Good for You and Your NACEP Review Team Karl Madeo Director, Tompkins Cortland Community College Dryden, New York.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.
Advertisements

Course Selected Institutions decide to examine an online or hybrid course as part of a peer review. Since institutions make a significant investment in.
Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Co-op/Intern with UT Dallas CSO Training and Networking Conference May 21, 2014 Presented by: UT Dallas Career Center.
NACEP Accreditation: Advancing Quality College Courses in High School and Improving Credit Transfer Kent Scheffel, President-Elect National Alliance of.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
Procurement.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
PowerPoint Adapted from The AP Course Audit and Other AP Program Updates AP Annual Conference Orlando July 2006 Georgia Association of Advanced Placement.
NEAIR November 2005 The Role of IR in Supporting the Accreditation Process: A Chair’s Perspective Dr. Barbara R. Sadowski Chief Planning Officer Marywood.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Foundational Skills Helping Students Get Ready for College EAP - Working Together to Prepare Students for College Jeff Gold - Director Academic Technology,
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Chapter 3: Data Collection: Process and Outcome Data In this Chapter You will Learn: Tasks you Will Undertake with Guidance from this Chapter Are:
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Commission on Accreditation for Respiratory Care The Site Visitors Are Coming! Transitioning from Successful Self- Study to Successful Site Visit Bradley.
Soup to Nuts: A "Course by Course" Examination of One School's Journey through the Application and Candidacy Process Presenters: Dr. Juliana Lancaster,
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Louisiana’s USDOE AP Test Fee Program Rima Duhon Louisiana Virtual School AP® Program Coordinator.
The Uses of Blackboard in IDARI
IT Introduction to Website Development Welcome!
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric.  Overview  State Legislation  District Policy  Key Components and Rating Percentiles  Outline the Evaluation Process,
Achieving the Dream Status Report Mentor Visit February 5-6, 2009.
Campus Forum on Institutional Accreditation HLC Team December 3, 2013.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.
InWEnt | Qualified to shape the future1 Internet based Human Resource Development Management Platform Human Resource Development Programme in Natural Disaster.
EVALUATIONS, STUDENT GROWTH MEASURES & KEEP AUG 25, 2014 BILL BAGSHAW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR.
AY Year  The administration period runs for two weeks in the 14 –weeks sessions (fall and spring) and six calendar days in other sessions. 
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.
Middle States Accreditation – update at Town Hall, 2/19/2014 Middle States Accreditation: Update at Town Hall Meeting February 19, 2014.
Ranada Smith Lamar University Conroe ISD Technology Plan
Jamestown Community College The Path to NACEP Accreditation.
Scott Butson District Technology Manager. Provide professional to all district staff Professional development has been provided on a regular basis to.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
RF Tracker Update April Other Oversight Activities: RF Monitoring  RF Monitoring Update –RF Tracker was opened for data entry on October.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
October 10-12, 2004 Boise, Idaho Welcome Transforming Learning Opportunities through Enrollment Partnerships.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Highlights from the 2 nd year FIPSE Annual Progress Report David Buchanan Novgorod State University June 14, 2011.
School Improvement Activities Accreditation (AdvancED) Process Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Domain Site Visit Team Orientation Office of Quality Performance and Accreditation.
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Post-Secondary Transition
Montana School Wellness Policy Tracking Tool
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
nd Annual Co-sponsored Informational Training for School Board Members July 2019 Graduating All Students Choice Ready and The Impact Board Members.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Good for You and Your NACEP Review Team Karl Madeo Director, Tompkins Cortland Community College Dryden, New York

About the CE Program  NACEP Accredited in July 2009  Currently 36 partner school districts in Central New York  Approximately 180 CE instructors teaching 500 CE sections annually  Over 3,000 individual CE students  Over 4,000 course enrollments annually

First…. Some insights into the NACEP application process…. ….from a program that has recently…and successfully…gone through the process.

Are you ready to apply for NACEP accreditation?  First…review your CE program in light of each of NACEP’s 15 standards.  You may have many of these program elements in place….but there will likely be some that you have not yet implemented.  For example…

EEEE1: “The CEP conducts annual program assessment and evaluation of its practices including at least course evaluations by CEP students and follow-up of the CEP graduates who are college or university freshmen. Qualified evaluators/ researchers and/or the college’s or university’s institutional research office conduct and analyze evaluations and assessments.”

