Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
Informed consent in research ethics
Phase O Trials: Ethical Considerations Holly Taylor, PhD, MPH Department of Health Policy and Management Bloomberg School of Public Health Berman Institute.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Informed consent requirements
Informed Consent: Requirements Ben Faneye, OP, DHCE West African Bioethics Training Program.
Good Clinical Research Practice Guidelines For Informed Consent Presented by Catherine May Acting Research Practice Development Officer The Office of Research.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Informed Consent, Parental Permission & Assent Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Vicki Hammen, Vice Chair, IRB IRB Brown Bag February 9, 2009.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
The Chaplain as Spiritual Guide in Ethics Consults 2006.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH RESEARCH Michael Jhon M. Tamayao, M.Phil. SEMINAR WORKSHOP ON HEALTH RESEARCH Cagayan State University.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
Justification of Research in Humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions without studying humans Impossible to reach the important conclusions.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. THE TITLE “INTRODUCTION”
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
Baltic Dental Meeting Palanga Dana Romane The Patient in the Centre – Patient’s Involvement in the Treatment Process, Full Awareness and.
1 Consent for treatment A summary guide for health practitioners about obtaining consent for treatment Bridie Woolnough Resolution Officer Health Care.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
DAY 2 Human Subjects 1. EPI CHALLENGE Proposal Form 5. Informed Consent Script Write the informed consent script that you will read aloud to potential.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
HRPP Training – Session Two Human Research Protection Program Manager
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
Established in 1996 to enforce standards for electronic health information & enhance the security and privacy of health information.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Providing Research Results to Participants David Shalowitz Department of Clinical Bioethics National Institutes of Health Pre-conference Program: Advanced.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Deception in Human Research Learning Objectives Define Deception and Incomplete Disclosure Understand when Deception or Incomplete Disclosure are allowable.
Consent & Vulnerable Adults Aim: To provide an opportunity for Primary Care Staff to explore issues related to consent & vulnerable adults.
12/24/2015Miss Samah Ishtieh1 Managerial Ethics Patient Rights & Nursing Ethics Prepared by: Miss Samah Ishtieh.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
Legally Effective Informed Consent VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
T HE I NFORMED C ONSENT Z ONE Patricia S. Kerby, MPA Office of Research Compliance September 10, 2008.
Copyright  2000 by Dr. ?????????, Wright State University Dr. ???????? Department of Biomedical, Human Factors, & Industrial Engineering Institutional.
ETHICAL ISSUES AND INFORMED CONSENT Juan M. Lozano, MD, MSc Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology Unit School of Medicine, Javeriana University.
PATIENT & FAMILY RIGHTS AT DOHMS. Fully understand and practice all your rights. You will receive a written copy of these rights from the Reception, Registration.
Ethics in Research Each research study involves a careful risk/benefit analysis prior to beginning data collection. The question each researcher must ask.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Informed Consent It’s a Process …not a form. Outline  Historical Background  Respect for Persons  Consent Process  Elements of Informed Consent 
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)
LEGAL ISSUES COMMON IN NURSING PRACTICE PRESENT BY: DR. AMIRA YAHIA.
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Common Rule Changes to Consent and Template
A Patient has the Right to…..
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Informed Consent (SBER)
Informed Consent in Clinical Trials
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Ivor Pritchard, Ph.D. April12, 2019
Informed Consent Allison Blodgett, PhD, CIP Director of IRB Operations
Presentation transcript:

Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators

ELEMENTS OF INFORMED CONSENT

1. DISCLOSURE In general necessary items to disclose include: a) the patient’s current medical status including the likely course if no treatment is provided. b) the contemplated procedure or medication c) alternative available procedures or medication d) anticipated risks and benefits of both e) a statement offering an opportunity to ask further questions f) in case of research, his right to withdraw any time g) a professional opinion about the alternatives

2. COMPREHENSION  7 th grade level (US Standard)  Language understood by the subject  Oral or written quizzes to assess comprehension  Use of educational intervention prior to getting consent  Allowed into research environment to experience routine and procedures

3. VOLUNTARINESS - The patient must of his own free will make a choice without being unduly pressured by anyone else. yBeing free in making a decision means that the patient owns the decision, that the decision is the patient’s alone, that the patient has chosen the option based on the information disclosed to him/her.

