Education Systems in East Africa Dr. Cosam Chawanga Joseph Inter-University Council for East Africa (Institution of the East African.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Re-accreditation Workshop Private Higher Education Institutions 6 August 2008.
“Modernizing the 3rd cycle at the University of Prishtina and Developing a PhD Program at the Faculty of Economics” Project number:
Paper Presented at the Standing Conference for African National and University Libraries in East, Central and Southern Africa (SCANUL – ECS), 1st and 2nd.
AN OVERVIEW MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY. MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY (1/11/07 ) pzv/09/09/08 2 Malaysian.
1 QUALTITY ASSURANCE The Ministry of higher education in Syria THE ROUNDTABLE MEETING OF QUALTITY ASSURANCE AGENCIES OF THE ORGANIZATION OF ISAMIC CONFERENCE.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
Eurydice Presentation at the Conference ‘Europe needs Teachers’ organised by ETUCE Brussels, 12 June 2006.
Meeting of the TEMPUS DoQuP Project –Workshop on “Documentation for Quality Assurance of Study Programs" 1-6 May 2012, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Accreditation.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
: National and Regional Developments in Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa: East African Experiences and Lessons Mayunga H.H. Nkunya Executive.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Council on Higher Education: Three-year Business Plan and MTEF Budget Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training.
Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli 16/1/2007Dr.Salwa B. El-magoli Cairo: 16/1/2007 Quality Assurance and Accreditation (The Egyptian Experience) Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli.
Assessment Design and its relationship to NARS and ILOs Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
Internal and external quality evaluation of internal audit in public sector in Ukraine Maxim Timokhin, Head of CHU, Public Financial Inspection, Ukraine.
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Quality assurance in the draft Education Act of Ukraine Külli All, Ministry of Education and Research
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 6 – Company Law Bilateral screening:
Network of VET institutions Olav Aarna TAIEX expert Estonian Qualifications Authority.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING PRESENTATION ON THE APP AND BUDGET ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2016/ th APRIL 2016.
Albanian Qualifications Framework Ejvis Gishti, NAVETQ Kiev, March
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
Higher Education Quality Committee
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS GRANTEES NEED ASSESSMENT
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Jacek Gdański Accounting Department
Introduction to the training
Dayalatha Lekamge Faculty of Education Open University of Sri Lanka
Dayalatha Lekamge Faculty of Education Open University of Sri Lanka
Presentation transcript:

Tanzania Commission for Universities (TCU) MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION AND SUPERVISION FOR EFFECTIVE DELIVERY OF QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION Dr. Christine Hongoke Thematic paper for the Annual Joint Education Sector Review 2010 29th September 2010

What is TCU? Established under the Universities Act Cap.346 to harmonize higher education system in Tanzanian the main functions being to: Recognize, approve, register and accredit university institutions and programs to operate in Tanzania; Coordinate the proper functioning of all university institutions in Tanzania Oversee institutional management processes in all universities in Tanzania as governed by the university charters

Roles of TCU Regulatory- TCU regulates systems, processes and quality of universities Supportive (QA advocacy, etc)-TCU supports universities and advocates for quality matters Advisory- Advises Government and stakeholders on matters of university education.

Common Terminologies in HE “inspection” and “supervision” : not commonly used in HE. common terms are, technical evaluation, regulation, accreditation and quality assurance. regulation of university education, is the prerogative of the Tanzania Commission for Universities Registration : is preceded by a technical evaluation on the basis of which the institution is granted the deserved registration certificate.

What is accreditation? A continuous process involving technical evaluation and assessment of an institution its systems, programmes, inputs , environment, and processes. Recognition of attainment of institutional status adhering to set quality benchmark standards;

Accreditation…. A continuous quality assurance process and compliance with benchmark standards as set by the regulatory agency (i.e. TCU, NACTE, VETA in TZ). Is a ‘barometer’ used to measure the status and credibility of an institution. is both a process and ultimate proof of credibility through certification granted to an institution.

TCU accreditation systems Institutional accreditation or evaluation for purposes of institutional registration Program accreditation or validation of previously approved program Accreditation of academic awards, and validation and recognition of foreign awards (to be integrated into the National Qualifications Framework)

Important aspects of the National Qualifications Framework TCU is coordinating the task of establishing a National Qualifications Framework. The proposed NQF will: Harmonize education and training at different levels Have ten levels of qualifications Link the four education and training categories currently in operation

The NQF will……. Have qualifications descriptors Consider Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Determine qualifications equivalences Portability of qualifications through recognized credit award system

Pre-requisites for institutional accreditation in TZ Every university and university college is supposed to: prepare a draft Charter with rules and statutes as legal instruments for the establishment and running of the institution; prepare internal academic, general and special regulations, including internal quality assessment procedures;

Pre-requisites……. get Senate clearance before submitting documents to TCU for validation and approval.