 E2: “The CEP conducts, every 5 years, an impact study of the CEP on participating high school instructors, principals and guidance counselors.”  E3: “The CEP conducts, every 5 years, a follow-up of CEP graduates who are seniors in a college or university.”

 F3: “Instructors teaching the CEP sections are part of a continuing collegial interaction, through annual professional development, required seminars, site visits, and ongoing communication with the post- secondary institutions’ faculty and CEP administration. This interaction addresses issues such as course content, course delivery, assessment, evaluation, and professional development in the field of study.”

Are you ready to apply for NACEP accreditation?  Next...plan and implement any needed program components.  Remember…the NACEP application is not just filling out a form. It requires evidence that each standard is being met. If the necessary program components are not in place, you won’t have the required evidence.

 As you implement any new program components, be sure to build in the tools and instruments that will enable you to easily acquire the kind of evidence you will want to include in your NACEP application.

Our Timeline  Fall of 2006: Conducted our program assessment through the lens of the NACEP standards.  Jan.– Dec. 2007: Implemented needed program components that were not in place (Program Evaluation Surveys, expansion of professional development for CE instructors, formalizing Faculty Liaison Program, including reaching agreement with Faculty Association on compensation)  Jan. 2008: Submitted NACEP Intent to Seek Accreditation form.  Jan.– June 2008: Worked on compiling evidence, required forms, and completing our web-based NACEP application.  June 2, 2008: Submitted NACEP Application to our Review Team  Oct – May 2009: Responded to questions, clarifications and requests for additional documentation in the 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd reviews by our Review Team  July 2009: NACEP Board voted to accredit the Concurrent Enrollment Program.

Thank you… …to Kevin Nemeth, Director of Continuing Education at Central Washington University. I attended his “Preparing a Web-Based Accreditation Application” presentation at the 2007 NACEP Conference in Salt Lake City….which got me started on the path to developing such an application for our CE program.

Our Web-based NACEP Application: Where we started First we considered these choices:  Create a completely new website  Use our existing CollegeNow website template and navigational structure CollegeNow Website CollegeNow Website

Next decision….  How to set up our NACEP application website so that it would communicate clearly with the NACEP Review Team.  We knew that ease of use would be essential.

Step 1:  Match the format and look of the NACEP application form that is found on the NACEP website and provided to programs seeking accreditation.

Step 2…  Make it easy to navigate. And….  One stop shopping…for the entire application process. CollegeNow NACEP Application Site CollegeNow NACEP Application Site

Posting content to your NACEP application website  It’s easy….

Posting content to your NACEP application website  Need some basic knowledge of html. This could be obtained from web developer, or other individual tutoring. Wouldn’t necessarily need formal training from a class, etc. This could be obtained from web developer, or other individual tutoring. Wouldn’t necessarily need formal training from a class, etc. Sometimes can use the html coding of other pages as examples. Sometimes can use the html coding of other pages as examples.

 Evidence documents: All reside on your web server All reside on your web server Provide as links to pdf documents. Provide as links to pdf documents. May be scanned docs (e.g. Faculty Liaison Site Visit Forms) May be scanned docs (e.g. Faculty Liaison Site Visit Forms) Docs must be made “web accessible” (pdfs via Adobe Pro) Docs must be made “web accessible” (pdfs via Adobe Pro)

NACEP Review Team: What they liked…  Direct accessibility to each standard without scrolling through large documents.  Easily tracked review team requests and the program responses, along with the ability to locate new evidence easily within the applicable standard.  Labeling links by review round gave reviewers a single entry point to find the question and answer.  The information was cumulative — the program has a final document for NACEP and for the program to keep, update and use.

What they said…  “…the web-based format you created for the NACEP accreditation application was very user-friendly…”  “Never did I have to wonder whether TC3 had responded to all of our questions.”  “I can only imagine that it was easier for you to make the changes our team suggested. “

Additional advantages over submitting the application on a cd:  Application is accessible by the review team from any computer with internet access.  The entire application process (including multiple rounds of review team questions and program responses) is documented in one place.

Key steps in developing a web- based NACEP application:  Work with your campus web developer or web content manager.  Use your existing web page style sheet with some modifications.  Once the site template is set up, then you just need someone to manage the content.  Provide evidence documents in web accessible pdf format.

Special thank you to…  Bob Edgecomb, the TC3 Web Communications Manager, who designed and set up our web-based NACEP application  Rhonda Kowalski-Oltz, CollegeNow Secretary, who did all the content management for our NACEP application

Questions? Karl Madeo Director, Tompkins Cortland Community College Dryden, New York