SAICE Executive Board September 2011 Matter for noting / approval: Admission Criteria for SAICE Adjudicators Ntsoli Maiketso Pr Eng MSAICE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary Input – process – output model. Input Written Oral Observational.
Advertisements

Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California State University Employees Union (CSUEU) Association of California State Supervisors (ACSS) California.
Railway Grade Separations Issues. Railway Grade Separations 1.Introduction Qualifications/experience to undertake bridge planning for railway grade separations:
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Overview and Purpose of Market.
Praxis Assessment Overview Educational Testing Service Kentucky Education Professional Standards Board Frankfort, Kentucky January 21, 2007 Copyright 2004.
AN INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE OF THE CIDB PROCESS Transport, Housing, Public Works, Local Government & Provincial Affairs, Water Affairs & Forestry.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
TESL Ontario Conference October 28 & 29, Project Team Project Lead - Carolyn Cohen Research Lead - Antonella Valeo Research Consultants - Sheila.
Goals: Session 1 (Legal & Evidentiary Challenges Obtain contributions on the particular successes and challenges on key L&E issues in different jurisdictions;
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Advances research methods and proposal writing Ronan Fitzpatrick School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology. September 2008.
A Brief overview of the Standards to support learning and assessment in practice. Nursing and Midwifery Council (2006) Standard to Support Learning and.
Research Proposal Development of research question
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Purpose of the Standards
ATP Winter 2008 Workshop Jim Valkenburg Delta College.
UOFYE Assessment Retreat
Mediation The goal of mediation is not to determine who is write or wrong Purpose is to explore solutions The mediator makes the final decision If no agreement.
CURRENT PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER INTRODUCTION OF DISPUTE BOARDS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN ROMANIA.
Auditing Standards IFTA\IRP Audit Guidance Government Auditing Standards (GAO) Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) International Standards on.
Conducting the IT Audit
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
INTERNAL AUDIT IN UKRAINE State Financial Inspection of Ukraine
Welcome to Social Work Dr Terry Murphy / Juliette Oko Social Work Team.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
How to Write a Critical Review of Research Articles
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Appendix E – Checklist for Review of Performance Audits Presented by: Ashton Coleman Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General August 16, 2012.
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS & CODES of BEHAVIOUR a presentation by HEW R. DUNDAS Chartered Arbitrator DipICArb International Arbitrator & Mediator President.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Third Party Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)?  It involves the application of theories, procedures, and skills designed.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Use of Student Conciliators at the University of Glamorgan Denise Williams Deputy Academic Registrar ©University of Glamorgan.
IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION IN ALBANIA IMPACT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM IN EFFECTIVENESS OF VOCATIONAL.
Dispute Resolution in the Workers Compensation Commission 15 October 2011.
Qualifications Update: Psychology Qualifications Update: Psychology.
Developing a Review Protocol. 1. Title Registration 2. Protocol 3. Complete Review Components of the C2 Review Process.
Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Slide 1 Accounting Education Requirements and Implementation of the EU Directive on Statutory Audit Wim Moleveld Education Subgroup of the Liberalization/Qualification.
East Midlands Councils CPD Programme Appeals and Inquiries: 12 September 2013 In Place of Strife: The Potential of Mediation in Planning Kay S. Powell.
ARBITRATION TASK FORCE ARIASU.S Spring Conference May 2013.
R ESOLUTION P ROCESS. Intro to Resolutions A conservation district supervisor should understand the importance of participating in the state and national.
Peer reviewer Workshop Presented by: Prof. Dr. Hussein Mahmoud El Magraby National Quality Assurance & Accreditation Project.
Vienna 14 March 2006 Andrew J. Popham Vice-President of FEE Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP The New Directive on Statutory Audit in the EU.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Canberra Chapter July PMI Chapter Meeting July 2007 PMCDF Competence Framework A presentation by Chris Cartwright.
Bill 73 & Dispute Resolution. ADR authorized for Planning Disputes prior to Bill : Sewell Commission recommended that OMB consider alternate ways.
PO Box 787, Five Dock, 2046ABN We acknowledge and pay respect to the traditional owners and custodians of the land on which.
The Mediation Centre of Chamber of Notaries in Gdańsk
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications on the:
Mini-HTA as a Tool for Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Not-For-Profit Private Hospitals: Preliminary Result. By Hafizah Besar Sa’aid School of Public.
MUHC Innovation Model.
ITI Portfolio Plan Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Current Date Visibility of ITI Projects ITI Projects.
Writing the Methods Section
The Insurance Brokers Code of Practice - an update
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGE PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL ACT, 2014 (Act No. 8 of 2014) PRESENTED TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION & RECREATION.
Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Name of Presenter Event Name DD Month 2018.
Creation of National List of Japanese Adjudicators
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Welcome and Induction Event for new External Examiners 2016
Overview of the recommendations on software updates
Presentation transcript:

