FRAP 32.1 and the Rise of Unpublished Opinions Karen Breda Boston College Law Library September 26, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EOC Judicial – Systems / Structures
Advertisements

SUCCESSFUL SUMMER STRATEGIES SPRING 2009 Federal and State Administrative Research.
Summer Success: California Legal Research Todd Ito
Judicial Branch Publications Peggy Roebuck Jarrett, guest lecturer
Chapter Three: FEDERAL COURTS
Judicial Branch Publications Peggy Roebuck Jarrett, guest lecturer
Our Precedential Court System
Federal & California Courts & Case Reports: The Basics Real World Research November 12, 2008 Marlene Harmon & Dean C. Rowan, Reference Librarians.
Copyright 2003, Darby Dickerson. Permission given to use for educational purposes. Putting Sources in the Correct Order ALWD Rule 45.
Judicial Branch Publications Peggy Roebuck Jarrett, guest lecturer
The Judicial Branch Chapter 14 Daily Dilemma: Should justices exercise judicial restraint or judicial activism?
Legal Research 101: Researching Local, State & Federal Cases Rita Kaiser, King County Law Library & Ann Hemmens, University of Washington Law Library Washington.
What They Are and How to Research Them.  Regulate business before court ◦ Control operation of court ◦ Control conduct of litigants ◦ Span from font.
Ohio Public Domain Cite By Sue Altmeyer For Prof. Mika’s Legal Writing Class March 24 & 25, 2009.
U. S. Law and Legal Research Pat Court Starr Foundation Workshop October 8, 2007.
Judicial Branch Publications Peggy Roebuck Jarrett, guest lecturer
1 Legal Research: New Jersey Case Law Legal Reference in the Digital Age Documents Association of New Jersey (DANJ) Fall Conference, 2010 Caroline Young,
Cases & Court Documents. What is Case Law? Though a case, as defined, is the action or controversy itself, the term is also commonly used to refer to.
February 19, 2011 Katie Fearer, Alaska State Library Marinke Van Gelder of the Alaska State Court Law Library assisted.
Florida State University College of Law Library Researching Civil Procedure.
The United States Supreme Court.  Function: ◦ Ensures uniformity in interpreting national laws ◦ Resolves conflicts among states ◦ Maintains national.
Law 11 Introduction. 2 Sources of American Law o Constitutions – federal plus every state; everyone in U.S. subject to federal constitution plus one state.
First Amendment: Legal Sources September 29th. What is a Case? Case = decision = opinion = judgment Issued in writing by a court of law Resolves a controversy.
California Law Legal Research January 28,2011. APPELLATE PROCESS FACTUAL DISPUTE IS RESOLVED AT TRIAL COURT(NO CASE LAW RESULTS) LOSING PARTY FILES APPEAL.
Researching the Law from the Newsroom SLA 2004 Annual Conference June 9, 2004.
1 Chapter 1: Tax Research. 2 TAX RESEARCH (1 of 2)  Types of tax research  Tax research process  How facts affect tax consequences  Sources of tax.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
The Courts Unit 4, Chapter 14.
Chapter 8 Traditional Research Tools American Law Reports DigestsShepard’s.
PA201 Introduction to Legal Research Unit 2 – Statutory Research A. E. Sloan (2009). Basic Legal Research Tools and Strategies (4 th ed.). New York: Aspen.
The Court System and Sources of Rights. Structure of the Court System Dual court system – one for federal cases and one for state cases 52 separate judicial.
The Judicial Branch. Jurisdiction Federal Courts –Article III, Section 1 vests judicial power in the Supreme Court and other inferior courts created by.
Copyright © 2005, The Sedona Conference ®
The Judiciary Chapter 10- The Judiciary. Federal Judiciary Act of 1789 O Established the basic 3 step federal court system. 3. Supreme Court 2. Appellate.
Federal Legal Print Materials Legal Writing Prof. Glassman - - Spring 2011.
Chapter 12 The Judiciary. Common Law Tradition  Common law = judge-made law; originated in England; derived from prevailing customs  Precedent = court.
Locating International Decisions Margaret Clark Reference Librarian FSU College of Law Research Center October 2007.
New Ex Parte Appeal Rules Patent and Trademark Practice Group Meeting January 26, 2012.
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Government - Libertyville HS The Federal Judicial System.
Locating International Decisions Margaret Clark Reference Librarian FSU College of Law Research Center October 2007.
The Federal Courts. I. Jurisdiction A. Trivia Question: How many court systems exist in the US today?
CHAPTER 4 Finding and Analyzing Case Law. The Bluebook Rule 10 State case law is cited in the same format that U.S. Supreme Court cases are cited State.
Prof. Emily Ryan PA 101.  Primary sources are actual statements of the law.  Enormous amounts of primary source materials available are issued chronologically.
Administrative Law Research By Carol Furnish, Chase Law Library.
Unit 6, Section 1 The United States Supreme Court.
Court Rules and Forms Professor Deborah McGovern Winter 2009.
Jennifer Allison Reference Librarian Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Pepperdine University School of Law Harnish Law.
Tax Law Research IQ Context and Finding Aids Sources and System/Structure of Tax Law Primary SourceSecondary SourcesMiscellaneous Prepared.
DEAN LISA SMITH-BUTLER ADVANCED LEGAL RESEARCH FALL 2009 Cost Effective Legal Research: The Internet & Beyond.
Chapter 2: Legal Research Presented by: Alexis Saperstein.
The Judiciary How the national and state court systems work along with a brief look at due process…..
Georgia Legal Services Program Super User Training April 9, 2008 Bluebook Citations And Court Filing Requirements and Procedures By Alice Schunemann.
South Carolina Supreme Court
Anatomy of a Case and Basic Case Citation Orientation Fall 2017
Chapter 12 The Federal Courts
Judicial Branch Interpret the Laws.
Lesson 25: What Is the Role of the Supreme Court in the American Constitutional System?
The Federal Court System
Ohio Public Domain Cite
Legal Research and Analysis
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Presented by Elisabeth McKechnie Mabie Law Library
The Federal Court System
Chapter 15 Tax Research 1.
Chapter 8 Section 1 Mr. Gordon.
Let’s Begin w/ the Basics
United States Legal System
The Judicial Branch.
Judicial Branch #1 The Supreme Court.
Presentation transcript:

FRAP 32.1 and the Rise of Unpublished Opinions Karen Breda Boston College Law Library September 26, 2007

New FRAP 32.1 In 2006, Supreme Court adopted FRAP 32.1 which permits citation of unpublished judicial opinions issued by federal courts on or after January 1, 2007.

FRAP 32.1 & Unpublished Opinions What are unpublished opinions? Evolution of new FRAP 32.1 A closer look at FRAP 32.1 Federal local rules Ramifications of FRAP 32.1 Citing unpublished opinions in state courts

What are “unpublished opinions”? In the federal judicial system, an opinion is “unpublished” when it has not been selected for publication in the West Federal Reporter series. See e.g. 1st Cir. R In state judicial systems, an opinion is “unpublished” when it has not been selected for publication in the state’s official case reporter.

What is an “unpublished opinion”? Generally, an appellate court may designate a decision “not for publication” where the decision is not meant to serve as legal precedent to guide future litigants but is written primarily for the parties to the case. Today, an opinion’s designation as “unpublished” refers to its non-precedential status.

What is an “unpublished opinion”? In today’s legal culture, the term “unpublished opinion” is a misnomer: -- West’s Federal Appendix publishes “unpublished” federal opinions. -- Section 205 of the E-Government Act of 2002 requires online access to all written federal court opinions, including the “unpublished” ones.

What is an “unpublished opinion”? “Unpublished” is misnomer, cont. -- Westlaw, Lexis and now LoisLaw publish “unpublished” opinions -- Legal periodicals, legal looseleaf services and internet sites sometimes publish “unpublished” cases.

Evolution of FRAP Judicial Conference of the United States resolves that only opinions of “general precedential value” should be published. 1972Judicial Conference directs Circuit Courts to develop plans for selective publication of opinions.

Evolution of FRAP sFederal Circuits limit number of published opinions and develop guidelines for designation of opinions “not for publication”. Each circuit develops citation rules for unpublished opinions.