Registration and accreditation of institutions. Procedure is stipulated in the Universities (Chartering, registration and Accreditation procedures) Regulation, 2006 All public universities established before 2005 were re-registered, reaccredited and chartered in 2008.

Registration procedures…. Registration involves institutions established under any of the following categories: - Existing universities at the level of accreditation, e.g. UDSM,SUA,OUT; - established through transformation of non-university institutions eg. SUZA & Mzumbe University;

Registration procedures…. - transformed Constituent Colleges into full-fledged universities e.g. from MUCHS to MUHAS and UCLAS to Ardhi University. An institution is required to conduct a self-assessment study and submit the resulting report as a basis for TCU to conduct an external assessment.

Registration (contd) External evaluation for re-accreditation of public universities was conducted in 2006 by experts from Kenya, Uganda, Lesotho and Tanzania.

Importance of Technical visitations or site visits Site visits play a critical role as they provide opportunities for : external reviewers to confirm, expand and elaborate on facts and figures submitted by the institutions in their self-assessment reports. peer reviewers to meet with administrators, staff and students as well as tour facilities in order to place in context the materials already provided.

Determining the institution’s registration status Stage 1: Provisional Registration–may admit students. Granted Certificate of Provisional Registration (CPR). Stage 2: Certificate of Full Registration– can conduct graduations and offer awards Stage 3: Accreditation stage–fully operational institution, granted Certificate of Accreditation

Programme validation and accreditation Universities are responsible for designing and implementing their programmes. All universities are required by law to ensure that programmes and matching awards: - are relevant to the full development of the holders’ potentials, -respond to stakeholders’ needs and national requirements;

Programme validation…… -may be achieved by through different learning modes. Institutions are expected to adhere to TCU guidelines and to allocate the necessary resources and to ensure the achievement of programme outcomes.

Principles of Accreditation TCU adopts: Participatory-approach involving universities in developing criteria and procedures for QA a mix of institutional self-evaluation and external or independent assessment; Principles that focus on improvement not on punitive measures. Request for institutional feedback on the objectivity of the report.

Quality in Higher Education Like other systems, Higher Education identifies with quality and quantity of inputs and outputs. Inputs: include infrastructural, teaching and learning facilities, students, staff and financial resources; Outputs: include graduates from the system.

QA in Higher Education Quality refers to fitness for purpose. In the context of this paper, it extends to take care of teaching-learning process and research activities. Quality Assurance: A systematic, structured and continuous attention to maintain and improve the effectiveness of the system or the delivery process and its output.

Importance of quality assurance in higher education provision Globalization requires our institutions to be linked with international quality assurance systems for the following reasons: the demand for greater accountability and efficiency in respect of public financing. Trends towards mass participation in the face of shrinking resources. Greater stakeholder scrutiny of education, training processes and outcomes.

Effective delivery of quality higher education External evaluations are expensive. TCU experience has shown that institution-wide assessments can have a larger impact in terms of shifting the institutional culture. Programmes exist within institutions therefore chances are that institution-wide assessments can indirectly lead to improved programmes.

TCU operational tools In accordance with Section 62 of the Universities Act No. 7 of 2005, TCU has various guidelines and regulations, e.g.: Regulations: Chartering, Registration and Accreditation 2006, and Quality Assurance Scheme of academic and professional qualifications and academic titles in universities Guidelines for admission of students in universities Guidelines for self-study assessment Quality Assurance Handbook as part of the IUCEA QA framework)

TCU Challenges TCU faces a number of challenges but three are worth mentioning: i) Dual role of Inspector and Regulator TCU as an accreditation body operates as an evaluator/inspector and regulator of quality. Plays the role of Prosecutor and Judge. In other words TCU sets rules and regulations and oversees their implementation without being regulated itself.

Challenges……. ii) Systems limitations Having the Universities Act under review means that TCU continue to issue guidelines which may not always be adhered to the letter by universities. iii) Limited number of agreed Programme Benchmarks TCU is yet to prepare benchmarks for quite a number of programmes. Most of these benchmarks need to be agreed by professional bodies before they can be adopted by universities.

Thank you for your attention! Conclusion For effective delivery of higher education, internal quality assurance and institutional self assessments should be continuous, uninterrupted processes and should be conducted at any cost. Thank you for your attention!