SAICE Executive Board September 2011 Matter for noting / approval: Admission Criteria for SAICE Adjudicators Ntsoli Maiketso Pr Eng MSAICE

Overview / in a nutshell SAICE recently introduced GCC 2010, which makes use of Adjudication, and provides for appointment of Adjudicators and Adjudication Boards Parties to a contract can ask SAICE president to appoint Adjudicators Therefore SAICE needed a panel of Adjudicators, to run similar to its panels of Arbitrators and Mediators Questions to be answered included skills & training, from educational to professional including specialist knowledge, to form basis of admission criteria Author serves on SAICE PMCD committee as portfolio co-ordinator on dispute resolution

Structure of Presentation Literature Review Research Methodology Results Discussion, Conclusion, Recommendation Admission Criteria: key features

Literature Review Relied mainly on ICE and CIDB criteria / guidelines – Other references: CIArb, DRBF, CIC, Queensland, FIDIC, etc – Others x-ref one another, e.g. RICS, RIBA, CIOB RICS 2007 findings – Lows levels of knowledge and use of adjudication in SA – Adjudicators need an “adjudication qualification” Maiketso and RICS 2009 findings – Not enough adjudicators in SA – No established framework for skills and training Further findings and recommendations – Need to better organize adjudication and accredit adjudicators – General agreement reached on relevant skills, useful techniques and desirable attributes – Unpacking of “adjudication qualification” revealed general agreement on knowledge & experience requirements Author submitted article for publication in SAICE journal in 2009 on this, which may be published in next issue (Oct-11)

Literature Review (cont.) typical requirements from selected institutions InstnExprnceRegCoCCourseAssgnmtExamIntervw CIDBPM past 5 yrs 45 yrs age 10 yrs Standing RecomWritten appl x 1 ICE10 yrs PM In past 15 yrs 10 yrs Standing Reqrdx 1 CIArb Reqrdx 3 Modules x 2 modules x 3 days Queensland Reqrdx 18x 1 CIC RICS, RIBA, ICE, CIArb, CIOB DRBF Attributes only FIDIC Reqrdwritten appl x 2 x 2 days

Research Methodology Purposeful sampling – theoretical sampling at start – discriminant sampling to close 1 st draft based on CIDB and ICE, then sourced comment from: – SAICE PMCD internal Jan & Sep 2009, AA(SA) Oct 2009, DRBF local chapter Nov 2009, SAFCEC Feb 2010, CESA Apr 2010, CIDB Jun 2010 – Final draft included separately, key features summarised at end Research ethics observed: confidentiality, privacy Data handling: content analysis – classification, synthesis, patterns, to enable conclusions Bias acknowledged, author had direct interest in outcome!

Results Construction Law, Conduct, lawyers (11+4+5=19)

Discussion, Conclusion, Recommendation Discussion: key points per Results diagram – Most supported: objectivity, formal assessment – Least questioned: experience technical & disputes – Least supported: include lawyers et al jurisdiction Conclusion: – more objectivity required, formal assessment can address, therefore criteria cannot be regarded as final Recommendation: – SAICE adopts criteria as interim, whilst developing long term solution, publicise and invite interested parties to participate in charting way forward

Key features of SAICE Adjudicator Admission Criteria No.FeatureRequirement i)ExperiencePM/CM/E/PA 10 yrs, past 5 yrs, disputes exprnce ii)Professional Registration Pr Eng 10 yrs standing iii)Forms of contractConversant with at least 1 recomm by CIDB, esp SAICE form, incl its adjudication provisions iv)AdjudicationFamiliar with intntl & local practice, laws & guidelines, esp CIDB guidelines v)LawConstruction contract law, rules of natural justice vi)AppreciationCosts, design & construction methods, programming and delays, resourcing, risk vii)ImpartialityCapable of free and independent judgment viii)Optional interviewDemonstrate suitability, incl communication skills, personal management for conducting adjudication Sunset clauseInterim for next 3 yrs, develop long-term criteria incl written appl, pass course / exam, interview

End… Ntsoli Maiketso Pr Eng MSAICE