Evolution of FRAP 32.1 By 1974, the federal judicial system has thirteen different sets of citation rules for unpublished federal opinions. Treatment of unpublished opinions varies by circuit. Some circuits permit citation, some disfavor citation, some prohibit citation of unpublished opinions.

Evolution of FRAP 32.1 Scope of citation rules for unpublished opinions varies by circuit. Some circuits regulate citation of a circuit’s unpublished opinions within that circuit; some circuits regulate citation of a circuit’s unpublished opinions in other courts as well. Some circuits regulate citation of unpublished opinions issued by other courts; some circuits defer to issuing court’s citation rules.

Evolution of FRAP sJudicial Conference conducts Federal Courts Study concerning development of uniform set of rules for access, publication and citation of appellate opinions. 2000Eighth Circuit holds “no citation” rules for unpublished opinions violate Art. 3 of the Constitution. Opinion is vacated as moot. 2001Department of Justice requests that FRAPs be amended to establish uniform procedures permitting citation of unpublished opinions.

Evolution of FRAP Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules publishes proposed FRAP 32.1 for comment; 4 circuits oppose proposed changes; many national bar organizations support proposed changes.

Evolution of FRAP Federal Judicial Center and Administrative Office of U.S. Courts conduct impact studies. Results of both studies fail to support arguments against new rule. 2006More than 80% of federal opinions are unpublished; U.S. Supreme Court adopts FRAP 32.1, effective December 2006.

A closer look at FRCP 32.1 New FRAP 32.1 provides uniform treatment in Circuit Courts of unpublished federal opinions issued after January 1, Compromise rule, resulting from controversy and debate; leaves many questions unanswered.

A closer look at FRAP 32.1 Abrogates “no citation” rules only for decisions issued after January 1, 2007; leaves treatment of pre-2007 unpublished decisions to the Circuits’ local rules. Does not address the weight to be given an unpublished opinion. Does not address citation of state unpublished opinions in federal circuits.

A closer look at FRAP 32.1 FRAP 32.1(b) requires copy of any unpublished opinion that is “not available in a publicly accessible electronic database” be filed and served with the brief in which it is cited. What is “publicly accessible”? When in doubt, file and serve copy of case. FRAP 32.1(b) applies to all unpublished decisions, regardless of issue date.

Summary of Circuit Court Local Rules All circuits permit citation of unpublished opinions to establish 1) Res Judiciata, 2) Collateral Estoppel, 3) Law of the Case or 4) Double Jeopardy. Seven “permissive” circuits -- 1 st, 3 rd, 5 th, 6 th 10 th, 11 th and D.C., do not restrict citation of unpublished opinions.

Summary of Circuit Court Local Rules Three “discouraging” circuits – 4 th, 8 th and Federal expressly discourage citation of unpublished opinions but will permit citation when there is no published authority on point. Three “restrictive” circuits – 2 nd, 7 th and 9 th prohibit citation of pre-2007 unpublished opinions (except to establish res judicata and the like).

Summary of Circuit Court Local Rules Treatment of unpublished decisions still varies substantially between Circuits. Be sure to research the most recent version of local rules before citing unpublished opinion issued before 2007.

Ramifications of FRAP 32.1 What will Circuits do regarding 1) citation of pre-2007 unpublished cases and 2) weight accorded unpublished opinions? Circuits have already started addressing those issues. See e.g. 1 st Cir. R and 36.0.

Ramifications of FRAP 32.1 What effect will FRAP 32.1 have upon practice of designating opinions “not for publication”? 1 st Cir. R may foreshadow new trend. How will FRAP 32.1 effect citation standards? Bluebook (18 th ed.) BT.2 and Rules 10.8, 16, and 19.

Ramifications of FRAP 32.1 Does FRAP 32.1 apply to citation of unpublished opinions in U.S. District Courts and federal agency hearings? Will state jurisdictions abrogate their “no citation rules” for unpublished opinions?

Further Readings on Unpublished Opinions A list of 103 law review articles on unpublished opinions, with many links to electronic articles, is found at: Excerpts from the Judicial Conference report on proposed FRAP 32.1 is found at: