The Nordic experience: Program Accreditation in Norway Gerhard Ploeg, senior adviser Ministry of Justice Glasgow, February 10, 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

9 November 2007 Cecilia de la Rosa Head of the Internal Quality Unit How to prepare for an external review Current trends in the European Quality Assurance.

Advertisements

Pan London Developments: Working with the Voluntary Sector Nicky Hill, Senior Programme Manager Lisa Bellis, Senior Programme Manager Safer London Foundation.

Application of Family Group Conferencing in the process of inmate support and after- care Velez Edit április 28.

Priority Youth Offender Project Alice Chapman Director Youth Conference Service Youth Justice Agency.

The accreditation process and the practice of behavioural programs in Dutch probation Tamar Fischer Criminology, Erasmus School of Law,

Page 1 Treating drug users in prison Dr Sanja Stojadinovic Special Prison Hospital Belgrade.

Does mentoring work? What the evidence tells us 25th June 2013.

Language, Learning And Literacy (L3)

ALTERNATIVES TO IMPRISONMENT COMMUNITY SENTENCE IN NORWAY (PROBATION) Author: Tamara Rojšek May, 2009.

1 Flintshire Youth Justice Service Parenting Support Programme Supporting the Parents of Adolescents ∞ Promoting Engagement and Overcoming Resistance.

John Nolan Forensic and Clinical Psychologist Port Macquarie Psychology Issues in sentencing indigenous offenders (to do with Alcohol.

Alice Chapman Director Youth Conference Service, Youth Justice Agency W.W.W III What works, when, why ?

Presentation to NTMAC, September  2007: Prevention and Early Intervention Programme, funded by Gov’t and Philanthropy;  Tasked to design, deliver.

Ministry of Justice and Public Security Department of Corrections Ministry of Justice and Public Security Department of Corrections Gerhard Ploeg Senior.

The Correctional Services of Norway

WAGGGS Policy & Guidelines: Adult Training, Learning and Development

Sexual Offender Treatment in Estonia: the Current Situation and Future Perspective Kaire Tamm Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department.

Prison and probation in cooperation – possibilities for improvement Rait Kuuse Director Prison of Tallinn.

Regimantas Mikaliūnas The mission is a systematic supervision of the Probation Service and the control of penitentiary institutions.

Unit 9. Human resource development for TB infection control TB Infection Control Training for Managers at National and Subnational Level.

Ministry of Justice and the Police Dept. of Corrections Norway’s “Reintegration Guarantee” Gerhard Ploeg, senior adviser Barcelona, DOMICE-seminar

Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.

Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL

Identity Change, Spirituality and Desistance from Crime THE BELIEF IN CHANGE PROGRAMME “Believing in Change makes Change possible” Risley participant Risley.

2003 Special Education Service Agency (907) Special Education Service Agency 2003Sp Data Assessment Lori Roth, Education Specialist Special Education.

ACJRD 16 th Annual Conference 4 th October  2007: Prevention and Early Intervention Programme, funded by DYCA and The Atlantic Philanthropies;

Jennifer Hillebrand, „Rehabilitation of Drug Addicted Persons: Experience of Lithuania and European Countries”, 18 October 2007 Improving drug treatment.

Drink Drivers Rehabilitation Systems Birgit Bukasa.

The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.

An Age of hope: a National Effort for Corrections, Rehabilitation and Social Re-integration of Offenders THE OFFENDER REHABILITATION PATH (ORP) THE OFFENDER.

Douglas P. Boer, Vilmantė Gintaraitė Riga, 16 th March, 2011.

Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.

Eleni Belivanaki & Sarah Khan

Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.

Criteria for Assessing The Feasibility of RCTs. RCTs in Social Science: York September 2006 Today’s Headlines: “Drugs education is not working” “ having.

© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.

Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OF SPs ■ Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ■ Faculty of Civil Engineering.

Ministry of Justice and the Police Dept. of Corrections Riga, March 17th, 2011 Gerhard Ploeg, senior adviser The Norwegian correctional reform plans.

Research project on Evaluation Michael Bommes and Ulrike Wolff-Jontofsohn Betzavta-Together Research project on Evaluation Evaluation.

UFD 1 Special Needs Education in Norway Royal Ministry of Education and Research Special Needs Education in Norway Marit Hognestad, Norwegian Board of.

Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.

Restorative processes in Norwegian corrections ”Restorative Justice in probation practice” Prague, 23rd September 2015 Gerhard Ploeg Senior adviser Directorate.

Offender Risk Management Model Community Forum Teal Maedel Psychologist Vancouver Parole RCMP Behavioural Sciences Group.

Content of this presentation What is the ERA? What is the aim of the ERA? What does the ERA? What can the ERA do for you? Why the needs analysis? How the.

Foreign prisoners in Norway Rome 23/11/12 Gerhard Ploeg Ph.D. Ministry of Justice and Public Safety, Senior adviser, Dept. of Corrections.

January 2012 Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey Employment Forum.

How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University

1 Organization of the Greek Penitentiary system The organisation of the Greek Penitentiary System is based on general principles drawn from:  the Penitentiary.

Enhancing capacity in the Child & Youth sector through situated supported distance learning Building Capacity through a Participatory Institutional Assessment.

Alice Chapman Director Youth Conference Service, Youth Justice Agency W.W.W III What works, when, why ?

Skills for teachers Systems for schools Motivation for students Possibilities for success Mentoring Non-Violent Crisis Intervention PBIS Personalised.

6 February 2012 The Accreditation of Behavioural Programmes Findings International Expert Meeting, November 2008, The Hague, Netherlands.

Curriculum Implementation Support Program (CISP).

Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.

School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.

RMA CONFERENCE Topic – Adolescents - Risk and Management Workshop leaders – Margaret MacKinnon Educational/Forensic Chartered Psychologist Accredited Trauma.

Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.

PROBATION: a new impetus for Conditional Release Round table Julie Masters Andy Stelman.

SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.

Evidence – Based Practices

Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation

The second international meeting in Prague

Offender Risk Management Correctional Strategy

European TRAINING FOUNDATION

Key Legislative Outcomes 2017

EAC Education Committee

Support Foundation European Social Fund Agency

Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Presentation transcript:

The Nordic experience: Program Accreditation in Norway Gerhard Ploeg, senior adviser Ministry of Justice Glasgow, February 10, 2012

Current situation Advisory panel since 2006 Six members External Experts on  Program activity  Cognitive theory  Research and evaluation No scoring system – consensus Advise – not accredit

To give recommendations to the directorate on whether to accredit, preliminarily accredit or not accredit the program To deliver a preliminary assessment of programs that are proposed to be introduced in corrections The Panel’s tasks

The Secretariat’s tasks Prepare cases for the panel Make a pre-assessment of the application as to whether it fullfills the basic requirements to be presented for the panel. If this should not be the case, points of improvement must be described and reported back to the applicants Propose to the directorate to have certain programmes apply for accreditation

1.A clear theory-based model of change 2.Target group selection 3.Targeting dynamic criminogenic factors 4.Effective methods 5.Skills oriented 6.Pedagogical aspects: sequence, duration, intensity 7.Programintegrity and quality-control 8.Regular evaluation Eight criteria for accreditation

Development Share of accredited programs (45%) and participants (32 %) unchanged from 2010 to 2011 Programs - 26 % general / - 27 % accreditedParticipants - 25 % general / - 14 % accredited

Motivator (acc.) Stop Crime (acc.) Dad in prison (acc.) Women’s program (acc.) Sexual offenders (acc.) Coping with anger (acc.) Drug program NSAP (acc.) One to one (acc.) Available programs Alternative to violence Traffic and drugs Coping with stress Building confidence Traffic and speed My choice Drugs in prison Alternative to violence

The case of Alternative to Violence Based on group discussions Relatively many trainers Relatively many deliveries Dedicated and enthusiastic “congregation” Developed by private foundation Rejected categorically by the panel: Not a program Imminent need for a solution: A working group!

Challenges and questions What do we do with non-accredited programs? How do we stimulate the use of accredited programs? How to avoid that accreditation has an inhibiting effect on program development and use? How broad should the definition of a program be? Should the working area of the panel be extended?

YES: PROGRAM NO: INTERVENTIO N GENERAL OBJECTIVE: BEHAVIOUR CHANGE? EFFECT (8) TARGET GROUP (2) SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE (3) METHOD (5,6) EVIDENCE BASE (4) THEORETICAL BASIS (1) EXPLANATION (1) PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE (4)

FINANCES TRAININGLOGISTICS FINANCES KIKS (7) REGIONAL MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION NATIONAL MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION

Programs and case-management New assessment system o Refer to certain interventions o Professional, «clinical» judgment Embed in daily practice o Case-management o Making staff conscious o Programs in different settings  In prison  Community sentence  Electronic monitoring  Early release

tel Thank you for your attention!