4. COMPETENCE - patient’s capacity for decision making. One is considered competent when (a) one has made a decision (i.e. one can choose between alternatives) (b) one has the capacity to justify one’s choice (i.e, give reasons for one’s choice) (c) one justifies one’s choice in a reasonable manner

Before requesting an individual's consent to participate in research, the investigator must provide the following information, in language or another form of communication that the individual can understand:

z 1.that the individual is invited to participate in research, the reasons for considering the individual suitable for the research, and that participation is voluntary;

2. that the individual is free to refuse to participate and will be free to withdraw from the research at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which he or she would otherwise be entitled;

z3. the purpose of the research, the procedures to be carried out by the investigator and the subject, and an explanation of how the research differs from routine medical care;

z4. for controlled trials, an explanation of features of the research design (e.g. randomization, double-blinding) and that the subject will not be told of the assigned treatment until the study has been completed and the blind has been broken;

z 5. the expected duration of the individual’s participation (including number and duration of visits to the research centre and the total time involved) and the possibility of early termination of the trial or of the individual’s participation in it;

z 6. whether money or other forms of material goods will be provided in return for the individual's participation and, if so, the kind and amount;

7. that, after the completion of the study, subjects will be informed of the findings of the research in general, and individual subjects will be informed of any finding that relates to their particular health status;

z 8.that subjects have the right of access to their data on demand, even if these data lack immediate clinical utility(unless the ethical review committee has approved temporary or permanent non-discloser of data, in which case the subject should be informed of, and given, the reasons for such nondisclosure);

z 9. any foreseeable risks, pain or discomfort, or inconvenience to the individual (or others) associated with participation in the research, including risks to the health or well-being of a subject’s spouse or partner;

z 10. the direct benefits, if any, expected to result to subjects from participating in the research

z 11. the expected benefits of the research to the community or to society at large, or contributions to scientific knowledge;

z 12. whether, when and how any products or interventions proven by the research to be safe and effective will be made available to subjects after they have completed their participation in the research, and whether they will be expected to pay for them;

13. any currently available alternative interventions or courses of treatment;

14. the provisions that will be made to ensure respect for the privacy of subjects and for the confidentiality of records in which subjects are identified;

15. the limits, legal or other, to the investigators’ ability to safeguard confidentiality, and the possible consequences of breaches of confidentiality;

z 16. the sponsors of the research, the institutional affiliation of the investigators, and the nature and sources of funding for the research;

z 17. the possible research uses, direct or secondary, of the subjects medical records and of biological specimens taken in the course of clinical care.

z 18. whether it is planned that biological specimens collected in the research will be destroyed at its conclusion, and, if not, details about their storage (where, how, for how long, and final disposition) and possible future use, and that subjects have the right to decide about such future use, to refuse storage, and to have the material destroyed.

z 19. whether the investigator is serving only as an investigator or as both investigator and the subject’s physician;

z20. the extent of the investigator's responsibility to provide medical services to the participant;

21. that treatment will be provided free of charge for specified types of research- related injury or for complications associated with the research, the nature and duration of such care, the name of the organization or individual that will provide the treatment, and whether there is any uncertainty regarding funding of such treatment.

22. in what way, and by what organization, the subject or the subject’s family or dependants will be compensated for disability or death resulting from such injury (or, when indicated, that there are no plans to provide such compensation);

23. that an ethical review committee has approved or cleared the research protocol.

Information The aims and methods of the study; Sources of funding and possible conflicts of interest; The institutional affiliations of the researcher; Anticipated benefits and potential risks and follow-up of the study; Discomfort that trial participation may entail; Right to abstain from taking part in the study, or withdraw from it at any time without any reprisal; and Each country’s local context should be considered in defining national policies on the ethics of clinical and biomedical research involving human participants.

Obligation for investigators zRefrain from unjustified deception, undue influence, or intimidation; zThat seek consent only after ascertaining that the prospective subject has adequate understanding of the relevant facts and of the consequences of participation and has had sufficient opportunity to consider whether to participate;