A Brief Introduction to COA Accreditation Joe Frisino Zoë Hutchinson Philip Gorelick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Illinois Department of Human Services Home Visiting Programs for New and Expectant Parents 2009 Request for Proposals Grant Information Conference.
The Individual Health Plan Essential to achieve educational equality for students with health management needs Ensures access to an education for students.
BS 8903 Your route to full competence. About BS 8903 BS 8903 is the first standard in the world to define and describe best practice in sustainable procurement.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Timeline for Accreditation Handbook and Early Adopters Stevie Chepko, Sr., VP.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #3 The Foster Care Process. FOSTER PARENTING  They are licensed and receive specialized training.  Work collaboratively as a member.
PHAB Slide Set 2013 The slides in this set are made available for use in presentations and educational sessions by health departments. The information.
A Brief overview of the Standards to Support Learning and Assessment in Practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
1 NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY Subcommittee on Quality Measures for Children's Healthcare in Medicaid and CHIP Overview.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
8 th Edition Administration and Management Standards: Human Resources Management Joe Frisino Standards Development and Performance Measurement October.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Do it pro bono. Competitor/Collaborator Analysis Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Competitor/Collaborator.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
1 National Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers THE ROADMAP TO NABH.
Start Something Quality Assurance System Assessment ™
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Welcome To Implementation Science 8 Part Webinar Series Kathleen Ryan Jackson Erin Chaparro, Ph.D University of Oregon.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Unit 8: Implementation, Part II Seminar Wednesday pm ET.
Opioid Treatment Stephanie Pacinella Standards Development & Performance Measurement May 2006.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Classroom Self-Assessment Using the ICP: Evaluation of the Process Award of Excellence in Inclusion of Children with Special Needs ExceleRate Illinois.
The SPTF Universal Standards for Social Performance Management Presentation for Financial Institutions.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
International Safety Rating System
Phase 2 of the National Accreditation System (NAS) and your CLC Monica Roberts Regional Accreditation Coordinator Meg Houston National Accreditation Coordinator.
California Department of Public Health California Department of Public Health Accreditation Readiness Team (ART) Orientation Office of Quality Performance.
Crisis Response and Information Services
The Policies and Processes of the WFME Recognition Program
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Joe Frisino Standards Development and Performance Measurement
مراجعـة النظـراء Peer Review
Office of Developmental Programs Quality Assessment & Improvement for HCBS Services SELF ASSESSMENTS June 23, 2017  11:00 AM June 26, 2017  1:00 PM.
Quality health plans & benefits
Validation Team Exit Report
Joe Frisino Standards Development and Performance Measurement
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Youth Peer Advocate Training and Credentialing December 6, 2018
Training and Supervision
Training and Supervision
DDD OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Crisis Response and Information Services
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

A Brief Introduction to COA Accreditation Joe Frisino Zoë Hutchinson Philip Gorelick

2 Learning Objectives By the end of this training you should be able to: 1.Describe the key characteristics of COA accreditation 2.Name and describe the seven steps in COA's accreditation process 3.Find basic information on COA's website

3 Agenda 1 Who is COA? 2 The Benefits Of Accreditation 3 The Accreditation Process 4 COA Standards

1 Who is COA 4

Who is COA? 5  National, private, non-profit  Established in 1977  Accredits full range of community-based behavioral health care and social service organizations  private and public organizations accredited or in process

What is Accreditation? 6  National Consensus-Based Standards  Self-Study Process  Site Visit Conducted by Review Team  Fair, Objective and Open Decision-Making  Checks and Balances and Opportunities to Correct Deficiencies

Characteristics of COA Accreditation 7  Open, Facilitative, Collaborative  Four – Year Accreditation  Reviews All Programs and Services  In-depth Review of Operations & Service Delivery  Process Takes Months  Standards / Accreditation Materials Free  Open Book Test

Programs and Services We Accredit 8  Homeless Services  Mental Health Services  Substance Abuse  Child and Family Services  Aging Services  Services for the People with Developmental Disabilities

10 For basic information about COA accreditation open the "Accreditation" Drop-Down Menu

11 To Review COA Standards open the "Standards" Drop- Down Menu SSVF programs

For information about COA Training and other resources open the "Training & Resources" Drop- Down Menu

Suggested Free Trainings 13 Name of TrainingWebinar Dates & Times Self-Paced Available Introduction to COA and the Private Organization Accreditation Process May 1, 3-4 PM ET COA Accreditation: Getting Started Get Organized! Creating Your Accreditation Workplan: All Editions May 8, 3-5 PM ET Format and Structure COA's Accreditation Standards Assessing Your Practices Against COA Private Organization Standards May 9, 3-4 PM ET to receive ongoing training updates

2 Benefits of Accreditation 14

15 Benefits of Accreditation  In-Depth Self Evaluation  Builds / Strengthens Organizational Infrastructure  Standards address all aspects of management and operational functioning  Thorough vetting of procedures and policies  Implementation of a framework for ongoing review of performance  Adoption of Known Best Practices  Research-based standards  External Validation of Your Practices  Recognition from government agencies, foundations, and insurance companies

Q. How has COA Accreditation Benefited Your Organization? % Agree or Strongly Agree a n=1425 Responses

Perspective of an Accredited Organization 17

3 The Accreditation Process 18

Your COA Accreditation Coordinator 19  Single point of contact w/ COA  Answer questions  Provide feedback and guidance  Connect you with resources  Help you meet timetable and milestones  Help you prepare Self-Study

Steps in the Process 20 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site VisitStep 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation

Steps in the Process 21 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  On-line Application  Verification of eligibility  Accreditation agreement and fee  Description of rights and responsibilities

Steps in the Process 22 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Match programs to COA's service standards  Establish important dates and milestones

Steps in the Process 23 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Evaluate practices against standards  Six to Twelve Months  On-line Submission of Evidence Eight Weeks Before Site Visit

Steps in the Process 24 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Minimum of 2-3 peer reviewers for 2-3 days  Activities –Interview Staff, Board, Stakeholders –Review Documents and Records –Visit Programs, Observe Staff/Client Interactions

Steps in the Process 25 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Summarizes important Site Visit findings  Provides specific recommendations for additional work as necessary

Steps in the Process 26 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Reviews site visit report and orgs response  Makes accreditation decision

Steps in the Process 27 Step 1: Accreditation Agreement Step 2: IntakeStep 3: Self-StudyStep 4 – Site Visit Step 5: Ratings Report Step 6: Accreditation Decision Step 7: Maintaining Accreditation  Maintain and sustain implementation  Annual Maintenance of Accreditation Report

4 COA Standards 28

COA Standards 29  Rigorous, Relevant, Realistic  Developed by the Field  Goal Statements -- Don't Have to be Perfect  Describe What not How  This is the Essence of "Contextual Accreditation"

Categories of COA Standards 31 N/A for SSVF

Case Management 33 SSVF programs will at a minimum, be assigned Case Management (CM) Service Section

Standards Example: CM 7 34

Cost of Accreditation 35  Fee Information on the Website –Application Fee –Accreditation Fee –Site Visit Fee –Maintenance of Accreditation Fee

Suggested Next Steps 36 Speak with Client Relations (Zoë)  Request a Cost Estimate  Request an Initial Assessment of Service Standards Visit  Review the Standards  Review the Accreditation Guidelines (“Where to get started”) Attend a COA Training or Webinar  Assessing Your Practices Against COA's Standards  Get Organized: Creating an Accreditation Work Plan  Intensive Accreditation Training  Getting Started Self Paced Training

Council on Accreditation 45 Broadway, 29th Floor, New York, NY toll free Thank You Joe Frisino: Zoë Hutchinson: Phillip Gorelick: